PATH DEPENDENCE, POLITICS OF TIME AND METAMORPHOSIS OF HISTORY
Keywords:
knowledge of the past, epistemology of historiography, transdisciplinarity, historicity, politics of time, temporal experience, historical timeAbstract
Path dependence, used in social sciences to model phenomena of various natures, provides an opportunity to reflect on how knowledge about the past works. In the new millennium, the ethos of history and its role in the lives of people occupy a large place in transdisciplinary research programs and discussions, in which not only historians, but also philosophers and representatives of all sciences, without exception, participate. It is connected with rethinking the conceptual foundations of historical knowledge and the formation of a new historical culture. The article discusses modern controversial trends in the epistemology of historiography related to the problems of historical dynamics and such basic concepts for historical knowledge as historicity, historical time, and the politics of time. Analysis of avant-garde trends in intellectual culture allows us to show how changes occur in the understanding and production of the historical. In the context of a rapidly changing world and a radical renewal of temporal experience, the discovery of the politics of time, the rethinking of historicity, and the search for high-quality historical time clarify the specifics of modern historical research, which is born at the intersection of theory and practice. Culture affirms the idea of the performative role of history and historians in our time. Historians do not just study the past; they participate in forming historicity and the temporal regime in which they live, helping people analyze life situations, make decisions, form the rules of communication, and create "institutions" as basic cultural structures that determine life in the present and allow them to find resources for thinking about the future.References
Артог Ф. Порядок времени, режимы историчности // Неприкосновенный запас. 2008. № 3 (59).
Историки в поисках новых перспектив. Монография / под. ред. З.А. Чеканцевой. М.: Аквилон, 2019. 416 с.
Казакова В.И. Концептуализация «path dependence» в современной социальной науке // Вестник Новгородского государственного технического университета им. Р.Е. Алексеева. Сер. «Управление в социальных системах. Коммуникативные технологии» 2012. №3. С. 6–16.
Ле Гофф Ж. История и память. М.: РОССПЭН, 2013. 302 с.
Лукьянов О.В. Экзистенциальный анализ и природа времени. Транстемпоральный характер экзистенциального опыта // Вестник Томского государственного университета. 2007. № 299, июнь. С. 164–170.
Мешонник А. Рифма и жизнь. М.: ОГИ, 2014. 400 с.
Норт Д. Институты, институциональные изменения и формирование экономики / пер. с англ. А. Н. Нестеренко. М.: Б. и., 1997. 190 с.
Олейников А. Откуда берётся прошлое? Апология анахронизма // Нов. лит. обозрение. 2014.
(126). С. 337–344.
Савельева И., Полетаев А. История как знание о прошлом // Логос. 2000. №2. С.39–74.
Серто М. dе. Разновидности письма, разновидности истории: Введение к монографии «История как письмо» (1975) / пер. Б. Дубина // Логос. 2001. № 4.
Тоштендаль Р. Возвращение историзма? Неоинституционализм и «исторический пово-рот» в социальных науках //Диалог со временем. 2010. № 30. С. 14–25.
Тулмин Ст. Человеческое понимание. Благовещенск. Б.: БГК им. И.А. Бодуэна де Куртена, 1998. 304 с.
Феномен прошлого / отв. ред. И.М. Савельева, А.В. Полетаев. М.: ГУ-ВША, 2005. 419 с.
Хайдеггер М. Бытие и время / пер. с нем. В. Бибихина. М.: Ад Маргинем, 1997. 452 с.
Чеканцева З.А. Историчность и история в интеллектуальной культуре XXI века // Диалог со временем. 2018. Вып. 65. С. 6–20.
Шлыков В. Память прошлых других как трансцендентальная экспликация историчности: к онтологии исторического сознания. Севастополь: Б. и., 2005. 256 с.
Aymes M. Historicités // Labyrinthe [En ligne], 17 | 2004 (1), mis en ligne le 13 juin 2008, con-sulté le 03 octobre 2016. URL: http://labyrinthe.revues.org/174 (дата обращения: 15.11.2017).
Bevernage B. Transitional justice and historiography: challenges, dilemmas and possibilities// Macquarie law journal. 2014. 13. P. 7–24.
Bevernage B., Lorenz Ch. Breaking up Time. Negotiating the Borders between Present, Past and Future// History of Historiography: International Review. 2013. N 1 (63). P. 31–50.
Droit E., Reichherzer F. La fin de l'histoire du temps présent telle que nous l'avons connue. Plaidoyer franco-allemand pour l'abandon d'une singularité historiographique // Vingtième Siècle: Revue d'histoire. 2013/2. N° 118. Р. 121–145.
Escudier A. Temporalisation et modernité politique: penser avec Koselleck //Annales. Histoire. Sciences Sociales. 2009. № 6. Р. 1269–1301.
Fabian J. Time and the Other: How Anthropology Makes Its Object. New York: Columbia University Press, 1983. 272 p.
Fasolt C. Past Sense: Studies in Medieval and Early Modern European History. Leiden: Brill, 2014. 658 p.
Garland D. What is a «history of the present»? On Foucault’s genealogies and their critical preconditions // Punishment & Society. 2014. Vol. 16(4). Р. 365–384.
Jordheim H. Introduction: Multiple Times and the Work of Synchronization // History and Theory. 2014. 53, no. 4. Р. 498–518.
Koselleck R. L’expérience de l’Histoire. Paris: Gallimard/Seuil, 1997. 247 p.
Koselleck R. Le futur passé : contribution à la sémantique des temps historiques. Paris: Ed. de l’EHESS, 1990. 334 p.
Martin S. L'historicité radicale du langage. URL: http://www.fabula.org/cr/278.php (дата обращения: 15.11.2017).
Meschonnic H. Critique du rythme, Anthropologie historique du langage. Verdier, 1982. 730 p.
Morsel J. Traces ? Quelles traces ? Réflexions pour une histoire non passéiste // Revue histo-rique. 2016/4. n° 680. Р. 813–868.
Noël P.-M. Les historiens québécois et la question de l’historicité de leur savoir // Erudit. 2012. Vol. 53, n. 1, janvier – avril. Р. 11–39.
Osborn P. The Politics of time: Modernity and Avant-Garde. London: Verso. 1995. 285 p.
Rancière J. Les noms de l’histoire. Essai de poétique du savoir. Paris: Le Seuil, 1992. 224 p.
Rancière J. Les mots de l’histoire du cinéma // Les Cahiers du Cinéma n°496, 1995.192 p.
Rethinking Historical Time. New Approaches to Presentism / Ed. by M. Tamm and L. Olivier. London: Bloomsbury Publishing Plc. 2019. 240 p.
Runia E. Moved by the Past. Discontinuity and Historical Mutation. Columbia University Press, 2014. 246 p.
Rüsen J. History, Narration, Interpretation, Orientation. New York; Oxford: Berghahn Books, 2005. 236 p.
Tanaka S. History without Chronology. Lever Press. 2019. Stable. URL: (дата обращения: 25.11.2019).
References
Artog, F. (2008), “Time order, modes of historicity”, Neprikosnovennyy zapas, № 3 (59), pp. 19–38.
Aymes, M. (2004), “Historicités”, Labyrinthe, available at: http://labyrinthe.revues.org/174 (accessed: 15.11.2017).
Bevernage, B. (2014), “Transitional justice and historiography: challenges, dilemmas and possibilities”, Mac-quarie law journal, № 13, pp. 7–24.
Bevernage, B. & Ch. Lorenz (2013), “Breaking up Time. Negotiating the Borders between Present, Past and Future”, History of Historiography: International Review, № 1 (63), pp. 31–50.
Chekantseva, Z.A. (2018), “Historicity and history in the intellectual culture of the 21st century”, Dialog so vremenem. Al'manah intellektual'noy istorii, № 65, pp. 6–20.
Chekantseva, Z.A. (ed.) (2019), Istoriki v poiskah novyh perspektiv [Historians in search of new perspectives], Akvilon, Moscow, Russia, 416 p.
Droit, E. & Reichherzer, F. (2013), “La fin de l'histoire du temps présent telle que nous l'avons connue. Plaidoyer franco-allemand pour l'abandon d'une singularité historiographique”, Vingtième Siècle: Revue d'histoire, № 118, pp. 121–145.
Escudier, A. (2009), “Temporalisation et modernité politique : penser avec Koselleck”, Annales. Histoire. Sci-ences Sociales, № 6, pp. 1269–1301.
Fabian, J. (1983), Time and the Other: How Anthropology Makes Its Object, Columbia University Press, New York, USA, 272 p.
Fasolt, C. (2014), Past Sense: Studies in Medieval and Early Modern European History, Brill, Leiden, Nether-lands, 658 p.
Garland, D. (2014), “What is a ‘history of the present’? On Foucault’s genealogies and their critical pre-conditions”, Punishment & Society, № 16(4), pp. 365–384.
Haydegger, M. (1997), Bytie i vremya [Being and time], Ad Marginem, Moscow, Russia, 326 p.
Jordheim, H. (2014), “Introduction: Multiple Times and the Work of Synchronization”, History and Theory, № 53, 4, pp. 498–518.
Kazakova, V.I. (2012), “Conceptualization of 'path dependence' in contemporary social science”, Vestnik NGTU im. R.E. Alekseeva. Seriya «Upravlenie v sotsial'nyh sistemah. Kommunikativnye tekhnologii», № 3, pp. 6–16.
Koselleck, R. (1990), Le futur passé: contribution à la sémantique des temps historiques, Ed. de l’EHESS, Paris, France, 334 p.
Koselleck, R. (1997), L’expérience de l’Histoire, Gallimard/Seuil, Paris, France, 247 p.
Le Goff, Zh. (2013), Istoriya i pamyat' [History and memory], ROSSPEN, Moscow, Russia, 302 p.
Luk'yanov, O.V. [2007], “Existential analysis and the nature of time. The trans-temporal nature of existential experience”, Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, № 299 (I), pp. 164-170.
Martin, S. (2002), “L'historicité radicale du langage”, Acta fabula, № 3, 2, available at: http://www.fabula.org/cr/278.php (accessed: 15.11.2017).
Meschonnic, H. (1982), Critique du rythme, Anthropologie historique du langage, Verdier, Lagrasse, France, 730 p.
Meshonnik, A. (2014), Rifma i zhizn' [Rhyme and life], OGI, Moscow, Russia, 400 p.
Morsel, J. (2016), “Traces ? Quelles traces ? Réflexions pour une histoire non passéiste”, Revue historique, № 680, pp. 813–868.
Noël, P.-M. (2012), “Les historiens québécois et la question de l’historicité de leur savoir”, Erudit, № 53, janvier – avril, pp. 11–39.
Nort, D. (1997), Instituty, institutsional'nye izmeneniya i formirovanie ekonomiki [Institutions, institutional change and economic shaping], Fond ekonomicheskoy knigi «Nachala», Moscow, Russia, 190 p.
Oleynikov, A. (2014), “Where does the past come from? Apology for anachronism”, Novoe literaturnoe obozre-nie, № 2 (126), pp. 337–344.
Osborn, P. (1995), The Politics of time: Modernity and Avant-Garde, Verso, London, UK, 285 p.
Rancière, J. (1992), Les noms de l’histoire. Essai de poétique du savoir, Le Seuil, Paris, France, 224 p.
Runia, E. (2014), Moved by the Past. Discontinuity and Historical Mutation, Columbia University Press, New York, USA, 246 p.
Rüsen, J. (2005), History, Narration, Interpretation, Orientation, Berghahn Books, New York; Oxford, USA; UK, 236 p.
Savel'eva, I. & A. Poletaev (2000), “History as knowledge of the past”, Logos, №2, pp. 39–74.
Savel'eva, I.M. & A.V. Poletaev (eds.) (2005), Fenomen proshlogo [Phenomenon of the past], GU-VShA, Mos-cow, Russia, 419 p.
Serto, M. de. (2001), “Varieties of writing, varieties of history. Introduction to the monograph «History as a Let-ter»”, Logos, № 4, pp. 7-18.
Shlykov, V. (2005), Pamyat' proshlyh drugih kak transtsendental'naya eksplikatsiya istorichnosti: k ontologii istoricheskogo soznaniya [The memory of past of others as a transcendental explication of historicity: toward an ontology of historical consciousness], SevNTU, Sevastopol', Ukraine, 256 p.
Tamm, M. & L. Olivier L. (eds.), (2019), Rethinking Historical Time. New Approaches to Presentism, Blooms-bury Publishing Plc., London, UK, 240 p.
Tanaka, S. (2019), History without Chronology, Lever Press, Amherst, USA, available: https://lib.ugent.be/catalog/ebk01:4100000010105022 (accessed: 25.11.2019).
Toshtendal', R. (2010), “The return of historicism? Neo-institutionalism and the 'historical turn' in the social sci-ences”, Dialog so vremenem, 30, pp. 14–25.
Tulmin, St. (1998), Chelovecheskoe ponimanie [Human understanding], BGK im. I.A. Boduena de Kurtena, Blagoveshhensk, Moscow, Russia, 304 p.
