REVIEW OF THE ARCHIVAL FUNDS ON THE ACTIVITIES OF THE ALL-RUSSIAN SOCIETY FOR THE PROTECTION OF HISTORICAL AND CULTURAL MONUMENTS FROM THE 1960s TO THE 1980s
Keywords:
VOOPIK, grassroots activism, central and regional archives, soviet mass voluntary organizations, protection of historical and cultural heritage, letters to the authoritiesAbstract
The article presents a review of Russian archival funds related to the protection of historical and cultural heritage and the activities of the All-Russian Society for the Protection of Historical and Cultural Monuments (hereinafter VOOPIK, or the Society). The study is based on materials from various state organizations, including the State Archive of the Russian Federation (GARF), the Perm State Archive of Socio-Political History (PermGASPI), the State Archive of the Perm Krai (GAPK), the Center for Documentation of Public Organizations of the Sverdlovsk Oblast (CDOOSO), the United State Archive of the Chelyabinsk Oblast (OGACHO), and the Perm Museum of Local Lore (PKM). The relevance of the study lies in the growing interest of the state, academia and society in both grassroots activism and mass voluntary organizations in the late Soviet Union. The Soviet experience is particularly valuable as many of its initiatives are being revisited in contemporary Russian reality. The main basis for Soviet studies are archival sources, which are regularly introduced into academic circulation. The aim of the article is to study and classify archival sources on the above topic. In addition to the review, the article provides a brief historiographical overview of the problem's research status, as well as a historical note on the activities of the VOOPIK. The author identifies several types of sources in archival funds and provides a brief description of each. An important role in studying the activity of Soviet mass organizations is played by the determination of the levels of research – from the republican (RSFSR) to regional (oblast, krai, ASSR) and grassroots (district, city) levels. This division justifies the use of both central and regional archives, as the archival sources from Central Archive (GARF) provide an understanding of the specifics of the functioning of the central apparatus of the VOOPIK, while the sources of regional archives recreate a picture of activism on “grassroots level” where the main productive activities of the Society took place. When using archives of different levels, one can change the optics of research and study VOOPIK from different angles. The study pays particular attention to the “Letters to VOOPIK” written by Soviet citizens to authorities, media, and voluntary organizations regarding the protection of historical and cultural heritage. These letters, which were a common practice in Soviet everyday life, can shed light on the motives and goals of the activists.References
Болтунова Е.М., Егорова Г.С. Территория и история. Позднесоветские проекты «Города-герои» и «Золотое кольцо». М.: Кучково поле, 2022. 400 с.
Донован В. «Идя назад, шагаем вперед»: краеведческие музеи и создание местной памяти в Северо-Западном регионе, 1956−1981 // Антропологический форум. 2012. № 16. С. 379−402.
Кормина Ж., Штырков С. «Это наше исконное русское, и никуда нам от этого не деться»: предыстория постсоветской десекуляризации // Изобретение религии: десекуляризация в постсоветском контексте. СПб.: Изд-во Европ. ун-та в С.-Петербурге, 2015. С. 7−46.
Матвеев Е.В. Всесоюзное добровольное общество любителей книги (1974−1992): «организован-ное чтение» в контексте позднего советского общества: дис. … канд. ист. наук. Пермь, 2021. 286 с.
Мельникова Е.А. Руками народа: следопытское движение 1960−1980-х гг. в СССР // Антрополо-гический форум. 2018. № 37.
Неплюев П.А. Публичная история «по-советски». Региональные отделения Всероссийского общества охраны памятников истории и культуры: «бюрократические правила игры» и историко-культурный активизм // Вестник Пермского университета. История. 2022. № 58(3). С. 79−93.
Несовершенная публичная сфера. История режимов публичности в России / под ред. Т. Вайзер, Т. Атнашева, М. Велижева. М.: Новое литературное обозрение, 2021. 744 с.
Klots A., Romashova M. Lenin’s Cohorts: The First Mass Generation of Soviet Pensioners and Public Activism in the Khrushchev Era // Kritika: Explorations in Russian and Eurasian History. 2018. Vol. 19, no. 3. P. 573−597.
Kozlov D. The Historical Turn in Late Soviet Culture: Retrospectivism, Factography, Doubt. 1953−1991 // Kritika. 2001. Vol. 2(3). P. 577−600.
References
Boltunova, E.M. & Egorova, G.S. (2022), Territoriya i istoriya. Pozdnesovetskie proekty «Goroda-geroi» i «Zolotoe kol'tso» [Territory and history: late Soviet projects of “Hero Cities” and the “Golden Ring”], Kuchkovo pole, Moscow, Russia, 400 p.
Donovan, V. (2012), “"Idya nazad, shagaem vpered": Kraevedcheskie museums and the making of local memory in North West Russia, 1956–1981”, Antropologicheskiy forum, № 16, pp. 379−402.
Klots, A. & M. Romashova (2018), “Lenin’s Cohorts: The First Mass Generation of Soviet Pensioners and Pub-lic Activism in the Khrushchev Era”, Kritika: Explorations in Russian and Eurasian History, vol. 17, № 1, pp. 573−597.
Kormina Zh. & Shtyrkov S. (2015) “"This is Ours, Russian, and We Can’t Get Away From it": Background of Post-Soviet Desecularization”, in Izobretenie religii: desekulyarizatsiya v postsovetskom kontekste [The Invention of Religion: Desecularization in the Post-Soviet Context], EUPress, St. Petersburg, Russia, pp. 7−46.
Kozlov D. (2001), “The Historical Turn in Late Soviet Culture: Retrospectivism, Factography, Doubt. 1953-1991”, Kritika, vol. 2 (3), pp. 577-600.
Matveev, E.V. (2021) Vsesoyuznoe dobrovol'noe obshhestvo lyubiteley knigi (1974−1992): «Organizovannoe chtenie» v kontekste pozdnego sovetskogo obshhestva. [All-Union Voluntary Society of Book Lovers (1974−-1992): “Organized reading” in the context of late Soviet society], PhD dissertation, Perm State University, Perm, Russia, 286 p.
Mel'nikova, E.A. (2018), “By the people’s hands: the sledopyt movement in the USSR of the 1960s – 1980s”, Antropologicheskiy forum, № 19, pp. 19−53.
Neplyuev, P.A. (2022) “Public history "in a Soviet way". Regional branches of the All-Russian Society for the Protection of Historical and Cultural Monuments: «bureaucratic rules of the game" and historical and cultural activism”, Vestnik Perm. un-ta. Istoriya, № 58 (3), pp. 79-93.
Vayzer, T., Atnashev, T. & M. Velizhev (eds.) (2021), Nesovershennaya publichnaya sfera. Istoriya rezhimov publichnosti v Rossii [An imperfect public sphere. History of publicity regimes in Russia], Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, Moscow, Russia, 744 p.
