Science and art in design development: history and modern times

Philosophy of creativity in the becoming of the culture’s language

Authors

  • Galina B. Stepanova Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences, 12/1, Goncharnaya st., Moscow, 109240, Russia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2024-2-170-179%20

Keywords:

design, project development, engineering, interdisciplinarity, beauty, convenience, person, creativity, projectivity, things, technology, objective world

Abstract

Design is one of significant areas of human professional activity, in which the languages of science and the languages of art interact in different forms. The problems of such interaction were posed by Russian scientists and designers back in the 1960-70s. That time was characterized by the emergence of a number of theoretical and methodological works in the field of design, philosophy, and psychology devoted to a new understanding of design as the interaction of a person with his objective world. In a variety of interpretations, it is possible to note the common positions — interdisciplinarity and project-based nature of design. The special place of project development in design activities was emphasized in theory and methodology of design. Project development requires knowledge about things, their properties, about how a person can act with them, about their place and role in his life as well as about the methods of producing these things. The concept of design thinking as a modern approach to project development focuses on the need to meet human needs and consumer demands, i.e., beauty and convenience, dressed in an aesthetic form. The general principles for the considered approaches in design are orientation toward the person, his needs, ease of use of things and technologies, fulfilment of his potential in a variety of areas of life, including professional, social, creative. Design thinking can be applied in business, medicine, transport industry, and especially in information and creative fields. Both in history and in modern times, this approach necessarily has led to the emergence of interdisciplinary interactions and the development of conceptual foundations for the methodology of interdisciplinarity. In terms of the methodological bases of interdisciplinarity, this methodology was in demand in design and ergonomics in our country, and it was included in the principles of organizing research and development. A significant role in the implementation of the methodology of interdisciplinarity is played by projectivity as a state, an intention toward creativity, transformation, and the search for something new.

Author Biography

Galina B. Stepanova, Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences, 12/1, Goncharnaya st., Moscow, 109240, Russia

Candidate of Psychology, Senior Researcher

References

Бобнева М. Инженерная психология и дизайн // Вопросы технической эстетики: сб. ст. / под ред. Г.Б. Минервина и др. М.: Искусство, 1970. Вып. 2. С. 254–302.

Богомолова И.С. Дизайн-мышление: от названия к сути метода // Architecture and Modern Information Technologies. 2023. № 4(65). С. 92– 102. URL: https://marhi.ru/AMIT/2023/4kvart23/ PDF/06_bogomolova.pdf (дата обращения: 21.04.2024). DOI: https://doi.org/10.24412/19984839-2023-4-92-102

Богоявленская Д.Б. От образа к мысли // Теоретическое наследие Л.М. Веккера: на пути к единой теории психических процессов: материалы науч. симпоз., посвящ. 90-летию со дня рождения Л.М. Веккера / отв. ред. М.А. Холодная, М.В. Осорина. СПб.: Изд-во С.-Петерб. ун-та, 2008. С. 16–25.

Зинченко В.П. Мысль и слово: подходы Л.С. Выготского и Г.Г. Шпета (часть 1) // Психологическая наука и образование. 2003. Т. 8, № 4. URL: https://psyjournals.ru/journals/pse/archive/ 2003_n4/Zinchenko (дата обращения: 21.04.2024).

Зинченко В.П. Сознание и творческий акт. М.: Языки славянских культур, 2010. 592 с.

Кантор К.М. Красота и польза. Социологические вопросы материально-художественной культуры. М.: Искусство, 1967. 279 с.

Кантор К.М. Пути изучения дизайна // Техническая эстетика. 1966. № 1. С. 2–4.

Мунипов В.М. Теория и практика эргодизайна: программа спецкурса // Психология труда и организационная психология. М., 1997. 200 с.

Мунипов В.М., Зинченко В.П. Эргономика: человекоориентированное проектирование техники, программных средств и среды: учебник. М.: Логос, 2001. 356 с. URL: http://psychlib.ru/mgppu/ MZE-2001/MEC-001.HTM#$p1 (дата обращения: 20.05.2023).

Рубинштейн С.Л. О мышлении и путях его исследования. М.: Изд-во Акад. наук СССР, 1958. 148 с.

Степанова Г.Б. Эргономика в СССР: опыт междисциплинарных исследований // Человек. 2017. № 1. С. 94–103.

Стрельникова В.Э. Дизайн-мышление как современный метод проектирования // Бизнес и дизайн ревю. 2019. № 4(16). URL: https://obe.ru/ journal/vypusk-2019-g-4-16-dekabr/strelnikova-v-edizajn-myshlenie-kak-sovremennyj-metodproektirovaniya/ (дата обращения: 21.04.2024).

Шутемова E.A. Метод смыслообразования в дизайнпроектировании. 2020. URL: https://elib.bsu.by/bitstream/123456789/257420/1/4552.pdf (дата обращения: 21.04.2024).

Щедровицкий Г.П. Избранные труды. М.: Школа культурной политики, 1994. 800 с.

Эргодизайн промышленных изделий и предметно-пространственной среды: учеб. пособие / под ред. В.И. Кулайкина, Л.Д. Чайновой. М.: Владос, 2009. 311 с.

Brown T. Design Thinking // Harvard Business Review. 2008. June. URL: https://readings.design/ PDF/Tim%20Brown,%20Design%20Thinking.pdf (accessed: 21.04.2024).

References

Bobneva, M. (1970). [Engineering psychology and design]. Voprosy tekhnicheskoy estetiki, pod red. G.B. Minervina i dr. [G.B. Minervina et al. (eds.) Issues of Technical Aesthetics]. Moscow: Iskusstvo Publ., iss. 2, pp. 254–302.

Bogomolova, I.S. (2023). [Design thinking: from the name to the essence of the method]. Architecture and Modern Information Technologies. No. 4(65), pp. 92–102. Available at: https://marhi.ru/AMIT/ 2023/4kvart23/PDF/06_bogomolova.pdf (accessed 21.04.2024). DOI: https://doi.org/10.24412/19984839-2023-4-92-102

Bogoyavlenskaya, D.B. (2008). [From image to thought]. Teoreticheskoe nasledie L.M. Vekkera: na puti k edinoy teorii psikhicheskikh protsessov: Materialy nauchnogo simpoziuma, posvyaschennogo 90letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya L.M. Vekkera [The theoretical heritage of L.M. Wecker: On the Way to a Unified Theory of Mental Processes: Proceedings of a Scientific Symposium Dedicated to the 90th Anniversary of the Birth of L.M. Wecker]. St. Petersburg: SPbU Publ., pp. 16–25.

Brown, T. (2008). Design thinking. Harvard Business Review. June. Available at: https://readings.design/PDF/Tim%20Brown,%20Desi gn%20Thinking.pdf (accessed 21.04.2024). Kantor, K.M. (1966). [Ways of studying design]. Tekhnicheskaya estetika [Technical Aesthetics]. No. 1, pp. 2–4.

Kantor, K.M. (1967). Krasota i pol’za. Sotsiologicheskie voprosy material’no-khudozhestvennoy kul’tury [Beauty and benefit. Sociological issues of material and artistic culture]. Moscow: Iskusstvo Publ., 279 p.

Kulaykin, V.I. and Chaynova, L.D. (eds.) (2009). Ergodizayn promyshlennykh izdeliy i predmetnoprostranstvennoy sredy [Ergodesign of industrial products and subject-spatial environment]. Moscow: Vlados Publ., 311 p.

Munipov, V.M. (1997). [Theory and practice of ergodesign: special course program]. Psikhologiya truda i organizatsionnaya psikhologiya [Labor psychology and organizational psychology]. Moscow: MSU Publ., 200 p.

Munipov, V.M. and Zinchenko, V.P. (2001). Ergonomika: chelovekoorientirovannoe proektirovanie tekhniki, programmnykh sredstv i sredy [Ergonomics: Human-centered design of technology, software and environment]. Moscow: Logos Publ., 356 p. Available at: http://psychlib.ru/mgppu/MZE-2001/MEC001.HTM#$p1 (accessed 20.05.2023).

Rubinstein, S.L. (1958). O myshlenii i putyakh ego issledovaniya [About thinking and ways of its research]. Moscow: USSR Academy of Sciences Publ., 148 p.

Shchedrovitsky, G.P. (1994). Izbrannye trudy [Selected works]. Moscow: Shkola Kul’turnoy Politiki Publ., 800 p.

Shutemova, E.A. (2020). Metod smysloobrazovaniya v dizaynproektirovanii [Method of meaning formation in design]. Available at: https://elib.bsu.by/ bitstream/123456789/257420/1/45-52.pdf (accessed 21.04.2024).

Stepanova, G.B. (2017). [Ergonomics in the USSR: the experience of multidisciplinary research]. Chelovek [Human Being]. No. 1, pp. 94–103. Strel’nikova, V.E. (2019). [Design thinking as a modern design method]. Biznes i dizayn rev’yu [Business and Design Review]. No. 4(16). Available at: https://obe.ru/journal/vypusk-2019-g-4-16dekabr/strelnikova-v-e-dizajn-myshlenie-kaksovremennyj-metod-proektirovaniya/ (accessed 21.04.2024).

Zinchenko, V.P. (2003). [Thought and word: Approaches of L.S. Vygotsky and G.G. Shpeta (part 1)]. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie [Psychological Science and Education]. Vol. 8, no. 4. Available at: https://psyjournals.ru/journals/pse/archive/ 2003_n4/Zinchenko (accessed 21.04.2024).

Zinchenko, V.P. (2010). Soznaniye i tvorcheskiy akt [Consciousness and the creative act]. Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskikh kul’tur Publ., 592 p.

Published

2024-08-07

Issue

Section

Статьи