THE ROLE OF IDENTITY IN ELITE INTERACTIONS: THE CASE OF CONFLICTS BETWEEN REGIONAL ENTREPRENEURS AND GOVERNORS IN RUSSIA

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2023-3-21-32%20

Keywords:

non-democratic politics; business political activity; identity; regional elites; regional politics; Russian re-gions; Russian politics

Abstract

The article explores the potential of the constructivist approach for understanding elite interactions in non-democratic political regimes by examining the case of public conflicts between regional entrepreneurs and governors in Russia. In conditions of weak property rights, conflicts with the authorities often threaten the existence of businesses and challenge the possibility of deriving material benefits from the positions of power held by entrepreneurs. Conflict behavior contradicts the imperatives of profit and rent maximization and often endangers the personal freedom of entrepreneurs, not to mention their business assets. The article examines the value of the concept of identity in explaining conflictual behavior, which can be considered as deviating from assumed economic rationality. Based on the methodology suitable for studying ideational factors of political outcomes and on the empirical material on conflicts between regional entrepreneurs and regional governors in Russia, it is shown that in the context where economy and politics are closely intertwined, assuming entrepreneurial identity and attributing economic rationality to business owners can be misleading. Salient political identities, formed by both formal and informal institutions, drive political action that cannot be reduced to rational choice models, and its goals contradict commonly assumed motives of profit and rent maximization.

Author Biography

D. A. Stremoukhov, HSE University, Russia

Senior Lecturer, Department of Political Science and International Affairs, St. Petersburg School of Social Sciences and Area Studies

References

Барсукова, С. Ю., Денисова-Шмидт, Е. В. (2020) ‘«Политические инвестиции» бизнеса в России, или почему бизнес финансирует избирательные кампа-нии’, Полис. Политические исследова-ния, 3(10), cc. 110‒125, DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2020.03.08. [Barsukova, S. Yu., Den-isova-Shmidt, E.V. (2020) ‘Political In-vestment of Business in Russia or Why Business Donates to Electoral Cam-paigns’ [“Politicheskie investitsii” biznesa v Rossii, ili pochemu biznes fi-nansiruet izbiratel'nye kampanii], Polis. Political Studies, 3, pр. 110‒125. (In Russ.)].

Расторгуев, С. (2012) ‘Инкумбенты-бизнесмены в областной законодательной власти в ЦФО в 2000‒2011 гг.’, Полис. Политические исследования, 4, cc. 117–125. [Rastorguyev, S. (2012) ‘In-cumbent Businesspeople in the Oblast’ Legislative Power in 2000-2011’ [Inkumbenty-biznesmeny v oblastnoi za-konodatel'noi vlasti v TsFO v 2000-2011 gg.]. Polis. Political Studies, 4, pр. 117‒125. (In Russ.)].

Сакаева, М. М. (2012) ‘Парламент как «окно возможностей»: исследование поведения предпринимателей с депутатским мандатом в ходе реализации рыночных интересов’, Экономическая социология, 13(3), cc. 96‒122. [Sakaeva, M. M. (2012) ‘Parliament as a Window of Op-portunity: Research on the Behaviour of Entrepreneurs with a Deputy Mandate in the Course of Market Interests Realiza-tion’ [Parlament kak «okno vozmozhnostei»: issledovanie povedeniya predprini-matelei s deputatskim mandatom v khode realizatsii rynochnykh interesov], Eco-nomic Sociology, 13(3), рp. 96‒122. (In Russ.)].

Сакаева, М. М. (2015) Бизнесмены в органах законодательной власти: использование депутатского статуса в предпринимательской деятельности. Дисс. … канд. соц. наук. Москва. [Sakaeva,M.M. (2015) Businesspeople in the Legislative Bodies: The Use of a Deputy Status in the Entrepreneurial Activity [Biznesmeny v organakh zakonodatel'noi vlasti: ispol'zovanie deputatskogo statusa v predprinimatel'skoi deyatel'nosti]. PhD. diss. Moscow. (In Russ.).].

Сакаева, М. М. (2019) ‘«Черный лебедь» и другие правила повседневной легальности в малом бизнесе: сравнительный анализ «рядовых» и политически аффилированных предпринимателей’, Laborato-rium: журнал социальных исследований, 11(1), cc. 31‒56. [Sakaeva, M. M. (2019) ‘A “Black Swan” and Other Rules of Everyday Legality in Small Business: A Comparative Analysis of “Ordinary” and Politically Affiliated Entrepreneurs’ [«Chernyi lebed'» i drugie pravila pov-sednevnoi legal'nosti v malom biznese: sravnitel'nyi analiz «ryadovykh» i politicheski affilirovannykh predprini-matelei], Laboratorium: zhurnal sotsi-al’nykh issledovaniy, 11(1), рp. 31‒56. (In Russ.)].

Чирикова, А. Е., Ледяев, В. Г. (2014) ‘Локальные элиты в малых российских городах: формальные и неформальные ресурсы власти’, Pro nunc, 1(13), cc. 129‒162. [Chirikova, A. E., Ledyaev, V. G. (2014) ‘Local Elites in Russian Small Towns: Formal and Informal Power Re-sources’ [Lokal'nye elity v malykh rossi-iskikh gorodakh: formal'nye i neformal'nye resursy vlasti’], Pro nunc, 1(13), рp. 129‒162. (In Russ.)].

Чирикова, А. Е., Ледяев, В. Г., Сельцер, Д. Г. (2014) ‘Власть в малом российском городе: конфигурация и взаимодействие основных акторов’, Полис. Политические исследования, 2, cc. 88‒105, DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2014.02.07. [Chirikova, A. E., Ledyaev, V. G., Seltser, D. G. (2014) ‘Power in a Russian Small Town: Con-stellation of Main Actors and Their Inter-action’ [Vlast' v malom rossiiskom go-rode: konfiguratsiya i vzaimodeistvie os-novnykh aktorov], Polis. Political Stud-ies, 2, pp. 88‒105. (In Russ.)].

Ashforth, B. E., Schinoff, B. S. (2016) ‘Identity Under Construction: How Individuals Come to Define Themselves in Organiza-tions’, Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 3(1), pр. 111‒137, DOI: 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062322.

Buehler, M., Ayari, M. (2018) ‘The Autocrat’s Advisors: Opening the Black Box of Ruling Coalitions in Tunisia’s Authoritarian Regime’, Political Research Quarter-ly, 71(2), рp. 330‒346, DOI: 10.1177/1065912917735400.

Brubaker, R., Cooper, F. (2000) ‘Beyond "Identity"’, Theory and Society, 29(1), рp. 1‒47, DOI: 10.1023/A:1007068714468.

Burke, P. J., Stets, J. E. (2009) Identity Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388275.001.0001.

Gecas, V. (1991) ‘The Self-Concept as a Basis for a Theory of Motivation’ in: J. A. Howard, P. L. Callero (eds.) The Self-Society Dynamic: Cognition, Emotion, and Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pр. 171‒187. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511527722.010.

Gehlbach, S., Sonin, K., Svolik, M. W. (2016) ‘Formal Models of Nondemocratic Politics’, Annual Review of Political Sci-ence, 19(1), pр. 565‒584. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-polisci-042114-014927.

Hitlin, S. (2003) ‘Values as the Core of Personal Identity: Drawing Links Between Two Theories of Self’, Social Psychology Quarterly, 66(6), рp. 118‒137, DOI: 10.2307/1519843.

Jones, C. (2015) ‘Seeing Like an Autocrat: Liber-al Social Engineering in an Illiberal State’, Perspectives on Politics, 13(1), pр. 24‒41, DOI: 10.1017/S1537592714003119.

Lux, S. T., Crook, T. R., Woehr, D. J. (2011) ‘Mixing Business with Politics: A Meta-Analysis of the Antecedents and Out-comes of Corporate Political Activity’, Journal of Management, 37(1), pр. 223‒247, DOI: 10.1177/0149206310392233.

March, J. G., Olsen, J. P. (1996) ‘Institutional Perspective on Political Institu-tions’, Governance, 9(3), pр. 247‒264, DOI: 10.1111/j.14680491.1996.tb00242.x

Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., Moules, N. J. ‘Thematic Analysis: Striv-ing to Meet the Trustworthiness Crite-ria’, International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1). DOI: 10.1177/1609406917733847.

Stets, J. E., Burke, P. J. (2014) ‘Emotions and Identity Nonverification’, Social Psychol-ogy Quarterly, 77(4), pр. 387‒410, DOI:10.1177%2F0190272514533708.

Svolik, M. (2012) The Politics of Authoritarian Rule. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, DOI:10.1017/CBO9781139176040.

Published

2023-10-30

How to Cite

Stremoukhov Д. А. (2023). THE ROLE OF IDENTITY IN ELITE INTERACTIONS: THE CASE OF CONFLICTS BETWEEN REGIONAL ENTREPRENEURS AND GOVERNORS IN RUSSIA. Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science, 17(3). https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2023-3-21-32