«IF IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO INCLUDE A SOIL SCIENTIST IN THE DELEGATION, PLEASE SEND A PHYSICIST OR A CHEMISTER»: SOVIET PROJECTS FOR TRANSFORMING NATURE AND THEIR PRESENTATION ABROAD
Keywords:
irrigation, the flow transfer of northern rivers, conquest of nature, Siberia-Aral canal, Volga-Chogray canalAbstract
The article deals with Soviet projects for the transformation of the natural environment and their presentation abroad. These projects were aimed at “conquering the elemental forces” of nature and introducing the lands located in the arid regions of the USSR into agricultural circulation. The most famous of these projects was the turn of the Siberian rivers, designed to solve the problem of lowering the Aral Sea level. The attempts of the Soviet authorities to transform the natural environment aroused great interest abroad, especially in the United States, where in the 1950s a similar project was being developed to turn the flow of northern rivers. Interest in these projects made them a showcase for Soviet scientific diplomacy. Only the project of turning the rivers of the north of the European part of the country came to practical implementation in the USSR, which was supposed to replenish the Volga water taken during the creation of the “Volga – Chogray” and “Volga – Don 2” canals. Initial interest in Soviet projects for the transformation of the natural environment abroad began to give way to anxiety. Soviet scientists and experts in the field of land reclamation themselves were divided into two camps – supporters and opponents of the turn of the rivers. The former motivated support for the project by saying that this is the only way to meet the needs of a planned economy. The latter called the project an ecological disaster, and over time their voices sounded louder. The impossibility of implementing the project of diversion of the rivers and presenting its advantages abroad led Soviet scientists to concentrate their attention on combating desertification and secondary salinization of soils. These developments were used abroad in the creation of irrigation systems in third world countries financed by the Soviet authorities.References
Александров Б.А. Сталинский план преобразования природы в действии. М., 1952. 306 с.
Воропаев Г.В., Бостанджогло А.А. Проблема изъятия, переброски и распределения части стока сибирских рек для районов Западной Сибири, Урала, Средней Азии и Казахстана. М.: Изд-во АН СССР, 1984.
Воробьев Д. Когда государство спорит с собой: дебаты о проекте «поворота рек» // Неприкос-новенный запас. 2006. № 46. С. 85−102.
Гололобов Е.И. Пространство воды как ресурс и как угроза в истории освоения Севера Запад-ной Сибири в XX веке // Вестник Сургут. гос. пед. ун-та. 2021. T. 75, № 6. С. 79−92.
Давыдов М. М. Великие гидротехнические сооружения сталинской эпохи // Большевик. 1951. № 20. С. 30−41.
Дэвид-Фокс М. Витрины великого эксперимента. Культурная дипломатия Советского Союза и его западные гости, 1921−1941. М.: Новое литературное обозрение, 2015. 568 с.
Захаров Г.А. Начальный этап деятельности ленинградского отделения Всесоюзного общества культурной связи с заграницей (ЛО ВОКС) в 1954−1955 гг. // Науч.-техн. ведомости СПбГПУ. Гуманитарные и общественные науки. 2017. Т. 8, № 1. С. 9−17.
Ковда В.А. Великий план преобразования природы. М.: Изд-во АН СССР, 1952. 109 с.
Колодин М. Вода и пустыни. М.: Мысль, 1981. 74 с.
Лужков Ю.М., Духовный В.А., Полад-заде А.П. О проекте перераспределения части стока си-бирских рек // Межбассейновая переброска стока рек: реализованные и нереализованные про-екты. Ташкент, 2020. C. 7−17.
Лесная-Лыжина Е.В. Сталинский план преобразования природы и его осуществление на Юж-ном Урале. М., 2018. 760 с.
Львович М.И. Мировые водные ресурсы и их будущее. М.: Мысль, 1974. 448 с.
Самарин А.В. Проекты переброски северных рек: ученые Коми против советской гигантомании // Новый исторический вестник. 2009. № 4. С. 58−66.
Саушкин Ю.Г. Великое преобразование природы Советского Союза. М.: Изд-во геолог. литер, 1951. 131 с.
Собисевич А.В. Споры о проекте канала Волга−Чограй: экологические принципы против инте-ресов плановой экономики // Вестник Сургут. гос. пед. ун-та. 2021. Т. 75, № 6. С. 70–78.
Шёнфельдер Т.Б. История орошения в Краснодарском и Ставропольском краях // Проблемы истории, методологии и социологии почвоведения: материалы III Всерос. науч. конф. с между-нар. участием. Пущино, 2017. C. 208−211.
Brain S. The Great Stalin Plan for the Transformation of Nature // Environmental History. 2010. Vol. 15, no. 4. P. 670–700.
Forest B., Forest P. Engineering the North American Waterscape: The High Modernist Mapping
of Continental Water Transfer Project // Political Geography. 2012. Vol. 31, no. 3. P. 167–183.
Josephson P. Industrialized Nature: Brute Force Technology and the Transformation of the Natural World. Washington and Covelo, CA: Island Press, 2002.
Shaw D. Mastering Nature through Science: Soviet Geographers and the Great Stalin Plan for the Transformation of Nature, 1948–53 // The Slavonic and East European Review. 2015. Vol. 93, no. 1. P. 120−146.
References
Aleksandrov, B.A. (1952), Stalinskiy plan preobrazovaniya prirody v deystvii [Stalin's plan for the transformation of nature in action], Krymizdat, Moscow, USSR, 306 p.
Brain, S. (2010), “The Great Stalin Plan for the Transformation of Nature”, Environmental History, vol. 15, № 4, pp. 670–700.
David-Fox, М. (2015), Vitriny velikogo eksperimenta. Kul'turnaya diplomatiya Sovetskogo Soyuza i yego zapadnyye gosti, 1921–1941 [Showcases of the great experiment. Cultural diplomacy of the Soviet Union and its Western guests, 1921–1941], Novoe literaturnoye obozrenie, Moscow, Russia, 568 p.
Davydov, M. M. (1951), “Great hydraulic structures of the Stalin era”, Bol’shevik, № 20, pp. 30–41.
Forest, B. & P. Forest (2012), “Engineering the North American waterscape: The high modernist mapping
of continental water transfer project”, Political Geography, vol. 31, № 3, pp. 167–183.
Gololobov, Ye.I. (2021), “The space of water as a resource and as a threat in the history of the development of the North of Western Siberia in the 20th century”, Vestnik Surgutskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta, vol. 75, № 6, pp. 79–92.
Josephson, P. (2002), Industrialized Nature: Brute Force Technology and the Transformation of the Natural World, Island Press, Washington, USA, 313 p.
Kolodin, M. (1981), Voda i pustyni [Water and deserts], Mysl', Moscow, USSR, 74 p.
Kovda, V.A. (1952), Velikiy plan preobrazovaniya prirody [The great plan for the transformation of nature], Izdatel'stvo AN SSSR, Moscow, USSR, 109 p.
Lesnaya-Lyzhina, E.V. (2018), Stalinskiy plan preobrazovaniya prirody i ego osushchestvlenie na Yuzhnom Urale [Stalin's plan for the transformation of nature and its implementation in the South Urals], Athanor, Moscow, Russia, 760 p.
Luzhkov, Yu.M., Dukhovnyy, V.A. & A.P Polad-zade (2020), “About the project for the redistribution of part
of the flow of Siberian rivers”, in Mezhbasseynovaya perebroska stoka rek: realizovannyye i nerealizovannyye proyekty [Inter-basin transfer of river runoff: implemented and unrealized projects], NIC MKVK, Tashkent,
Uzbekistan, pp. 7–17.
L'vovich, M.I. (1974), Mirovyye vodnyye resursy i ikh budushcheye [World water resources and their future]. Mysl', Moscow, USSR, 448 p.
Samarin, A.V. (2009), “Northern river diversion projects: Komi scientists against Soviet megaloma”, Novyy istoricheskiy vestnik, № 4, pp. 58–66.
Saushkin, Yu. (1951), Velikoye preobrazovaniye prirody Sovetskogo Soyuza [The great transformation of the nature of the Soviet Union], Izdatel'stvo geologicheskoy literatury, Moscow, USSR, 131 p.
Shaw, D. (2015), “Mastering Nature through Science: Soviet Geographers and the Great Stalin Plan for the Transformation of Nature, 1948–53”, The Slavonic and East European Review, vol. 93, № 1, pp. 120–146.
Shonfel'der, T.B. (2017), “The history of irrigation in the Krasnodar and Stavropol Territories”, in Problemy istorii, metodologii i sotsiologii pochvovedeniya: materialy III Vseros. nauch. konf. s mezhdunar. uchastiem [Problems of the history, methodology and sociology of soil science: materials of the 3d All-Russian. scientific conf. with international participation], Tovarishchestvo nauchnykh izdaniy KMK, Pushino, Russia, pp. 208–211.
Sobisevich, A.V. (2021), “Disputes over the Volga-Chogray canal project: ecological principles against the interests of the planned economy”, Vestnik Surgutskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta, vol. 75, № 6, pp. 70–78.
Vorob'yev, D. (2006), “When the State Argues with Itself: The Debate on the «Turn of the Rivers» Project”, Neprikosnovennyy zapas, № 46, pp. 85–102.
Voropayev, G.V. & A.A. Bostandzhoglo (1984), Problema izyatiya, perebroski i raspredeleniya chasti stoka sibirskikh rek dlya rayonov Zapadnoy Sibiri, Urala, Sredney Azii i Kazakhstana [The problem of withdrawal, transfer and distribution of part of the flow of Siberian rivers for the regions of Western Siberia, the Urals, Central Asia and Kazakhstan], Izdatel'stvo AN SSSR, Moscow, USSR, 375 p.
Zaharov, G.A. (2017), “The initial stage of the activities of the Leningrad branch of the All-Union Society for Cultural Relations with Foreign Countries (LO VOKS) in 1954–1955”, Nauchno-tekhnicheskiye vedomosti SPbGPU. Gumanitarnyye i obshchestvennyye nauki, vol. 8, № 1, pp. 9–17.
