«Comrades! Let me thank you for entrusting me»: culture of trust in the soviet electoral process

Authors

  • A. A. Fokin Chelyabinsk State University

Keywords:

election, deputies, the Soviets, government and society, the 1960s and the 1970s, trust

Abstract

The 1960s and the 1970s were the time of the transformation of interactions between the government and the society. The government shifted to the arrangement and intensification of political communication channels, the organization of the areas and niches for the engagement of an individual into the field of cooperation and participation in the exercise of power. The institution of elections was a mechanism used for the reinforcement of trust between the government and the society. Developing the approach of Piotr Sztompka, the author states that the Soviet elections provided regulatory consistency, because they were based on customary legal and moral standards. They provided the stability of social order through the consistency and predictability of the voting process. The transparency of social organization lied in the public nature of elections and the roles of deputies as the people's representatives; in its turn, it provided accountability and, as a result, created an idea of the understandability of the world around. The idea of trust was also directly present in the Soviet elections. The records of meetings to nominate candidates for deputies show that this term was widely used and ritualized. Additionally, the invocation of trust during the Soviet elections manifested itself in the figure of constituency agents of deputy candidates. The principles of the Soviet democracy were considerably different from the liberal variant of democracy and were based not on the competition model, but on certain game rules. The elections in the USSR in the 1960s and the 1970s were an attempt to amalgamate some democratic features with the predictability of the results for the government and the population. It appears that the significant part of the population accepted those specific features of the elections in the USSR in exchange for social, economic, and political stability.

Author Biography

A. A. Fokin, Chelyabinsk State University

Candidate of Science in History, Associate Professor, Chelyabinsk State University (Russia)

References

Список источников

Областной государственный архив Челябинской области (ОГАЧО). Ф. Р-274. Оп. 10. Д. 1731, 1733, 1819, 1864а.

Российский государственный архив новейшей истории (РГАНИ). Ф. 5. Оп. 61. Д. 23.

Российский государственный архив социально-политической истории (РГАСПИ). Ф. 591. Оп. 1. Д. 110.

Библиографический список

Горлицкий Й. Структуры доверия после Сталина // Неприкосновенный запас. 2013. №6 (092).

Кулевиг Э. Народный протест в хрущевскую эпоху: Девять рассказов о неповиновении в СССР. М., 2009.

Левин М. Советский век. М., 2008.

Тихомиров А. «Режим принудительного доверия» в Советской России, 1917–1941 гг. // Неприкосновен-ный запас. 2013. №6 (092).

Фокин А.А. «Коммунизм не за горами»: образы коммунистического будущего у власти и населения СССР в 1950–1970-х гг. Челябинск, 2012.

Фреик Н.В. Концепция доверия в исследованиях П. Штомпки // Социс. 2006. № 1.

Хоскинг Дж. Доверие и недоверие в СССР: общий обзор // Неприкосновенный запас. 2013. №6 (092).

Хупер С. Доверие и террор: в поисках научного подхода к кадрам // Неприкосновенный запас. 2013. №6 (092).

Юрчак А. Это было навсегда, пока не кончилось. Последнее советское поколение. М., 2014.

Patzelt W.J. Elections in Modern Dictatorships: Some Analytical Considerations // Voting for Hitler and Stalin: Elections Under 20th Century Dictatorships. Campus Verlag, 2011.

Tikhomirov A. The Regime of Forced Trust: Making and Breaking Emotional Bonds between People and State in Soviet Russia, 1917–1941 // Slavonic and East European Review, Special Issue «Trust and Distrust in the USSR». 2013. Vol. 91, No. 1, January.

References

Fokin A.A. «Kommunizm ne za gorami»: obrazy kommunisticheskogo budushchego u vlasti i naseleniya SSSR v 1950-1970-kh gg. Chelyabinsk, 2012.

Freik N.V. Kontseptsiya doveriya v issledovaniyakh P. Shtompki. Sotsis. 2006. № 1.

Gorlitskiy Y. Struktury doveriya posle Stalina. Neprikosnovennyy zapas. 2013. №6 (092).

Khosking Dzh. Doverie i nedoverie v SSSR: obshchiy obzor. Neprikosnovennyy zapas. 2013. №6 (092).

Khuper S. Doverie i terror: v poiskakh nauchnogo podkhoda k kadram. Neprikosnovennyy zapas. 2013. №6 (092).

Kulevig E. Narodnyy protest v khrushchevskuyu epokhu. Devyat' rasskazov o nepovinovenii v SSSR. M., 2009.

Levin M. Sovetskiy vek. M., 2008.

Oblastnoy gosudarstvennyy arkhiv Chelyabinskoy oblasti (OGAChO). F. R-274. Op. 10. D. 1731, 1733, 1819, 1864a.

Patzelt W.J. Elections in Modern Dictatorships: Some Analytical Considerations. Voting for Hitler and Stalin: Elections Under 20th Century Dictatorships. Campus Verlag, 2011.

Rossiyskiy gosudarstvennyy arkhiv noveyshey istorii (RGANI). F. 5. Op. 61. D. 23.

Rossiyskiy gosudarstvennyy arkhiv sotsial'no-politicheskoy istorii (RGASPI). F. 591. Op. 1. D. 110.

Tikhomirov A. «Rezhim prinuditel'nogo doveriya» v Sovetskoy Rossii, 1917-1941 gody. Neprikosnovennyy zapas. 2013. №6 (092).

Tikhomirov A. The Regime of Forced Trust: Making and Breaking Emotional Bonds between People and State in Soviet Russia, 1917–1941, in: Slavonic and East European Review, Special Issue «Trust and Distrust in the USSR», Vol. 91, No. 1, January 2013.

Yurchak A. Eto bylo navsegda, poka ne konchilos'. Poslednee sovetskoe pokolenie. M., 2014.

Published

2020-07-22

How to Cite

Fokin, A. A. (2020). «Comrades! Let me thank you for entrusting me»: culture of trust in the soviet electoral process. PERM UNIVERSITY HERALD. History, 30(3), 110–115. Retrieved from https://press.psu.ru/index.php/history/article/view/3473