The role of humanistic values in self-identification of the actors of innovation development in society
Philosophy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2018-1-16-25Keywords:
humanistic values, self-identification, innovation development, critical thinking, investor, modernityAbstract
This article deals with the problem of human self-identification in its direct connection with the opportunities of innovation development in society and main actors of innovation development (inventor, investor and society) in modern cultural context. Under the term self-identification, we mean the process of the subject’s (personal, group, social) self-determination, which implies activation of the volitional «self», during which they feel as the subjects of creative activity with free will and answer the questions: «Who am I?», «What is the territory (the space) of my responsibility?», «What is significant for me?», «What is the purpose of my existence?», «What is the sense of my actions?», «How I position myself in relations with other people?». The article shows that the result of self-identification (particular self-identity) plays a fundamental role in realizing the innovation development of society, which we distinguish from the innovation development of particular communities or groups. In the context of humanistic approach, inadequate self-identification is the subject’s selfidentification with something that does not represent one, particularly, with spontaneously arising wishes, belonging to a special group or territory, imposed ideas about oneself, with the role of being under control or even being «human capital». The authors consider humanistic values to be compulsory condition of providing adequate self-identification, which leads to cooperation of all social subjects. The article recommends a number of semantic sets which allow one to activate the process of correct (adequate to real conditions) personal self-identification. These sets are formulated in the form of «self-expressions» which allow one to use them both in independent and group trainings and also in developing mass technologies stimulating the processes ofpersonal matureness awakening.References
Агамбен Дж. Homo sacer. Чрезвычайное положение.М.: Европа, 2011. 148 с.
Базарный В.Ф. Школа или конвейер биороботов.М.: Концептуал, 2015. 43 с.
Бахтияров О.Г. Активное сознание.Архангельск: Постум, 2010. 274 с.
Бодрийяр Ж. Общество потребления.М.: Республика, 2006. 272 с.
Вылегжанина А.О. Ценности гуманизма как основа современного социального заказа на новый вид социальной идентичности // Культура и цивилизация. 2015. № 6. С. 205–219.
Греф О.Г. Выход из управленческого тупика: мудрость толпы или авторитарный гений? / Международный экономический форум 2012. 2012. Цит. фрагмент: 22:31–22:48. URL: https://youtu.be/RABgXkL3GqE(дата обращения: 14.08.2017).
Жиру А. Зомби-политика и культура в эпоху казино-капитализма.М.: Гуманитарный центр, 2015. 284 с.
Ильин А.А. Квалифицированный потребитель — цель системы образования? //Философия и гуманитарные науки в информационном обществе. 2014. № 4(6). С. 49–57.
Катасонов В.Ю. От рабства к рабству.М.: Кислород, 2014. 448 с.
Лёвкин В.Е. Современная социальная система как контекст психологического заказа // Контекст и рефлексия: философия о мире и человеке. 2015. № 6. С. 114–138.
Павлов А.В. Автор и человек: индивидуальность как предмет гуманитарного исследования // Социум и власть. 2014. № 1(45). С. 106–115.
Павлов А.В. Философия современности и межвременья.Тюмень: ИД «Титул», 2017. 280 с.
Толстой Л.Н. Рабство нашего времени // Полн. соб. соч. Т. 34: Произведения 1900–1903 гг.М.: Рос. гос. библиотека, 2006. С. 144–199.
Фуко М. Дискурсиистина// Логос.2008. № 2(65). С. 159–262.
Stiglitz J.E. The Great Divide: Unequal Societies and What We Can Do About Them. N.Y.: W.W. Norton & Company, 2016. 464 p.
Vitali S., Glattfelder J.B., Battiston S.The network of global corporate control // PLoS ONE. 2011. № 10(6). URL: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0025995(accessed: 14.08.2017). DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025995.
Agamben Jh. (2011). Homo sacer. Chrezvychaynoe polozhenie [Homo sacer. State of emergency]. Moscow, Evropa Publ., 148 p. (In Russian).
Bahtijarov O.G. (2010). Aktivnoe soznanie [Active conciousness]. Arhangelsk, Postum Publ., 274 p. (In Russian).
Baudrillard J. (2006). Obshchestvo potrebleniya [The consumer society]. Moscow, Respublika Publ., 272 p. (In Russian).
Bazarnyj V.F. (2015). Shkola ili konveyer biorobotov [School or conveier of biorobots]. Moscow, Konceptual Publ., 43 p. (In Russian).
Foucault M. (2008). Diskurs i istina [Discourse and truth]. Logos. No. 2(65), pp. 159–262. (In Russian).
Gref O.G. (2012). Vyhod iz upravlencheskogo tupika: mudrost’ tolpy ili avtoritarnyy geniy? [Exit from the management deadlock]. Mezhdunarodnyy ekonomicheskij forum 2012 [International economic forum 2012]. Quot. fragment: 22:31–22:48. Available at: https://youtu.be/RABgXkL3GqE (accessed 14.08.2017). (In Russian).
Il’in A.A. (2014). Kvalificirovannyy potrebitel’ — tsel’ sistemy obrazovaniya? [Qualified consumer-the purpose of the education system?]. Filosofiya i gumanitarnyie nauki v informatsionnom obshchestve [Philosophy and Humanities in Information Society]. No. 4(6), pp. 49–57. (In Russian).
Katasonov V.Ju. (2014). Ot rabstva k rabstvu [From slavery to slavery]. Moskva, Kislorod Publ., 448 p. (In Russian).
Lyovkin V.E. (2015). Sovremennaya social’naya sistema kak kontekst psikhologicheskogo zakaza [Modern social system as a context of psychological order]. Kontekst i refleksiya: filosofiya o mire i cheloveke [Context and reflection: philosophy about world and human]. No. 6, pp. 114–138. (In Russian).
Pavlov A.V. (2017). Filosofiya sovremennosti i mezhvremen’ya [Philosophy of modernity and intertemporality]. Tyumen, Titul Publ., 280 p. (In Russian).
Pavlov A.V. (2014). Avtor i chelovek: individual’nost’ kak predmet gumanitarnogo issledovaniya [Author and human: individuality as a subject of humanitarian research]. Socium i vlast’ [Socium and power]. No. 1(45), pp. 106–115. (In Russian).
Stiglitz J.E. (2016). The Great Divide: Unequal Societies and What We Can Do About Them. NewYork, W.W. Norton & Company, 464 p. (In English).
Tolstoy L.N. (2006). Rabstvo nashego vremeni [Slavery of our times]. Polnoe sobranie sochochineniy T. 34: Proizvedeniya 1900–1903 gg. [Full collection of works. Vol. 34: Works 1900–1903]. Moscow, Rossijskaja gosudarstvennaja biblioteka Publ., pp. 144– 199. (In Russian).
Vitali S., Glattfelder J.B., Battiston S. (2011). The network of global corporate control. PLoS ONE. No. 10(6). Available at: http://journals.plos.org/ plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0025995 (accessed 14.08.2017). DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025995. (In English).
Vylegzhanina A.O. (2015). Cennosti gumanizma kak osnova sovremennogo social’nogo zakaza na novyy vid social’noy identichnosti [Humane values as a base of modern social order for new type of civilization identity]. Kul’tura i civilizatsiya [Culture and civilization]. No. 6, pp. 205–219. (In Russian).
Zhiru A. (2015). Zombi-politika i kul’tura v epokhu kazino-kapitalizma [Zombi politics and culture in era of cazino-capitalism]. Moscow, Humanitarian center Publ., 284 p. (In Russian).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Perm University Herald. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.