YOUTH CIVIC ACTIVITY PROFILES: PRACTICES, ENGAGEMENT MODES, VALUES

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2023-4-102-114

Keywords:

civiс activity; active citizenship; civic participation; civic engagement; civic values; youth

Abstract

The author analyzes the relationship between civic engagement and other concepts that describe the specifics of the current situation in the field of reproduction of active citizenship. Three components of civic engagement are distinguished: civic participation (activity aspect), civic engagement (cognitive and communicative aspect) and active citizenship orientation (value component). The article then describes the practice and forms of civic activity of young people in a large Russian city. Empirical data is collected through two questionnaire surveys of Tyumen youth aged 18-24, conducted in 2021 and 2023. When analyzing data, the author relies on a multidimensional personality-oriented approach, which makes it possible to identify homogeneous groups of respondents and describe their profiles. The primary criterion for grouping is the experience of civic participation. The emphasis is on participation formats that are developing in the digital era and are more flexible than traditional, institutional forms. The first study identifies five clusters: "passive", "electoral reserve", "offline reserve", "online reserve", "active". There is an increase in civic activity according to the results of the second measurement. At the same time, there is a change in the structure of the clusters, a change in their proportions. Furthermore, two new clusters are added: "digital asset" and "participants".

Author Biography

V. V. Malenkov, Tyumen State University

Cand. Sci. (Sociol.), Associate Professor

References

Алмонд, Г., Верба, С. (2014) Гражданская культура: политические установки и демократия в пяти странах. Москва: Мысль. [Almond, G. S., Verba, S. (2014) The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations [Grazhdanskaya kul'tura: politicheskiye ustanovki i demokratiya v pyati stranakh]. Moscow: Misl. (In Russ.)].

Маленков, В. В. (2021) ‘Активное гражданство: эмпирические проекции концепта (по результатам исследования тюменской молодежи)’, Социологические исследования, 3, сc. 131–136. [Malenkov, V. V. (2021) ‘Active Citizenship: Con-cept and its empirical Projections (Based on the Results of Tyumen Youth Sur-vey)’ [Aktivnoye grazhdanstvo: em-piricheskiye proyektsii kontsepta (po re-zul'tatam issledovaniya tyumenskoy mo-lodezhi)], Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 3, pp. 131–136. (In Russ.)].

Петухов, В. В. (2020) ‘Российская молодежь и ее роль в трансформации общества’, Мониторинг общественного мнения: экономические и социальные перемены, 3, сс. 119–138. [Petukhov, V. V. (2020) ‘Russian Youth and Its Role in Society Transformation’ [Rossiyskaya molodezh' i yeye rol' v transformatsii obshchestva], Monitoring of Pub¬lic Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, 3, pp. 119–138. DOI: 10.14515/monitoring.2020.3.1621 (In Russ.)].

Соколов, А. В., Палагичева, А. В. (2021) ‘Особенности политической демобилизации граждан в современной России’, Вест-ник Пермского университета. Полито-логия, 15(2), сс. 82–95. [Sokolov, А. V., Palagicheva, А. V. (2021) ‘Features of political mobilization of citizens in protest in modern Russia’ [Osobennosti politicheskoy demobilizatsii grazhdan v sovremennoy Rossii], Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science, 15(2), pp. 82–95. (In Russ.)].

Юдин, Г. (2021) ‘Россия как плебисцитарная демократия’, Социологическое обозрение, 20(2), сс. 9–47. [Yudin, G. (2021) ‘Russia as a Plebiscitary Democracy’ [Rossiya kak plebistsitarnaya demokratiya], The Russian Sociological Review, 20(2), pp. 9–47 (In Russ.)].

Amnå, E., Ekman, J. (2014) ‘Standby citizens: diverse faces of political passivity’, Euro-pean Political Science Review, (6), pp. 261–281, DOI:10.1017/S175577391300009X.

Arnstein, S. R. (1969) ‘A Ladder of Citizen Par-ticipation’, Journal of the American Insti-tute of Planners, 35(4), pp. 216–224.

Barrett, M., & Brunton-Smith, I. (2014) ‘Political and Civic Engagement and Participation: Towards an Integrative Perspective’, Journal of Civil Society, 10(1), pp. 5–28.

Boulianne, S. (2015) ‘Social media use and par-ticipation: a meta-analysis of current re-search’, Information, Communication & Society, 18(5), pp. 524–538.

Dahlgren, P. (2014) ‘Political participation via the web: Structural and subjective con-tingencies’, Interactions: Studies in Com-munication & Culture, 5(3), pp. 255–269.

Dalton, R. J. (2008) ‘Citizenship Norms and the Expansion of Political Participation’, Po-litical Studies, 56(1), pp. 76–98.

Ekman, J., Amnå, E. (2012) ‘Political participa-tion and civic engagement: Towards a new typology’, Human Affairs, 22(3), pp. 283–300. DOI: 10.2478/s13374-012-0024-1.

Frick, K. T. (2016) ‘Citizen activism, conserva-tive views and mega planning in a digital era’, Planning Theory & Practice, 17(1), pp. 93–118.

Foa, R., and Mounk, Y. (2016) ‘The Democratic Disconnect’, Journal of Democracy, 27(3), pp. 5–17.

Hooghe, M. and Dejaeghere, Y. (2007) ‘Does the ‘monitorial citizen’ exist? An empirical investigation into the occurrence of postmodern forms of citizenship in the Nordic countries’, Scandinavian Political Studies, 30(2), pp. 249–271.

Hoskins, B. L. and Mascherini, M. (2009) ‘Meas-uring Active Citizenship through the De-velopment of a Composite Indica-tor’, Social Indicators Research, 90(3), pp. 459–488.

Kahne, J., Hodgin, E. and Eidman-Aadahl, E. (2016) ‘Redesigning Civic Education for the Digital Age: Participatory Politics and the Pursuit of Democratic Engagement’, Theory & Research in Social Education, 44(1), pp. 1–35.

Lawy, R. and Biesta, G. (2006) ‘Citizenship-As-Practice: The educational implications of an inclusive and relational understanding of citizenship’, British Journal of Educa-tional Studies, 54(1), pp. 34–50.

Leyva, R. (2016) ‘Exploring UK Millennials’ So-cial Media Consumption Patterns and Participation in Elections, Activism, and “Slacktivism”, Social Science Computer Review, 35(4), pp. 462–479.

Magidson, J. and Vermunt, J. K. (2004) ‘Latent class models’. In D. Kaplan (Ed.), The Sage handbook of quantitative methodolo-gy for the social sciences (pp. 175–198). Sage.

Milbrath, L. W. (1981) ‘Political Participation’. In: S. L. Long (ed.) The Handbook of Po-litical Behavior. New York: Plenum Press.

Morozov, E. (2009) ‘From slacktivism to activ-ism’, Foreign Policy. URL: http://foreignpolicy.com/2009/09/05/from-slacktivism-to-activism (accessed 12.08.20).

Nelson, J., Lewis, D., Lei, R. (2017) ‘Digital Democracy in America: A Look at Civic Engagement in an Internet Age’, Jour-nalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 94(1), pp. 318–334.

Ohme, J. (2019) ‘Updating citizenship? The ef-fects of digital media use on citizenship understanding and political participa-tion’, Information, Communication and Society, 22(13), pp. 1903–1928.

Pykett, J., Saward M., Schaefer A. (2010) ‘Fram-ing the Good Citizen’, The British Jour-nal of Politics and International Relations, 12(4), pp. 523–538.

Schudson, M. (1998) The Good Citizen: A History of American Public Life. New York: The Free Press.

Suwana, F. (2020) ‘What motivates digital activ-ism? The case of the Save KPK move-ment in Indonesia’, Information, Commu-nication and Society, 23(9), pp. 1295–1310.

Taylor, M., Howard, J., Lever, J. (2010) ‘Citizen Participation and Civic Activism in Comparative Perspective’, Journal of Civ-il Society, 6(2), pp. 145–164.

Wray-Lake, L., Metzger, A., Syvertsen, A. K. (2017) ‘Testing multidimensional models of youth civic engagement: Model com-parisons, measurement invariance, and age differences’, Applied Developmental Science, 21(4), pp. 266–284.

Published

2023-12-22

How to Cite

Malenkov В. В. (2023). YOUTH CIVIC ACTIVITY PROFILES: PRACTICES, ENGAGEMENT MODES, VALUES. Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science, 17(4). https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2023-4-102-114