ON THE ATTRIBUTION OF THE FUNCTIONS OF “CROOKED SCYTHES” FROM THE KAMA REGION MONUMENTS (ON THE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE ECONOMIC SECTOR)

Authors

  • A. A. Krasnopyorov

Keywords:

Glyadeno culture, Mazunino culture, Azelino culture, farming, beekeeping, knife

Abstract

The article discusses the finds of specific iron objects at the sites of the Glyadenovo, Mazunino, and Azelino cultures. These objects are short, narrow, double-edged blades with a handle set at an obtuse angle (120°) to its plane and a hook at the end. The width is consistent over almost the entire length and is 2.0–3.0 cm, and the blade is 13.0–17.0 cm long with a triangular cross-section. These objects have repeatedly attracted attention of researchers, but most of the participants in the discussion a priori assumed their military function without providing reasonable explanations or analogies, and believed that the objects were imported. Other, based on very distant similarities, believed that the objects were used as scythes for cutting grass, but neither of these explanations stand up to criticism, primarily in terms of functional efficiency. In ethnography, right up to modern life, objects of this morphology – a knife, with a pointed end, two working blades, sometimes with an triangular cross-section, a handle bent above the plane of the blade (outwardly similar to a modern construction trowel or art stack), most often with a blade length of about 12-13 cm and a total length of about 27 cm, the length of the handle, regardless of the size of the blade, is about 12 cm and is determined by the ease of grip with the palm – have been used as knives for cutting wax from honeycombs. Thus, the finds reveal another area of the economy of the ancient population of the forest zone of Eastern Europe, which has not been previously noted by researchers. The distribution of these finds in the forest zone, i.e. in the bee distribution zone, supports the theory that they were used for cutting wax from honeycombs.

References

Волков С.Р. Комплекс вооружения из погребений с т.н. «косами-горбушами» IV‒V вв. в Среднем Прикамье // Тез. докл. II Рос. университ.-акад. науч.-практ. конф. Ижевск, 1995. Ч. 1. С. 16.

Гавритухин И.О., Красноперов А.А. Тураевский курганный могильник // Археология Волго-Уралья: в 7 т. Т. 4. Эпоха Великого переселения народов / Ин-т археологии им. А.Х. Халикова АН РТ; под общ. ред. А.Г. Ситдикова. Казань: Изд-во АН РТ, 2022. С. 175‒192.

Генинг В.Ф. Тураевский могильник V в. н.э. (захоронение военачальников) // Из археологии Волго-Камья / отв. ред. А.Х. Халиков. Казань: ИЯЛИ КФАН СССР, 1976. С. 55‒108.

Завьялов В.И., Розанова Л.С., Терехова Н.Н. История кузнечного ремесла финно-угорских наро-дов Поволжья и Предуралья: к проблеме этнокультурных взаимодействий. М.: Знак, 2009. 264 с.

Казанцева О.А. Металлические «косы-горбуши» в могильнике Кудашевский I // Вестник Перм. ун-та. История. 2017. № 1 (36). С. 74‒83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17072/2219-3111-2017-1-74-83

Кондрашин В.В. Железообработка в Среднем Поволжье и Прикамье в III в. до н.э. ‒ VII в. н.э. (технологический аспект): автореф. дис. ... канд. ист. наук. Ижевск, 2003. 26 c.

Малашев В.Ю. Периодизация ременных гарнитур позднесарматского времени // Сарматы и их соседи на Дону: материалы и исследования по археологии Дона / отв. ред. Ю.К. Гугуев. Ростов н/Д: Терра, 2000. Вып. 1. С. 194‒232.

Малашев В.Ю., Гаджиев И.С., Ильюков Л.С. Страна маскутов в Западном Прикаспии. Курганные могильники Прикаспийского Дагестана III–V вв. н.э. Махачкала: Мавраевъ, 2015. 452 с.

Останина Т.И. Население Среднего Прикамья в III‒V вв. Ижевск: Удмурт. ин-т истории, языка и литературы УрО РАН, 1997. 327 с.

Перевощиков С.Е. Еще раз о «косах-горбушах» // Проблемы межэтнических взаимодействий в сопредельных национальных и административных образованиях (на примере региона среднего Прикамья): тез. докл. Сарапул, 1997. С. 67‒68.

Перевощиков С.Е. Железообрабатывающее производство населения Камско-Вятского междуре-чья в эпоху средневековья (технологический аспект). Ижевск, 2002. 176 с.

Перевощиков С.Е., Пастушенко И.О. «Косы-горбуши» в средневековых памятниках Прикамья // Российские немцы: история и современность / Историк и дело. Вып. 5 / отв. ред. А.Н. Маркин. Ижевск, 2006. С. 105‒120.

Перескоков М.Л. Пермское Приуралье в финале раннего железного века. Пермь: Изд-во Перм. гос. ун-та, 2018. 320 с.

Семыкин Ю.А. Технологическая характеристика кузнечного инвентаря из Тураевского могильника // Новое в средневековой археологии Евразии / отв. ред. А.В. Богачев. Самара: Артефакт, 1993. С. 192‒200.

Терехова Н.Н., Розанова Л.С., Завьялов В.И., Толмачева М.М. Очерки по истории древней желе-зообработки в Восточной Европе. М.: Металлургия, 1997. 320 с.

References

Gavrituhin, I.O. & A.A. Krasnoperov (2022), “Turaevsky burial mound”, in Goldina, R.D. (ed.) Arheologiya Volgo-Ural'ya. V 7 t. T. 4. Epoha Velikogo pereseleniya narodov [Archeology of the Volga-Ural region. In 7 vols. Vol. 4. The era of the Great Migration of Peoples], Izd-vo AN RT, Kazan, Russia, pp. 175–192.

Gening, V.F. (1976), “Turaevo burial ground in the 5th century (burial of military leaders)”, in Halikov, A.H. (ed.), Iz arheologii Volgo-Kam'ya [From the archeology of Volga-Kama], IYALI KFAN SSSR, Kazan, Russia, pp. 55–108.

Kazantseva, O.A. (2017), “Metal «crooked scythes» in the Kudash I burial ground”, Vestnik Perm. un-ta. Ser. Istoriya, № 1 (36), pp. 74–83.

Kondrashin, V.V. (2003), Zhelezoobrabotka v Srednem Povolzh'e i Prikam'e v III v. do n.e. VII v. n.e. (tekhnologicheskiy aspekt) [Iron processing in the Middle Volga and Kama region in the 3d century BC – 7th century AD (technological aspect)], Extended abstract of PhD dissertation, Izhevsk, Russia, 26 p.

Malashev, V.Yu. (2000), “Periodization of belt sets of the late Sarmatian period”, in Guguev, Yu. K. (ed.), Sarmaty i ih sosedi na Donu [Sarmatians and their neighbors on the Don], Materials and research on the archeology of the Don, vol. 1], Terra, Rostov-on-Don, Russia, pp. 194–232.

Malashev, V.Yu., Gadzhiev, I.S. & L.S. Il'yukov (2015), Strana maskutov v Zapadnom Prikaspii. Kurgannye mogil'niki Prikaspiyskogo Dagestana III-V vv. n. e. [Country of the Maskuts in the Western Caspian region. Barrows burial grounds of Caspian Dagestan in the centuries], Mavraev, Mahachkala, Russia, 452 p.

Ostanina, T.I. (1997), Naselenie Srednego Prikam'ya v III-V vv. [Population of the Middle Kama region in the 3d – 5th centuries], Udmurtskiy institut istorii, yazyka i literatury UrO RAN, Izhevsk, Russia, 327 p.

Pereskokov, M.L. (2018), Permskoe Priural'e v finale rannego zheleznogo veka [Perm Urals at the end of the Early Iron Age], PGU, Perm, Russia, 320 p.

Perevoshchikov, S.E. & I.O. Pastushenko (2006), “«Crooked scythes» in medieval monuments of the Kama region”, in Markin, A.N. (ed.), Rossiyskie nemtsy: istoriya i sovremennost' [Russian Germans: history and modernity], The historian and the case, vol. 5, n.p., Izhevsk, Russia, pp. 105–120.

Perevoshchikov, S.E. (1997), “Once again about «crooked scythes»”, in Problemy mezhetnicheskih vzaimodejstvij v sopredel'nyh nacional'nyh i administrativnyh obrazovaniyah (na primere regiona srednego Prikam'ya) [Problems of interethnic interactions in adjacent national and administrative entities (using the example of the middle Kama region)], n.p., Sarapul, Russia, pp. 67–68.

Perevoshchikov, S.E. (2002), Zhelezoobrabatyvayushchee proizvodstvo naseleniya Kamsko-Vyatskogo mezhdurech'ya v epohu srednevekov'ya (tekhnologicheskiy aspekt) [Iron processing production of the population of the Kama-Vyatka interfluve in the Middle Ages (technological aspect)], n.p., Izhevsk, Russia, 176 p.

Semykin, Yu.A. (1993), “Technological characteristics of blacksmith equipment from the Turaevo burial ground”, in Bogachev, A.V. (ed.), Novoe v srednevekovoy arheologii Evrazii [New in medieval archeology of Eurasia], Istoriko-kul'turnaya assotsiatsiya «Artefakt», Samara, Russia, pp. 192–200.

Terekhova, N.N., Rozanova, L.S., Zav'yalov, V.I. & M.M. Tolmacheva (1997), Ocherki po istorii drevney zhelezoobrabotki v Vostochnoy Evrope [Essays on the history of ancient ironworking in Eastern Europe], Metallurgiya, Moscow, Russia, 320 p.

Volkov, S.R. (1995), “A set of weapons from burials with the scythes of the 4th and 5th centuries in the Kama region”, in Vtoraya Rossiyskaya universitetsko-akademicheskaya nauchno-prakticheskaya konferentsiya [Second Russian University-Academic Scientific and Practical Conference], part 1, n.p., Izhevsk, Russia, p. 16.

Zav'yalov, V.I., Rozanova, L.S. & N.N. Terekhova (2009), Istoriya kuznechnogo remesla finno-ugorskih narodov Povolzh'ya i Predural'ya: K probleme etnokul'turnyh vzaimodeystviy [History of the blacksmith craft of the Finno-Ugric peoples of the Volga and Cis-Ural regions: On the problem of ethnocultural interactions], Znak, Moscow, Russia, 264 p.

Published

2024-04-08

How to Cite

Krasnopyorov А. А. . (2024). ON THE ATTRIBUTION OF THE FUNCTIONS OF “CROOKED SCYTHES” FROM THE KAMA REGION MONUMENTS (ON THE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE ECONOMIC SECTOR). PERM UNIVERSITY HERALD. History, 64(1), 67–72. Retrieved from http://press.psu.ru/index.php/history/article/view/8964