FAMILY AS A VALUE IN THE SHOWCASES OF RUSSIA'S CULTURAL POLICY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2024-4-102-110Keywords:
state cultural policy, family values, Year of the Family, representation of values, federal cultural projectsAbstract
The family is a major focus of state cultural policy in contemporary Russia. The representation of its normative image is facilitated both at the rhetorical level of strategic documents and through specific cultural projects. This article examines consistency between these two levels using the Year of the Family 2024 as a case study. Typically, the family as a subject of state interest is at the centre of social policy research, but the examination of value-normative policy instruments is rarely included in such analyses. Simultaneously, studies on cultural policy mostly focus on the contents of strategic documents or the activities of particular institutions. This study highlights how a particular theme is conveyed through different cultural projects, as well as studies thematic years as a tool for this purpose. We regard the Year of the Family as an official showcase intended to illustrate the normative image of the family. The value connotations in textual and visual materials from federal cultural event websites and public pages (according to the Federal Plan of the Year) is analyzed. These connotations are correlated with the value systems contained in Russia’s strategic documents. The issue of the integrity of the showcase of cultural policy on the family is considered.References
Астафьева, О. Н. (2010) ‘Культурная политика России: теория – реальность – перспектива’, Государственная служба, 1, сс. 68–73. [Astafʹeva, O. N. (2010) ‘Cultural policy of Russia: theory – reality – prospect’ [Kul’turnaya politika Rossii: teoriya – real’nost’ – perspektiva], Public Administration,1, pp. 68–73. (In Russ.)].
Базиева, Г. Д. (2007) ‘Культурная политика России на Северном Кавказе (на примере Кабардино-Балкарии)’, Вопросы культурологии, 12, сс. 42–44. [Bazieva G. D. (2007) ‘Cultural policy of Russia in the North Caucasus (on the example of Kabardino-Balkaria)’ [Kul’turnaya politika Rossii na Severnom Kavkaze (na primere Kabardino-Balkarii)], Issues of Cultural Studies, 12, pp. 42–44. (In Russ.)].
Бакулина, С. Д. (2013) ‘Региональная культурная политика в контексте государственной культурной политики Российской Федерации (на примере южных регионов Западной Сибири)’, Вестник Омского университета, 3, сс. 165–70. [Bakulina, S. D. (2013) ‘Regional cultural policy in the context of the state cultural policy of the Russian Federation (on the example of the southern regions of Western Siberia)’ [Regional’naya kul’turnaya politika v kontekste gosudarstvennoj kul’turnoj politiki Rossijskoj Federacii (na primere yuzhnyh regionov Zapadnoj Sibiri)], Herald of Omsk University, 3, pp. 165–70. (In Russ.)].
Балакшин, А. С. (2001) ‘Сущность и содержание понятия “культурная политика„’, Вестник Нижегородского государственного университета им. Лобачевского,1 (3), cc. 374–79. [Balakshin, A. S. (2001) ‘The essence and content of the concept of "cultural policy"’ [Sushchnost’ i soderzhanie ponyatiya „kul’turnaya politika“], Vestnik of Lobachevsky University of Nizhni Novgorod, 1 (3), pp 374–79. (In Russ.)].
Барабанов, А. А. (2014) ‘Механизмы культурной политики Российской Федерации в области поддержки и развития фестивалей классической музыки’, Культура и цивилизация, 1–2, cc. 10–19. [Barabanov, A. A. (2014) ‘Mechanisms of cultural policy of the Russian Federation in the promotion of classical music festivals’ [Mekhanizmy kul’turnoj politiki Rossijskoj Federacii v oblasti podderzhki i razvitiya festivalej klassicheskoj muzyki], Culture and Civilization, 1–2, pp. 10–19. (In Russ.)].
Бычкова, О. И., Костина, Н. А., Саркисова, Е. Г. (2023) ‘Эффективность стратегий региональной культурной политики юга России’, Культура и образование: научно-информационный журнал вузов культуры и искусств, 3 (50), cc. 23–34. [Bychkova, O. I., Kostina, N. A., Sarkisova, E. G. (2003) ‘The effectiveness strategies of regional cultural policy in the South of Russia’ [Effektivnost’ strategij regional’noj kul’turnoj politiki yuga Rossii], Kul’tura i obrazovanie: nauchno-informacionnyj zhurnal vuzov kul’tury i iskusstv, 3 (50), pp. 23–34. (In Russ.)].
Востряков, Л. Е. (2011) ‘Государственная культурная политика: от патерналистской к партнерской модели?’, Управленческое консультирование, 4, cc. 140–55. Vostriakov, L. E. (2011) ‘State cultural policy: from paternalistic to partnership model?’ [Gosudarstvennaya kul’turnaya politika: ot paternalistskoj k partnerskoj modeli?], Administrative Consulting, 4, pp. 140–55. (In Russ.)].
Востряков, Л. Е., Тургаев, А. С. (2018) ‘Новая модель государственной культурной политики России’, Вестник СПбГИК, 3, cc. 6–16. [Vostryakov, L. E., Turgaev, A. S. (2018) ‘New model of state cultural policy of Russia’ [Novaya model’ gosudarstvennoj kul’turnoj politiki Rossii], Vestnik of Saint-Petersburg State University of Culture, 3, pp. 6–16. (In Russ.)].
Горлова И. И. (2008) Культурная политика в современной России: региональный аспект: Учеб. Пособие. Москва: РГБ. [Gorlova I.I. (2008) Cultural Policy in Modern Russia: Regional Aspect: Textbook [Kulʹturnaia politika v sovremennoĭ Rossii: regionalʹnyĭ aspekt: Ucheb. Posobie]. Moscow: RGB. (In Russ.)].
Горшенева-Долунц, И. К. (2012) ‘О проблеме основного приоритета и моделях современной культурной политики в России’, Общество: философия, история, культура, 3, cc. 19–26. [Gorsheneva-Dolunc, I. K. (2012) ‘On the problem of the main priority and models of contemporary cultural policy in Russia’ [O probleme osnovnogo prioriteta i modelyah sovremennoj kul’turnoj politiki v Rossii], Society: Philosophy, History, Culture, 3, pp. 19–26. (In Russ.)].
Духанова, Д. (2018) ‘Петр и Феврония и День семьи, любви и верности: пронатализм и нестабильный гендерный порядок в современной России’, Государство, религия, Церковь в России и за рубежом, 2 (36), cc. 194–220. [Duhanova D. (2018) ‘Peter and Fevronia and the Day of Family, Love and Fidelity: Pronatalism and the Unstable Gender Order in Modern Russia’ [Petr i Fevroniya i Den’ sem’i, lyubvi i vernosti: pronatalizm i nestabil’nyj gendernyj poryadok v sovremennoj Rossii], State, Religion and Church in Russia and Worldwide, 2 (36), pp. 194–220. (In Russ.)].
Жидков, В. С., Соколов К. Б. (2001) Культурная политика России: теория и история: учебное пособие для вузов. М.: Академический проект, 592 c. [Zhidkov, V. S., Sokolov, K. B. (2001) Cultural policy of Russia: theory and history: a textbook for universities [Kul’turnaya politika Rossii: teoriya i istoriya: uchebnoe posobie dlya vuzov]. M.: Akademicheskij proekt, 592 p. (In Russ.)].
Жидкова, Н. Г., Тулаева, С. А. (2020) ‘Культурная политика в российских регионах: коренные народы, государство и корпорации’, Журнал исследований социальной политики, 18 (3), cc. 429–444. [Zhidkova, N. G., Tulaeva, S. A. (2020) ‘Cultural policy in Russia’s regions: The state, corporations andiIndigenous people’ [Kul’turnaya politika v rossijskih regionah: korennye narody, gosudarstvo i korporacii], The Journal of Social Policy Studies, 18 (3), pp. 429–444. (In Russ.)].
Загребин, С. С. (2008) ‘Культурная политика в современной России’ Вопросы культурологии, 3 cc. 33–35. [Zagrebin, S. S. (2008) ‘Cultural policy in contemporary Russia [Kul’turnaya politika v sovremennoj Rossii], Issues of Cultural Studies, 3, pp. 33–35. (In Russ.)].
Калинин, И. (2014) ‘Культурная политика как инструмент демодернизации’, Новое литературное обозрение, 6 (98), cc. 85–94. [Kalinin, I. (2014) ‘Cultural policy as a tool of demodernization’ [Kul’turnaya politika kak instrument demodernizacii], New Literary Observer, 6 (98), pp. 85–94. (In Russ.)].
Карпова, Г. Г. (2009) ‘Государственное управление и общественные приоритеты в сфере культурной политики России’, Журнал исследований социальной политики, 7 (1), сс. 7–20. [Karpova, G.G. (2009) ‘Public Administration and Public Priorities in the Sphere of Cultural Policy in Russia’ [Gosudarstvennoe upravlenie i obshchestvennye prioritety v sfere kul’turnoj politiki Rossii], The Journal of Social Policy Studies, 7 (1), pp. 7–20. (In Russ.)].
Карпова, Г. Г., Михина, Н. В. (2015) ‘Культурная политика современной России: законодательное регулирование и механизмы реализации’, Власть, 4, cc. 73–78. [Karpova, G. G., Mihina, N. V. (2015) ‘Cultural policy of modern Russia: legislative regulation and implementation mechanisms’ [Kul’turnaya politika sovremennoj Rossii: zakonodatel’noe regulirovanie i mekhanizmy realizacii], Vlastʹ, 4, pp. 73–78. (In Russ.)].
Ким, Н. В. (2017) ‘Женщина в семье: репрезентация семейной политики в российских СМИ до и после 2006 г.’, Женщина в российском обществе, 1 (82), cc. 64–74. [Kim, N.V. (2017) ‘Woman in the family: representation of family policy in Russian media before and after 2006’ [Zhenshchina v semʹe: reprezentaciya semejnoj politiki v rossijskih SMI do i posle 2006 g.], Woman in Russian Society, 1(82), pp. 64–74. (In Russ.)].
Клупт, М. А. (2021) ‘Проблемы семьи и рождаемости в ценностных конфликтах 2010-х гг.’, Социологические исследования, 5, cc. 36–46. [Klupt, M.A. (2021) ‘Family and fertility issues in value conflicts during the 2010s’ [Problemy sem’i i rozhdaemosti v cennostnyh konfliktah 2010-h gg.], Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniia, 5, pp. 36–46. (In Russ.)].
Ковба, Д. М. (2023) ‘Семья и семейные ценности в президентском дискурсе: содержание, анализ, дискуссия’, Россия и современный мир, 2 (119), cc. 6–25. [Kovba, D. M. (2023) ‘Family and family values in presidential discourse: content, analysis, discussion’ [Sem’ya i semejnye cennosti v prezidentskom diskurse: soderzhanie, analiz, diskussiya], Russia and the contemporary world, 2 (119), pp. 6–25. (In Russ.)].
Куштанина, Е. В. (2016) ‘Региональная культурная политика: государственные обязанности в сфере культуры в региональном законодательстве’, Вопросы государственного и муниципального управления, 2, cc. 111–130. [Kushtanina, E. V. (2016) ‘Regional cultural policy: state responsibilities in the sphere of culture in regional legislation’ [Regional’naya kul’turnaya politika: gosudarstvennye obyazannosti v sfere kul’tury v regional’nom zakonodatel’stve], Public Administration Issues, 2, pp. 111–130. (In Russ.)].
Мартьянов, В. С. (2008) ‘Политизированная демография, или сколько населения нужно России’, Россия и мир в XXI веке, 1 (58), сс. 26–45. [Mart’yanov, V. S. (2008) ‘Politicized demography, or how much population Russia needs’ [Politizirovannaya demografiya, ili skol’ko naseleniya nuzhno Rossii], Russia in Global Affairs, 1 (58), pp. 26–45. (In Russ.)].
Музычук, В. Ю. (2012) ‘Основные тенденции культурной политики в современной России’, Россия и современный мир, 4, сс. 72–82. [Muzychuk, V. Yu. (2012) ‘The main trends in cultural policy in modern Russia’ [Osnovnye tendencii kul’turnoj politiki v sovremennoj Rossii], Russia and the contemporary world, 4, pp. 72–82. (In Russ.)].
Слепокуров, В. С. (2022) ‘Образовательные стратегии вузов культуры в контексте задач государственной культурной политики России’, Культура и образование: научно-информационный журнал вузов культуры и искусств, 3 (46), cc. 5–13. [Slepokurov, V. S. (2022) ‘Educational strategies of university of culture in the context of the tasks of the state cultural policy of Russia’ [Obrazovatel’nye strategii vuzov kul’tury v kontekste zadach gosudarstvennoj kul’turnoj politiki Rossii], Kul’tura i obrazovanie: nauchno-informacionnyj zhurnal vuzov kul’tury i iskusstv, 3 (46), pp. 5–13. (In Russ.)].
Флиер, А. Я. (2018) ‘Культурная политика и идеология’, Культура культуры, 4:3. [Flier, A. Ya. (2018) ‘Cultural policy and ideology’ [Kul’turnaya politika i ideologiya], The Culture of Culture Journal, 4:3. (In Russ.)].
Шпаковская, Л. Л. (2012) ‘Политика институциализации и практики приватизации семейной жизни: партнерство и брак в России’, Журнал исследований социальной политики, 3 (10), cc. 309–322. [Shpakovskaya L. L. (2012) ‘The policy of institutionalization and the practice of privatization of family life: partnership and marriage in Russia’ [Politika institucializacii i praktiki privatizacii semejnoj zhizni: partnerstvo i brak v Rossii], The Journal of Social Policy Studies, 3 (10), pp. 309–322. (In Russ.)].
Юлдашбаева, А. Ш. (2022) ‘Консервативная ориентация и социокультурные основания государственной культурной политики России’ Юридическая наука: история и современность, 9, cc. 63–69. [Yuldashbaeva, A. Sh. ‘Сonservative orientation and socio-cultural foundations of the state cultural policy of Russia’ [Konservativnaya orientaciya i sociokul’turnye osnovaniya gosudarstvennoj kul’turnoj politiki Rossii], Juridical science: history and modernity, 9, pp. 63–69. (In Russ.)].
Gray, C. (2015) ‘‘My Name is Legion For We are Many’: Cultural Policies, Sectoral Disaggregation and Differentiated Network Specificity’, Paper to International Public Policy Conference, Milan [online]. Available at: https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/arts/scapvc/ccmps/staff/gray/research/ (Accessed: 31 August 2024).
Kawashima, N. (1997) ‘Theorising decentralisation in cultural policy: Concepts, values and strategies’, The European Journal of Cultural Policy, 2 (3), pp. 341–359.
Lewis J., Miller, T. (2003) ‘Introduction’ in: Lewis J., Miller T. (eds.) Critical Cultural Policy Studies: A Reader. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Miller T., Yudice, G. (2002) Cultural Policy. London: Sage Publications.
Mulcahy K.V. (2006) ‘Cultural Policy’ in: Peters, G., Pierre, J. (eds.) Handbook of Public Policy. London: Sage Publications.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The author grants the Publisher of the journal (Perm State University) the right to use their article in the journal, as well as to include the text of the abstract, the full text of the article and information about authors in the "Russian Science Citation Index" (RSCI).
The author agrees to the processing of personal data.
The right to use the journal as a whole belongs to the Publisher and acts indefinitely on the territory of the Russian Federation and beyond in accordance with cl. 1260 of the Russian Federation Civil Code.
There is no author's fee paid for providing the above rights by the author.
The author of the article included in the journal retains the exclusive right to it, regardless of the Publisher's right to use the journal as a whole:
a. The authors retain their copyrights to the article and transfer the right of the first publication along with the article to the journal, while also licensing it on the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to distribute this article with the obligatory indication of authorship of the article and reference to the original publication in this journal.
b. The authors retain the right to enter into separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive dissemination of the version of the text published by this journal (for example, post it in a university archive or publish it in a book), with reference to the original publication in this journal.
c. d. Authors are allowed to post their text on the Internet (for example, in a university archive or on their personal website) before and during the review process by this journal, as this can lead to a fruitful discussion and to higher number of the references to this published work (Please refer to The Effect of Open Access).
Submission of an article by the author implies that they agree for it to be used by the Publisher on the above conditions and to be included in the RSCI system. It also implicates that the author is aware of the terms of its use. The information about the author sent to the Publisher, including by e-mail, is also considered as such consent.
The editorial board posts the full text of the article on the Perm State University site: http://www.psu.ru and in the OJS system at http://press.psu.ru
The publication fee is not collected and fees are not paid. The author's copy is sent to the author to the address provided by them.
