Country house (dacha) as a space of autonomy for a modern subject
Keywords:
modernization, dacha, subjectivity, country house, second house, modernity, Soviet modern projectAbstract
Many citizens in modern cities tend to spend their leisure time in their country houses (dachas in Russian). This kind of second houses normally fulfill a compensatory function and can be regarded as a space of day-to-day experience of modernity. In this way country houses give valuable data for comparison of different modernity projects, such as those implemented in theUSSRand Western countries, and their consequences in everyday lives of ordinary people. On the basis of the variety of sources including field-work and archival data for the Soviet and Russian case and research literature from Western countries an attempt of such a comparison is undertaken in the article. Several general issues common for country house/dacha narratives in bothRussiaand Western countries were identified; every issue deals with a contradiction typical for modernizing societies. Firstly, life in a country house gives more opportunities for modern citizens to control their schedule, occupations, quality of food. Secondly, a country house provides a friendlier environment which forms stronger emotional ties in comparison with depersonalized spaces of a modern city. Then, both dacha and country house act as an important source of authenticity in the global urbanized world. One can see it in the trend to furnish country houses with old rural items. The last issue is consumption. Western people perceive their country houses as a place to relax and leave the race for brand new consumption items behind. The Russians’ habit to bring their old stuff to their dachas was first caused by the Soviet economy of shortage and later Russian crisis economy. However those old things nowadays tend to be perceived as vintage and to evoke nostalgic feelings. Western and Soviet modern projects succeeded in creating the same kind of a modern subject who is seeking escape from the control of big systems to build his/her own autonomous enclave and to implement his/her own personal projects. Due to the limited variety of sources on Western country-houses this conclusion is rather a hypothesis and needs further testing.References
Библиографический список
Высоковский А. Уют не герой // Жилище в России. Век ХХ. Архитектура и социальная история. М., 2001.
Джохадзе И. Homo faber и будущее труда // Логос. 2004. № 6. URL: http://magazines.russ.ru/
logos/2004/6/dzh1.html (дата обращения: 12.03.2014).
Касаткина А.К. Как садовый участок превратился в дачу // Конструируя «советское»? Политическое сознание, повседневные практики, новые идентичности: матер. науч. конф. студентов и аспирантов (15–16 апреля 2010 г., Санкт-Петербург). СПб., 2010.
Каспэ И. Границы советской жизни: представления о «частном» в изоляционистском обществе // НЛО. 2009. № 100.
Ловелл С. Дачники: История летнего житья в России 1710–2000. СПб., 2008.
Малинова-Тзиафета О. Из города на дачу. Социокультурные факторы освоения дачного пространства вокруг Петербурга (1860–1914). СПб., 2013.
Caldwell M. Dacha Idylls. Living Organically in Russia's Countryside. University of California Press, 2011.
Chaplin D. Consuming work/productive leisure: the consumption patterns of second home environments // Leisure Studies. 1999. Vol. 18.
Clarke S. Varshavskaya L. et al. The Myth of the Urban Peasant // Work, Employment and Society. 2000. Vol. 14, № 3.
Crowley D., S. Reid. Introduction: Pleasures in Socialism? // Pleasures in Socialism: Leisure and Luxury in the Eastern Bloc / еd. by D.Crowley, S. Reid. Northwestern University Press, 2010.
Eisenstadt S.N. Multiple Modernities // Daedalus. 2000. 129. 1.
Galtz N.R Space and the Everyday: an Historical Sociology of the Moscow Dacha: PhD diss. University of Michigan, 2000.
Garvey P. The Norwegian Country Cabin and Functionalism: a Tale of Two Modernities // Social Anthropolo-gy. 2008. Vol. 16, № 2.
Jamison M. The Joys of Gardening: Collectivist and Bureaucratic Cultures in Conflict // The Sociological Quar-terly. 1985. Vol. 26, № 4.
Larsen L. H., Kirkendall R. S. A History of Missouri: 1953 to 2003. University of Missouri Press, 2004. Vol. 6.
Lovell S. Soviet Exurbia: Dachas in Postwar Russia // Socialist Spaces: Sites of Everyday Life in the Eastern Bloc / еd. by D. Crowley, S. Reid. Berg, 2002.
Lovell S. Summerfolk. A History of the Dacha, 1710-2000. Ithaka; London: Cornell University Press, 2003.
Mottiar Z., B. Quinn. Shaping leisure/tourism places - the role of holiday home owners: a case study of Courtown, Co. Wexford, Ireland // Leisure Studies. 2003. Vol. 22.
Rose R., Tikhomirov Ye. Who Grows Food in Russia and Eastern Europe? // Post-Soviet Geography. 1993. Vol. 34. No. 2.
Seeth H., Chachnov S., Surinov A., Braun J. von. Russian poverty: Muddling through economic transition with garden plots // World Development. 1998. Vol. 26, No. 9.
Vysokovskii A. Will domesticity return? // Russian Housing in the Modern Age, Design and Social History / ed. by C. Brumfield & B.A. Ruble. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
White M. Sisters of the Soil: Urban Gardening as Resistance in Detroit // Race/ethnicity: Multidisciplinary Global Contexts. 2011. Vol. 5, № 1.
Williams D., Kaltenborn B. Leisure Places and Modernity: the Recreational Cottages in Norway and the USA // Leisure/Tourism Geographies: Geographical Knowledge / еd. by C. Crouch. Routledge, 1999.
Zavisca J. Contesting Capitalism at the Post-Soviet Dacha: the Meaning of Food Cultivation for Urban Russians // Slavic Review. 2003. Vol. 62, № 4.
References
Caldwell M. Dacha Idylls. Living Organically in Russia's Countryside. University of California Press, 2011.
Chaplin D. Consuming work/productive leisure: the consumption patterns of second home environments // Lei-sure Studies. 1999. Vol. 18. P. 41–55.
Clarke S. Varshavskaya L. et al. The Myth of the Urban Peasant // Work, Employment and Society. 2000. Vol. 14, № 3. P. 481–499.
Crowley D., S. Reid. Introduction: Pleasures in Socialism? // Pleasures in Socialism: Leisure and Luxury in the Eastern Bloc / Ed. by D., S. Reid. Northwestern University Press, 2010.
Dzhokhadze I. Homo faber i budushchee truda // Logos. 2004. № 6. URL: http://magazines.russ.ru/logos/2004/6/dzh1.html (data obrashcheniya: 12.03.2014).
Eisenstadt S.N. Multiple Modernities // Daedalus. 2000. 129. 1. P. 1–29.
Galtz N.R Space and the Everyday: an Historical Sociology of the Moscow Dacha. PhD dissertation, University of Michigan, 2000. P. 8–9.
Garvey P. The Norwegian Country Cabin and Functionalism: a Tale of Two Modernities // Social Anthropology. 2008. Vol. 16. № 2. P. 203–220.
Jamison M. The Joys of Gardening: Collectivist and Bureaucratic Cultures in Conflict // The Sociological Quar-terly. 1985. Vol. 26. № 4. P. 473–490.
Kasatkina A.K. Kak sadovyy uchastok prevratilsya v dachu // Konstruiruya «sovetskoe»? Politicheskoe soznanie, povsednevnye praktiki, novye identichnosti: Mater. nauch. konf. studentov i aspirantov (15–16 aprelya 2010 g., Sankt-Peterburg). SPb, 2010. P. 57–62.
Kaspe I. Granitsy sovetskoy zhizni: predstavleniya o «chastnom» v izolyatsionistskom obshchestve // NLO. 2009. № 100. P. 527–547.
Larsen L. H., Kirkendall R. S. A History of Missouri: 1953 to 2003. Vol. VI. University of Missouri Press. 2004.
Lovell S. Dachniki: Istoriya letnego zhit'ya v Rossii 1710–2000. SPb., 2008.
Lovell S. Soviet Exurbia: Dachas in Postwar Russia // Socialist Spaces: Sites of Everyday Life in the Eastern Bloc / Ed. by D. Crowley, S. Reid. Berg, 2002. P. 105–121
Lovell S. Summerfolk. A History of the Dacha, 1710-2000. Ithaka and London: Cornell University Press, 2003.
Malinova-Tziafeta O. Iz goroda na dachu. Sotsiokul'turnye faktory osvoeniya dachnogo prostranstva vokrug Peterburga (1860–1914). SPb., 2013.
Mottiar Z., B. Quinn. Shaping leisure/tourism places - the role of holiday home owners: a case study of Courtown, Co. Wexford, Ireland // Leisure Studies. 2003. Vol, 22. P. 109–127.
Rose, R. and Ye. Tikhomirov. Who Grows Food in Russia and Eastern Europe? // Post-Soviet Geography. 1993. Vol. 34. No. 2. Pp. 111–126.
Seeth H., S. Chachnov, A. Surinov, J. von Braun. Russian poverty: Muddling through economic transition with garden plots // World Development. 1998. Vol. 26. No. 9. Pp. 1611–1623.
Vysokovskii A. Will domesticity return? // Russian Housing in the Modern Age, Design and Social History / ed. by C. Brumfield & B.A. Ruble. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1993. Pp. 271–308.
Vysokovskii A. Uyut ne geroy // Zhilishche v Rossii. Vek XX. Arkhitektura i sotsial'naya istoriya. M., 2001.
White M. Sisters of the Soil: Urban Gardening as Resistance in Detroit // Race/ethnicity: Multidisciplinary Global Contexts. 2011. Vol. 5. № 1. P. 13–28.
Williams D., B. Kaltenborn. Leisure Places and Modernity: the Recreational Cottages in Norway and the USA // Leisure/Tourism Geographies: Geographical Knowledge / Ed. by C. Crouch. Routledge, 1999. P. 214–231.
Zavisca J. Contesting Capitalism at the Post-Soviet Dacha: the Meaning of Food Cultivation for Urban Russians // Slavic Review. 2003. Vol. 62. No. 4. Pp. 786–810.
