MODELING THE EFFECTS OF LAND USE TRANSFORMATION USING ECOSYSTEM SERVICE ASSESSMENT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17072/2079-7877-2021-1-173-186Keywords:
ecosystem services, natural capital, agriculture, land use patterns, carbon sequestrationAbstract
The study analyzes the possibilities of using cost estimates of ecosystem services to assess the effects of transformations in land use. The consequences of transformations were assessed by comparing the value of basic ecosystem services for different patterns of the land use structure, taking into account the fact that the volume of ecosystem services provided is limited by the ecosystem sustainability limits. To estimate ecosystem services, the methodology developed by the author was used. It is based on the indicators of agricultural land productivity and their value terms. The assessment was carried out for the Zarinsky district of Altai Krai, located at the junction of the West Siberian and Altai-Sayan physicogeographical countries. The study has revealed that the greatest value of basic ecosystem services in the region with agricultural specialization can be achieved by optimizing the agricultural load – reducing the share of arable land and increasing the share of forage land in the total area. It is proposed to implement this by involving plots of fallow lands in circulation: some of the plots are proposed to be used for reforestation, while others – for haying and grazing. This will balance the need to maximize agricultural production, while not reducing the sustainability of the ecosystems. DOI: 10.17072/2079-7877-2021-1-173-186.References
Алтайкрайстат. База данных показателей муниципальных образований. URL: https://www.gks.ru/dbscripts/munst/munst01/DBInet.cgi#1 (дата обращения: 02.04.2020).
Бобылев С.Н., Захаров В.М. Экосистемные услуги и экономика. М.: ООО «Типография Левко», 2009. 72 с.
Лесной план Алтайского края. Утвержден указом Губернатора Алтайского края от 26.02.2019 № 33. URL: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/553109198 (дата обращения: 02.04.2020).
Назаренко А.Е., Красноярова Б.А. Стоимостная оценка экосистемных услуг по депонированию углерода экосистемами Алтайского края как составляющая перехода к устойчивому развитию // Геополитика и экогеодинамика регионов. 2018. Вып. 3. Т. 4 (14). С. 89–99.
Орлова И.В., Шарабарина С.Н. Реализация методики оценки сельскохозяйственного воздействия на природные системы (на примере Смоленского района Алтайского края) // География и природные ресурсы. 2016. № 2. С. 183–190.
О ставках платы за единицу объема лесных ресурсов и ставках платы за единицу площади лесного участка, находящегося в федеральной собственности: Постановление Правительства РФ от 22.05.2007 № 310 (ред. от 18.04.2019).
Реймерс Н.Ф., Штильмарк Ф.Р. Особо охраняемые природные территории. М., 1978. 295 с.
Цимбалей Ю.М. Ландшафтная карта Алтайского края. Масштаб 1:500000; Барнаул: ИВЭП СО РАН, 2016.
Шелюто Б.В., Шелюто А.А., Горновский А.А. Пастбищное хозяйство: теория и практика: практ. пособие / Горки: Белорусская государственная сельскохозяйственная академия, 2010. 108 с.
Bastian O. Ecosystem properties, potentials and services. The EPPS conceptual framework and an urban application example / O. Bastian, D. Haase, K. Grunewald // Ecological Indicators. 2012. V. 21. P. 7–16. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOLIND.2011.03.014.
Bolliger J., Kienast F. Landscape functions in a changing environment // Landsc. Online. 2010. V. 21. P. 1–5. doi: https://doi.org/10.3097/LO.201021.
Costanza R et al. Changes in the global value of ecosystem services // Global Environmental Change. 2014. V. 26. P. 152–158.
Costanza R., Daly H.E. Natural Capital and Sustainable Development. Vol. 6, No. 1 (Mar., 1992). P. 37–46.
Dolman A.J. An estimate of the terrestrial carbon budget of Russia using inventory-based, eddy covariance and inversion methods / A.J. Dolman, A. Shvidenko, D. Schepaschenko, P. Ciais, N. Tchebakova, T. Chen, M.K. Van Der Molen, L. Belelli Marchesini, T.C. Maximov, S. Maksyutov, E.D. Schulze // Biogeosciences. 2012. V. 9. P. 5323–5340. doi: https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-5323-2012.
Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. A report of the millenium ecosystem assessement. Washington: Island Press, 2005.
Jax K. Ecosystem services and ethics / D.N. Barton, K.M.A. Chan, R. de Groot, U. Doyle, U. Eser, C. Görg, E. Gómez-Baggethun, Y. Griewald, W. Haber, R. Haines-Young, U. Heink, T. Jahn, H. Joosten, L. Kerschbaumer, H. Korn, G.W. Luck, B. Matzdorf, B. Muraca, C. Neßhöver, B. Norton, K. Ott, M. Potschin, F. Rauschmayer, C. von Haaren, S. Wichmann. // Ecological Economics. 2013. Volume 93. P. 260–268. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.06.008.
Koschke L. A multi-criteria approach for an integrated land-cover-based assessment of ecosystem services provision to support landscape planning / L. Koschke, C. Fürst, S. Frank, F. Makeschin // Ecological Indicators. 2012. V. 21. P. 54–66. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.12.010.
MEA. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: A Framework for Assessment // Island Press. 2003 266 p.
Müller F. Ecosystem services at the landscape scale: The need for integrative approaches / F. Müller, R. de Groot, L. Willemen // Landsc. Online / 2010. V. 23. P. 1–11. doi: https://doi.org/10.3097/LO.201023.
Simoncini R. Constraints and opportunities for mainstreaming biodiversity and ecosystem services in the EU’s Common Agricultural Policy: Insights from the IPBES assessment for Europe and Central Asia / R. Simoncini, I. Ring, C.Sandström, C. Albert, U. Kasymov, R. Arlettaz // Land Use Policy. 2019. Volume 88. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104099.
TEEB. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: The Ecological and Economic Foundations // Ed. Kumar P. Earthscan. 2010. 422 p. URL: http://www.teebweb.org/our-publications/teeb-study-reports/ecological-and-economic-foundations (дата обращения 02.04.2020).
USGS. Официальный сайт. URL: https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/. URL: https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov (дата обращения 02.04.2020).
Wilson C.M., Matthews W.H. Man’s impact for the global environment // report of the study of critical environmental problems (SCEP). Cambridge: MIT Press, 1970. 319 p.
