ADAPTING URBAN POLICIES TO SOCIO-POLITICAL CHALLENGES: ACTORS, MODELS, AND PRACTICES IN FREETOWN

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2025-2-48-58

Keywords:

urbanization, socio-political challenges, urban development policy, social cohesion, inclusive identity, multi-stakeholder model, international city brand, African cities

Abstract

This paper examines urbanization challenges within the context of contemporary socio-political issues. It uses the implementation of an internationally recognized multi-stakeholder partnership model for the development of Freetown, Sierra Leone, as a case study. Numerous challenges are compelling rapidly growing cities in African states to develop diverse adaptive practices. This study examines official documents, scholarly literature, and media sources to identify key actors, their interactions, roles in implementing the 2018–2024 urban transformation strategy, and its main instruments. The paper describes the network organizational model that the city's new leadership implemented to secure funding, integrate local communities into development processes, and mitigate the risks of socio-political destabilization. It demonstrates that the administration has prioritized certain challenges the city faces, primarily climate threats, to facilitate communication patterns with external actors (i.e. international organizations and development agencies), integrate the city into international networks, and promote its international brand. The study concludes that the city's development strategy is hindered by local power struggles between national structures and the municipality, which limits the latter's power and resources, and the challenges' complexity. The paper suggests that aspects of the Freetown model may be relevant for urban governance in Russia and other BRICS nations.

Author Biography

Andrei Bardin, Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Acade-my of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.

Candidate of Political Science, Center for Comparative Socio-Economic and Political Studies

References

Глухова, А. В., Кольба, А. И., Соколов, А. В. (2021) ‘Политико-конфликтные взаимодействия городских сообществ: сетевые аспекты’, Политическая наука, 4, сс. 185–209. [Glukhova, A.V., Kol'ba, A.I., and Sokolov, A.V. (2021) Political Conflict Interactions of Urban Communities: Network Aspects [Politiko-konfliktnye vzaimodeistviya gorodskikh soobshchestv: setevye aspekty], Political Science (RU), 4, pp. 185–209. (In Russ.) DOI: doi.org/10.31249/poln/2021.04.08 EDN: KIQARC

Ермолаева, П. О., Башева, О. А., Корунова, В. О. (2021) ‘Экологическая политика и гражданское участие в российских мегаполисах: достижения и вызовы с позиции городских стейкхолдеров’, Журнал исследований социальной политики, 19 (2), сс. 301–314. [Ermolaeva, P. O., Basheva, O. A., and Korunova, V. O. (2021) ‘Environmental Policy and Civic Participation in Russian Megacities: Achievements and Challenges From the Perspective of Urban Stakeholders’ [Ekologicheskaya politika i grazhdanskoe uchastie v rossiiskikh megapolisakh: dostizheniya i vyzovy s pozitsii gorodskikh steikkholderov], Zhurnal issledovanii sotsial'noi politiki, 19 (2), pp. 301–314. (In Russ.)]. DOI: 10.17323/727-0634-2021-19-2-301-314 EDN: AUDDUE

Тыканова, Е. В., Шевцова, И. К., Желнина, А. А. (2024) ‘Альянсы чиновников и активистов в городских локальных конфликтах’, Социологическое обозрение, 23 (2), сс. 90–119. [Tykanova, E. V., Shevtsova, I. K., Zhelnina, A. A. (2024) ‘Alliances between Authorities and Activists in Urban Local Conficts’ [Al'yansy chinovnikov i aktivistov v gorodskikh lokal'nykh konfliktakh], Russian Sociological Review, 23 (2), pp. 90–119. (In Russ.)]. DOI: 10.17323/1728-192x-2024-2-90-119.

Africa’s Urbanisation Dynamics 2022: The Economic Power of Africa’s Cities (2022) Paris: OECD Publishing. DOI: 10.1787/3834ed5b-en

Ardill, N., and Lemes de Oliveira, F. (2018) ‘Social innovation in urban spaces’, International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development, 10 (3), pp. 207–221. DOI: 10.1080/19463138.2018.1526177

Broto, V. C. et al. (2022) ‘Co-production outcomes for urban equality: learning from different trajectories of citizens' involvement in urban change’, Current Research in Environmental Sustainability, 4, pp. 100–179. DOI: 0.1016/j.crsust.2022.100179

Chua, C. (2023) ‘Disruption from above, the middle and below: three terrains of governance’, Review of International Studies, 49 (1), pp. 37–52. DOI: 10.1017/S0260210

Farrell, K. (2017) ‘The rapid urban growth triad: a new conceptual framework for examining the urban transition in developing countries’, Sustainability, 9 (8), p. 1407. DOI: 10.3390/su9081407.

Figueiredo, Y., Aparecida Prim, M., and Aparecida Dandolini, G. (2022) ‘Urban regeneration in the light of social innovation: a systematic integrative literature review’, Land Use Policy, 113, pp. 105–873. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105873 EDN: WGVROI

Freeman, R. E. (2004) ‘The Stakeholder Approach Revisited’, Zeitschrift für wirtschafts-undunternehmensethik, 5 (3), pp. 228–254. DOI: 10.5771/1439-880x-2004-3-228.

Koroma, B., and Macarthy, J. M. (2022) Participatory Planning: The role of Community and City Learning Platforms in Freetown. GOLD VI Pathways to Equality Cases Repository: Democratizing. United Cities and Local Governments.

Krase, J., and DeSena, J. N. (Eds.) (2020) Gentrification around the World, In 2 volumes. Cham: Pallgrave Mcmillan. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-41341-5

Macarthy, J. M., de Bruijne, K., Conteh, F. M., Hitchen, J., Koroma, B., and Reffell, F. (2024) Freetown: City report. ACRC Working Paper 2024-16. Manchester: African Cities Research Consortium, The University of Manchester. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4916071

Mberu, B. U. (2024). ‘Urban transformations and SLURC: learning, understanding and impact’ In: Macarthy, J. M., Koroma, B., Rigon, A., Frediani, A. A., and Klingel, A. (eds), Urban Transformations in Sierra Leone: Knowledge co-production and partnerships for a just city. London: UCL Press. DOI: 10.14324/111.9781800086852

Mukim, M. (2018) Freetown urban sector review: options for growth and resilience. Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group.

Muñoz-Gielen, D. (2014) ‘Urban governance, property rights, land readjustment and public value capturing’, European Urban and Regional Studies, 21 (1), pp. 60–78. DOI: 10.1177/0969776412440543

Noll, S., and Tuhina, B. (2023) ‘The Five Pillars of Urban Environmental Justice: A Framework for Building Equitable Cities’, Philosophy of the City Journal, 1 (1), 84–99. DOI: 10.21827/potcj .1.1.41048. EDN: YHUTOU

Pieterse, E., and Hyman, K. (2018) ‘Infrastructure deficits and potential in African Cities’, In: Burdett, R. and Hall, S. (eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Urban Sociology: New approaches to the twenty-first century city. London: Sage Publishers.

Rochell, K., Bulkeley, H., and Runhaar, H. (2024) ‘Nature for resilience reconfigured: global-to-local translation of frames in Africa’, Buildings and Cities, 5 (1), pp. 1–15. DOI: 10.5334/bc.379

Sakketa, T.G. (2023) Urbanisation and social cohesion: theory and empirical evidence from Africa. Bonn: German Institute of Development and Sustainability. DOI: 10.23661/idp16.2023

Teebken, J. (2024) ‘Disrupt and unlock? The role of actors in urban adaptation pathbreaking’, Buildings and Cities, 5 (1), pp. 162–181. DOI: doi.org/10.5334/bc.383

Published

2025-07-07

How to Cite

Bardin А. Л. (2025). ADAPTING URBAN POLICIES TO SOCIO-POLITICAL CHALLENGES: ACTORS, MODELS, AND PRACTICES IN FREETOWN. Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science, 19(2), 48–58. https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2025-2-48-58

Issue

Section

Political institutions, processes, technologies