A causal footprint in individual-intellectual integrations. Part 2. Causal chains and longitudinal mediator models
PSYCHOLOGY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2022-4-597-608Keywords:
systemic approach, integration, individual-intellectual integration, causal chains, mediator modelsAbstract
In the previous report, the authors described three possible lines of integration: theoretical and empirical jointly, cross-theoretical and cross-empirical. In this report, their empirical verification examines on the example ofV.S. Merlin’s theory of integral individuality, D.V. Ushakov’s structural-dynamic theory of intelligence, and J. Guilford’s theory of divergent (creative) thinking. Individual-intellectual integrations derive from above theories. These integrations appear due to the viewpoint of a causal chain. Its operational marker is longitudinal mediator models. The purpose of the study is to examine functionally the resource and potential of the theories of V.S. Merlin, D.V. Ushakov and J. Guilford for integration at empirical level; individual-intellectual integrations develop following causal chains in three time periods. Longitudinal mediation models were to test with an emphasis on the transformation of the effects of previous causes into new causes. The study involved 211 students of Perm higher educational institutions, studying humanities, of which 161 girls and 50 boys aged 17 to 22 years at the time of the first measurement (M = 18.56, SD = 0.83). We tested traits of integral individuality (nervous system, temperament, and personality traits), crystallized and fluid intelligence, and creative thinking in three periods, namely, the present, the future, and the post-future. Structural modeling was the main statistical methods of data analysis. Crystallized intelligence, fluid intelligence, and creative flexibility revealed their mediator part between traits of integral individuality in earlier and later measurements. Each model was fit indices. However, creative fluency and originality did not function as mediators. Rather, they acted as the environment on which longitudinal mediator models operate. The results of the study can form the background for the development of a program of comprehensive individual-intellectual integrations as the basis of the educational capital of the individual.References
Аверина И.С., Щебланова Е.И. Вербальный тест творческого мышления «Необычное использование». М.: Соборъ, 1996. 60 с.
Батурин Н.А., Курганский Н.А. Краткое руководство по Универсальному интеллектуальному тесту (УИТ СПЧ): Челябинск – Санкт-Петербург. СПб., 1995. 19 с.
Данилова Н.П., Шмелев А.Г. Тест-опросник Стреляу // Практикум по психодиагностике. М.: Изд-во МГУ, 1988. С. 4−10.
Дорфман Л.Я. Каузальный плюрализм и психология // Мир психологии. 2014. № 3(79). C. 220–236.
Дорфман Л.Я., Калугин А.Ю. Индивидуально-интеллектуальная модель академических достижений студентов (на материале гуманитарных специальностей) // Психологическая наука и образование. 2022. Т. 27, № 4. C. 68–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/pse.2022270407
Дорфман Л.Я., Калугин А.Ю. Каузальный след в индивидуально-интеллектуальных интеграциях. Сообщение 1. Интеграции и каузальность // Вестник Пермского университета. Философия. Психология. Социология. 2022. Вып. 3. С. 452–464. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2022-3-452-464
Дорфман Л.Я., Калугин А.Ю. Четырехфакторный опросник Я: его концептуальный и психометрический анализ // Сибирский психологический журнал. 2020. № 75. С. 53–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17223/17267080/75/4
Калугин А.Ю., Щебетенко С.А., Мишкевич А.М., Сото К.Дж., Джон О.П. Психометрика русскоязычной версии Big Five Inventory – 2 // Психология. Журнал Высшей школы экономики. 2021. Т. 18, № 1. С. 7–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8918-2021-1-7-33
Мерлин В.С. Очерк интегрального исследования индивидуальности. М.: Педагогика, 1986. 256 с.
Наследов А.Д. IBM SPSS Statistics 20 и AMOS: профессиональный статистический анализ данных. СПб.: Питер, 2013. 416 с.
Равен Дж.К., Курт Дж.Х., Равен Дж. Руководство к прогрессивным матрицам Равена и словарным шкалам. Разд. 1. Общая часть руководства. М.: Когито-Центр, 1997. 82 с.
Стреляу Я., Митина О., Завадский Б., Бабаева Ю., Менчук Т. Методика диагностики темперамента (формально-динамических характеристик поведения). М.: Смысл, 2009. 104 с.
Ушаков Д.В. Психология интеллекта и одаренности. М.: Ин-т психологии РАН, 2011. 464 с.
Brown T. Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. N.Y.: The Guilford Press, 2015. 462 p.
Browne M.W. Asymptotically distribution‐free methods for the analysis of covariance structures // British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology. 1984. Vol. 37, iss. 1. P. 62–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8317.1984.tb00789.x
Byrne B.M. A primer of LISREL. N.Y.: Springer, 1989. 196 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8885-2
Gana K., Broc G. Structural equation modeling with lavaan. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2019. 304 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119579038
Gatignon H. Statistical analysis of management data. 3rd ed. N.Y.: Springer, 2014. 578 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8594-0
Guilford J.P. The nature of human intelligence. N.Y.: McGraw-Hill, 1967. 538 p.
Hayes A.F. An Index and Test of Linear Moderated Mediation // Multivariate Behavioral Research. 2015. Vol. 50, iss. 1. P. 1–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2014.962683
Hayes A.F. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach (Methodology in the Social Sciences). 3rd ed. N.Y.: The Guilford Press, 2022. 732 p.
Ryu E., Cheong J. Comparing Indirect Effects in Different Groups in Single-Group and Multi-Group Structural Equation Models // Frontiers in Psychology. 2017. Vol. 8. URL: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00747/full (accessed: 18.05.2022). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00747
Shchebetenko S.A., Kalugin A.Yu., Mishkevich A.M., Soto C.J., John O.P. Measurement invariance and sex and age differences of the Big Five Inventory-2: Evidence from the Russian version // Assessment. 2019. Vol. 27, iss. 3. P. 472–486. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191119860901
Soto C.J., John O.P. The next Big Five Inventory (BFI-2): Developing and assessing a hierarchical model with 15 facets to enhance bandwidth, fidelity, and predictive power // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2017. Vol. 113, iss. 1. P. 117−143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000096
Strelau J., Angleitner A., Newberry B.H. The Pavlovian temperament survey (PTS): An international handbook. Göttingen, DE: Hogrefe & Huber, 1999. 108 p.
Strelau J., Zawadzki B. The formal characteristics of behavior – Temperament inventory (FCB–TI): Validity studies // European Journal of Personality. 1995. Vol. 9, iss. 3. P. 207−229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2410090304
Wallach M.A., Kogan N. Modes of thinking in young children: A study of the creativity-intelligence distinction. N.Y.: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1965. 357 p.
References
Averina, I.S. and Scheblanova, E.I. (1996). Verbal’nyy test tvorcheskogo myshleniya «Neobychnoe ispol’zovanie» [Verbal test of creative thinking «Unusual use»]. Moscow: Sobor Publ., 60 p.
Baturin, N.A. and Kurganskiy, N.A. (1995). Kratkoe rukovodstvo po Universal’nomu intellektual’nomu testu (UIT SPCh): Chelyabinsk – Sankt-Peterburg [A quick guide to the Universal intelligent test: Chelyabinsk –Saint Petersburg]. St. Petersburg, 19 p.
Brown, T. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: The Guilford Press, 462 p.
Browne, M.W. (1984). Asymptotically distribution‐free methods for the analysis of covariance structures. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology. Vol. 37, iss. 1, pp. 62–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8317.1984.tb00789.x
Byrne, B.M. (1989). A primer of LISREL. New York:Springer Publ., 196 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8885-2
Danilova, N.P. and Shmelev, A.G. (1988). Testoprosnik Strelyau [Strelau’s survey]. Praktikum po psikhodiagnostike [Psychodiagnostic workshop]. Moscow: MSU Publ., pp. 4–10.
Dorfman, L.Ya. (2014). [Causal pluralism and psychology]. Mir psikhologii [World of Psychology]. No. 3(79), pp. 220–236.
Dorfman, L.Ya. and Kalugin, A.Yu. (2020). [The four-factor self questionnaire: its theoretical and psychometric properties]. Sibirskiy psikhologicheskiy zhurnal [Siberian Journal of Psychology]. No. 75, pp. 53–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17223/17267080/75/4
Dorfman, L.Ya. and Kalugin, A.Yu. (2022). [A causal footprint in individual-intellectual. Part 1. Integrations
and causality]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Filosofia. Psihologia. Sociologia [Perm University Herald. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology]. Iss. 3, pp. 452–464. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2022-3-452-464
Dorfman, L.Ya. and Kalugin, A.Yu. (2022). [An Individual-intellectual model of students’ academic achievement (Based on humanitarian specializations)]. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie [Psychological Science and Education]. Vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 68–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/pse.2022270407
Gana, K. and Broc, G. (2019). Structural equation modeling with lavaan. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons
Publ., 304 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119579038
Gatignon, H. (2014). Statistical analysis of management data. 3rd ed. New York: Springer Publ., 578 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8594-0
Guilford, J.P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill Publ., 538 p.
Hayes, A.F. (2015). An index and test of linear moderated mediation. Multivariate Behavioral Research. Vol. 50, iss. 1, pp. 1–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2014.962683
Hayes, A.F. (2022). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regressionbased approach (Methodology in the social sciences). 3rd ed. New York: The Guilford Press, 732 p.
Kalugin, A.Yu., Schebetenko, S.A., Mishkevich, A.M., Soto, C.J. and John, O.P. (2021). [Psychometric properties of the Russian version of the Big Five Inventory – 2]. Psikhologiya. Zhurnal Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki [Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics]. Vol. 18, № 1, pp. 7–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8918-2021-1-7-33
Merlin, V.S. (1986). Ocherk integral’nogo issledovaniya individual’nosti [Essay on the integral study of individuality]. Moscow:Pedagogika Publ., 256 p.
Nasledov, A.D. (2013). IBM SPSS Statistics 20 i AMOS: professional’nyy statisticheskiy analiz dannykh [IBM SPSS Statistics 20 and AMOS: Professional statistical data analysis]. St. Petersburg: Piter Publ., 416 p.
Raven, J.C., Court, J.H. and Raven, J. (1997). Rukovodstvo k progressivnym matritsam Ravena i slovarnym shkalam. Razdel 1. Obschaya chast’ rukovodstva [Manual for Raven’s progressive matrices and vocabulary scales. Section 1. General overview]. Moscow: Kogito-Tsentr Publ., 82 p.
Ryu, E. and Cheong, J. (2017). Comparing indirect effects in different groups in single-group and multigroup structural equation models. Frontiers in Psychology. Vol. 8. Available at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00747/full (accessed
05.2022). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00747
Schebetenko, S.A., Kalugin, A.Yu., Mishkevich, A.M., Soto, C.J. and John, O.P. (2020). Measurement invariance and sex and age differences of the Big Five Inventory-2: Evidence from the Russian version. Assessment. Vol. 27, iss. 3, pp. 472−486. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191119860901
Soto, C.J. and John, O.P. (2017). The next Big Five nventory (BFI-2): Developing and assessing a hierarchical model with 15 facets to enhance bandwidth, fidelity, and predictive power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 113, iss. 1, pp. 117−143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000096
Strelau, J., Angleitner, A. and Newberry, B.H. (1999). The Pavlovian temperament survey (PTS): an international handbook. Göttingen, DE: Hogrefe & Huber Publ., 108 p.
Strelau, J. and Zawadzki, B. (1995). The formal characteristics of behavior – Temperament inventory (FCB–TI): Validity studies. European Journal of Personality. Vol. 9, iss. 3, pp. 207−229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2410090304
Strelau, J., Mitina, O., Zavadskiy, B., Babaeva, Yu. and Menchuk, T. (2009). Metodika diagnostiki temperamenta (formal’no-dinamicheskikh kharakteristik povedeniya) [Method for diagnosing temperament (formal and dynamic characteristics of behavior)]. Moscow: Smysl Publ., 104 p.
Ushakov, D.V. (2011). Psikhologiya intellekta i odarennosti [Psychology of intelligence and giftedness]. Moscow: IP RAS Publ., 464 p.
Wallach, M.A. and Kogan, N. (1965). Modes of thinking in young children: A study of the creativityintelligence distinction. New York:Holt, Rinehart, and Winston Publ., 357 p.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Perm University Herald. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
