Tradition in Vietnam: reality or a simulacrum?
Philosophy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2024-2-241-249Keywords:
tradition, Vietnam, traditionalism, spiritual practice, religion, ontological incompletenessAbstract
The article is devoted to the phenomenon of traditionalism in the context of human ontological incompleteness. In culture, there are different ways of representing incompleteness, which can be overcome or corrected. In global reality, the crisis of identity and the sense of increased insufficiency relate to the structural change of personality and identity in a dynamic social reality, where virtual way of the human opening to the world plays an increasingly important role, and types of ontic existence multiply. The response to the increased incompleteness is two postsecular vectors of virtualization — a direct departure into virtuality and traditionalism, the impulse of which is a return to the social reality in some form, taken from the past, that would ensure rootedness, namely that into tradition, and a return to religion in inextricable connection with its national carrier. In the light of the concept of ontological incompleteness and based on field research on traditionalism in Vietnam and other countries, the authors explicate traditionalism as the virtualization of reality and manipulative substitution of the ontological with the ontic. The peculiarity of traditionalism as a worldview and ideology is that it represents tradition itself as a value, whereas it is a construct for the preservation and transmission of values. The paper shows that traditionalism is the most radical cultural form of return of the cultural structures of the historical past, which is represented as a spiritual need. However, these structures are outdated, not constructive, and addressing them, instead of overcoming incompleteness, turns man into a self-sufficient structure, which contradicts the fundamental ontological openness of the human being. The authors explain traditionalism in Vietnam and some other countries as the invention of tradition not based on the historical ground, and show how tradition turns into a simulacrum and virtualization of reality.References
Антощенко В.И. Мифологические персонажи в государственном пантеоне духов во Вьетнаме // Вестник Московского университета. Серия 13: Востоковедение. 2002. № 4. С. 108–131.
Бодрийяр Ж. Симулякры и симуляция / пер. с фр. О.А. Печенкина. Тула, 2013. 204 с.
Быстров В.Ю. Человек в мире традиций: монография. Великий Новгород: НовГУ им. Ярослава Мудрого, 2001. 159 с.
Дугин А.Г. Философия традиционализма. М.: Арктогея-Центр, 2002. 624 с.
Макаров А.И. Традиция против истории в философии современного европейского традиционализма // Диалог со временем: Альманах интеллектуальной истории. М.: Едиториал УРСС, 2001. Вып. 6. С. 275–283.
Новакова О.В. Вьетнам: поиск культурной идентичности в новых политических реалиях // Юго-Восточная Азия: историческая память, этнокультурная идентичность и политическая реальность: сб. статей / отв. ред. Н.Н. Бектимирова. М.: Ключ-С, 2009. Вып. 1. С. 258–275.
Старикова Е.О. Конструирование образа национальной культуры во Вьетнаме // Азия и Африка сегодня. 2020. № 1. С. 61–65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/s032150750008525-9
Хайдеггер М. Бытие и время / пер. с нем. В.В. Бибихина. Харьков: Фолио, 2003. 510 с.
Хобсбаум Э. Изобретение традиций / пер. с англ. С.А. Панарина // Вестник Евразии. 2000. № 1. С. 47–62.
Хоружий С.С. Злоключения традиции, или Почему нужно защищать традицию от традиционалистов // Вопросы философии. 2017. № 9. С. 104–120.
Хоружий С.С. Проблематика рисков современности: концептуальные основания и ведущие подходы // Фонарь Диогена: человек в многообразии практик. 2015. № 1. С. 131–157.
Цветов П.Ю. Короли Хунги: от историографической проблемы к государственному культу // Восток (ORIENS). 2004. № 4. С. 109–114.
Элиаде М. Трактат по истории религий: в 2 т. / пер. с фр. А.А. Васильева. СПб.: Алетейя, 2000. 394 с., 415 с.
Kelley L.C. The Biography of the Hồng Bàng Clan as a Medieval Vietnamese Invented Tradition // Journal of Vietnamese Studies. 2012. Vol. 7, iss. 2. P. 87–130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/ vs.2012.7.2.87
Krapchunov D.E. Maximova E.V. Freedom of Belief and Ecological Consciousness in India // Perishable and Eternal: Mythologies and Social Technologies of Digital Civilization: Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference (Veliky Novgorod, November 22–23, 2021). London, UK: European Publisher Ltd., 2021. Vol. 1. P. 681–687. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2021.12.03.91
Sedgwick M. Against the modern world: Traditionalism and the secret intellectual history of the twentieth century. N.Y.: Oxford University Press, 2004. 370 p. Taylor K.W. The Birth of Vietnam. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1983. 397 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520343108 What is Intangible Cultural Heritage? / UNESCO. 2011. URL: https://ich.unesco.org/en/collection00002 (accessed: 21.01.2024).
Zuckerman P. Atheism: Contemporary Numbers and Patterns // The Cambridge Companion to Athe
ism / ed. by M. Martin. N.Y.: Cambridge University Press, 2006. P. 47–66. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.1017/ccol0521842700.004
References
Antoshenko, V. I. (2002). [Mythological characters in the State pantheon of spirits in Vietnam]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 13. Vostokovedenie [Lomonosov Oriental Studies Journal]. No. 4, pp. 108–131.
Baudrillard, J. (2013). Simulyakr i simulyatsiya [Simulacra and simulation]. Tula, 204 p.
Bystrov, V.Yu. (2001). Chelovek v mire traditsiy [А man in the world of tradition]. Veliky Novgorod: NovGU Publ., 159 p.
Eliade, M. (2000). Traktat po istorii religiy: v 2 t. [A treatise on the History of Religions: in 2 vols]. St. Petersburg: Aleteya. 394 p., 415 p. Dugin, A.G. (2002). Filosofiya traditsionalizma [The philosophy of traditionalism]. Moscow: Arktogeya-Tsentr Publ., 624 p. Heidegger, M. (2003). Bytie i vremya [Being and time]. Kharkov: Folio Publ., 510 p.
Hobsbawm, E. (2000). [The invention of traditions]. Vestnik Evrazii [Bulletin of Eurasia]. No. 1, pp. 47–62.
Kelley, L.C. (2012). The biography of the Hồng Bàng Clan as a medieval Vietnamese invented tradition. Journal of Vietnamese Studies. Vol. 7, iss. 2, pp. 87–130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/ vs.2012.7.2.87
Khoruzhiy, S.S. (2015). [Problematics of risks of modernity: conceptual foundations and leading approaches]. Fonar’ Diogena: chelovek v mnogoobrazii praktik [Diogenes’ Lantern: the Human Being in Diversity of Practice]. No. 1, pp. 131–157.
Khoruzhiy, S.S. (2017). [Misadventures of the tradition or why it is necessary to defend the tradition from traditionalists]. Voprosy Filosofii. No. 9, pp. 104–120.
Krapchunov, D.E. and Maximova, E.V. (2021). Freedom of belief and ecological consciousness in India. Perishable and Eternal: Mythologies and Social Technologies of Digital Civilization: Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference (Veliky Novgorod, November 22–23, 2021). London, UK: European Publisher Ltd., vol. 1, pp. 681–687. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15405/ epsbs.2021.12.03.91
Makarov, A.I. (2001). [Tradition versus history in the philosophy of modern European traditionalism]. Dialog so vremenem: Al’manakh intellectual’noy istorii [Dialogue with Time. The Almanac of Intellectual History]. Moscow: Editorial URSS Publ., iss. 6, pp. 275–283. Novakova, O.V. (2009). [Vietnam: the search for cultural identity]. Yugo-vostochnaya Aziya: istoricheskaya pamat’, etnokul’turnaya identichnost’ i politicheskaya realnost’, otv. red. N.N. Bektimirova [N.N. Bektimirova (ed.) Southeast Asia: Historical Memory, Ethnocultural Identity and Political Reality]. Moscow: Klyuch-S Publ., iss. 1, pp. 258–275.
Sedgwick, M. (2004). Against the modern world: Traditionalism and the secret intellectual history of the twentieth century. New York: Oxford University Press, 370 p.
Starikova, E.O. (2020). [Constructing the image of national culture in Vietnam]. Aziya i Afrika segod
nya [Asia and Africa Today]. No. 1, pp. 61–65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/s032150750008525-9
Taylor, K.W. (1983). The birth of Vietnam. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 397 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520343108
Tsvetov, P.Yu. (2004). [The Hung Kings: from a historiographical problem to a state cult]. Vostok (ORIENS) [East (ORIENS)]. No. 4, pp. 109–114.
UNESCO (2011). What is intangible cultural heritage? Available at: https://ich.unesco.org/en/ collection-00002 (accessed 21.01.2024). Zuckerman, P. (2006). Atheism: Contemporary numbers and patterns. M. Martin (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Atheism. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 47–66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/ccol0521842700.004
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Perm University Herald. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.