The uprising of the eastern turks and the Tang dynasty in 679 – 690

Authors

  • R. T. Ganiev Ural Federal University

Keywords:

ancient Turks, Eastern Turks, Eastern Turk Empire, Central Asia, climate, the Tang Dynasty, China

Abstract

The materials of the Chinese written sources are used in studying the Eastern Turks’ war for independence in 679–690. After 630, the Eastern Turks were subordinate to the Tang Dynasty. The Emperor Taizong (627–649) took a course on convergence of Turks and Chinese. The reasons for the Turks’ dissatisfaction with China’s policy have been already formed during the reign of the next Emperor Gaozong who ruled from 650 to 683. Initially, he contin-ued the policy of his predecessor, but it was less successful. The author distinguishes three stages of the uprising. The first two stages were unsuccessful for the rebels and their leaders (Nishufu and Funian Qaghan). The third stage, headed by Ashina Gudolu, was the longest and the most stressful one in relations with the Tang Dynasty. In 682–683, Ashina Gudolu and Ashide Yuanchzhen were regularly defeated by China. However, in 684–686, the Turks managed to win few battles and to turn the tide in their favour. At that time, serious climatic anomalies occurred and influenced the Eastern Turks. The sources indicated drought, snow, famine, locusts, diseases, many deaths, and can-nibalism among nomads due to natural anomalies. Despite this, the Turks coped with the difficulties and laid the foundations for further strengthening of the Eastern Turkic Kaganate during the reign of the next Kagan Mocho. doi: 10.17072/2219-3111-2017-2-115-121

Author Biography

R. T. Ganiev, Ural Federal University

Candidate of Science in History, Associate Professor, Department of Russian History, Ural Federal University (Russia)

References

Список источников

Бичурин Н. Я. (Иакинф). Летопись китайской империи, называемая Юй-пьхи цзы чжи тхун-цзянь ган-му. Разделенная на три части, летопись древнюю, среднюю и новейшую / пер. с кит. И. Бичу-рина. 1828 // Архив востоковедов ИВР РАН. Ф. 7. Ед. хр. 7–8. Тетр. 30–43.

Бичурин Н. Я. Собрание сведений о народах, обитавших в Средней Азии в древние времена. М.; Л.: Изд-во АН СССР, 1950. Т. 1–3.

Кюнер Н. В. Китайские известия о народах Южной Сибири, Центральной Азии и Дальнего Восто-ка. М.: Изд-во АН СССР, 1961. 391 с.

Liu Mau-Tsai. Die сhinesischen Nachrichten zur Geschichte der Ost-Turken (Tu-kue). (Gottinger Asiat-ische Forschungen, Bd 27). I. Buch (Texte), II. Buch (Anmerkungen. Anhange. Index) // Gottinger Asiat-ische Forschungen. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrasowitz Verlag, 1958. Bd. 10.

旧唐书。二十四史。北京: 中华书局。2012 年。(Jiutangshu. Ershisi shi. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju. 2012 nian).

新唐书。二十四史。北京: 中华书局。2012 年。(Xintangshu. Ershisi shi. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju. 2012 nian).

Библиографический список

История Китая с древнейших времен до начала XXI века. Т. 3: Троецарствие, Цзинь, Южные и Северные династии, Суй, Тан (220–907) / отв. ред. И.Ф. Попова, М.Е. Кравцова; Ин-т вост. рукописей РАН. М.: Наука, Вост. лит., 2014. 991 с.

Камалов А. К. Древние уйгуры VIII–IX вв. Алматы, 2001. 216 с.

Кляшторный С. Г. Древнетюркские рунические памятники как источник по истории Средней Азии. М.: Наука, 1964. 214 с.

Концевич Л. Р. Хронология стран Восточной и Центральной Азии. М.: Вост. лит. 2010. 806 с.

Малов С. Е. Памятники древнетюркской письменности: Тексты и исследования. М.; Л.: Изд-во АН СССР, 1951. 451 с.

Малявкин А. Г. Тактика Танского государства в борьбе за гегемонию в восточной части Центральной Азии // Дальний Восток и соседние территории. Новосибирск: Наука, 1980.

C. 103–126.

Щербак А. М. Тюркская руника. Происхождение древнейшей письменности тюрок. СПб.: Наука, 2001. 147 с.

Lewis M. E. China’s cosmopolitan empire: the Tang dynasty. Cambridge; London, 2009. 356 p.

References

Bichurin, N. Ya. (1950), Sobranie svedeniy o narodah, obitavshih v Sredney Azii v drevnie vremena [Collection of information about the peoples who lived in Central Asia in ancient times], Izd-vo AN SSSR, Moscow, Leningrad, Russia.

Kyuner, N. V. (1961), Kitayskie izvestiya o narodah Yuzhnoj Sibiri, Tsentral'noy Azii i Dal'nego Vostoka [Chinese news about the peoples of Southern Siberia, Central Asia and the Far East], Izd-vo AN SSSR, Moscow, Russia, 391 р.

Liu Mau-Tsai (1958), “Die shinesischen Nachrichten zur Geschichte der Ost-Turken (Tu-kue)”, Gottinger Asiatische Forschungen, Band 10.

Istoriya Kitaya s drevneyshih vremen do nachala XXI veka. T. III: Troetsarstvie, Tsin, Yuzhnye i Severnye dinastii, Sui, Tan (220–907) (2014) [History of China from ancient times to the beginning of the 21st century. T. III: Three King-doms, Jin, Southern and Northern Dynasties, Sui, Tan (220-907)], Nauka, Moscow, Russia, 991 p.

Kamalov, A. K. (2001), Drevnie uygury VIII–IX vv. [The ancient uygurs 8-9 century], Almaty, Kazakhstan, 216 p.

Klyashtornyy, S. G. (1964), Drevnetyurkskie runicheskie pamyatniki kak istochnik po istorii Sredney Azii [Ancient Turkic runic monuments as a source on the history of Central Asia], Nauka, Moscow, Russia, 214 p.

Kontsevich, L. R. (2010), Chronologia stran Vostochnoy i Centralnoy Azii [Chronology of the countries of East and Central Asia], Vostochnaya literatura, Moscow, Russia, 806 p.

Malov, S. E. (1951), Pamyatniki drevnetyurkskoy pismennosti. Teksty i issledovaniya [Monuments of ancient Turkic writing. Texts and research], Izd-vo AN SSSR, Moscow, Leningrad, Russia, 451 p.

Malyavkin, A. G. (1980), “The tactics of the Tang state in the struggle for hegemony in the eastern part of Central Asia”, in Dal'niy Vostok i sosednie territorii [The Far East and neighboring territories], Nauka, Novosibirsk, Russia, pp. 103 – 126.

Shcherbak, A. M. (2001), Tyurkskaya runika. Proishozhdenie drevneyshey pismennosti tyurok [Origin of the earliest written language of the Turks], Nauka, St. Peterburg, Russia, 147 p.

Lewis, M. E. (2009), China’s cosmopolitan empire: The Tang dynasty, Cambridge, London, UK, 356 p.

Published

2019-11-23

How to Cite

Ganiev, R. T. (2019). The uprising of the eastern turks and the Tang dynasty in 679 – 690. PERM UNIVERSITY HERALD. History, 37(2), 115–121. Retrieved from http://press.psu.ru/index.php/history/article/view/2732