Gilbert Simondon and Evald Ilyenkov on humanism and technocracy
LIGHT AND SHADOWS OF DIGITAL REALITY (Special issue)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2023-3-327-337Keywords:
alienation, cybernetics, humanism, Ilyenkov, Marx, Simondon, technology, technocracyAbstract
G. Simondon (1924–1989) and E.V. Ilyenkov (1924–1979) are outstanding philosophers of the second half of the 20th century, who searched for answers to the questions that the development of modern technology posed to the mankind. These thinkers belonged to different philosophical traditions, but their approaches converge in a number of significant points. They brought to the fore the sociocultural aspects of the integration of technology at the time when cybernetics attracted general attention as a methodology and was assigned a significant role in the progress of science and technology, both in France and in the USSR. This article aims to identify the common and the different in the criticism by Simondon and Ilyenkov of some essential aspects of technical civilization and in their proposed solutions to a number of problems that arise in the course of its development at the present stage. An analysis and comparison of texts written by the philosophers in the 1950s–1960s showed that both of them state the presence of disharmony in the relationship between culture and technology, the emergence of which they associate with the spread of the technocratic approach to technology and man and the mythology associated with it. Both authors stand on humanistic positions and consider it necessary to eliminate the myths of technocracy in order to prevent the transformation of technology into a tool for the enslavement of man. However, their approaches differ significantly in their attitude to technology: Simondon fundamentally refuses to consider technology only as a means and endows it with certain autonomy, while Ilyenkov considers it primarily a means of achieving goals that a society formulates for itself as an ideal. For this reason, the Soviet philosopher insists on the need to eliminate all social, economic, and political obstacles to the creation of conditions for the complete liberation and comprehensive development of man, while Simondon highlights the task of integrating technology into culture through cognizing it and identifying its immanent laws of development.References
Бурова М.Л. Проблемы философии техники в творчестве Э.В. Ильенкова // Философия и гуманитарные науки в информационном обществе. 2015. № 3(9). С. 54–63.
Григорова Я.В. Информационные технологии как «машина эксплуатации» // Вестник Пермского национального исследовательского политехнического университета. Культура. История. Философия. Право. 2016. № 3. С. 98–102.
Ильенков Э.В. Собрание сочинений. Т. 3: Идеал. М.: Канон+ РООИ «Реабилитация», 2020. 512 с.
Ильенков Э.В. Собрание сочинений. Т. 4: Диалектическая логика. М.: Канон+ РООИ «Реабилитация», 2020. 464 с.
Майданский А.Д. Коммунистический идеал Э.В. Ильенкова и реальный социализм // Наука. Искусство. Культура. 2017. Вып. 3(15). С. 59–65.
Маркузе Г. Одномерный человек: исследование идеологии развитого индустриального общества / пер. с англ. А.А. Юдина. М.: REFL-book, 1994. 368 с.
Симондон Ж. О способе существования технических объектов (Сокращенный перевод заключения) / пер. с фр. М.А. Куртова // Транслит. 2011. № 9. С. 94–105.
Таубе М. Вычислительные машины и здравый смысл: миф о думающих машинах / пер. с англ. С.С. Вениаминова; предисл. акад. А.И. Берга. М.: Прогресс, 1964. 184 с.
Bardin A. De l’homme à la matière: pour une «ontologie difficile». Marx avec Simondon // Cahiers Simondon / éd. par J.-H. Barthélémy. Paris, FR: L’Harmattan, 2013. No. 5. P. 25–43.
Barthélémy J.-H. Glossaire Simondon: les 50 grandes entrées dans l’oeuvre // Appareil. 2015. No. 16. URL: https://journals.openedition.org/ appareil/pdf/2253 (accessed: 12.07.2023). DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/appareil.2253
Chateau J.-Y. Le vocabulaire de Gilbert Simondon. Paris, FR: PUF, 2008. 128 p.
Guchet X. Pour un humanisme technologique. Culture, technique et société dans la philosophie de Gilbert Simondon. Paris, FR: PUF, 2010. 280 p.
Marcuse H. De l’ontologie à la technologie: les tendances de la société industrielle // Arguments. 1960. Vol. 4, no. 18. P. 54–59. Simondon G. Du mode d’existence des objets techniques. Paris, FR: Aubier, 2012. 368 p.
Simondon G. L’individuation à la lumière des notions de forme et d’information. Grenoble, FR: Jérôme Millon, 2017. 576 p.
Simondon G. Sur la philosophie (1950–1980). Paris, FR: PUF, 2016. 472 p.
References
Bardin, A. (2013). [From Humain to Matter: for «Difficult Ontology». Marx with Simondon]. J.H. Barthélémy (ed.) Cahiers Simondon [J.H. Barthélémy (ed.) Simondon Notebooks]. Paris, FR: L’Harmattan Publ., no. 5, pp. 25–43.
Barthélémy, J.-H. (2015). [Simondon’s Glossary: 50 Key Terms in the Works of Gilbert Simondon]. Appareil [Apparatus]. No. 16. Available at: https://journals.openedition.org/appareil/pdf/2253 (accessed 12.07.2023). DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.4000/appareil.2253
Burova, M.L. (2015). [The philosophy of technology in E. V. Ilyenkov’s works]. Filosofiya i gumanitarnye nauki v informatsionnom obschestve [Philosophy and Humanities in Information Society]. No. 3(9), pp. 54–63.
Chateau, J.-Y. (2008). Le vocabulaire de Gilbert Simondon [Simondon’s Vocabulary]. Paris, FR: PUF, 128 p.
Grigorova, Ya.V. (2016). [Information technology as an exploitation machine]. Vestnik Permskogo natsional’nogo issledovatel’skogo politekhnicheskogo universiteta. Kul’tura. Istoriya. Filosofiya. Pravo [Bulletin of Perm National Research Polytechnic University. Culture. History. Philosophy. Law]. No. 3, pp. 98–102.
Guchet, X. (2010). Pour un humanisme technologique. Culture, technique et société dans la philosophie de Gilbert Simondon [For a technological humanism. Culture, technology and society in the philosophy of Gilbert Simondon]. Paris, FR: PUF, 280 p.
Il’enkov, E.V. (2020). Sobranie sochineniy. T. 3: Ideal [Collected works. Vol. 3: Ideal]. Moscow: Kanon+ ROOI «Reabilitatsiya» Publ., 512 p.
Il’enkov, E.V. (2020). Sobranie sochineniy. T. 4: Dialekticheskaya logika [Collected works. Vol. 4: Dialectical logic]. Moscow: Kanon+ ROOI «Reabilitatsiya» Publ., 464 p.
Marcuse, H. (1960). [From ontology to technology: Tendencies of industrial society]. Arguments. Vol. 4, no. 18, pp. 54–59.
Marcuse, H. (1994). Odnomernyy chelovek: issledovanie ideologii razvitogo industrial’nogo obschestva [One-dimensional man: Studies in the ideology of advanced industrial society]. Moscow: REFLBook Publ., 368 p.
Maydanskiy, A.D. (2017). [E.V. Ilyenkov’s communist ideal and the real socialism]. Nauka. Iskusstvo. Kul’tura [Science. Art. Culture]. Iss. 3(15), pp. 59–65.
Simondon, G. (2011). [On the mode of existence of technical objects]. Translit. No. 9, pp. 94–105.
Simondon, G. (2012). Du mode d’existence des objets techniques [On the mode of existence of technical objects]. Paris, FR: Aubier Publ., 368 p.
Simondon, G. (2016). Sur la philosophie (1950– 1980) [About philosophy (1950–1980)]. Paris, FR: PUF, 472 p.
Simondon, G. (2017). L’individuation à la lumière des notions de forme et d’information [Individuation in light of notions of form and information]. Grenoble, FR: Jérôme Millon Publ., 576 p. T
aube, M. (1964). Vychislitel’nye mashiny i zdravyy smysl: mif o dumayuschikh mashinakh [Computers and common sense: The myth of thinking machines]. Moscow: Progress Publ., 184 p.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Perm University Herald. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
