Temptations of the New Economic Policy: malfeasances of the Ural responsible officials and economic executives in the 1920s

Authors

  • S. V. Vorobyev Institute of History and Archaeology, Ural branch of Russian Academy of Sciences

Keywords:

regional management system, the Ural region, the New Economic Policy, Party and Soviet leaders, economic executives, malfeasances

Abstract

With the beginning of the New Economic Policy in the Soviet Russia, the external environment of the functioning of the Soviet system of governance changed, because “rules of the game” in economic sphere were changed, and free entrepreneurial activity was revived. New entrepreneurs established informal personal contacts with representatives of the government who were often materially stimulated by the Nepmen. There was no effective mechanism of control over the activity of Party, Soviet and economic organizations of local authorities in the 1920s which led to favorable conditions for misuses. The Soviet administrative elite with no constant monitoring from the higher authorities and sometimes with low moral characteristics sought to “cash out” administrative resources for getting material benefits. Official misuses began to spread widely with the beginning of the New Economic Policy because it allowed for favorable economic environment in which those vices extended to grow. Economic executives, government authorities and law enforcement authorities experienced the temptations of the NEP, but there was also infiltration of the new psychology into the ranks of the Party which was the core of the emerging Soviet system of government. The deviant behavior of the communists expressed in the misuse of official position, bribery, embezzlement of public funds, maintaining a bourgeois way of life. Such behavior of the Soviet elite undermined authority of the power and worsened psychological climate of the society. The Party leadership tried to counteract such negative phenomena and to limit their spread by issuing several resolutions and organizing various mass events aimed to improve the Party's ranks. However such preventive and repressive measures of the Party authorities during the NEP period did not succeed in eliminating corruption practices, bribery and other mismanagement among the Party, government and economic executives, but only kept them within certain limits.

Author Biography

S. V. Vorobyev, Institute of History and Archaeology, Ural branch of Russian Academy of Sciences

Candidate of Science in History, Research Fellow, Department of Political and Sociocultural History, Institute of History and Archaeology, Ural branch, Russian Academy of Sciences (Russia)

References

Библиографический список

Борисова Л.В. Нэп в зеркале показательных процессов по взяточничеству и хозяйственным преступлени-ям // Отеч. история. 2006. № 1. С. 84–97.

Воробьев С.В. Формирование властной вертикали советской политической системы в период нэпа (на примере Урала) // Государство и народ в условиях социалистического эксперимента: опыт ретроспект. анализа. Екатеринбург, 2008. С. 47–96.

Епихин А.Ю., Мозохин О.Б. ВЧК–ОГПУ в борьбе с коррупцией в годы новой экономической политики (1921–1928). М., 2007.

Лебина Н.Б., Чистиков А.Н. Обыватель и реформы. Картины повседневной жизни горожан в годы нэпа и хрущевского десятилетия. СПб., 2003.

Лейбович О., Колдушко А. А жертвы кто? Культовые практики местной номенклатуры до большого тер-рора // Ретроспектива. 2008. № 1. С. 15–23.

Лютов Л.Н. Региональная руководящая элита в начале нэпа (1921–1923 гг.): социокультурный аспект // НЭП: экон., полит. и социокульт. аспекты. М., 2006.

Нарский И.В. Жизнь в катастрофе: Будни населения Урала в 1917–1922 гг. М., 2001.

Никулин В.В. Власть и общество в 20-е годы. Политический режим в период нэпа. Становление и функ-ционирование (1921–1929 гг.). СПб., 1997.

Орлов И.Б., Маркосян Г.М. Взятка и борьба с ней в годы нэпа. М., 2013.

Чистиков А.Н. Партийно-государственная бюрократия Северо-Запада советской России 1920-х годов. СПб., 2007.

References

Borisova L.V. NEP v zerkale pokazatelnykh prozessov po vzyatochnichestvu i khozyaystvennym prestupleniyam // Otechestvennaya istoriya. 2006. no. 1. P. 84–97.

Vorobev S.V. Formirovanie vlastnoi vertikali sovetskoi politicheskoi sistemy v period NEPa (ns primere Urala) // Gosudarstvo i narod v usloviyakh sotsialisticheskogo eksperimenta: opyt retrospektivnogo analiza. Ekaterinburg, 2008. P. 47–96.

Epikhin A.Yu., Mozokhin O.B. VChK–OGPU v bor'be s korrupziey v gody novoi ekonomicheskoi politiki (1921–1928). Moscow, 2007.

Lebina N.B., Chistikov A.N. Obyvatel' i reformy. Kartiny povsednevnoi zhizni gorozhan v gody NEPa i khrushcevskogo desyatiletiya. St. Petersburg, 2003.

Leybovich O., Koldushko A. A zhertvy kto? Kul'tovye praktiki mestnoy nomenklatury do bolshogo terrora // Retrospektiva. 2008. no. 1. P. 15–23.

Lyutov L.N. Regionalnaya rukovodyashchaya elita v nachale NEPa (1921–1923 gg.): sotsiokulturnyy aspect // NEP: ekonomicheskie, politicheskie i sotsiokulturnye aspecty. Moscow, 2006.

Narskiy I.V. Zhizn' v katastrofe: Budni naseleniya Urala v 1917–1922 gg. Moscow, 2001.

Nikulin V.V. Vlast' i obshchestvo v 20-e gody. Politicheskiy rezhim v period NEPa. Stanovlenie i funktsionirovanie (1921–1929 gg.). St. Petersburg, 1997.

Orlov I.B., Markosyan G.M. Vzyatka i bor'ba s nei v gody NEPa. Moscow, 2013.

Chistikov A.N. Partiyno-gosudarstvennaya byurokratiya Severo-Zapada sovetskoi Rossii 1920-h godov. St. Petersburg, 2007.

Published

2020-08-05

How to Cite

Vorobyev, S. V. (2020). Temptations of the New Economic Policy: malfeasances of the Ural responsible officials and economic executives in the 1920s. PERM UNIVERSITY HERALD. History, 25(2), 60–71. Retrieved from http://press.psu.ru/index.php/history/article/view/3611