“CIVIL WAR IS THE KEY WORD OF OUR DAYS”: THE TERM “CIVIL WAR” IN THE RHETORIC OF GRIGORY ZINOVIEV
Keywords:
Civil War, the Russian Revolution, Soviet of workers’ and peasants’ deputies, legitimizing of violence, BolsheviksAbstract
The article examines the usage of the concept of “civil war” by Grigory Zinoviev, one of the key figures in the Bolshevik Party during the 1914–1918 period. The article uses the approach proposed by scholars of the Cambridge History of Ideas and draws on a variety of sources, including Zinoviev's writings, stenographic records of his speeches at various meetings, and newspaper reports on these events. Bolshevik discursive practices differed from most such practices of other political forces at the time. Before World War I broke out, Zinoviev used the concept of “civil war” as a mere statement. However, from the end of 1914 he, following Lenin, produced a series of party slogans. The most famous of these was “the transformation of the imperialist war into a civil war”, which the Bolsheviks working in Russia adopted ambiguously. Recognizing its unpopularity, Lenin and Zinoviev removed it from the agenda by 1917. Upon his arrival in Russia, Zinoviev stopped using the term “civil war” in public speeches as well as in intra-party discussions, preferring related terms such as “revolutionary war” and “socialist revolution”. However, this changed by July 1917, when Zinoviev was engaged in polemics with spokesmen of other parties, denying their accusations of “fomenting civil war” against the Bolsheviks and delegating these accusations to his opponents. Zinoviev's use of this term in this context peaked in November 1917 – March 1918, during the discussions surrounding the Brest Peace. As a categorical supporter of the peace, Zinoviev used the term “revolutionary war”, which was popular among “left communists” and left SRs. He first peripheralized the Russian civil war, attributing it as a regional conflict in Finland and Ukraine, before internationalizing it. The term “civil war” was actively used by Zinoviev during a time when it was necessary to decisively separate from the Social Democrats who took a patriotic stance and put forward the slogan of “civil peace”. Later, after he returned to Russia from exile, Zinoviev avoided using the term “civil war” in explaining Bolshevik strategies and tactics. As chairman of the Petrograd Soviet, he legitimized mobilizations for the Red Army, constantly emphasizing the participation of foreign forces in the civil war against Soviet government. Using images and concepts from the language of the Russian Revolution, he referred Clemenceau as “the French Kornilov”.References
Дажина И.М. Большевистские листовки в России периода Первой мировой войны и Февральской революции. Опыт источниковедческого анализа сводной таблицы документов. М., 1981. 179 с.
Годунов К.В. «Гражданская война»: политическое использование понятия весной 1917 г. // Слова и конфликты: язык противостояния и эскалация гражданской войны в России: сб. ст. СПб.: Изд-во Европ. ун-та в С.-Петербурге, 2022. С. 37–59.
Колоницкий Б.И. Введение // Слова и конфликты: язык противостояния и эскалация гражданской войны в России: сб. ст. СПб.: Изд-во Европ. ун-та в С.-Петербурге, 2022. С. 7–34.
Колоницкий Б.И., Годунов К.В. «Корниловщина» как «гражданская война»: использование поня-тия в условиях политического кризиса // Вестник Перм. ун-та. История. 2021. № 3. С. 78–87.
Рабинович А. Большевики у власти. Первый год советской эпохи в Петрограде. М.: АИРО-XXI: Новый хронограф, 2008. 624 с.
Резник А.В.* Вожди революции и легитимация гражданской войны // Слова и конфликты: язык противостояния и эскалация гражданской войны в России: сб. ст. СПб.: Изд-во Европ. ун-та в С.-Петербурге, 2022. С. 151–179.
Резник А.В.* Риторика репрезентации гражданской войны в «Известиях» (октябрь 1917 – январь 1918 г.) // Вестник Перм. ун-та. История. 2021. № 3(54). С. 88–100.
Тютюкин С.В., Шелохаев В.В. Марксисты и русская революция. М.: РОССПЭН, 1996. 240 с.
Эннкер Б. Аура вождя и пучины политики масс. Роль Ленина в российском революционном процессе 1917 г.: новый взгляд // Личность, общество и власть в истории России: сб. науч. ст., посвящ. 70-летию д. и. н., проф. В.И. Шишкина. Новосибирск, 2018. С. 170–190.
References
Dazhina, I.M. (1981), Bol'shevistskie listovki v Rossii perioda Pervoy mirovoy voyny i Fevral'skoy revolyutsii. Opyt istochnikovedcheskogo analiza svodnoy tablitsy dokumentov [Bolshevik leaflets in Russia during the First World War and the February Revolution. Experience in source analysis], Institut marksizma-leninizma pri TsK KPSS, Moscow, USSR, 179 p.
Ennker, B. (2018), “The aura of a leader and the abyss of mass politics. Lenin's role in the Russian revolutionary process of 1917: a new look”, in Lichnost', obshchestvo i vlast' v istorii Rossii. Sb. nauchnyh st., posvyashchennyy 70-letiyu d.i.n., prof. V.I. Shishkina [Personality, society and power in the history of Russia. Sat. scientific articles dedicated to the 70th anniversary of Doctor of Historical Sciences, prof. V. I. Shishkin], Izdatel'stvo Sibirskogo otdeleniya RAN, Novosibirsk, Russia, pp. 170–190.
Godunov, K.V. (2022), “«Civil War»: the political use of the concept in the spring of 1917”, in Slova i konflikty: yazyk protivostoyaniya i eskalatsiya grazhdanskoy voyny v Rossii: sb. st. [Words and Conflicts: The Language of Confrontation and the Escalation of the Russian Civil War. Collection of Articles], Izd-vo Evrop. un-ta v S.-Peterburge, St. Petersburg, Russia, pp. 37–59.
Kolonitskii, B.I. & Godunov, K.V. (2021), “«Kornilovshchina» as a «civil war»: the application of the concept in the context of a political crisis”, Vestnik Perm. Un-ta. Seriya Istoriya, № 3, pp. 78–87.
Kolonitskii, B.I. (2022), “Introduction”, in Slova i konflikty: yazyk protivostoyaniya i eskalatsiya grazhdanskoy voyny v Rossii: sb. st. [Words and Conflicts: The Language of Confrontation and the Escalation of the Russian Civil War. Collection of Articles], Izd-vo Evrop. un-ta v S.-Peterburge, St. Petersburg, Russia, pp. 7–34.
Rabinovich, A., (2008), Bol'sheviki u vlasti. Pervyy god sovetskoy epokhi v Petrograde [The Bolsheviks in Power: The First Year of Soviet Rule in Petrograd], “AIRO-XXI”, Novyy khronograph, Moscow, Russia, 624 p.
Reznik, A.* (2021), “Representation rhetoric of the civil war in “Izvestia” (October 1917 – January 1918)”, Vestnik Perm. Un-ta. Seriya Istoriya, № 3 (54), pp. 88–100.
Reznik, A.* (2022), “Leaders of the revolution and the legitimation of the Civil War”, in Slova i konflikty: yazyk protivostoyaniya i eskalatsiya grazhdanskoy voyny v Rossii: sb. st. [Words and Conflicts: The Language of Confrontation and the Escalation of the Russian Civil War. Collection of Articles], Izd-vo Evrop. un-ta v S.-Peterburge, St. Petersburg, Russia, pp. 151–179.
Tyutyukin, S.V. & Shelokhaev, V.V. (1996), Marksisty i russkaya revolyutsiya [Marxists and the Russian Revolution], ROSSPEN, Moscow, Russia, 240 p.
