THE “`BIG MASQUERADE” OF 1740 AND LEGISLATIVE COMMISSION CLERKS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17072/2219-3111-2025-3-69-77Keywords:
patron-client relationships, Legislative Commissions, early modern period, bureaucracy, public administrationAbstract
The article is dedicated to the principles of recruiting and operating the Masquerade Commission, a temporary government institution that was established specifically for the planning of the “Big Masquerade” of 1740. This topic has been poorly studied in existing historical literature. The case of the Masquerade Commission is interpreted as a representative example of formal and informal ruling practices in early modern Russia. There is no legislative act or another official document that would govern the establishment, structure, and operations of this institution. Meanwhile, as established in the article, clerks of Legislative Commission were involved in Masquerade Commission operations. They were one of the most highly qualified Russian officials responsible for development of legal acts drafts that seemed to be objective of a higher priority than the masquerade. Using the case of the Masquerade Commission as an example, it is concluded that informal ruling practices played a significant role within Russian government system. Such practices didn’t perceive as a deviation, but rather were feature of public administration in early modern period. The case of the Masquerade Commission illustrates flexibility of this system in which people were not just obedient executors but rather actors. It is argued that cases such as the Masquerade Commission raise broader historiographic questions and encourage the reconsideration of the type of authority in early modern Russia.References
Бабич М.В. Государственные учреждения XVIII века: комиссии петровского времени. М.: РОССПЭН, 2003. 477 с. ISBN: 5-8243-0466-1. EDN: QVRDHP.
Курукин И.В. Эпоха «дворских бурь»: очерки политической истории послепетровской России, 1725–1762 гг. Рязань, 2003. 570 с.
Курукин И.В. Артемий Волынский и его клиенты // Правящие элиты и дворянство России во время и после петровских реформ (1682–1750). М.: РОССПЭН, 2013. С. 225–233. EDN: RWSWLT.
Латкин В.Н. Законодательные комиссии в России в XVIII ст. Историко-юридическое ис-следование. СПб.: Издание Л. Ф. Пантелеева, 1887. Т. 1. 607 с.
Петрухинцев Н.Н. Внутренняя политика Анны Иоанновны (1730–1740). М.: РОССПЭН, 2014. 1063 с. ISBN: 978-5-8243-1927-9. EDN: VUMAUL.
Русский биографический словарь / под наблюдением А.А. Половцова. СПб.: Тип. В. Де-макова, 1904. Т. XVIII. 673 с.
Соловьев С.М. Сочинения: в 18 кн. М.: Мысль, 1993. Кн. X. 751 с.
Успенский Б.А. Вокруг Тредиаковского: труды по истории русского языка и русской куль-туры. М.: Индрик, 2008. 608 с.
Хеншелл Н. Миф абсолютизма: перемены и преемственность в развитии западноевропей-ской монархии раннего Нового времени. СПб.: Алетейя, 2003. 272 с.
Babkova G.O. Avraam Stepanovich Sverchkov and “Embezzlers”: Family Connections Within Russian Bureaucracy in the First Half of the 18th Century // Cahiers du Monde russe. 2016. Vol. 57, no. 2–3. P. 609–640. DOI: 10.4000/monderusse.8375. EDN: STWQCR.
LeDonne J.P. Absolutism and Ruling Class: The Formation of the Russian Political Order, 1700–1825. N.Y.; Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991. 376 p. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780195068054.001.0001.
References
Babich, M. V. (2003). Gosudarstvennye uchrezhdeniya XVIII veka: Komissii petrovskogo vremeni [State institu-tions of the 18th century: The commissions of the Peter the Great’s period]. ROSSPEN.
Babkova, G. O. (2016). Avraam Stepanovich Sverchkov and «Embezzlers»: Family connections within Russian bureaucracy in the first half of the 18th century. Cahiers du Monde Russe, 57(2–3), 609–640.
Henshall, N. (2003). Mif absolyutizma: Peremeny i preemstvennost' v razvitii zapadnoevropeyskoy monarkhii rannego Novogo vremeni [The myth of absolutism: Changes and continuity in the development of the Early Modern Western European monarchy]. Aleteiya.
Kurukin, I. V. (2003). Epokha «dvorskikh bur'»: Ocherki politicheskoy istorii poslepetrovskoy Rossii 1725–1762 [The era of palace revolutions: Historical essays on the politics of post-Petrine Russia, 1725–1762]. Rya-zan.
Kurukin, I. V. (2013). Artemy Volynsky and his clients. In N. N. Petrukhintsev & L. Erren (Eds.), Pravyashchiye elity i dvoryanstvo Rossii vo vremya i posle petrovskikh reform (1682–1750) [The ruling elites and the nobility of Russia during and after Peter the Great's reforms] (pp. 225–233). ROSSPEN.
Latkin, V. N. (1887). Zakonodatel'nye komissii v Rossii v XVIII st. Istoriko-yuridicheskoe issledovanie [Legisla-tive commissions in Russia in the 18th century: Historical and legal research]. Izdanie L.F. Panteleeva.
LeDonne, J. P. (1991). Absolutism and ruling class: The formation of the Russian political order, 1700–1825. Oxford University Press.
Petrukhintsev, N. N. (2014). Vnutrennyaya politika Anny Ioannovny (1730–1740) [The internal politics of Anna Ioannovna (1730–1740)]. ROSSPEN.
Polovtsov, A. A. (Ed.). (1904). Russkiy biograficheskiy slovar' [Russian biographical dictionary] (Vol. 18). Tipo-grafiya V. Demakova.
Solovyov, S. M. (1993). Sochineniya v vosemnadtsati knigakh [Essays in eighteen books] (Vol. 10). Mysl'.
Uspenskiy, B. A. (2008). Vokrug Trediakovskogo: Trudy po istorii russkogo yazyka i russkoy kul'tury [Around Trediakovskiy: Works on the history of the Russian language and Russian culture]. Indrik.
