SITE SELECTION FOR LARGE-SCALE INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUC-TION IN THE USSR IN THE 1930S (USING THE EXAMPLE OF THE BAKALSKY METALLURGICAL PLANT)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17072/2219-3111-2025-3-163-175Keywords:
Chelyabinsk, Urals, unrealized project, industrialization, spatial planning, ghost constructionAbstract
The article examines the procedure of selecting and approving the construction site for the Bakalsky Metallurgical Plant, an unrealized industrial construction project from the era of the first five-year plans. The author concludes that the site near the village of Alekseyevka in the mining zone of the Southern Urals, which was optimal in terms of economic indicators, expressed the pragmatics of spatial dispersion of industry, which met the economic and managerial interests of the highest party and regional leadership. A different strategy – the concentration of industrial enterprises in large industrial centers – was followed by the Main Directorate of the Metallurgical Industry of the Supreme Council of the National Economy of the USSR, which lobbied for the choice of a "risky" site near the city of Chelyabinsk. The approval of the latter as the location for the plant was determined not by the objective merits of the option, but by the priority status of the city in the industrialization program of Ural. The acquisition of this status was accompanied by the implementation of a comprehensive physical-geographical and economic examination of the city's territory, the fact of which (and not its results) predetermined the placement of the plant in Chelyabinsk. The acceleration of the decision to place the plant on a "risky" site was due to the desire of economic agents to comply with the directive deadlines for the deployment of construction in the context of the center's fluid ideas about the raw material base and the territorial nature of the project as intra- or interregional. In conclusion, the author assumes about the "freezing" of large industrial construction projects because of economic departments occupying sites suitable for large-scale industrial construction with the aim of reactivating them at an appropriate time in accordance with current instructions from the center.References
Баканов С.А. Угольная промышленность Урала: жизненный цикл отрасли от зарождения до упадка. Челябинск: Энциклопедия, 2012. 328 с.
Бугров К.Д. Между горой и рекой: формирование городского пространства Златоуста 1930-х – 1940-х гг. // Вестник Том. гос. ун-та. История. 2021. № 74. С. 5–14. DOI: 10.17223/19988613/74/1. EDN: WRKQZB.
Бугров К.Д., Симонов М.А. Уголь, нефть и железные руды: индустриальное планирование и трансформация представлений об Урале в экономической мысли СССР (1920–1930-е гг.) // История: электрон. науч.-образоват. журнал. 2023. T. 14, № 5 (127). DOI: 10.18254/S207987840013837-9. EDN: LBJDDZ.
Время. Люди. Сталь: к 70-летию Челябинского металлургического комбината / авт.-сост. Л.П. Ярош. Челябинск: Авто Граф, 2013. 352 с.
Золотов А.А. Путь длиной в 60 лет. Челябинская ТЭЦ-1. Челябинск: [б. и.], 2001. 270 с.
Меерович М.Г. Административно-хозяйственное районирование страны в 1920–1930-х гг. – основа градостроительной политики советского государства // Советское градострои-тельство 1920–1930-х годов: новые исследования и материалы / сост. и отв. ред. Ю.Л. Ко-сенкова. М.: Книжный дом «ЛИБРОКОМ», 2010. С. 8–28.
Седых А.Д. Одна из великих побед техники // Газохимия. 2008. № 3 (2). С. 70–73.
Сысов А.И. «Бакал-гигант»: поиск оптимальных вариантов строительства завода // Архив в социуме – социум в архиве: материалы регион. науч.-
практ. конф. / сост., науч. ред. Н.А. Антипин. Челябинск: Челяб. дом печати, 2018. С. 228–231.
Сысов А.И. Районные органы власти и их роль в модернизационных процессах на Южном Урале в середине 20–30-х гг. ХХ в. // Вестник Юж.-Урал. гос. ун-та. Социально-гуманитарные науки. 2019. Т. 19, № 2. С. 73–78. DOI: 10.14529/ssh190210. EDN: ZBMMPB.
Твердюкова Е.Д. Пространственное размещение промышленности и населения в СССР в 1930-е гг. // Труды исторического факультета Санкт-Петербургского университета. 2010. № 1. С. 412–430.
Хакимов Р.Ш. Использование водных ресурсов озера Аргази: прошлое, настоящее, буду-щее. Челябинск: Изд-во Челяб. гос. ун-та, 2021. 108 с. ISBN: 978-5-7271-1722-4. EDN: ZQBNPM.
Appel H., Anand N., Gupta A. Temporality, Politics, and the Promise of Infrastructure // The promise of Infrastructure / eds. N. Anand, A. Gupta, H. Appel. Durham: Duke University Press, 2018. P. 1–38. DOI: 10.1215/9781478002031-001.
Kotkin S. Magnetic Mountain: Stalinism as a Civilization. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995. 640 p.
References
Appel, H., Anand, N., & Gupta, A. (2018). Temporality, politics, and the promise of infrastructure. In N. Anand, A. Gupta, & H. Appel (Eds.), The promise of infrastructure (pp. 1–38). Duke University Press.
Bakanov, S. A. (2012). Ugol'naya promyshlennost' Urala: zhiznennyy tsikl otrasli ot zarozhdeniya do upadka [Coal industry of the Urals: Life cycle of the industry from inception to decline]. Entsiklopediya.
Bugrov, K. D. (2021). Between the mountain and the river: The formation of the urban space of Zlatoust in the 1930s–1940s. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Istoriya, 74, 5–14.
Bugrov, K. D., & Simonov, M. A. (2023). Coal, oil, and iron ore: Industrial planning and the transformation of ideas about the Urals in the economic thought of the USSR (1920s–1930s). ENOZh Istoriya, 14(5).
Khakimov, R. Sh. (2021). Ispol'zovanie vodnykh resursov ozera Argazi: proshloe, nastoyashchee, budushchee [Use of water resources of Lake Argazi: Past, present, future]. Izd-vo Chelyab. gos. un-ta.
Kotkin, S. (1995). Magnetic mountain: Stalinism as a civilization. University of California Press.
Meerovich, M. G. (2010). Administrative and economic regionalization of the country in the 1920s–1930s as the basis of the urban planning policy of the Soviet state. In Yu. L. Kosenkova (Ed.), Sovetskoe gradostroitel'stvo 1920–1930-kh godov: Novye issledovaniya i materialy [Soviet urban planning of the 1920s–1930s: New research and materials] (pp. 8–28). Knizhnyy dom «LIBROKOM».
Sedykh, A. D. (2008). One of the great victories of technology. Gazokhimiya, 3(2), 70–73.
Sysov, A. I. (2018). "Bakal-giant": The search for optimal variants of plant construction. In N. A. Antipin (Ed.), Arkhiv v sotsiume – sotsium v arkhive: materialy region. nauch.-prakt. konf. [Archive in society – society in the archive: Materials of the regional scientific and practical conference] (pp. 228–231). OAO «Chelyabinskiy Dom pechati».
Sysov, A. I. (2019). District authorities and their role in modernization processes in the Southern Urals in the mid-1920s–1930s. Vestnik Yuzhno-Ural'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya “Sotsial'no-gumanitarnye nauki”, 19(2), 73–78.
Tverdyukova, E. D. (2010). Spatial distribution of industry and population in the USSR in the 1930s. Trudy is-toricheskogo fakul'teta Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta, 1, 412–430.
Yarosh, L. P. (2013). Vremya. Lyudi. Stal' : k 70-letiyu Chelyabinskogo metallurgicheskogo kombinata [Time. People. Steel: 70th anniversary of Chelyabinsk Metallurgical Combine]. Avto Graf.
Zolotov, A. A. (2001). Put' dlinoy v 60 let. Chelyabinskaya TETs-1 [A 60-year-long path. Chelyabinsk TPP-1]. Chelyabinsk.
