NEW MEANS OF COMMUNICATION AND THE OLD SYSTEM (INTEGRATION OF THE TELEPHONE ACTIVITY INTO THE SYSTEM OF STATE REGULATION OF COMMUNICATIONS IN RUSSIA IN THE LATE 19TH AND EARLY 20TH CENTURIES)
Keywords:
telephone, telephonization, public telephone networks, communications regalia, communications monopoly, concessions, Main Administration of Posts and TelegraphsAbstract
The paper analyzes the process of formulating the main principles of the state regulation of the telephone activities in Russia in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Even though the emergence of the telephone in Russia matched the process of the whole unified postal and telegraph service’s organizing, crucial necessity of including the telephone into the system of the state management of communications did not become just a step in these reforms’ development. It caused the discussion on another matter, namely on the main principle of the system’s functioning, i.e. perception of the communications as the subject of the state monopoly. Thus, the Russian government’s attempts to adopt the telephone to a broadly settled system of the state regulation happened to be followed by the debates on neither administrative no technical, but on the legal and economic matters. Lately, they moved to the principle of the state monopoly in the communications sphere as a whole and to perception of the latter as a source of the state income. Nevertheless, during the analyzed period, the focus of all the disputes was made on responding to the private capital’s threat to the monopoly status of the government. However, its main concern was not the monopoly itself, but one of its aspects, i.e. the most commercially profitable way to build and use the telephone communications.References
Борисова Н.А. Россия – родина «слонов» или «Кулибиных»? Из истории электросвязи 1830-х – 1930-х гг. СПб.: ЦМС им. А.С. Попова, 2017. 343 с.
Высоков М.С. Российская империя на путях модернизации: зарождение и развитие электросвязи в XIX – начале XX вв.: дис. … д-ра ист. наук. СПб.: Изд-во РГПУ им. А.И. Герцена, 2004. 468 с.
Глущенко А.А. Лжепредпринимательство в сфере электросвязи России на рубеже XIX–XX вв. // Наука и техника: вопросы истории и теории: материалы XXXIX Междунар. годич. науч. конф. СПбО РНК ИФНиТ РАН «Международные сети как фактор интеграции научного сообщества», 12–16 ноября 2018 г. СПб., 2018. Вып. XXXIV. С. 123–124.
Лапина С.Н., Лелюхина Н.Д. Государственное предпринимательство в России и его участие в регулировании экономики (опыт начала XX века) // Экономическая история России
XIX–XX вв.: современный взгляд. М.: РОССПЭН, 2001. С. 13–36.
Осадчий П.С. Почтовые, телеграфные и телефонные сообщения как элемент государственного хозяйства в Европе. Опыт сравнительного статистико-экономического исследования. СПб.: Тип. А. Бенке, 1908. 51 с.
Фролова О.В. Междугородние телефонные линии Российской империи // Сети и линии связи: прошлое, настоящее, будущее: материалы Девятых науч. чтений памяти А.С. Попова, посвящ. Дню радио – празднику работников всех отраслей связи, 6 мая 2016 г. СПб.: ЦМС им. А.С. По-пова, 2016. С. 74–81.
Фролова О.В. Частные инициативы по строительству междугородных телефонных сетей в до-революционной России // Телекоммуникации: история инноваций: материалы Третьих науч. чтений памяти А.С. Попова, посвящ. Дню радио – празднику работников всех отраслей связи, 6 мая 2010 г. СПб.: ЦМС им. А.С. Попова, 2010. С. 37–44.
Bar F., Sandvig Ch. US Communication Policy after Convergence // Media, Culture & Society. 2008. Vol. 30 (4). P. 531–550.
Huurdeman A.A. The Worldwide History of Telecommunications. Hoboken: A John Wiley & Sons, inc., 2003. 638 p.
MacDougall R.D. The People’s Telephone: The Politics of Telephony in the United States and Canada, 1876–1926 : PhD dissertation. Cambridge: Harvard University, 2004. 428 p.
Milne G.J. British Business and the Telephone, 1878–1911 // Business History. 2007. Vol. 49, no. 2. P. 163–185.
Ploeckl F. Uniform Service, Uniform Productivity? Regional Efficiency of the Imperial German Postal, Telegraph, and Telephone Service // Australian Economic History Review. 2016. Vol. 56, no. 2. P. 221–243.
Stein J.L. Ideology and the Telephone: the Social Reception of a Technology, London 1876–1920: PhD dissertation. London: University College London, 1996. 267 p.
References
Bar, F. & Ch. Sandvig (2008), “US Communication Policy after Convergence”, Media, Culture & Society, vol. 30 (4), pp. 531–550.
Borisova, N.A. (2017), Rossiya – rodina “slonov” ili Kulibinykh? Is istorii elektrosvyazi 1830-kh – 1930-kh gg. [Is Russia the motherland of “elephants” or that of Kulibins? From the history of telecommunications in the 1830s – 1930s], TSMS im. A.S. Popova, St. Petersburg, Russia, 343 p.
Frolova, O.V. (2010), “The private initiates on building the long-distance telephone networks in pre-revolutionary Russia”, in Telekommunikatsii: istoriya innovatsyy: Materialy 3-h nauchnykh chteniy pamyati A.S. Popova, posvyashchennykh Dnyu radio – prazdniku rabotnikov vsekh otrasley svyazi (6 Maya 2010 g.) [Telecommunications. History of the innovations. Proceedings of the 3th A.S. Popov Readings devoted to the Radio Day, all the communications workers’ professional day. 6 May 2010], TSMS im. A.S. Popova, St. Petersburg, Russia, pp. 37–44.
Frolova, O.V. (2016), “The long-distance telephone networks in Russian Empire”, in Seti i linii svyazi: proshloe, nastoyashchee i budushchee: Materialy 9-h nauchnykh chteniy pamyati A.S. Popova, posvyashchennykh Dnyu radio – prazdniku rabotnikov vsekh otrasley svyazi (6 Maya 2016 g.) [The networks and communications lines. The past, present and future. Proceedings of the 9th A.S. Popov Readings devoted to the Radio Day, all the communications workers’ professional day. 6 May 2016], TSMS im. A.S. Popova, St. Petersburg, Russia, pp. 74–81.
Glushchenko, A.A. (2018), “Fake enterprise in the Russian telecommunications at the turn of the 19th century”, in Nauka i tekhnika: Voprosy istorii i teorii. Materialy 39-y Mezhdunarodnoi godichnoi nauch-noi konferentsii SPBO RNK IFNIT RAN “Mezhdunarodnye seti kak faktor integratsii nauchnogo soobshchestva»” (12–16 noyabrya 2018 g.) [Science and technology. Issues of the history and theory. Proceedings of the 39th international annual conference of the RAS SPbSN RNKliFNT “International networks as the factor of academia’s integration”. 12–16 November 2018)], vol. 34, SPBF IIET RAN, St. Petersburg, Russia, pp. 123–124.
Huurdeman, A.A. (2003), The Worldwide History of Telecommunications, A John Wiley & Sons, inc., Hoboken, USA, 638 p.
Lapina, S.N. & N.D. Lelyukhina (2001), “The state enterprise in Russia and its participation in the regulation of economics. (The experience of the early 20th century)”, in Economicheskaya istoriya Rossii XIX–XX vv.: Sovremennyy vzglyad [Economical history of Russia in the 19th and 20th centuries. The modern view], ROSSPEN, Moscow, Russia, pp.13–36.
MacDougall, R.D. (2004), The People’s Telephone: The Politics of Telephony in the United States and Canada, 1876–1926, PhD dissertation, Harvard University, Cambridge, USA, 428 p.
Milne, G.J. (2007), “British Business and the Telephone, 1878–1911”, Business History, vol. 49, № 2,
pp. 163–185.
Osadchiy, P.S. (1908), Pochtovye, telegrafnye i telefonnye soobshcheniya kak element gosudarstvennogo khozyaistva v Evrope. Opyt sravnitelnogo statistiko-ekonomicheskogo issledovaniya [Postal, telegraph and telephone communications as an element of the state economy in Europe. Comparative statistics and economic research], A. Benkepress, St. Petersburg, Russia, 51 p.
Ploeckl, F. (2016), “Uniform Service, Uniform Productivity? Regional Efficiency of the Imperial German Postal, Telegraph, and Telephone Service”, Australian Economic History Review, vol. 56, № 2, pp. 221–243.
Stein, J.L. (1996), Ideology and the Telephone: The Social Reception of a Technology, London 1876–1920, PhD dissertation, University College of London, London, UK, 267 p.
Vysokov, M.S. (2004), Rossiyskaya imperiya na putyakh modernizatsii: Zarozhdenie i razvitie elektrosvyazi
v XIX – nachale XX vv. [Russian Empire on the roads of modernization. Emergence and development of the telecommunications in the 19th and the early 20th centuries], PhD dissertation, Herzen State Pedagogical University, St. Petersburg, Russia, 468 p.
