Roman social «community» in epigram of Martialis (axiology of the socially differentiated whole)
Philosophy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2020-3-365-374Keywords:
community, differentiation, social identities, single and common, culture of everyday life, semantic structures, lifestylesAbstract
The study deals with differentiated social «communities» peculiar to the Roman society of the late period (Empire era), which formed the «meaningful contents» of the everyday life culture constructs. As one of the typical «artifacts» there are considered «book» texts (epigrams of Martialis), reflecting «small» events of social and family life of Rome. The study aims to trace the transformation of traditional social communities (of the class, family, political, professional, ethnic types) caused by historical social practice, Roman ideology, mental concepts and stereotypes of social behavior. The methodology of the study is determined by the interrelations of the «epistemological fields» of related disciplines within which the studied phenomena are represented in different aspects. The research is conducted at the intersection of philosophy, sociology (including sociology of culture) and textual criticism; the axiological aspect of the problem under discussion acquires a special meaning. The analyses of literary sources allows to trace the static and dynamics of the daily culture of antiquity, reflecting the profound changes that occurred both in the formation structures of the «great» Rome and in the sociocultural space of Roman antiquity. The scope of application of the research results is not limited to the field of humanities; possible follow-up may involve expansion of the range of sources (up to material sources, such as archaeological, statistical) and specialization in one of the areas indicated in the paper. The conclusions demonstrate the potential of the axiological approach (in conjunction with the philosophy of culture and social psychology) to the studied social and cultural phenomena.References
Аристотель. Сочинения. М.: Мысль, 1983. Т. 4. 830 с.
Бурдье П. Социология социального пространства: пер. с фр. СПб.: Алетейя, 2007. 288 с.
Вебер М. Хозяйство и общество: очерки понимающей социологии: в 4 т. Т. 1: Социология. М.: Изд. дом ВШЭ, 2016. 445 с.
Вебер М. Хозяйство и общество: очерки понимающей социологии: в 4 т. Т. 2: Общности. М.: Изд. дом ВШЭ, 2017. 432 с.
Зиммель Г. Избранное. Проблемы социологии: пер. с нем. М.; СПб.: Университетская книга: Центр гуманит. инициатив, 2015. 416 с.
Зомбарт В. Социология: пер. с нем. М.: Едиториал УРСС, 2003. 138 с.
Котова А.В. Источники и рецепция Catull. 3 как средства определения интонации текста // Ученые записки Петрозаводского государственного университета. 2018. № 1(170). С. 41–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15393/uchz.art.2018.7
Левек П. Эллинистический мир: пер. с фр. М.: Наука, 1989. 252 с.
Марциал Марк Валерий. Эпиграммы. М.: Худ. лит., 1968. 488 с.
Мельцер Р.И., Недбайлик С.Р. Эпиграммы как малый литературный жанр: обзор античных традиций // Вестник Шадринского государственного педагогического университета. 2019. № 1(41). С. 145–150.
Моммзен Т. История Рима: пер. с нем. СПб.: Наука: Ювента, 1997. Т. 1. 732 с.
Плиний Младший. Письма Плиния Младшего. М.: Наука, 1982. 408 с.
Плутарх. Сравнительные жизнеописания: в 3 т. Т. 3. М.: Наука, 1964. 546 с.
Синергетическая парадигма. Многообразие поисков и подходов / отв. ред. В.И. Аршинов, В.Г. Буданов, В.Э. Войцехович. М.: Прогресс–Традиция, 2000. 536 с.
Синергетическая парадигма. Нелинейное мышление в науке и искусстве: сб. ст. / отв. ред. В.А. Копцик. М.: Прогресс–Традиция, 2002. 496 с.
Синергетическая парадигма. Социальная синергетика: сб. ст. / отв. ред. В.В. Василькова. М.: Прогресс–Традиция, 2009. 688 с.
Сорокин П.А. Социальная и культурная динамика. М.: Астрель, 2006. 1176 с.
Фромм Э. Иметь или быть? / пер. с нем. М.: АСТ, 2018. 320 с.
Шелер М. Избранные произведения: пер. с нем. М.: Гнозис, 1994. 490 с.
Шлегель Ф.В.К. Сочинения: в 2 т. Т. 1: Философия истории. М.: Quadrivium, 2015. 816 с.
Шохин В.К. Философия ценностей и ранняя аксиологическая мысль. М.: Изд-во РУДН, 2006. 457 с.
Штирнер М. Единственный и его собственность: пер. с нем. М.: Рипол-Классик, 2017. 464 с.
Bennett A. Culture and everyday life. Brisbane, AU: SAGE Publications, 2005. 216 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446219256
Fitzgerald W. Martial: the world of the epigram. Chicago, IL; L., UK: University of Chicago press, 2007. 258 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226252568.001.0001
Griswold W. Cultures and societies in a changing world. Lincoln, NE: SAGE Publications, 2013. 228 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452240534
Holzberg N. Martial und das antike Epigramm. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 2002. 168 S.
Inglis D. Culture and everyday life. Abingdon, UK: Routledge Publ., 2005. 176 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203005200
Martialis M.V. Epigrammata. Ducenti epigrammata obscena selecta. Toronto, CA: Aeterna Publ., 2012. 192 p.
Sullivan J.P. Martial: The Unexpected Classic. L., UK: Cambridge University Press, 2005. 420 p.
References
Aristotle (1983). Sochineniya [Works]. Moscow: Mysl’ Publ., vol. 4, 830 p.
Arshinov, V.I., Budanov, V.G., Voytsekhovich, V.E. (ed.) (2000). Sinergeticheskaya paradigma. Mnogoobrazie poiskov i podkhodov [Synergistic paradigm. A variety of searches and approaches]. Moscow: Progress–Traditsiya Publ., 536 p.
Bennett, A. (2005). Culture and everyday life. Brisbane: SAGE Publ., 216 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446219256
Bourdieu, P. (2007). Sotsiologiya sotsial’nogo prostranstva. Per. s fr. [Social space and symbolic space. Trans. from French]. Saint Petersburg: Aleteya Publ., 288 p.
Fitzgerald, W. (2007). Martial: the world of the epigram. Chicago, London: University of Chicago press Publ., 258 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226252568.001.0001
Fromm, E. (2018). Imet’ ili byt’? Per. s nem. [To have or to be? Trans. from Germ.]. Moscow: AST Publ., 320 p.
Griswold, W. (2013). Cultures and societies in a changing world. Lincoln: SAGE Publ., 228 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452240534
Holzberg, N. (2002). Martial und das antike Epigramm [Martial and the Ancient epigram]. Darmstadt, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 168 p.
Inglis, D. (2005). Culture and everyday life. Abingdon: Routledge Publ., 176 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203005200
Koptsik, V.A. (ed.) (2002). Sinergeticheskaya paradigma. Nelineynoe myshlenie v nauke i iskusstve [Synergistic paradigm. Nonlinear thinking in science and art]. Moscow: Progress–Traditsiya Publ., 496 p.
Kotova, A.V. (2018). Istochniki i retseptsiya Catull. 3 kak sredstva opredeleniya intonatsii teksta [Sources and reception Catull. 3 as means of defining the text’s mood]. Uchenye zapiski Petrozavodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Proceedings of Petrozavodsk State University]. No. 1(170), pp. 41–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15393/uchz.art.2018.7
Leveque, P. (1989). Ellinisticheskiy mir. Per. s fr. [The Hellenistic world. Trans. from French]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 252 p.
Martialis, M.V. (1968). Epigrammy [Epigrams]. Moscow: Hudozhestvennaya Literatura Publ., 488 p.
Martialis, M.V. (2012). Epigrammata. Ducenti epigrammata obscena selecta [Epigrams]. Toronto: Aeterna Publ., 192 p.
Meltzer, R.I. and Nedbailik, S.R. (2019). Epigrammy kak malyy literaturnyy zhanr: obzor antichnykh traditsiy [Epigrams as small literary genre: review of antique traditions]. Vestnik Shadrinskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta [Journal of Shadrinsk State Pedagogical University]. No. 1(41), pp. 145–150.
Mommzen, T. (1997). Istoriya Rima. Per. s nem. [History of Rome. Trans. from Germ.]. Saint Petersburg: Nauka Publ., vol. 1, 732 p.
Plinius (1982). Pis’ma Pliniya Mladshego. [Letters]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 408 p.
Plutarchos (1964). Sravnitel’nye zhizneopisaniya: v 3 t. [Comparative biographies: in 3 vols]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., vol. 3, 546 p.
Scheler, M. (1994). Izbrannye proizvedeniya. Per. s nem. [Selected works. Trans. from Germ]. Moscow: Gnozis Publ., 490 p.
Shlegel, F.W.C. (2015). Sochineniya: v 2 t. T. 1: Filosofiya istorii [Works: in 2 vols. Vol. 1: Philosophy of history]. Moscow: Kvadrivium Publ., 816 p.
Shokhin, V.K. (2006). Filosofiya tsennostey i rannyaya aksiologicheskaya mysl’ [Philosophy of values and early axiological thought]. Moscow: RUDN Publ., 457 p.
Simmel, G. (2015). Izbrannoe. Problemy sotsiologii. Per. s nem. [Selected works. Problems of sociology. Trans. from Germ.]. Moscow, Saint Petersburg: Universitetskaya Kniga Publ., 416 p.
Sombart, W. (2003). Sotsiologiya. Per. s nem. [Sociology. Trans. from Germ.]. Moscow: Editorial URSS Publ., 138 p.
Sorokin, P.A. (2006). Sotsial’naya i kul’turnaya dinamika [Social and cultural dynamics]. Moscow: Astrel’ Publ., 1176 p.
Stirner, M. (2017). Edinstvennyy i ego sobstvennost’. Per. s nem. [The only one and his property. Trans. from Germ]. Moscow: Ripol-Klassik Publ., 464 p.
Sullivan, J.P. (2005). Martial: The unexpected classic. London: Cambridge University Publ., 420 p.
Vasil’kova, V.V. (ed.) (2009). Sinergeticheskaya paradigma. Sotsia’naya sinergetika [Synergistic paradigm. Social synergies]. Moscow: Progress–Traditsiya Publ., 688 p.
Weber, M. (2016). Hozyaystvo i obschestvo: ocherki ponimayuschey sotsiologii: v 4 t. T. 1: Sotsiologiya [Economics and society: Essays of understanding sociology: in 4 vols. Vol. 1: Sociology]. Moscow: HSU Publ., 445 p.
Weber, M. (2017). Hozyaystvo i obschestvo: ocherki ponimayuschey sotsiologii: v 4 t. T. 2: Obshchnosti [Economics and society: Essays of understanding sociology: in 4 vols. Vol. 2: Community]. Moscow: HSU Publ., 432 p.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Perm University Herald. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
