"HIDE YOUR GRANDMOTHER'S PASSPORT!": AGE DISCOURSE AS A RESOURCE FOR CONSTRUCTING THE IMAGE OF THE ENEMY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2024-4-167-177Keywords:
the image of the enemy, the discourse of age, securitization, political mobilization, age and politics, social views, Russian politicsAbstract
The article is the first to address the discourse of age as a resource for constructing the image of the enemy. It is based on the Russian government's official statements, politicians' comments and the country's leading media sources, as well the authors' sociological research. The first part of the paper examines approaches to the analysis of the image of the enemy, its essential characteristics and the emotions it is intended to evoke. In the second section, the authors show that the political potential of the discourse of age stems from the ability to employ it in drawing external and internal symbolic boundaries and in legitimising social inequality. The third part examines how age differences are used in politics. It looks at two periods: the rally activity of 2017–2021 and the confrontation with the "collective West" in the context of the Special military operation. Next, the authors demonstrate that the discourse of age contributes to the realization of the functions of the enemy image, the strengthening of collective identity, the legitimation of violence, power and socio-political order, and the prediction of victory. Finally, the article examines the extent to which the age markers correlate with the images of the enemy that function in the social views of contemporary Russians.References
Гудков, Л. (2005) ‘Идеологема «врага»: «Враги» как массовый синдром и механизм социокультурной интеграции’ в: Гудков, Л. (ред.) Образ врага. М.: ОГИ, 2005, сс. 7–79. [Gudkov, L. (2005) ‘Ideologeme of the Enemy: Enemy as a Mass Syndrome and a Means of Sociocultural Integration [Ideologema “vraga”: “Vragi” kak massovyi sindrom i mehanizm sociokul’turnoi integratsii] in: Gudkov, L. (ed.). (2005) Image of Enemy [Obraz vraga]. Moscow: OGI, 2005, pp. 7–79. (In Russ.)].
Денисов, А. А. (2009) ‘Идентификация образа врага в политической коммуникации’, Вестник РГГУ. Серия: Политология. История. Международные отношения, 1, cc. 113–126. [Denisov, A. A. (2009) ‘Identification of the images of the enemy in political communication’ [Identifikatsiia obraza vraga v politicheskoi komminikatsii], RGGU BULLETIN. Political Science. History. International Relations, 1, pp. 113–126. (In Russ.)].
Евгеньева, Т. В., Селезнева, А. В. (2007) ‘Образ «врага» как фактор формирования национальной идентичности современной российской молодежи’, Полития, 3, cc. 83–92. [Evgeneva, T., Selezneva, A. V. (2007) ‘Image of the "Enemy" as a forming instrument for national identity of contemporary Russian youth’ [Obraz “vraga” kak factor formirovaniia natsional’noi identichnosti sovremennoi rossiiskoi molodezhi], Politeia, 3, pp. 83–92. (In Russ.)].
Евгеньева, Т. В., Титов, В. В. (2014) ‘Образ «врага» как инструмент формирования политической идентичности в сети интернет: опыт современной России’, Информационные войны, 4 (32), cc. 22–26. [Evgeneva, T., Titov, V. (2014) ‘Image of the “Enemy” as a forming instrument for political identity in the Internet: the experience of contemporary Russia’ [Obraz “vraga” kak instrument formirovaniia politicheskoi identichnosti v seti Internet: opyt sovremennoi Rossii], Information wars, 4 (32), pp. 22–26. (In Russ.)].
Козырев, Г. И. (2008) «Жертва» в социально-политическом конфликте. Москва: Экслибрис-пресс. [Kozyrev, G. I. (2008) “Victim” in social and political conflict [“Zhertva” v sotsialno-politicheskom konflikte]. Moscow: Eksilibris-press (In Russ.)].
Кузнецова, О. А., Михайлов, Д. А. (2019) ‘Милитаризация образа врага в современном в современном российском общественно-политическом дискурсе’, Вестник Пермского университета. ПОЛИТОЛОГИЯ. 13 (2), сс. 17–26. [Kuznetsova, O. A., Mikhailov, D. A. (2019) Militarization of the enemy image in the modern Russian socio-political discourse [Militarizatsia obraza vraga v sovremennom rossiiskom obshchestvenno-politichheskom diskurse], Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science, 13 (2), pp. 17–26. (In Russ.)]. DOI: 10.17072/2218-1067-2019-2-17-26.
Малинова, О. Ю., Миллер, А. И. (2021) ‘Введение. Символическая политика и политика памяти’ в: Лапин, В. В., Миллер, А. И. (ред.) Символические аспекты политики памяти в современной России и Восточной Европе. СПб.: Европейский университет, сс. 7–37. [Malinova, O. Yu., Miller, A. I. (2021) ‘Introduction. Symbolic politics and politics of memory’ [Vvedenie. Simvolicheskaia politika i politika pamiati] in: Lapin, V. V., Miller, A. I. (eds.) Symbolic aspects of politics of memory in contemporary Russia and Eastern Europe [Simvolicheskie aspecty politiki pamiati v sovremennoi Rossii i Vostochnoi Evrope]. Saint Petersburg: EU, pp. 7–37 (In Russ.)].
Рябов, О. В. (2024) ‘Возрастной дискурс в современной политике российской идентичности’, PolitBook, 3. cc. 39–59. [Riabov, O. (2024) ‘The age discourse in contemporary politics of Russian identity’ [Vozrastnoi diskurs v sovremmennoi politike rossiiskoi identichnosti], PolitBook, 3, pp. 39–59. (In Russ.)]. DOI: 10.24412/2227-1538-2024-3-39-59.
Рябов, О. В., Белов, С. И., Давыдова, О. С. Кубышкин, А. И., Рябов, Д. О., Рябова, Т. Б., Смирнов, Д. Г., Спутницкая, Н. Ю., Юдин, К. А. (2023) «Враг номер один» в символической политике кинематографий СССР и США периода холодной войны. М.: Аспект Пресс. [Riabov, O. V., Belov, S. I., Davydova, O. S., Kubyshkin, A. I., Riabov, D. O., Riabova, T. B., Smirnov, D. G., Sputnitskaia, N. Iu., Iudin, K. A. (2023) “Enemy Number One” in Symbolic Politics of Soviet and American Cold War Cinema [‘Vrag nomer odin’ v simvolicheskoi politike kinematografii SSSR i SShA perioda kholodnoi voiny]. Moscow: Aspekt Press, 400 p. (In Russ.)].
Рябов, О. В., Рябова, Т. Б. (2023) ‘Связь поколений как политический символ’ в: Саралиева, З. М. (ред). Культурное наследие и связь поколений. Нижний Новгород: ННГУ им. Н. И. Лобачевского, cc. 177–185. [Ryabov, O. V., Ryabova, T. V. (2023) ‘The connection of generations as a political symbol’ [Sviaz’ pokolenii kak politicheskii simvol] in: Saralieva, Z. M. (ed.) (2023) Сultural heritage and connection of generations [Kul’turnoe nasledie i sviaz’ pokolenii]. Nizhniy Novgorod: University of Nizhnii Novgorod, pp. 177–185 (In Russ.)].
Рябова, Т. Б., Рябов, О. В. (2020) ‘«…Слышу речь не мальчика, но мужа»: о гендерно-возрастных стереотипах в политике’, Женщина в российском обществе. 4, cc. 5–13. [Riabova, T., Riabov, O. (2020) “Not a boy, but a man”: on the gender-age stereotypes in politics [“…Slyshu rech’ ne mal’chika, no muzha”: o genderno-vozrastnykh stereotipakh v politike], Woman in Russian Society, 4, pp. 5–13. (In Russ.)]. DOI: 10.21064/WinRS.2020.4.1.
Сенявский, А. С., Сенявская, Е. С. (2006) ‘Историческая имагология и проблема формирования «образа врага» (на материалах российской истории XX в.)’, Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Сер: История России, 2, cc. 34–72. [Senyavskii, A. S., Senyavskaya, E. S. (2006) ‘The historical imagology and the problem of building of "the enemy’s image"(on the materials of Russian history of the XXth century)’ [Istoricheskaia imagologiia i problema formirovaniia “obraza vraga” (na materialakh rossiiskoi istorii XX veka], RUDN journal of Russian history, 2, pp. 54–72. (In Russ.)].
Фадеева, Л. А. (2023) ‘Секьюритизация политики идентичности как аналитический инструментарий’, Вестник Пермского университета. Политология, 17 (2), cc. 101–111. [Fadeeva, L. A. (2003) ‘Securitization of Identity Politics as analytical tool’ [Sekiuritizatsia politiki identichnosti kak analiticheskii instrumentarii], Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science, 17 (2), pp. 101–111. (In Russ.)]. DOI: 10.17072/2218-1067-2023-2-101-111.
Шмитт, К. (1992) ‘Понятие политического’, Вопросы социологии, 1992, 1, cc. 35–67. [Schmitt, K. (2009) ‘Concept of political’ [Poniatie politicheskogo], Voprosy sotsiologii,1, pp. 35–67 (In Russ.)].
Campbell, D. (1992) Writing security: United States foreign policy and the politics of identity. Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota press.
Delori, M., Ware, V. (2019) ‘The faces of enmity in international relations. An introduction’, Critical Military Studies, 5 (4), pp. 299–303.DOI:10.1080/23337486.2019.1652460.
Fettweis, C. J. (2015) ‘Misreading the Enemy’, Survival, 57 (5), pp. 149–172. DOI: doi:10.1080/00396338.2015.1090135.
Frank, J. D. (1967) Sanity and Survival: Psychological Aspects of War and Peace. New York: Vintage Books.
Grossman, D. (1996) On killing: the psychological cost of learning to kill in war and society. Boston: Little, Brown.
Harle, V. (2000) The Enemy with a Thousand Faces: The Tradition of the Other in Western Political Thought and History. Westport: Praeger Publishers.
Haslam, N. (2006) ‘Dehumanization: An Integrative Review’, Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10 (3), pp. 252–264. DOI: 10.1207/ s15327957pspr1003_4.
Keen, S. (1986) Faces of the Enemy: Reflections of the Hostile Imagination. San Francisco: Harper & Row.
Oppenheimer, L. (2006) ‘The Development of Enemy Images: A Theoretical Contribution’, Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 2 (3), pp. 269–292. DOI: 10.1207/s15327949pac1203_4.
Riabov, O., Riabova, T., Kleshchenko, L. (2022). ‘ “Save the Children!”. The Symbol of Childhood and (De)Legitimation of Power in Russian Protests 2017–2021’, Region. Regional Studies of Russia, Eastern Europe, and Central Asia, 2, pp. 235–252. DOI: 10.1353/reg.2022.0014.
Rieber, R. W., Kelly, R. J. (1991) ‘Substance and shadow: Images of the enemy’ in Rieber, R. W. (ed). Psychology of war and peace: The image of the enemy. Boston: Springer Publ., pp. 3–39.
Sion, L. (2016) ‘Enemy Making’ in Paul Joseph (ed). The SAGE Encyclopedia of War: Social Science Perspectives. SAGE, pp. 560–562.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The author grants the Publisher of the journal (Perm State University) the right to use their article in the journal, as well as to include the text of the abstract, the full text of the article and information about authors in the "Russian Science Citation Index" (RSCI).
The author agrees to the processing of personal data.
The right to use the journal as a whole belongs to the Publisher and acts indefinitely on the territory of the Russian Federation and beyond in accordance with cl. 1260 of the Russian Federation Civil Code.
There is no author's fee paid for providing the above rights by the author.
The author of the article included in the journal retains the exclusive right to it, regardless of the Publisher's right to use the journal as a whole:
a. The authors retain their copyrights to the article and transfer the right of the first publication along with the article to the journal, while also licensing it on the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to distribute this article with the obligatory indication of authorship of the article and reference to the original publication in this journal.
b. The authors retain the right to enter into separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive dissemination of the version of the text published by this journal (for example, post it in a university archive or publish it in a book), with reference to the original publication in this journal.
c. d. Authors are allowed to post their text on the Internet (for example, in a university archive or on their personal website) before and during the review process by this journal, as this can lead to a fruitful discussion and to higher number of the references to this published work (Please refer to The Effect of Open Access).
Submission of an article by the author implies that they agree for it to be used by the Publisher on the above conditions and to be included in the RSCI system. It also implicates that the author is aware of the terms of its use. The information about the author sent to the Publisher, including by e-mail, is also considered as such consent.
The editorial board posts the full text of the article on the Perm State University site: http://www.psu.ru and in the OJS system at http://press.psu.ru
The publication fee is not collected and fees are not paid. The author's copy is sent to the author to the address provided by them.
