DISSERTATIONISTS AND OPPONENTS: DISSERTATION DEFENCE MODELS AND OPPONENCY EXPERIENCE (THE 1930s AND 1940s)
Keywords:
generations of historians, soviet dissertation culture, dissertation defence model, dissertation dispute, degree candidates, opponents, dissertation reviews, A.V. Predtechensky, N.L. RubinshteinAbstract
This article explores the meaning and nature of the Opponents-Dissertationist communication models established in Soviet dissertation system, examining how they reflect the academic/professional, official, and personal interactions between scholars. The focus of the article is on the procedures for defending a doctoral dissertation. The key source of information for the research is the verbatim records (transcripts) of meetings of the academic councils at the educational institutions. By analyzing their content, the author identifies the types of interactions between dissertationists and opponents that were typical during the period in question. The author reviews in detail the doctoral defense of A.V. Predtechenskiy, highlighting the specific communication between the opponents and the dissertationist, as well as between experts related to the dissertation in question. The opponents of this scholar were mainly representatives of the first generation of historians of the 1930s and 1940s trained in history at universities before the revolution. The author studies the reviews to determine the principles of expert analysis of dissertations. The interactions between the opponents and degree candidates were used to develop several dissertation defense models. These include the following: Equal among equal; Disciple dissertationists and patron/mentor opponents; and Opponents and dissertationists on a search for the meaning of historical studies. The author concludes that the Soviet dissertation system adopted pre-revolutionary academic traditions, and that dissertation opponency was viewed as a valid means of upholding professional standards and scholarly principles during the period in question.References
Алеврас Н.Н. Защита диссертаций Николаем Ильичом Покровским в Ленинградском университете // Вестник С.-Петерб. ун-та. История. 2023. Т. 68, вып. 1. С. 259–276.
Алеврас Н.Н., Гришина Н.В. Историки из дореволюционного прошлого в советской диссертаци-онной системе: защиты докторских диссертаций М.Д. Присёлковым (1939) и А.И. Андреевым (1940) // Диалог со временем. 2022а. № 3. С. 205−221.
Алеврас Н.Н., Гришина Н.В. Докторская диссертация в советской диссертационной системе: опыт защит в довоенный период // Научный диалог. 2022b. Т. 11, вып. 3. С. 337−354.
Анатолий Васильевич Предтеченский. Из творческого наследия / сост. Т.Н. Жуковская, Л.М. Предтеченская. СПб., 1999. 436 с.
Вайнштейн О.Л. Историография средних веков в связи с развитием исторической мысли от начала средних веков до наших дней. М., Л.: Гос. соц.-экон. изд-во, 1940. 366 с.
Ганелин Р.Ш. А.В. Предтеченский в ЛОИИ // Анатолий Васильевич Предтеченский. Из творче-ского наследия / сост. Т.Н. Жуковская, Л.М. Предтеченская. СПб., 1999. С. 361−376.
Диссертационная культура российского историко-научного сообщества: опыт и практики подготовки и защит диссертаций (XIX – начало XX в.): коллективная монография / под ред. Н.Н. Алеврас, Н.В. Гришиной. М.; СПб.: Нестор-История, 2022. 464 с.
Жуковская Т.Н. Правительственные реформы и общественная мысль Александровской эпохи в творчестве А.В. Предтеченского (по материалам личного архива) // Анатолий Васильевич Предтеченский. Из творческого наследия / сост. Т.Н. Жуковская, Л.М. Предтеченская. СПб., 1999. С. 325−361.
Корзун В.П., Мягков Г.П. Отзывы официальных оппонентов: историографические задворки или ключевой жанр научного письма? // Magistra Vitae. Электронный журнал по историческим наукам и археологии. 2023. № 1. С. 93−106.
Попов А.И. Географические названия. Введение в топонимику. М.; Л.: Наука [Ленингр. отд.], 1965. 181 с.
Предтеченский А.В. Очерки общественно-политической истории России в первой четверти XIX века. М.; Л.: Изд-во Акад. наук СССР, 1957. 456 с.
Рубинштейн Н.Л. Русская историография. М.: Госполитиздат, 1941. 659 с.
Тарле Е.В. Об исследовании М.Ф. Злотникова «Континентальная блокада в России» // Злотников М.Ф. Континентальная блокада и Россия. М.; Л.: Наука, 1966. С. 7−8.
References
Alevras, N. N. (2023), “Dissertation defence of Nikolay Ilyich Pokrovsky at Leningrad University”, Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Istoriya, № 1(68) 68, pp. 259–276.
Alevras, N.N. & Grishina N.V. (2022a), “Pre-revolutionary historians in the soviet dissertation system: doctoral dissertation defense procedures of M.D. Priselkov (1939) and A.I. Andreev (1940)”, Dialog so vremenem, № 3, pp. 205–221.
Alevras, N.N. & N.V. Grishina (2022b), “Doctoral dissertations in soviet dissertation system: defense experiences in the pre-war period”, Nauchnyy dialog, № 3 (11), pp. 337–354.
Alevras, N.N. & N.V. Grishina (eds.) (2022), Dissertatsionnaya kul'tura rossiiskogo istoriko-nauchnogo soobshchestva: opyt i praktiki podgotovki i zashchit dissertatsii (XIX – nachalo XX v.): kollektivnaya monografiya [The Dissertation Culture of Russian Academic Society of Historians: experiences and practices of writing and defending dissertations (XIX – early XX centuries): a collective monograph], Nestor-Istoriya, Moscow - St. Petersburg, Russia, 464 p.
Ganelin, R.Sh. (1999), “A.V. Predtechenskiy”, in Zhukovskaya, T.N. & L.M. Predtechenskaya (eds.) (1999), Anatoliy Vasil'evich Predtechenskiy. Iz tvorcheskogo naslediya [Anatoly Vasilievich Predtechensky. From creative heritage], Dmitriy Bulanin, St. Petersburg, Russia, pp. 361–376.
Korzun, V.P. & G.P. Myagkov (2023), “Reviews of official opponents: historiographic periphery or the key genre of academic writing?”, Magistra Vitae. Elektronnyi zhurnal po istoricheskim naukam i arkheologii, № 1, pp. 93–106.
Popov, A.I. (1965), Geograficheskie nazvaniya. Vvedenie v toponimiku [Geographic names. Introduction to toponymy], Nauka. Leningr. otd., Moscow; Leningrad, USSR, 181 p.
Predtechenskiy, A.V. (1957), Ocherki obshchestvenno-politicheskoy istorii Rossii v pervoy chetverti XIX veka [Essays on the social and political history of Russia in the first quarter of the 19th century], Izd-vo Akademii nauk SSSR, Moscow; Leningrad, USSR, 456 p.
Rubinshtein, N.L. (1941), Russkaya istoriografiya [Russian historiography)], Gospolitizdat, Moscow, USSR, 659 p.
Tarle, E.V. (1966), “On M.F. Zlotnikov’s study of the Continental blockade of Russia”, in Zlotnikov, M.F., Kontinental'naya blokada i Rossiya [Continental blockade and Russia], Izd-vo Nauka, Moscow; Leningrad, USSR, pp. 7–8.
Vaynshtein, O.L. (1940), Istoriografiya srednikh vekov v svyazi s razvitiem istoricheskoy mysli ot nachala srednikh vekov do nashikh dney [The historiography of the Middle Ages and the development of historical thought from the early Middle Ages to present day], Gosudarstvennoe sotsial'no-ekonomicheskoe izd-vo, Moscow; Leningrad, USSR, 366 p.
Zhukovskaya, T.N. (1999), “Governmental reforms and social thought in the Alexander’s age in the works of A.V. Predtechenskiy (based on the private archive)”, in Zhukovskaya, T.N. & L.M. Predtechenskaya (eds.) (1999), Anatoliy Vasil'evich Predtechenskiy. Iz tvorcheskogo naslediya [Anatoly Vasilievich Predtechensky. From creative heritage], Dmitriy Bulanin, St. Petersburg, Russia, pp. 325–361.
Zhukovskaya, T.N. & L.M. Predtechenskaya (eds.) (1999), Anatoliy Vasil'evich Predtechenskiy. Iz tvorcheskogo naslediya [Anatoly Vasilievich Predtechensky. From creative heritage], Dmitriy Bulanin, St. Petersburg, Russia, 436 p.
