“WE ALL ARE SELFLESS HEROES...”: HEROIC DISCOURSE AND THE CULT OF CELEBRITY IN THE 1930s
Keywords:
Soviet society, the 1930s, social hierarchy, heroic discourse, “noble people of the Soviet country”, the Stakhanovite movementAbstract
The article attempts to interpret the nature of the heroic discourse in Soviet culture of the 1930s. Based on published and archival sources, the hypothesis is offered, according to which the cult of heroes was associated with the search for an identity of the Soviet society adequate to the tasks of the power. The idea of a classless society, put forward by the 17th Conference of the VKP(b) in 1932, was supplemented by the image of a friendly family of Soviet peoples, in another version a country of heroes. Of all types of heroism, labor heroism came to the fore. All Soviet people, in accordance with this ideologeme, possess this dignity. A situation was needed in which a Soviet man could become a hero in labor, in aeronautics, in polar expeditions, and the fight against the enemies of the people. Such a situation was to be provided by the Stakhanovite movement. The victorious record-breakers were given the status of “noblemen” with the privileges attributed to them, including the right to fame. Thus, a new hierarchy was to emerge – a hierarchy of achievements, instead of a hierarchy of origin. The Stakhanovite movement developed under the rules of a political campaign with powerful ideological accompaniment. Each branch of the economy was represented by one or two record-breakers who became all-Union celebrities. Texts about their successes abounded in hyperbole; their personal stories were constructed along the same lines. The social outcome of the campaign was the creation of a workers' aristocracy as an additional pillar of the regime. The ideological outcome was the creation of a culture of success in society, a hope for attainable personal well-being. The images of Alexei Stakhanov and Dusya Vinogradova remained in the collective memory.References
Аллен Р.С. От фермы к фабрике: новая интерпретация советской промышленной революции / пер. с англ. Е. Володиной. М.: РОССПЭН, 2013. 390 с.
Бондарев К.А. Автоматический ткацкий станок типа «Нортроп» марки «Н» и его монтаж. М.: Гизлегпром, 1934. 47 с.
Бранденбергер Д. Кризис сталинского агитпропа: пропаганда, политпросвещение и террор в СССР, 1927−1941. М.: Политическая энциклопедия, 2017. 367 с.
Введенский В.В. «Знатные люди»: благосостояние передовых работников промышленных предприятий Западной Сибири в середине 1930-х гг. // Гуманитарные науки в Сибири. 2014. № 2. С. 86–90.
Наволоцкая Д.И. Восприятие образа стахановки: фанатские письма Дусе Виноградовой, 1935–1936 гг. // Вестник Перм. ун-та. История. 2021. № 2(53). С. 160–172.
Постников С.П., Фельдман М.А. Социокультурный облик промышленных рабочих России в 1900−1941 гг. М.: РОССПЭН, 2009. 367 с.
Сушков А.В. Империя товарища Кабакова: уральская партноменклатура в 1930-е годы. Екатеринбург: Альфа Принт, 2019. 292 с.
Тростин Е. Страна писателей, страна ученых//Историк. №22 сентябрь 2016 [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://xn--h1aagokeh.xn--p1ai/journal/post/5366 (дата обращения: 13.10.2021).
Фицпатрик Ш. Сталинские крестьяне. Социальная история Советской России в 30-е годы: деревня. М.: РОССПЭН; Фонд Первого Президента России Б.Н. Ельцина, 2008. 422 с.
Benvenuti F. Stakhanovism and Stalinism, 1934−38 // CREES Discussion Papers, Series SIPS. 1989. No. 30. P. 40–47.
Siegelbaum L. Stakhanovism and the Politics of Productivity in the USSR 1935−41. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988. 344 p.
Thurston R. The Stakhanovite Movement: The Background to the Great Terror in the Factories, 1935−1938 // Stalinist Terror New Perspectives / eds. by John Arch Getty, Roberta Thompson Manning. Cambridge University Press, 1993. P. 142–162.
References
Allen, R. С. (2013), Ot fermy k fabrike: novaya interpretatsiya sovetskoy promyshlennoy revolyutsii [Farm to Factory. A Reinterpretation of the Soviet Industrial Revolution], ROSSPEN, Moscow, Russia, 390 p.
Bondarev, K. A. (1934), Avtomaticheskiy tkatskiy stanok tipa "Nortrop" marki “N” i ego montazh [Automatic weaving machine type “Northrop” brand “H” and its installation], Gizlegprom, Moscow, USSR, 47 p.
Brandenberger, D. (2017), Krizis stalinskogo agitpropa: Propaganda, politprosveshchenie i terror v SSSR, 1927–1941 [Propaganda state in crisis: Soviet ideology, indoctrination, and terror under Stalin, 1927–1941], Politicheskaya entsiklopediya, Moscow, Russia, 367 p.
Fitzpatrick, Sh. (2008), Stalinskie krest'yane. Sotsial'naya istoriya Sovetskoy Rossii v 30-e gody: derevnya [Sta-linist peasants. Social history of Soviet Russia in the 30s: the village], ROSSPEN, Fond Pervogo Prezidenta Rossii B. N. El'tsina, Moscow, Russia, 422 p.
Navolotskaya, D. I. (2021), “Perception of the Image of Stakhanovka: Fan Letters to Dusya Vinogradova, 1935–1936”, Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Istoriya, № 2(53), pp. 160–172.
Postnikov, S.P. & M.A. Fel'dman (2009), Sotsiokul'turnyy oblik promyshlennyh rabochih Rossii v 1900-1941 gg. [The socio-cultural profile of industrial workers in Russia between 1900 and 1941], ROSSPEN, Moscow, Russia, 367 p.
Sushkov, A.V. (2019), Imperiya tovarishcha Kabakova: ural'skaya partnomenklatura v 1930-e gody [Comrade Kabakov's empire: the Urals party establishment in the 1930s], Al'fa Print, Yekaterinburg, Russia, 292 p.
Trostin, E. (n.d.), Strana pisateley, strana uchenyh [A country of writers, a country of scientists], available at: https://xn--h1aagokeh.xn--p1ai/journal/22/strana-pisatelej-strana-uchenyih-b6.html (accessed: 13.10.2021).
Vvedenskiy V.V. (2014), “Notable people": welfare of advanced industrial workers of Western Siberia in the mid-1930s”, Gumanitarnye nauki v Sibiri, № 2, pp. 86–90.
