Biconical arrowheads from the cave sacred place on the stone Dirovatiy (the Chusovaya river, Middle Urals)
Keywords:
cave sacred place, the Stone Dirovatiy, the Stone Age, biconical arrowheadsAbstract
The unique collection of arrowheads of all epochs from the Mesolithic to the Middle Ages (about 22 thousand items) was found in the cave sacred place on the Stone Dirovatiy (the Chusovaya river in the Sverdlovsk region). The author analyzes biconical arrowheads which are the rarest type of the Stone Age arrowheads. Among 780 biconical arrowheads, the products of the Mesolithic, Neolithic and Eneolithic were allocated and described. The Mesolithic arrowheads (328 items) are of two types. The first type prevails (about 90%) and has a convex separative belt on the connection of cone’s base. Arrowheads of the second type have lower cone which is wider than the upper cone. As a result, there is a ledge between the cones. Among the Neolithic biconical arrowheads (383 items), the products that have a regular form of body of rotation are the most interesting ones. Such form could be created only as a result of turning which also cannot be cut out by hand. Five types of those arrowheads were defined. Arrowheads of the first type (246 items) have a biconical head and flattened on a two-edged nozzle. The upper cone of arrowhead has a cut on 5 - 8 edges, and the lower cone is decorated with a circular ornament. The upper cone of arrowheads of the second type (24 items) also has a cut and flattened on a two-edged nozzle. The lower part of the upper cone is decorated with a circular ornament. In the collection of the Neolithic arrowheads, there are the artefacts with traces of turning processing but without a circular ornament (14 items). The arrowheads without decorations (9 items) are single allocated, their biconical head and nozzle are made with planning. The last type is performed with the chiseled arrowheads. The lower cone of them is ornamented with a frequent thin rifling parallel to each other (13 items). The traces of processing on biconical arrowheads incontrovertibly argue that the Neolithic men on the territory of Middle Trans-Urals already used turning lathe with a bow driver. The author proves that bones for arrowheads were softened in advance with a chemical way. Biconical arrowheads of the Eneolithic are performed with the products of original kind (51 items). The upper cone was made like a stretched trihedral pyramid with noticeably rounded edges. The lower cone sharp constricts closer to the top and turns into a thin awl-looked nozzle of round cut.doi 10.17072/2219-3111-2018-1- 20-30References
Библиографический список
Ашихмина Л. И., Черных Е. М. Шаталов В. А. Костяной инвентарь ананьинской эпохи (I тыс. до н.э.). Ижевск: ИПК «Звезда», 2006. 220 с.
Жилин М. Г. Костяная индустрия мезолита лесной зоны Восточной Европы. М.: Эддиториал
УРСС, 2001. 326 с.
Жилин М. Г., Савченко С. Н., Сериков Ю. Б., Коссинская Л. Л., Косинцев П. А. Мезолитические памятники Кокшаровского торфяника. М.: Б.и., 2012. 214 с.
Ошибкина С. В. Веретье I. Поселение эпохи мезолита на севере Восточной Европы. М.: Наука,
204 с.
Прокошев Н. А. Район реки Чусовой // Известия ГАИМК. 1935. Вып. 109. С. 176–187.
Савченко С. Н. Мезолитические наконечники стрел восточноевропейских типов в Шигирской
коллекции Свердловского областного краеведческого музея // Тверской археологический
сборник. Тверь: Б.и., 2006. Вып. 6, т. I. С. 214–223.
Савченко С. Н. Костяные наконечники стрел «шигирского типа» с утолщенной головкой и
длинным стержнем в собрании Свердловского областного краеведческого музея // Своеобразие
и особенности адаптации культур лесной зоны Северной Евразии в финальном плейстоцене –
раннем голоцене. М.: Изд-во Ин-та археологии РАН, 2007. С. 253–273.
Савченко С. Н. Костяные наконечники стрел с пазами в Среднем Зауралье // Российская
археология. 2011. № 1. C. 27–37.
Савченко С. Н., Жилин М. Г. Костяная индустрия мезолитических стоянок Горбуновского
торфяника // Тр. IV (XX) Всерос. археол. съезда в Казани. Казань: Отечество, 2014. Т. I. С. 342–
Сериков Ю. Б. Реконструкция технических приспособлений каменного века // Первобытная и
средневековая история и культура Европейского Севера: проблемы изучения и научной
реконструкции: Междунар. науч.-практ. конф.: Сб. науч. ст. и докл. Соловки: СОЛТИ, 2006. С.
–303.
Сериков Ю. Б. Пещерные святилища реки Чусовой. Нижний Тагил: Изд-во Нижнетагил. гос.
соц.-пед. академии, 2009. 368 с.
Чаиркин С. Е. Пещеры Урала: общий обзор // Культовые памятники горно-лесного Урала.
Екатеринбург: Изд-во УрО РАН, 2004. С. 24–37.
Чаиркина Н. М., Савченко С. Н., Сериков Ю. Б., Литвяк А. С. Археологические памятники
Шигирского торфяника. Екатеринбург: Б.и., 2001. 196 с.
References
Ashikhmina, L.I., Chernykh, E.M. & V.A. Shatalov (2006), Kostyanoy inventar' anan'yinskoy epokhi (I tys. do
n.e.) [Bone inventory of the Ananynskaya epoch (1 millennium BC)], «IPK "Zvezda"», Izhevsk, Russia, 220 p.
Chairkin, S.E. (2004), “Caves of the Urals: an overview”, in Kul'tovye pamyatniki gorno-lesnogo Urala [Cult
monuments of the mountain-forest Urals], UrO RAN, Yekaterinburg, Russia, pp. 24–37.
Chairkina, N.M., Savchenko, S.N., Serikov, Yu.B. & A.S. Litvyak (2001), Arkheologicheskie pamyatniki
Shigirskogo torfyanika [Archeological sites in the Shigirskiy moor], Bank kul'turnoi informatsii, Yekaterinburg,
Russia, 196 p.
Oshibkina, S.V. (1997), Veretye I. Poselenie epokhi mezolita na severe Vostochnoi Evropy [Veretye 1. The
settlement of the Mesolithic epoch in the North of Eastern Europe], Nauka, Moscow, Russia, 204 p.
Prokoshev, N.A. (1935), “The Chusovaya River region”, Izvestiya GAIMK, vyp. 109, pp. 176–187.
Savchenko, S.N. (2006), “Mesolithic arrowheads of East European type in the Shigirskaia collection of
Sverdlovsk Region Museum”, in Tverskoy arkheologicheskiy sbornik [Tver archaeological collection], Tverskoy
gosudarstvennyy obyedinennyy muzey, Tver', Russia, vyp. 6, vol. I, pp. 214–223.
Savchenko, S.N. (2007), “Bone arrowheads of the “Shigirskiy type” with thickened head and long kernel in the
collection of Sverdlovsk Region Museum”, in Svoeobrazie i osobennosti adaptatsii kul'tur lesnoy zony Severnoy
Evrazii v final'nom pleistotsene – rannem golotsene [Peculiarities of the adaptation of the cultures of the forest
zone of Northern Eurasia in the final Pleistocene - early Holocene], Institut arkheologii RAN, Moscow, Russia,
pp. 253–273.
Savchenko, S.N. (2011), “Bone arrowheads with grooves in the Middle Trans-Urals”, Rossiyskaya arkheologiya,
no. 1, pp. 27–37.
Savchenko, S.N. & M.G. Zhilin (2014), “Bon industry of the Mesolithic settlements in the Gorbunovskiy moor”,
in Trudy IV (XX) Vserossiyskogo arkheologicheskogo syezda v Kazani [Proceedings of the IV (XX) All-Russian
Archaeological Congress in Kazan], Otechestvo, Kazan, Russia, vol. I, pp. 342–346.
Serikov, Yu.B. (2006), “Reconstruction of technical devices of Stone Age”, in Pervobytnaya i srednevekovya
istoriya i kul'tura Evropeyskogo Severa: problemy izucheniya i nauchnoy rekonstruktsii: mezhdunarodnaya
nauchno-prakticheskaya konferentsiya: sbornik nauchnykh statey i dokladov [Primitive and medieval history and
culture of the European North: problems of studying and scientific reconstruction: International scientific and
practical conference], izd-vo «SOLTI», Solovki, Russia, pp. 297–303.
Serikov, Yu.B. (2009), Peshchernye svyatilishcha reki Chusovoy [Cave sanctuaries of the river Chusovaya],
NTGSPA, Nizhniy Tagil, Russia, 368 p.
Zhilin, M.G. (2001), Kostyanaya industriya mezolita lesnoy zony Vostochnoy Evropy [Mesolithic bone industry
in the forest area of East Europe], URSS, Moscow, Russia, 326 p.
Zhilin, M.G., Savchenko S.N., Serikov Yu.B., Kossinskaya L.L. & P.A. Kosintsev (2012), Mezoliticheskie
pamyatniki Koksharovskogo torfyanika [Mesolithic sites in Koksharovskiy moor], Voskresenskaya tipografiya,
Moscow, Russia, 214 p.