«RUSSIAN» FAR EAST? NATIONALIST RHETORIC IN THE DEBATE ON FREE TRADE IN THE FAR EASTERN TERRITORIES OF THE RUSSIAN EMPIRE

Authors

  • A. D. Turbin

Keywords:

Russian Empire, nationalism, self-identification, free ports, free trade, political claims

Abstract

The article analyzes the debate on free trade in the Amur Region in 1880–1910. It places the economic debate on the porto franco system in the ideological context of a nationalizing empire. The use of the language of nationalism is seen not as a reflection of internal national mobilization, but rather as a rhetorical tool aimed at enhancing political arguments. The annexation of the Amur Region and the introduction of the Amur porto franco are put in the context of the nationalist project. An analysis of nationalist rhetoric in public and managerial discussions about porto franco demonstrates the reception, instrumentalization, and adaptation of nationalist rhetoric, as well as the search for alternative languages to describe the population and political space. Finally, the dynamics of nationalist rhetoric during the implementation of the Russian colonial project in Manchuria demonstrates, on the one hand, the active construction of the “Russianness” of the Far East and Vladivostok as opposed to the “alien” Manchuria, Port Arthur, Dalian, and, on the other, the rejection of nationalist rhetoric in cases where it conflicted with the interests of local historical actors. In general, the author demonstrates the variety of political imaginations in late imperial Russia.

References

Bassin M. Imperial Visions: Nationalist Imagination and Geographical Expansion in the Russian Far East, 1840–1865. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999. 348 p.

Lieven D. Empire: The Russian Empire and Its Rivals from the Sixteenth Century to the Present. London: John Murray, 2000. 486 p.

Zayarnyuk A. Supranational Patriots? // Ab Imperio. 2018. № 2. P. 225–229.

Беляева Н.А. Дискуссия о судьбе приамурского порто-франко (1901–1905 гг.) // Гума-нитарные исследования в Восточной Сибири и на Дальнем Востоке. 2009. № 1. C. 5–10.

Беляева Н.А. От порто-франко к таможне: очерк региональной истории российского протекционизма. Владивосток: Дальнаука, 2003. 214 c.

Берар Е. Империя и город: Николай II, «Мир искусства» и городская дума в Санкт-Петербурге, 1894–1914. М.: Нов. лит. обозрение, 2016. 344 с.

Брубейкер Р. Мифы и заблуждения в изучении национализма // Мифы и заблуждения в изучении империи и национализма / под ред. И. Герасимова, М. Могильнер, А. Семенова, М.: Нов. изд-во, 2010. С. 62-109.

Деег Л. Кунст и Альберс: история немецкого торгового дома на российском Дальнем Востоке (1864–1924 гг.). Изд. 2-е, испр. и доп. Владивосток: Изд. дом Дальневост. федер. ун-та, 2012. 392 с.

Николаев А.М. Противоречия по вопросам таможенной политики в торговых кругах Приамурского края в конце XIX – начале ХX в.: Монография. Владивосток: Б. и., 2009. 172 c.

От редакции: Политика языка и политика смыслов // Ab Imperio. 2005. № 2. C. 11–15.

Позняк Т.З. Иностранные подданные в городах Дальнего Востока России (вторая половина XIX – начало XX в.). Владивосток: Дальнаука, 2004. 316 с.

Регион в истории империи: Исторические эссе о Сибири / ред.-сост. С. Глебов. М.: Нов. изд-во, 2012. 294 с.

Ремнев А.В. Россия Дальнего Востока: имперская география власти XIX – начала XX веков. Омск: Изд-во Омского гос. ун-та, 2004. 548 c.

Схиммельпеннинк ван дер Ойе Д. Навстречу восходящему солнцу: как имперское мифотворчество привело Россию к войне с Японией. М.: Нов. лит. обозрение, 2009. 419 c.

Уортман Р.С. Сценарии власти: Мифы и церемонии русской монархии. М.: ОГИ, 2004. Т. 2. 796 с.

Федевич К.К., Федевич К.I. За Віру, Царя і Кобзаря. Малоросійські монархісти і український національний рух (1905–1917 роки) / пер. з рос. К. Демчук. Київ: Критика, 2017. 308 с.

Шаталов Д. Черносотенные украинофилы? // Ab Imperio. 2018. № 2. С. 201–212.

References

Bassin, M. (1999), Imperial Visions: Nationalist Imagination and Geographical Expansion in the Russian Far East, 1840—1865, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 348 p.

Belyaeva, N.A. (2003), Ot porto-franko k tamozhne: ocherk regional'noy istorii rossiyskogo protektsioniz-ma [From porto franco to customs: essay on the regional history of protectionism], Dal'nauka, Vladivostok, Russia, 214 p.

Belyaeva, N.A. (2009), “Amur porto franco discussion (1901–1905)”, Gumanitarnye issledovaniya v Vos-tochnoy Sibiri i na Dal'nem Vostoke, № 1, pp. 5–10.

Berard, E. (2016), Imperiya i gorod: Nikolay II, “Mir iskusstva” i gorodskaya duma v Sankt-Peterburge, 1894–1914 [Empire and the city: Nicolas II, “World of Art” movement and St. Petersburg city council, 1894–1914], Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, Moscow, Russia, 344 p.

Brubaker, R. (2010), “Myths and misconceptions in the study of nationalism”, in Gerasimov I, Mogil'ner M. & A.M. Semenov (eds.), Mify i zabluzhdeniya v izuchenii imperii i natsionalizma [Myths and miscon-ceptions in the study of empire and nationalism], Novoe izd-vo, Moscow, Russia, pp. 62–109.

Deeg, L. (2012), Kunst i Al'bers: istoriya nemetskogo torgovogo doma na rossiyskom Dal'nem Vostoke (1864-1924 gg.) [Kunst and Albers: The history of a German trading company in the Russian Far East 1864–1924], second edition, Izdatel'skiy dom Dal'nevostochnogo federal'nogo universiteta, Vladivostok, Russia, 392 p.

Fedevich, K.K. & K.I. Fedevich (2017), Za Vіru, Tsaria і Kobzaria. Malorosіis'kі monarkhіsti і ukraїns'kii natsіonal'nii rukh (1905—1917 roki) [For the Faith, the Tsar, and the Kobzar: The Malorossian Monarchists and Ukrainian National Movement (1905–1917)], translated by Katerina Demchuk, Kritika, Kiev, Ukraine, 308 p.

“From the editors: politics of language and politics of meaning” (2005), Ab Imperio, № 2, pp. 11–15.

Glebov, S. (ed.) (2013), Region v istorii imperii: istoricheskie esse o Sibiri [Region in the history of the empire: historical essays about Siberia], Novoe izd-vo, Moscow, Russia, 294 p.

Lieven, D. (2000), Empire: The Russian Empire and Its Rivals from the Sixteenth Century to the Present, John Murray, London, UK, 486 p.

Nikolaev, A.M. (2009), Protivorechiya po voprosam tamozhennoy politiki v torgovykh krugakh Priamur-skogo kraya v kontse XIX – nachale XX v. [Contradictions on customs policy among business community of the Amur region in the late 19th – early 20th centuries], w.p., Vladivostok, Russia, 172 p.

Poznyak, T.Z. (2004), Inostrannye poddannye v gorodakh Dal'nego Vostoka Rossii (vtoraya polovina XIX — nachalo XX v.) [Foreign citizens in the cities of the Russian Far East (the second half of the 19th – early 20th centuries)], Dal'nauka, Vladivostok, Russia, 316 p.

Remnev, A.V. (2004), Rossiya Dal'nego Vostoka: imperskaya geografiya vlasti XIX — nachala XX vekov [Russia's Far East. The imperial geography of power in the 19th – early 20th centuries], Izd. OmGU, Omsk, Russia, 548 p.

Schimmelpenninck van der Oye, D. (2009), Na vstrechu voskhodiashchemu solntsu: kak imperskoe mifotvorchestvo privelo Rossiyu k voine s Yaponiey [Toward the rising sun: how imperial myth-making led Russia to war with Japan], Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, Moscow, Russia, 419 p.

Shatalov, D. (2018), “Black Hundred Ukrainophiles?”, Ab Imperio, № 2, pp. 201–212.

Wortman, R. (2004), Stsenarii vlasti: Mify i tseremonii russkoy monarkhii, T. 2 [Scenarios of Power. Myth and Ceremony in Russian Monarchy, Volume 2], OGI, Moscow, Russia, 796 p.

Zayarnyuk, A. (2018), “Supranational Patriots?”, Ab Imperio, № 2, pp. 225–229.

Published

2020-08-05

How to Cite

Turbin, A. D. (2020). «RUSSIAN» FAR EAST? NATIONALIST RHETORIC IN THE DEBATE ON FREE TRADE IN THE FAR EASTERN TERRITORIES OF THE RUSSIAN EMPIRE. PERM UNIVERSITY HERALD. History, 49(2), 45–56. Retrieved from http://press.psu.ru/index.php/history/article/view/3352