URAL VERSUS THE SOUTH: CRAWLER TRACTOR IN THE VISUAL CULTURE OF THE USSR IN THE ERA OF INDUSTRIALIZATION
Keywords:
socialism, tractor, Chelyabinsk Tractor Plant, VDNH, Moscow Metro, socialist realism, Alexander Deineka, industrial identityAbstract
The paper analyzes the role of the tractor as a visual symbol in the Soviet culture of the industrialization era, using a number of different cases including those of painting, photography, graphics, textual narratives, and presentations of material objects. The author shows that, originally, it was wheeled tractor that served as a visual symbol of the socialist transformation of the Soviet village, including both imported machines and those produced by Soviet factories in Leningrad. The start of industrialization and launching of facilities in Stalingrad and Kharkov led to changes in symbolic system: the wheeled tractor SKhTZ-15/30 (“international”) moved to the foreground. However, since the mid-1930s, the symbolic status transferred to the crawler tractor, which corresponded with the major trend of the Soviet economy of the period. Thus, the “Stalinets” tractors of the Chelyabinsk Tractor Plant started to dominate in the sphere of symbols, combining spectacular appearance, technological reputation of the plant, choice of name, and design solutions in regard for coloring. The paper examines the ways in which the “Stalinets” crawler assumed the leading role in the Soviet visual culture of the second half of the 1930s. However, in 1937, both Stalingrad and Kharkov plants launched their own mass-produced crawler under the name of SKhTZ-NATI. A sort of competition between crawler machines of the South and the Urals unfolded in the Soviet culture of the late 1930s – early 1940s. The author investigates the case by studying the presence of crawler tractors imagery in the decorations of the All-Union Agricultural Exhibition (VSHV) in 1939 and in the mosaics of Moscow Metro in 1943. The conclusion is made about the double character of the symbolism of crawler tractors, which served both as general symbols of the promoted success of the Soviet agriculture, and as manifestations of the industrial identity of particular enterprises, cities and territories.References
Басс В.Г. Архитектура для внутреннего и наружного употребления: советский павильон на Нью-йоркской выставке 1939 г. и ансамбль ВСХВ // Шаги – Steps. 2016. № 1. С. 82–102.
Бугаевский К.А. Челябинский «Танкоград» в отражении средств коллекционирования: фалеристики, нумизматики, филумении и бонистики // Вестник совета молодых ученых и специалистов Челябинской области. 2020. Т. 2, № 2 (29). С. 29–37.
Бугров К.Д. Соцгорода Большого Урала. Екатеринбург: Изд-во Урал. ун-та, 2018. 472 с.
Бугров К.Д., Запарий В.В. Танкостроение в контексте военно-хозяйственной стратегии СССР 1930-х гг. // Вестник Том. гос. ун-та. 2019. № 448. С. 108–118.
Дейнека А.А. Монументальное искусство. Скульптура. М.: Интеррос, 2011. 424 с.
Евсеев Л. СТЗ-НАТИ // Техника – молодежи. 1975. № 6. С. 26.
Комаров Л.С., Ховив Е.Г., Заржевский Н.И. Летопись Челябинского тракторного
(1929–1945 гг.). М.: Профиздат, 1972. 375 с.
Косенко В.В., Носов Г.И. О необходимости использования гусеничных тракторов в сельском хозяйстве России // Техника и оборудование для села. 2015. № 2. С. 83–85.
Косенко В.В., Шаров В.В., Ценч Ю.С. 70 лет легендарному трактору ДТ-54 // Технический сервис машин. 2019. № 1 (136). С. 196–209.
Макаров А.Н. Советский индустриальный фоторепортаж 1930-х гг. как средство стереотипизации массового сознания // Проблемы истории, филологии, культуры. 2012. № 3 (37). С. 111–124.
Механизация сельского хозяйства. М.: Сельхозгиз, 1940. 218 с.
Михеев М.В. Урал в системе межрегиональной конкуренции в период сталинизма
(1930–1940-е гг.) // Гуманитарные науки в Сибири. 2017. № 1. С. 66–72.
Московское метро: подземный памятник архитектуры. М.: Кучково поле, ABCdesign, 2018. 336 с.
Очерки истории Харьковского тракторного завода имени Орджоникидзе. 1931–1961. Харьков: Харьков. книж. изд-во, 1962. 299 с.
Родионов В.А., Анненков П.Н. Рожденный дважды. Харьков: Прапор, 1981. 343 с.
Рубинчик А.Л. Живопись соцреализма в советских открытках. Альбом-каталог. М.: Магма, 2008. 200 с.
Храмов А.В. Живая карта империи // Неприкосновенный запас. 2014. № 4. С. 129–143.
Ценч Ю.С. История создания первого российского трактора // Технический сервис машин. 2019. Т. 135 (2). С. 184–197.
Чолахян В.А. Проблемы освоения новой техники на Сталинградском тракторном заводе в годы первой пятилетки // Изв. Саратов. ун-та. 2007. Т. 7, вып. 1. С. 66–75.
Чудинова К.С., Суслов В.Ю. Мозаичные панно заслуженного художника РФ П.Ф. Шардакова в г. Волгоград: от эскиза к монументальности // Актуальные вопросы современного искусства. Петрозаводск: Международный центр научного партнерства «Новая Наука», 2020. С. 71–85.
Dalrymple D. The American Tractor Comes to Soviet Agriculture: The Transfer of a Technology // Technology and Culture. 1964. Vol. 5, no. 2. P. 191–214.
Harris J.R. The Great Urals: Regionalism and the Evolution of the Soviet System. Ithaca; L.: Cornell University Press, 1999. 235 p.
Lapidus R. The “Erotic” Tractor in the Soviet Cinema // Quaestio Rossica. 2020. No. 2. P. 519–535.
Udovicki-Selb D. Facing Hitler's Pavilion: The Uses of Modernity in the Soviet Pavilion at the 1937 Paris International Exhibition // Journal of Contemporary History. 2012. Vol. 47. P. 13–47.
References
Bass, V. G. (2016), “Architecture for internal and external use: Soviet pavilion at the New York Expo 1939 and the VSHV ensemble”, Shagi-Steps, № 1, pp. 82–102.
Bugaevskiy, K. A. (2020), “Chelyabinsk “Tankograd” as reflected in the collections: phaleristics, numismatics, phillumeny and notaphily”, Vestnik soveta molodykh uchenykh i spetsialistov Chelyabinskoy oblasti, №2 (29), vol. 2, pp. 29–37.
Bugrov, K. D. (2018), Sotsgoroda Bol'shogo Urala [Socialist Cities of Greater Urals], Izd-vo Ural. un-ta, Yeka-terinburg, Russia, 472 с.
Bugrov, K. D. & V. V. Zapariy (2019) “Tank Production in the Context of the USSR Military-Economic Strategy in the 1930s”, Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, № 448, pp. 108–118.
Cholakhyan, V. A. (2007) “Problems of adaptation of new technics at the Stalingrad tractor plant during the first Five Year Plan”, Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. T. 7. Ser. Istoriya. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, № 1, pp. 66–75.
Chudinova, K. S. & V. Yu. Suslov (2020), “Mosaic panels of the honored artist of RF P. F. Shardakov in Volgo-grad: from sketch to monumentality”, in Aktual'nye voprosy sovremennogo iskusstva [Actual issues of modern art], Novaya Nauka, Petrozavodsk, Russia, pp. 71–85.
Dalrymple, D. (1964), “The American Tractor Comes to Soviet Agriculture: The Transfer of a Technology”, Technology and Culture, Vol. 5, № 2, pp. 191–214.
Deineka. Monumental'noe iskusstvo. Skul'ptura (2011) [Deineka. Monumental Art. Sculpture], Interros, Mos-cow, Russia, 424 p.
Evseev, L. (1975), “STZ-NATI”, Tekhnika – molodezhi, № 6, p. 26.
Harris, J. R. (1999), The Great Urals: Regionalism and the Evolution of the Soviet System, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, USA; London, UK, 235 p.
Hramov, A.V. (2014), “The living map of the empire”, Neprikosnovennyy zapas, № 4, pp. 129–143.
Komarov, L. S., Khoviv, E. G. & N. I. Zarzhevskiy (1972), Letopis' Chelyabinskogo traktornogo (1929–1945 gg.) [Chronicle of Chelyabinsk tractor plant (1929–1945)], Profizdat, Moscow, USSR, 375 p.
Kosenko, V. V. & G. I. Nosov (2015), “On the necessity of the use of crawler tractors in Russia’s agrarian econ-omy”, Tekhnika i oborudovanie dlya sela, № 2, pp. 83–85.
Kosenko, V. V., Sharov, V. V. & Yu. S. Tsench (2019), “70 years to the legendary DT-45 tractor”, Tekhnicheskiy servis mashin, № 1(136), pp. 196–209.
Lapidus, R. (2020), “The “Erotic” Tractor in the Soviet Cinema”, Quaestio Rossica, № 2, pp. 519–535.
Makarov, A. N. (2012), “Soviet industrial photo report of the 1930s as a mean of stereotypization of mass con-sciousness”, Problemy istorii, filologii, kul'tury, № 3 (37), pp. 111–124.
Mikheev, M. V. (2017), “Urals in the system of cross-regional competition in the Stalinism era (1930s – 1940s)”, Gumanitarnye nauki v Sibiri, № 1, pp. 66–72.
Moskovskoe metro: Podzemnyy pamyatnik arkhitektury (2018) [Moscow Metro. The underground monument of architecture], Kuchkovo pole, ADCdesign, Moscow, Russia, 336 p.
Ocherk istorii Kharkovskogo traktornogo zavoda imeni Ordzhonikidze. 1931–1961 (1962) [Essays in the history of Kharkov tractor plant named after Ordzhonikidze, 1931–1961], Kharkovskoe knizhnoe izdatelstvo, Kharkov, USSR, 299 p.
Rodionov, V. A. & P. N. Annenkov (1981), Rozhdennyy dvazhdy [Twice born], Prapor, Kharkov, USSR, 343 p.
Rubinchik, A. L. (2008), Zhivopis' sotsrealizma v sovetskikh otkrytkakh. Al'bom-katalog [Pictorial art of socialist realism in Soviet postcards. Album-catalogue], Magma, Moscow, Russia, 200 p.
Tsench, Yu. S. (2019), “History of first Russian tractor”, Tekhnicheskiy servis mashin, № 135 (2), pp. 184–197.
Udovicki-Selb, D. (2012), “Facing Hitler's Pavilion: The Uses of Modernity in the Soviet Pavilion at the 1937 Paris International Exhibition”, Journal of Contemporary History, Vol. 47, pp. 13–47.
Ocherk istorii Kharkovskogo traktornogo zavoda imeni Ordzhonikidze. 1931–1961 (1962) [Essays in the history of Kharkov tractor plant named after Ordzhonikidze, 1931 – 1961], Kharkovskoe knizhnoe izdatelstvo, Kharkov, USSR, 299 p.
Rodionov, V. A., Annenkov, P. N. (1981) Rozhdennyy dvazhdy [Twice born]. Prapor, Kharkov, USSR, 343 p.
Rubinchik, A. L. (2008) Zhivopis' sotsrealizma v sovetskikh otkrytkakh. Al'bom-katalog [Pictorial art of socialist realism in Soviet postcards. Album-catalogue] Magma, Moscow, Russia, 200 p.
Tsench, Yu. S. (2019) Istoriya sozdaniya pervogo rossiyskogo traktora [History of first Russian tractor] // Tekhnicheskiy servis mashin, № 135 (2), pp. 184-197.
Udovicki-Selb, D. (2012) Facing Hitler's Pavilion: The Uses of Modernity in the Soviet Pavilion at the 1937 Paris International Exhibition, Journal of Contemporary History, Vol. 47, pp. 13-47.
