Neolithic and chalcolithic comb ware pottery in the Chashkinskoe lake region: results of investigations
Keywords:
Perm region, pottery, Neolithic, Chalcolithic, technical and technological analysisAbstract
Chashkinskoye Lake is a system of the Kama river former oxbow lakes which is now connected with the main riverbed because of the Kama reservoir overflooding. On the eastern side of the lake, more than 10 archaeological sites belonging to the late Neolithic – Chalcolithic are located close one to another on the territory of 7 km along the river bank. For the study, ceramic complexes of five sites of the Kama Neolithic culture (the Khutorskaya, Chashkinskoye Lake I, Chashkinskoye Lake IIIa, Chashkinskoye Lake IV, Chashkinskoye Lake VI sites), the complex of the Novoilyinskaya culture’s Chashkinskoye Lake I site and the ceramic complexes of four sites of the Garinskaya culture (the Khutorskaya, Chashkinskoye Lake II, Chashkinskoye Lake IIIa, Chashkinskoye Lake IX sites) were used. Based on the typological analysis of the external features of pottery, the authors divided the ceramics into cultural and chronological groups. Chronology of the existence of different types of pots was reconstructed by direct dating of ceramics and dating through organic matter taken from the rubble of vessels. The study of pottery was provided as a part of the historical-cultural approach, proposed by Bobrinsky. The authors suggest that heterogeneity of ceramic complexes of the Kama culture is associated with the impact of the Volga-Kama ceramic tradition having a southern (the Lower Kama – the Middle Volga) origin. The formation of the Novoilyinskaya ceramic tradition took place in the southern part of the Kama region with the direct influence of the Kama and Volga-Kama ceramic traditions. The formation of the Garinskaya ceramic tradition occurred later and was not associated with the Kama and Novoil'iynskaya ceramic traditions. The time, sources and place of formation of the Garinskaya ceramic tradition require a separate study.doi 10.17072/2219-3111-2018-1-31-43References
Библиографический список
Бобринский А.А. Гончарство Восточной Европы. Источники и методы изучения. М.: Б.и., 1978. 272 с.
Бобринский А.А. Гончарная технология как объект историко-культурного изучения // Актуальные проблемы изучения древнего гончарства: кол. монография. Самара: Б.и., 1999. С. 5–109.
Бобринский А.А., Васильева И.Н. О некоторых особенностях пластического сырья в истории гончарства // Проблемы древней истории Северного Прикаспия: межвуз. сб. Самара, 1998. С. 193–214.
Васильева И.Н. Гончарство населения Северного Прикаспия в эпоху неолита // Вопросы археологии Поволжья. Самара: Б.и., 1999. Вып. 1. С. 72–96.
Васильева И.Н. К вопросу о зарождении гончарства в Поволжье // Вопросы археологии Поволжья. Самара: Б.и., 2006. Вып. 4.С. 426–439.
Васильева И.Н. Ранненеолитическое гончарство Волго-Уралья (по материалам елшанской
культуры) // Археология, этнография и антропология Евразии. 2011. № 2. С. 70–81.
Васильева И.Н. О выделении камского ареала гончарных традиций эпохи неолита // Археология, этнография и антропология Евразии. 2013. № 4. С. 73–83.
Васильева И.Н., Выборнов А.А. Новые подходы к изучению неолитизации в Среднем Поволжье // Самарский край в истории России. Самара: Б.и., 2012а. Вып. 4. С. 61–68.
Васильева И.Н., Выборнов А.А. К разработке проблем изучения неолитического гончарства Верхнего и Среднего Прикамья // Тр. Камской археол.-этногр. экспедиции. Пермь: Б.и., 2012б. Вып. 8. С. 33–50.
Ересько О.В. Предварительные результаты технико-технологического анализа керамики новоильинской культуры поселения Сауз II //Археологическое наследие Урала: от первых открытий к фундаментальному научному знанию: Матер. всерос. науч. конф. с междунар. участ. Ижевск, 2016. С. 107–109.
Жукова О.В., Лычагина Е.Л. Новоильинский керамический комплекс поселения Чашкинское Озеро I // Вестник музея археологии и этнографии Пермского Предуралья. Пермь: Б.и., 2008. Вып. 2. С. 19–29.
Жукова О.В., Лычагина Е.Л. Сравнительная характеристика поздненеолитических и новоильинских комплексов керамики Верхнего и Среднего Прикамья // Вестник Пермского университета: История. 2012 Вып. 1. С. 80–86.
Лычагина Е.Л. О хронологии и периодизации неолита Верхнего и Среднего Прикамья // Археология, этнография и антропология Евразии. 2011. № 1. С. 28–33.
Лычагина Е.Л. Каменный и бронзовый век Предуралья. Пермь: Б.и., 2013. 120 с.
Лычагина Е.Л., Батуева Н.С. Использование историко-культурного подхода для анализа неолитической керамики Прикамья // Традиции и инновации в изучении древнейшей керамики: Матер. междунар. конфер. СПб., 2016. С. 113-115.
Цетлин Ю.Б. Древняя керамика: Теория и методы историко-культурного подхода. М.: Б.и., 2012. С. 68–75.
References
Bobrinskiy, A.A. (1978), Goncharstvo Vostochnoi Evropy. Istochniki i metody isucheniya [Pottery of Eastern Europe. Sources and methods of study], Nauka, Moscow, Russia, 272 p.
Bobrinskiy, A.A. (1999), “Pottery technology as an object of historical and cultural study”, in Aktualnye problemy
izucheniya drevnego goncharstva [Actual problems of studying ancient pottery], w.p., Samara, Russia, pp. 5-109.
Bobrinskiy, A.A. & I.N. Vasilyeva (1998), “On some features of plastic raw materials in the history of pottery”, in Problemy drevnei istorii Severnogo Prikaspiya [Problems of the ancient history of the Northern Caspian], w.p., Samara, Russia, pp. 193-214.
Eres’ko, O.V. (2016), “Preliminary results of technical and technological analysis of ceramics of the Novoilyinskaya culture of the settlement Sauz II”, in Arheologicheskoe nasledie Urala: ot pervyh otkrytiy k fundamen tal’nomu nauchnomu znaniyu [Archaeological heritage of the Urals: from the first discoveries to fundamental scientific knowledge], w.p., Izhevsk, Russia, pp. 107-109.
Lychagina, E.L. (2011), “Chronology and periodization of the Neolithic Upper and Middle Kama”, Archaeology, Ethnology and Anthropology of Eurasia, no. 1, pp. 28-33.
Lychagina, E.L. (2013), Kamennyy i bronzovyy vek Preduralya [Stone and Bronze Age in Cis-Urals], w.p., Perm, Russia, 120 p.
Lychagina, E.L. & N.S. Batueva (2016), “The use of the historical and cultural approach for the analysis of the Neolithic pottery of the Kama region”, in Traditsii i innovatsii v izuchenii drevneyshey keramiki [Traditions and innovations in the study of ancient ceramics], St. Petersburg, Russia, pp. 113-115.
Tsetlin, Yu.B. (2012), Drevnyaya keramika. Teoriya i metody istoriko-kul’turnogo podhoda [Ancient ceramics: Theory and methods of historical and cultural approach], w.p., Moscow, Russia, pp. 68-75.
Vasilyeva, I.N. (1999), “Pottery of the population of the Northern Caspian region in the Neolithic Age”, in Voprosy arheologii Povolzhiya, no. 1, pp. 72-96.
Vasilyeva, I.N. (2006), “On the issue of the origin of pottery in the Volga region”, in Voprosy arheologii Povolzhiya, no. 4, pp. 426-439.
Vasilyeva, I.N. (2011), “Early Neolithic pottery of the Volga-Ural region (on the basis of the Elshanskaya culture)”, Archaeology, Ethnology and Anthropology of Eurasia, no. 2, pp. 70-81.
Vasilyeva, I.N. (2013), “On the allocation of the Kama range of pottery traditions of the Neolithic period”, Archaeology, Ethnology and Anthropology of Eurasia, no. 4, pp. 73-83.
Vasilyeva, I.N. & A.A. Vybornov (2012a), “New approaches to the study of neolithization in the Middle Volga region”, in Samarskiy krai v istorii Rossii [Samara Region in the History of Russia], no. 4, w.p., Samara, Russia, pp. 61-68.
Vasilyeva, I.N. & A.A. Vybornov (2012b), “Study of the problems of the Neolithic pottery of the Upper and Middle Kama”, in Trudy Kamskoy Archeologo-Ethnographicheskoy Expeditsyi [Proceedings of the Kamsky Archaeological and Ethnographic Expedition], no. VIII, w.p., Perm’, Russia, pp. 33-50.
Zhukova, O.V. & E.L. Lychagina (2008), “Novoilyinsky ceramic complex of the settlement Chashkinskoe Lake I”, in Vestnik muzeya arheologii i etnografii Permskogo Predural’ya, no. 2, pp. 19-29.
Zhukova, O.V. & E.L. Lychagina (2012), “Comparative characteristics of the Late Neolithic and Novoilyinsky complexes of ceramics of the Upper and Middle Kama region”, Vestnik Permskogo universiteta, no. 1, pp. 80-86.
