DIGITAL ECOSYSTEM OF A MODERN MEGAPOLIS AS A MECHANISM FOR FORMING THE POLITICAL WORLDVIEW OF RUSSIAN YOUTH

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2026-2-98-111

Keywords:

digitalization, digital ecosystem, digital state, megalopolis, youth of the megalopolis, political worldview, regional profile, risks of digitalization

Abstract

The article examines the structural and substantive features of youth political worldview and the functioning of digital ecosystems in the Volga Federal District cities of Ufa, Kazan, and Nizhny Novgorod. It provides a comparative analysis of these cities’ digital environments and assesses the social effectiveness of regional digital solutions. The study shows the uneven development of the digital environment and the internal contradictions of digitalization associated with the costs of digital decisions. Within the study of youth worldview, predictors of satisfaction with digital ecosystems are identified, including assessments of the accessibility and effectiveness of digital infrastructure, as well as perceptions of key problems and contradictions of digitalization. Digital ecosystems have been showing a strong yet contradictory impact on youth political worldviews, marked by a pragmatic and moderately critical assessment of urban digital environments and ambivalent perceptions of digitalization shaped by differing views of technological and administrative solutions. The authors conclude that the costs of implementing digital projects in the studied regions become factors in socio-psychological risks, associated with increased frustrations and deprivations in the minds of young people, as well as the inability to predict the vector of worldview development.

 

Author Biographies

  • Alexander Shirinyants, M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Peoples' Friendship University of Russia, Moscow, Russian Federation.

    Doctor of Sciences (in Politics), Professor, Head of the Department of History of Socio-Political Doctrines of the Faculty of Political Science, Professor of the Department of Comparative Political Science.

  • Olga Shmeleva, Lobachevsky State University, Nizhny Novgorod, Russian Federation.

    Doctor of Sciences (in Politics), Associate Professor of the Department of Political Science at the Institute of International Relations and World History

References

Быков, И. А., Курушкин, С. В. (2022) ‘Цифровая политическая коммуникация в России: ценности гуманизма против технократического подхода’, Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Политология, 3, сс. 419–432 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1438-2022-24-3-419-432 [Bykov, I. A., Kurushkin, S. V. (2022) ‘Digital political communication in Russia: the values of humanism versus the technocratic approach’, RUDN Journal of POLITICAL SCIENCE, 3, pp. 419–432. (In Russ.)].

Василенко, И. А. (ред.) (2018) «Умный город» XXI века: возможности и риски смарт-технологий в городском ребрендинге. Москва: Международные отношения. 256 с. ["Smart City" of the 21st Century: Opportunities and Risks of Smart Technologies in Urban Rebranding. Moscow: Mejdunarodnie otnosheniya. 256 p. (In Russ.)].

Володенков, С. В. (2022) ‘Политика в цифровом формате в исследованиях российских и зарубежных учёных: представляю номер’, Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Политология, 3, сс. 339–350. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1438-2022-24-3-339-350 [Volodenkov, S. V. (2022) ‘Politics in digital format in the studies of Russian and foreign scientists: I present the issue’, RUDN Journal of POLITICAL SCIENCE, 3, pp. 339–350. (In Russ.)].

Володенков, С. В., Федорченко, С. Н., Печенкин, Н. М. (2023) ‘Особенности формирования мировоззрения в условиях современной цифровой среды: анализ академических дискурсов’, Дискурс-Пи, 1, сс. 8–16 DOI: 10.17506/18179568_

2023_20_1_8 [Volodenkov, S. V., Fedorchenko, S. N., Pechenkin, N. M. (2023) ‘Features of the formation of a worldview in the context of a modern digital environment: analysis of academic discourses’, Diskurs_Pi, 1, pp. 8–16. (In Russ.)].

Гигаури, Д. И., Гуторов, В. А., Ширинянц, А. А. (2019) ‘Youtube-блогеры как лидеры общественного мнения молодежи: новые технологии формирования идентичности в виртуальном пространстве’, Каспийский регион: политика, экономика, культура, 3, сс. 38–46. [Gigauri, D. I., Gutorov, V. A., Shirinyants, A. A. (2019) ‘Youtube-bloggers as leaders of public opinion of youth: new technologies of identity formation in virtual space’, The Caspian region: politics, economy, culture, 3, pp. 38–46. (In Russ.)].

Голова, А. Г., Курбатова, Е. В. (2021) ‘Цифровая экосистема города как драйвер устойчивого развития’, Экономические системы, 4, сс. 43–52. DOI: 10.29030/2309-2076-2021-14-4-43-52. [Golova, A.G., Kurbatova, E. V. (2021) ‘Digital ecosystem of the city as a driver of sustainable development’ [Cifrovaya ekosistema goroda kak draiver ustoichivogo razvitiya], Economic systems, 4, pp. 43–52. (In Russ.)].

Кондратенко, К. С. (2020) ‘Управленческая ментальность новых цифровых сервисов обратной связи с населением: технологии мотивации поведением пользователей’, Политическая экспертиза: ПОЛИТЭКС, 4, сс. 475–492. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu23.2020.404 [Kondratenko, K. S. (2020) ‘Management mentality of new digital services of feedback with the population: technologies of motivation by user behavior’, Political expertise: POLITEX, 4, pp. 475–492. (In Russ.)].

Махмудова, Г. Н., Ашурова, З. А., Разакова, Б. С. (2022) ‘Развитие цифровой экосистемы и формирование цифровых платформ в Узбекистане’, π-Economy, 2, cc. 7–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18721/JE.15201 [Makhmudova, G. N., Ashurova, Z. A., Razakova, B. S. (2022) ‘Development of the digital ecosystem and formation of digital platforms in Uzbekistan’, π-Economy, 2, pp. 7–21. (In Russ.)].

Морозова, С. С. (2024) Цифровые экосистемы в политической сфере: анализ тенденций и перспективы развития, Политическая экспертиза: ПОЛИТЭКС, 2. cc. 356–369. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu23.2024.215 [Morozova, S. S. (2024) Digital ecosystems in the political sphere: analysis of trends and development prospects, Political expertise: POLITEX, 2, pp. 356–369. (In Russ.)].

Ромашкина, А. Б., Киричук, Д. А. (2024) Трансляция ценностно-смысловых нарративов в публичной цифровой коммуникации: возможности и ограничения, Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Политология, 4, сс. 630–643. DOI: 10.22363/2313-1438-2024-26-4-630-643 [Romashkina, A. B., Kirichuk, D. A. (2024) Broadcasting value-semantic narratives in public digital communication: possibilities and limitations, RUDN Journal of POLITICAL SCIENCE, 4, pp. 630–643. (In Russ.)].

Соколов, А. В., Гребенко, Е. Д. (2024) Создание и развитие цифровых экосистем в России как способа коммуникации власти и граждан, PolitBook, 2, сс. 6–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24412/2227-1538-2024-2-6-23 [Sokolov, A. V., Grebenko, E. D. (2024) Creation and Development of Digital Ecosystems in Russia as a Way of Communication between Government and Citizens, PolitBook, 2, pp. 6–23. (In Russ.)]

Тойнби, А. Дж. (1991) Постижение истории. M: Прогресс. 736 с. [Toynbee, A. J. (1991) Understanding History. Moscow: Progrecc. 736 p. (In Russ.)].

Удовенко, И. П. (2022) Государство в цифровом преобразовании управленческих процессов: от электронного документооборота к цифровым экосистемам, Анализ и прогноз. Журнал ИМЭМО РАН, 2, сс. 32–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20542/afij-2022-2-32-42 [Udovenko, I. P. (2022) The state in the digital transformation of management processes: from electronic document management to digital ecosystems, Analysis and forecast. Journal of IMEMO RAS, 2, pp. 32–42. (In Russ.)].

Федорченко, С. Н. (2022) Мировоззрение в условиях цифровизации государства, Журнал политических исследований, Т.6, № 3, сс. 69-90 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12737/2587-6295-2022-6-3-69-90 [Fedorchenko, S. N. (2022) Worldview in the context of digitalization of the state, Journal of Political Studies, 3, pp. 69-90. (In Russ.)].

De Blasio, E., Viviani, L. (2020) Platform party between digital activism and hyper-leadership: The reshaping of the public sphere, Media and Communication, 4, pp. 16–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i4.3230

Dommett, K., Power, S. (2023). Monitoring digital election campaigns: Assessing the transparency ecosystem in the United Kingdom, Politics, 1, pp. 119–139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/02633957231156084

Draheim, D., Krimmer, R., Tammet, T. (2021) On state-level architecture of digital government ecosystems: From ICT-driven to data-centric, Transactions on Large-Scale Data-and Knowledge-Centered Systems XLVIII: Special Issue In Memory of Univ. Prof. Dr. Roland Wagner. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 165–195. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-63519-3_8

Krawatzek, F. (2022) A Sign of Things to Come? Youth and Politics: Regimes, Values and Agency, Europe-Asia Studies. Vol. 74(7), pp. 1105–1122.

Kwet, M. (2019) Digital colonialism: US empire and the new imperialism in the Global South, Race & Class, 4, pp. 3–26.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-08

Issue

Section

Political institutions, processes, technologies

How to Cite

DIGITAL ECOSYSTEM OF A MODERN MEGAPOLIS AS A MECHANISM FOR FORMING THE POLITICAL WORLDVIEW OF RUSSIAN YOUTH. (2026). Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science, 20(2), 98-111. https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2026-2-98-111