TRAVELOGUE BY ANDREI KRASNOV FROM HIS TRIP TO INDIA IN THE CONTEXT OF ORIENTALISM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17072/2219-3111-2025-4-96-108Keywords:
Travelogue, scientific expedition, historical and ethnographic heritage, British India, British Empire, orientalism, postcolonialismAbstract
Indian chapters from the travelogue of Russian scientist and traveler Andrei Krasnov From the Cradle of Civilization. Letters from the Circumnavigation (1898) are considered in the context of Orientalism, in accordance with key concepts, set forth by Edward Said. Drawing on the polemic in Western academic circles concerning the supposed specificity of Russian orientalism, that was initiated in 2000 by Nathaniel Knight, the paper analyzes the perception by Andrei Krasnov of Indian culture, as well as colonial activities and attitudes of the British in India. The paper argues that in contrast to the concept of the dichotomy of East and West, which is pivotal for Orientalism, the Russian researcher focuses more on perceived similarities rather than differences between the cultures of the peoples of India and the Russian Empire. The result of this approach is the closing of civilizational gap and the deconstruction of the image of an Indian as the ontological “Other”. From the travelogue, the scientist’s ambivalent position towards the British in India also becomes apparent. He highly appreciates their contribution to the development of the country, but is critical of their attitude towards its population. A conclusion is made about the idiosyncrasy of the perception of Andrei Krasnov and the inconsistency of his reasoning with the paradigm of Orientalism. It is suggested that a close study of the works of Russian authors of the 19th century in the context of Orientalist and postcolonial theories can help better understand not only Russian Orientalism, but also Russian historical identity.References
Абашин С.Н. В.П. Наливкин: «…будет то, что неизбежно должно быть; и то, что неизбеж-но должно быть, уже не может не быть…». Кризис ориентализмов Российской империи? // Азиатская Россия: люди и структуры империи: сб. науч. ст. к 50-летию со дня рождения проф. А.В. Ремнева / под ред. Н.Г. Суворовой. Омск: Изд-во Омск. гос. ун-та, 2005. С. 47‒102.
Бобровников В. Почему мы маргиналы? Заметки на полях русского перевода «Ориента-лизма» Эдварда Саида // Ab imperio. 2008. Т. 2008, № 2. С. 325‒344. EDN: PBZRMT.
Буйнова К.Р. Далекое близкое: русские путешественники XIX в. О рабстве в Латинской Америке // Вестник Моск. ун-та. История. 2013. Вып. 5. С. 3‒11. EDN: RMRWJR.
Буйнова К.Р. Латинская Америка в восприятии русских путешественников XIX – начала XX в. // Российская история. 2015. Вып. 2. С. 99‒111. EDN: TRQBGZ.
Васильцов К.С. Россия и «азиятцы»: риторика и практика российского ориентализма // Русский ориентализм (наука, искусство, коллекции). СПб.: МАЭ РАН, 2019. С. 8‒26.
Индуизм. Джайнизм. Сикхизм: словарь / под общ. ред. М.Ф. Альбедиль, А.М. Дубянского. М.: Республика, 1996. 576 c.
Кучерская М. История одного заблуждения (Эдвард В. Саид. Ориентализм. Западные кон-цепции Востока) // Отечественные записки. 2007. № 1. С. 363‒365.
Резван М.Е. «Москва, Астрахань, Персия, Индия!» (вместо предисловия) // Русский ориен-тализм (наука, искусство, коллекции) / отв. ред. М. Резван. СПб.: МАЭ РАН, 2019. С. 7‒16.
Рейтблат А.И. «Ориентализм» и русский ориентализм (обзор книг по ориентализму в русских востоковедении и литературе) [Электронный ресурс] // Новое литературное обо-зрение. 2020. № 1. С. 392‒400. URL: https://magazines.gorky.media/nlo/2020/1/orientalizm-i-russkij- orientalizm.html (дата обращения: 13.12.2024). EDN: JUIDNZ.
Русско-индийские отношения в XIX веке: сб. архив. документов и материалов / отв. ред. П.М. Шаститко. М.: Восточная литература РАН, 1997. 374 c.
Савицкий Е.Е. Для чего нам нужны постколониальные исследования? // Вестник РГГУ. Литературоведение. Языкознание. Культурология. 2013. № 7 (108). С. 25‒33. EDN: QIWZKX.
Стасевич И.В. Российские востоковеды и этнографы в Киргизии (история и перспективы изучения региона) // Русский ориентализм (наука, искусство, коллекции) / отв. ред. М. Рез-ван. СПб.: МАЭ РАН, 2019. С. 36‒61.
Эткинд А. Бремя бритого человека, или Внутренняя колонизация России // Ab imperio. 2002. Т. 2002, № 1. С. 265‒298. EDN: PDAFIX.
Khalid A. Russian History and the Debate over Orientalism // Kritika: Explorations in Russian and Eurasian History. 2000а. Vol. 1, no. 4. P. 691‒699.
Knight N. Grigor'ev in Orenburg, 1851‒1862: Russian Orientalism in the Service of Empire? // Slavic Review. 2000b. Vol. 59, no. 1. P. 74‒100. EDN: HADFOP.
Knight N. On Russian Orientalism: A Response to Adeeb Khalid // Kritika: Explorations in Rus-sian and Eurasian History. 2000с. Vol. 1, no. 4. P. 701‒715.
Leerssen J. Imagology: History and method // Imagology / ed. by M. Beller, J. Leerssen. Leiden: Brill, 2007. P. 17‒32.
Said E.W. Orientalism. New York: Vintage Books, 1979.
Said E.W. Orientalism Reconsidered // Cultural Critique. 1985. No. 1. P. 89‒107.
Schimmelpenninck Van Der Oye D. The Curious Fate of Edward Said in Russia // Études de let-tres. 2014. No. 2-3. P. 81‒94.
Todorova M. Does Russian Orientalism Have a Russian Soul? A Contribution to the Debate be-tween Nathaniel Knight and Adeeb Khalid // Kritika: Explorations in Russian and Eurasian His-tory. 2000. Vol. 1, no. 4. P. 717‒727.
References
Abashin, S. N. (2005). V.P. Nalivkin: ‘...there will be what must inevitably be; and what must inevitably be, can no longer not be...’. Crisis of Orientalism of the Russian Empire? In N. G. Suvorova (Ed.), Aziatskaya Rossiya: lyudi i struktury imperii: sbornik nauchnykh statei. K 50-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya professora A. V. Remneva [Asian Russia: People and structures of the empire: A collection of scientific articles. To the 50th anniversary of the birth of Professor A. V. Remnev] (pp. 47–102). Omsk State University Press.
Albedil, M. F., & Dubyanskiy, A. M. (Eds.). (1996). Induizm. Dzhainizm. Sikkhizm: Slovar' [Hinduism. Jainism. Sikhism: Dictionary]. Respublika.
Bobrovnikov, V. (2008). Why are we marginalised?: Notes in the margins of Edward Said's Russian translation of Orientalism. Ab Imperio, 2008(2), 325–344.
Buinova, K. R. (2013). Distant close: Russian travelers of the 19th century. About slavery in Latin America. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 8. Istoriya, 5, 3–11.
Buinova, K. R. (2015). Latin America in the perception of Russian travelers of the 19th and early 20th centuries. Rossiyskaya istoriya, 2, 99–111.
Etkind, A. (2002). The burden of the shaven man, or the internal colonisation of Russia. Ab Imperio, 2002(1), 265–298.
Khalid, A. (2000). Russian history and the debate over orientalism. Kritika: Explorations in Russian and Eura-sian History, 1(4), 691–699.
Knight, N. (2000). Grigor'ev in Orenburg, 1851-1862: Russian orientalism in the service of Empire? Slavic Re-view, 59(1), 74–100.
Knight, N. (2000). On Russian Orientalism: A response to Adeeb Khalid. Kritika: Explorations in Russian and Eurasian History, 1(4), 701–715.
Kucherskaya, M. (2007). History of one misconception (Edward W. Said. Orientalism. Western concepts of the Orient). Otechestvennye zapiski, 1, 363–365.
Leerssen, J. (2007). Imagology: History and method. In M. Beller & J. Leerssen (Eds.), Imagology (pp. 17–32). Brill.
Reytblat, A. I. (2020). «Orientalism» and Russian Orientalism (review of books on Orientalism in Russian Asian studies and literature). Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 1, 392–400. Retrieved December 13, 2024, from https://www.nlobooks.ru/magazines/novoe_literaturnoe_obozrenie/161_nlo_1_2020/article/21990/
Rezvan, M. E. (2019). «Moscow, Astrakhan, Persia, India!» (instead of a preface). In M. Rezvan (Ed.), Russkiy orientalizm (nauka, iskusstvo, kollektsii) [Russian Orientalism (science, art, collections)] (pp. 7–16). MAE RAN.
Said, E. W. (1979). Orientalism. Vintage Books.
Said, E. W. (1985). Orientalism reconsidered. Cultural Critique, 1, 89–107.
Savitskiy, E. E. (2013). Why do we need postcolonial studies? Vestnik RGGU. Seriya: Literaturovedenie. Yazy-koznanie. Kul'turologiya, 7(108), 25–33.
Schimmelpenninck van der Oye, D. (2014). The curious fate of Edward Said in Russia. Études de lettres, 2-3, 81–94.
Shastitko, P. M. (Ed.). (1997). Russko-indiyskie otnosheniya v XIX v. Sbornik arkhivnykh dokumentov i materi-alov [Russian-Indian relations in the 19th century. Collection of archival documents and materials]. “Vos-tochnaya literatura” RAN.
Stasevich, I. V. (2019). Russian orientalists and ethnographers in Kyrgyzstan (history and prospects of studying the region). In M. Rezvan (Ed.), Russkiy orientalizm (nauka, iskusstvo, kollektsii) [Russian Orientalism (science, art, collections)] (pp. 36–61). MAE RAN.
Todorova, M. (2000). Does Russian orientalism have a Russian soul? A contribution to the debate between Na-thaniel Knight and Adeeb Khalid. Kritika: Explorations in Russian and Eurasian History, 1(4), 717–727.
Vasil'tsov, K. S. (2019). Russia and the «Asians»: Rhetoric and practice of Russian Orientalism. In M. Rezvan (Ed.), Russkiy orientalizm (nauka, iskusstvo, kollektsii) [Russian Orientalism (science, art, collections)] (pp. 8–26). MAE RAN.
