The problem of foundations of philosophical anthropological discourse
Philosophy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2017-1-29-34Keywords:
man, philosophical anthropology, philosophical foundations, human being, self-knowledgeAbstract
The purpose of this article is the study of the problem of foundations of philosophical anthropological discourse.The emergence of the question of foundations of philosophical anthropology connects with the position of those philosophers who suppose that philosophical anthropology can not exist as a system of positive productive knowledge. The analysis of the reasons for this approach shows that these reasons are related to the understanding of a man as aunique and specific singularity. Philosophers who deny the existence of philosophical anthropology as a science, believe that this individuality and uniqueness of a person can not be represented by means of abstract conceptual structures with shared meanings. The foundation of this interpretation of human being is the recognition of the limitedhuman body. Besides, emphasizing the sphere of the immediate and of the sensuous as a determining state of human being is another foundation. According to the author these fundamentals are not only possible and the author thinks that the alternative basis of anthropological theories is the approval of the uniform nature of human reality. Thisfoundation of anthropological conceptions is the most promising and effective basis for the development and the perfection of philosophical anthropology. Especially, this perfection applies to existential versions of philosophical anthropological thought.References
ЧерданцеваИ.В. Пролегомены к пониманию человека в философии. Барнаул: Концепт, 2014. 166с.
ШтирнерМ. Единственный и его собственность. Харьков: Основа, 1994. 560с.
СвасьянК.А.Prooemium // Вопросы философии. 2010. №3–12.
РиккертГ. Границы естественнонаучного образования понятий: логическое введение в исторические науки. СПб.: Наука, 1997. 532с.
Международный ежегодник по философии культуры «Логос». 1925. Кн. М.: Территория будущего, 2005. 237с.
ГайденкоП.П. Прорыв к трансцендентному: новая онтологияXX века. М.: Республика, 1997. 495с.
ШелерМ. Положение человека в космосе // Проблемы человека в западной философии. М.: Прогресс, 1998. С.31–95.
References
Cherdantseva I.V. Prolegomeny k ponimaniyu cheloveka v filosofii [Prolegomenon to the Understanding of a Man in Philosophy]. Barnaul, Koncept Publ., 2014, 166 p. (In Russian).
Shtirner M. Edinstvennyy i ego sobstvennost [The One and his Property]. Harkov, Osnova Publ., 1994, 560 p. (In Russian).
Svasyan K.A. [Prooemium]. Voprosy filosofii [Questions of Philosophy]. 2010, no. 2, pp. 3–12. (In Russian).
Rikkert G. Granitsy estestvennonauchnogo obrazovaniya ponyatiy: logicheskoe vvedenie v istoricheskie nauki [The Boundaries of Concepts in the Natural Sciences: a Logical Introduction to the History of Science]. Saint Petersburg, Nauka Publ., 1997, 532 p. (In Russian).
Mezhdunarodnyy ezhegodnik po filosofii kultury «Logos». 1925. Kniga 1 [International Yearbook of the Philosophy of Culture «Logos». 1925. Book 1]. Moscow, Territoriya buduschego Publ., 2005, 237 p. (In Russian).
Gaydenko P.P. Proryv k transtsendentnomu: novaya ontologiya XX veka [A Breakthrough to Transcendental: New Ontology of the XX Century]. Moscow, Respublika Publ., 1997, 495 p. (In Russian).
Sheler M. [Man’s Position in the Universe]. Problemy cheloveka v zapadnoy filosofii [Human Problems in the Western Philosophy]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1998, pp. 31– 95. (In Russian).
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Perm University Herald. Philosophy. Psychology. Sociology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
