ONE IS GOOD, BUT THREE ARE BETTER? CHALLENGES OF REFORMS IMPLEMENTATION IN MULTI-LEVEL GOVERNANCE SYSTEMS. THE CASE OF MILITARY REFORM IN GERMANY 2000–2003

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2024-4-92-101

Keywords:

multi-level governance, European Union, policy, institutions, policy change, Germany, ; defense policy

Abstract

Existing literature on multi-level governance suggests that interactions between actors at different levels lead to successful, more efficient implementation of policies. Using the example of the failed military reform of 2000–2003 in Germany, we show that multi-level governance can complicate the implementation of reforms. Particular attention is paid to how actors at the supranational and regional level try to exploit opportunities that are not provided by established rules. By formulating hypotheses through a top-down implementation approach, we use process tracing and secondary data (documents, media reports, and interviews taken by other researchers) to prove our point. As a result, it can be argued that supranational institutions indirectly influenced bureaucrats at the stage of planning the reform project. In addition, we believe that the actions of regional actors, who have no interest in economic losses and are an interest group directly involved in the implementation of the reform, have led to a decline in support for the reform and a cessation of the flow of resources necessary for its implementation.

Author Biography

Maksim Borisenko, National Research University Higher School of Economics

visiting lecturer, Department of Political Science and International Affairs,

References

Bernhard, S., Gartner, H., Stephan G. (2008) ‘Wage Subsidies for Needy Job-Seekers and Their Effect on Individual Labour Market Outcomes after the German Re-forms’, IZA Discussion Paper (3772) [online]. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1293544 (Accessed 9 June 2024).

Bradley, J. and Kuegler, A. (2019) ‘Labor market reforms: An evaluation of the Hartz policies in Germany’, European Economic Review, 113, pp. 108–135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2018.12.008.

Collier, D. (2011) ‘Understanding process tracing’, PS: political science & politics, 44 (4), pp. 823–830. DOI: 10.1017/S1049096511001429.

Dyson, T. (2005) ‘German Military Reform 1998–2004: Leadership and the Triumph of Domestic Constraint over International Opportunity’, European Security, 14 (3), pp. 361–386. DOI: 10.1080/09662830500407929.

Halperin, S., Heath, O. (2020) Political research: methods and practical skills. 3rd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hering, M. (2008) ‘Welfare State Restructuring without Grand Coalitions: The Role of Informal Cooperation in Blame Avoidance’, German Politics, 17 (2), pp. 165–183. DOI: 10.1080/09644000802075757.

Hooghe, L, Marks, G. (2003) ‘Unraveling the central state, but how? Types of multi-level governance’, American Political Science Review, 97 (2), pp. 233–243. DOI: 10.1017/S0003055403000649.

Kaiser, A., Vogel, S. (2019) ‘Dynamic De/Centralization in Germany, 1949–2010’, Publius: The Journal of Federal-ism, 49 (1), pp. 84–111. DOI: 10.1093/publius/pjx054.

Kingdon, J. (2003) Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. 2nd edn. New York, NY: Pearson.

Ricks, J. I., Liu A. H. (2018) ‘Process-tracing research designs: a practical guide’, PS: Political Science & Politics, 51 (4), pp. 842–846. DOI: 10.1017/S1049096518000975.

Sabatier, P. (2005) ‘From policy implementation to policy change: A personal odyssey’ in: Gornitzka, Å., Kogan, M. and Amaral, A. (eds.) Reform and change in higher education. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 17–34.

Sabatier, P., Weible, C. M. (2007) ‘The advocacy coalition framework: Innovations and clarifications’ in: Sabatier, P. (ed.) Theories of the Policy Process. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp. 189–220.

Scharpf, F. W. (1988) ‘The Joint-decision trap: Lessons from German Federalism and European Integration’, Public Administration, 66 (3), pp. 239–278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.1988.tb00694.x.

Scharpf, F. W. (2008) ‘Community, Diversity and Autonomy: The Challenges of Re-forming German Federalism’, German Politics, 17 (4), pp. 509–521. DOI: 10.1080/09644000802490568.

Scharpf, F. W. (2010) ‘Multi-level Europe–the case for multiple concepts’ in: Ender-lein, H., Wälti, S. and Zürn, M. (eds) Handbook on multi-level governance, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, pp. 66–79.

Scharping, R. (2001) ‘Die Bundeswehr der Zukunft – Feinausplanung und Stationierung’, Bulletin der Bundesregierung, 13 (2).

Downloads

Published

2025-01-06

How to Cite

Borisenko М. С. (2025). ONE IS GOOD, BUT THREE ARE BETTER? CHALLENGES OF REFORMS IMPLEMENTATION IN MULTI-LEVEL GOVERNANCE SYSTEMS. THE CASE OF MILITARY REFORM IN GERMANY 2000–2003. Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science, 18(4), 92–101. https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2024-4-92-101

Issue

Vol. 18 No. 4 (2024): Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science

Section

Political institutions, processes, technologies

License

The author grants the Publisher of the journal (Perm State University) the right to use their article in the journal, as well as to include the text of the abstract, the full text of the article and information about authors in the "Russian Science Citation Index" (RSCI).

The author agrees to the processing of personal data.

The right to use the journal as a whole belongs to the Publisher and acts indefinitely on the territory of the Russian Federation and beyond in accordance with cl. 1260 of the Russian Federation Civil Code.

There is no author's fee paid for providing the above rights by the author.

The author of the article included in the journal retains the exclusive right to it, regardless of the Publisher's right to use the journal as a whole:

a.     The authors retain their copyrights to the article and transfer the right of the first publication along with the article to the journal, while also licensing it on the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to distribute this article with the obligatory indication of authorship of the article and reference to the original publication in this journal.

b.     The authors retain the right to enter into separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive dissemination of the version of the text published by this journal (for example, post it in a university archive or publish it in a book), with reference to the original publication in this journal.

c.     d. Authors are allowed to post their text on the Internet (for example, in a university archive or on their personal website) before and during the review process by this journal, as this can lead to a fruitful discussion and to higher number of the references to this published work (Please refer to The Effect of Open Access).

Submission of an article by the author implies that they agree for it to be used by the Publisher on the above conditions and to be included in the RSCI system. It also implicates that the author is aware of the terms of its use. The information about the author sent to the Publisher, including by e-mail, is also considered as such consent.

The editorial board posts the full text of the article on the Perm State University site: http://www.psu.ru and in the OJS system at http://press.psu.ru

The publication fee is not collected and fees are not paid. The author's copy is sent to the author to the address provided by them.