SECURITIZATION OF INTERETHNIC RELATIONS IN RUSSIA (BASED ON MATERIALS FROM OFFICIAL DISCOURSE)

Authors

  • Dmitriy Pogorelsky Lomonosov Moscow State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2024-4-20-29

Keywords:

securitization, Copenhagen School, national security, interethnic relations, official discours, President of Russia

Abstract

The study of the securitization of public policy is a hot research area in political science. Based on the Copenhagen School approach, the author describes the securitization of the sphere of interethnic relations in Russia as a threatened referent object. The empirical analysis is based on content analysis of official discourse material, with 2012 as the lower chronological time frame. The source base includes speeches by the President of the Russian Federation on topics of national security and law enforcement and transcripts of meetings of the Council for Interethnic Relations with the participation of the head of state. The relevance of these sources lies in the fact that they formulate general approaches that are developed in strategic planning documents and other legal acts. The results show a stable presence of security topics in the public discourse on inter-ethnic relations and the implementation of state ethnic policy. Moreover, an intensification of securitization rhetoric has been recorded in recent years, as well as the presence of a significant share of securitizing acts associated with the mention of external challenges and threats. It is assumed that these phenomena are associated with geopolitical threats to the Russian Federation’s national security, including its ethnopolitical component.

Author Biography

Dmitriy Pogorelsky, Lomonosov Moscow State University

postgraduate student, School of Public Administration

References

Бахлов, И. В., Бахлова, О. В. (2020) ‘Этнополитические вызовы: отражение в теоретическом дискурсе и инструментарии государственной национальной политики’, Право и управление. XXI век, 1 (54), сс. 42–50. [Bakhlov, I. V., Bakhlova, O. V. (2020) ‘Ethno-political challenges: reflection in the theoretical discourse and tools of state national policy’ [Jetnopoliticheskie vyzovy: otrazhenie v teoreticheskom diskurse i instrumentarii gosudarstvennoj nacional’noj politiki], Journal of Law and Administration, 1 (54), pp. 42–50, DOI: 10.24833/2073-8420-2020-1-54-42-50 (In Russ.)].

Богачев, М. И., Фридман, А. Д. (2024) ‘Безопасность как дискурсивная практика: идентичность и формирование дискурса социетальной безопасности’, Вестник Пермского университета. Политология, 18 (1), сс. 135–144. [Bogachev, M., Fridman, A. (2024) ‘Security as a discursive practice: identity and the formation of the discourse of societal security’ [Bezopasnost’ kak diskursivnaja praktika: identichnost’ i formirovanie diskursa societal’noj bezopasnosti], Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science, 18 (1), pp. 135–144, DOI: 10.17072/2218-1067-2024-1-135-144 (In Russ.)].

Григорьева, К. С. (2021a) ‘Мигранты как «лица, подверженные идеологии терроризма». Институциональный анализ российского кейса секьюритизации миграции’, Журнал социологии и социальной антропологии, 24 (3), сс. 58–85. [Grigoryeva, K. S. (2021a) ‘Migrants as “Persons Susceptible to the Ideology of Terrorism”. Institutional Analysis of the Russian Migration Securitization Case’ [Migranty kak «lica, podverzhennye ideologii terrorizma». Institucional’nyj analiz rossijskogo kejsa sek’juritizacii migracii], The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology, 24 (3), pp. 58–85, DOI: 10.31119/jssa.2021.24.3.4 (In Russ.)].

Григорьева, К. С. (2021b) ‘Теоретические дебаты о секьюритизации и их влияние на разработку программ эмпирических исследований’, Гуманитарий Юга России, 5 (51), сс. 217–229. [Grigoryeva, K.S. (2021b) ‘Theoretical debate about securitization and its impact on the design of empirical research programs’ [Teoreticheskie debaty o sek’juritizacii i ih vlijanie na razrabotku programm jempiricheskih issledovanij’], Humanities of the south of Russia, 5 (51), pp. 217–229, DOI: 10.18522/2227-8656.2021.5.15 (In Russ.)].

Зорин, В.Ю. (2019) ‘Российская этнополитика на современном этапе: традиции и инновации’, Вестник Российской нации, 2, сс. 9–33. [Zorin, V. Ju (2019) ‘The Russian ethnopolicy at the present stage: traditions and innovations’ [Rossijskaja jetnopolitika na sovremennom jetape: tradicii i innovacii], Bulletin of Russian nation, 2, pp. 9–33. (In Russ.)].

Кириленко, В. П. и др. (2023) ‘Противодействие экстремистской идеологии и медиабезопасность государства’, Управленческое консультирование, 11, сс. 9–24. [Kirilenko, V. P. et al. (2023) ‘Countering Extremist Ideology and Media Security of the State’ [Protivodejstvie jekstremistskoj ideologii i mediabezopasnost’ gosudarstva], Administrative consulting, 11, pp. 9–24, DOI: 10.22394/1726-1139-2023-11-9-24 (In Russ.)].

Летняков, Д. Э. (2019) ‘Управление культурным разнообразием на постсоветском пространстве: “Национализирующие государства” 30 лет спустя’, Южно-российский журнал социальных наук, 20 (2), сс. 16–33. [Letnyakov, D.E. (2019) ‘Cultural Diversity Management in the Post-Soviet Countries: “Nationalizing States” 30 Years Later’ [Upravlenie kul’turnym raznoobraziem na postsovetskom prostranstve: "Nacionalizirujushhie gosudarstva" 30 let spustja], South-Russian Journal of Social Sciences, 20 (2), pp. 16–33, DOI: 10.31429/26190567-20-2-16-33 (In Russ.)].

Татунц, С. А., Пискарев, М. Д. (2018) ‘Этнорелигиозный экстремизм как проблема государственной и общественной безопасности: вопросы концептуального осмысления’, Вестник Российской нации, 5, сс. 107–118. [Tatunts, S. A., Piskarev, M. D. (2018) ‘Ethnic and religious extremism as social security and interstate relations problem: questions of conceptual comprehension’ [Jetnoreligioznyj jekstremizm kak problema gosudarstvennoj i obshhestvennoj bezopasnosti: voprosy konceptual’nogo osmyslenija], Bulletin of Russian nation, 5, pp. 107–118. (In Russ.)].

Фадеева, Л. А., Плотников, Д. С. (2021) ‘Политика идентичности и международная безопасность европейских государств постсоветского пространства’, Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Политология, 23 (4), сс. 614–629. [Fadeeva, L. A. & Plotnikov, D. S. (2021) ‘Identity politics and international security of the post-Soviet European states’ [Politika identichnosti i mezhdunarodnaja bezopasnost’ evropejskih gosudarstv postsovetskogo prostranstva], RUDN Journal of Political Science, 23 (4), pp. 614–629, DOI: 10.22363/2313-1438-2021-23-4-614-629 (In Russ.)].

Федякин, А. В. (2020) ‘Приоритеты государственной национальной политики в повестке дня Президента России’, Вестник Российской нации, 1, сс. 40–56. [Fedyakin, A. V. (2020) ‘Priorities of state ethno-national policy in the agenda of the Russian President’ [Prioritety gosudarstvennoj nacional’noj politiki v povestke dnja Prezidenta Rossii], Bulletin of Russian nation, 1, pp. 40–56. (In Russ.)].

Энтина, Е. Г., Пророкович, Д. (2022) ‘Распад Югославии в научно-исследовательском и политическом дискурсах России и Сербии’, Международная аналитика, 13 (3), сс. 94–115. [Entina, E.G. & Prorocovic, D. (2022) ‘The Breakup of Yugoslavia in the Research and Political Discourses of Russia and Serbia’ [Raspad Jugoslavii v nauchno-issledovatel’skom i politicheskom diskursah Rossii i Serbii], Journal of International Analytics, 13 (3), pp. 94–115, DOI: 10.46272/2587-8476-2022-13-3-94-115 (In Russ.)].

Frear, M., Mazepus, H. (2021) ‘Security, Civilisation and Modernisation: Continuity and Change in the Russian Foreign Policy Discourse’, Europe-Asia Studies, 73 (7), pp. 1215–1235, DOI: 10.1080/09668136.2020.1843601

Hendershot, C., Mutimer, D. (2018) ‘Critical security studies’ in Gheciu, A. & Wohlforth, W. C. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of International Security. Oxford University Press, pp. 60–71.

Karolak-Michalska, M. (2020) ‘The Role of Securitization of National and Ethnic Minorities in the Management of Ethno-Politics in Eastern European Countries’, International Journal of Contemporary Management, 19 (2), pp. 71–95, DOI: 10.4467/24498939IJCM.20.006.12671

Knott, E. (2023) ‘The Securitised ‘Others’ of Russian Nationalism in Ukraine and Russia’, LSE Public Policy Review, 3 (1), pp. 1–9, DOI: 10.31389/lseppr.80

Kragh, M. et al. (2020) ‘Conspiracy theories in Russian security thinking’, Journal of Strategic Studies, 45 (1), pp. 1–35, DOI: 10.1080/01402390.2020.1717954

Laine, V. (2021) ‘Evolution of Russia’s ‘Others’ in Presidential Discourse in 2000-2020’ in: Pynnöniemi, K. (ed.) Nexus of Patriotism and Militarism in Russia: A Quest for Internal Cohesion. Helsinki University Press, pp. 49–79.

Laine, V. & Zamyatin, K. (2021) ‘Russia’s Nationalities Policy Before and After the 2020 Constitutional Amendments: Is the “Ethnic Turn” Continuing?’, Finnish Institute of International Affairs Working Papers, 125, 14 p.

Loftus, S. (2019) Insecurity & the Rise of Nationalism in Putin’s Russia: Keeper of Traditional Values. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Osipov, A. (2010) ‘Ethnicity, Discrimination, and Extremism in Russia’, Problems of Post-Communism, 57 (2), pp. 50–60, DOI: 10.2753/PPC1075-8216570204

Østbø, J. (2016) ‘Securitizing “spiritual-moral values” in Russia’, PostSoviet Affairs, 33 (3), pp. 200–216, DOI: 10.1080/1060586X.2

Prina, F. (2020) ‘Constructing Ethnic Diversity as a Security Threat: What It Means to Russia’s Minorities’, International Journal on Minority and Group Rights, 28 (1), pp. 1–35, DOI: 10.1163/15718115-bja10002

Ruutu, K. (2017) ‘The Concepts of State and Society in Defining Russia’s Domestic Political Unity: A Research Note’, Europe-Asia Studies, 69 (8), pp. 1–10, DOI: 10.1080/09668136.2017.1378621

Solovyov, A. (2021) ‘National Securitization Strategy?’, Russia in Global Affairs, 19 (3), pp. 164–172, DOI: 10.31278/1810-6374-2021-19-3-164-172

Tolz, V. (2017) ‘From a threatening “Muslim migrant” back to the conspiring “West:” race, religion, and nationhood on Russian television during Putin’s third presidency’, Nationalities Papers, 45 (5), pp. 742–757, DOI: 10.1080/00905992.2017.1282449

Yusupova, G. (2022) ‘How Does the Politics of Fear in Russia Work? The Case of Social Mobilisation in Support of Minority Languages’, Europe-Asia Studies, 74 (4), pp. 620–641, DOI: 10.1080/09668136.2021.1965094

Published

2025-01-06

How to Cite

Pogorelsky Д. М. (2025). SECURITIZATION OF INTERETHNIC RELATIONS IN RUSSIA (BASED ON MATERIALS FROM OFFICIAL DISCOURSE). Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science, 18(4), 20–29. https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2024-4-20-29

Issue

Section

Political institutions, processes, technologies