ESG IN THE POLITICAL DISCOURSE OF MODERN RUSSIA: KEY RISKS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2023-2-39-47

Keywords:

risk; ESG agenda; political stakeholders; political risks; sustainable development; regional development strategy

Abstract

The relevance of the research is connected with the need to form its own policy and strategy for the development of the ESG agenda in the political space of Russia in the new international and geopolitical conditions. The current international and domestic political situation requires a special approach to understanding and identifying existing risks in the field of forming the ESG agenda. The purpose of the study is to identify the main risks in the political space within the framework of the ESG agenda formation process in modern Russia. In this research, we propose a broader understanding of political risk as a situation of uncertainty that can negatively and positively affect the political situation and stakeholders. The main research methods are content analysis, SWOT analysis, as well as qualitative risk assessment methods: the development of a probability and impact matrix. The results of the study show that a large number of stakeholders (representatives of various political groups and organizations) are involved in the discussion of the topic and the implementation of the ESG agenda in the Russian space. The study identified risk groups with the greatest impact, primarily legal and financial. Also, risks with a high degree of influence are the risks of strategic planning.

Author Biographies

D. M. Semenova, Perm National Research Polytechnic University

Candidate of Political Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Public Administration and History

S. A. Kudryavtsev, Russian State Social University

postgraduate student of the Department of Political Science and Applied Political Work

References

Ануфриев, В. П., Гудим, Ю. В., Каминов, А. А. (2021) Устойчивое развитие. Энергоэффективность. Зеленая экономика. Москва: ИНФРА-М, 201 с. [электронное издание]. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12737/1226403. [Anufriev, V. P., Gudim, Yu. V., Kaminov, A. A. (2021) Sustaina-ble Development. Energy efficiency. Green economy [Ustoichivoe razvitie. Ener-goeffektivnost'. Zelenaya ekonomika]. Moscow: INFRA-M, 201 p. E-book li-brary [online]. (In Russ.)].

Барановский, В. Г., Иванова, Н. И., отв. ред. (2015) Глобальное управление: возможности и риски. Москва, ИМЭМО РАН, 315 с. [Baranovskii, V. G., Ivanova, N. I., otv. red. (2015) Global Governance: Op-portunities and Risks. [Global'noe upravlenie: vozmozhnosti i riski]. Moscow, IMEMO RAN, 315 p. (In Russ.)].

Бек, У. (2000) Общество риска: на пути к другому модерну. Москва. [Bek, U. (2000) Risk society: on the way to another modernity [Obshchestvoriska: naputi k dru-gomu modern]. Moscow. (In Russ.)].

Боброва, О. С. (2022) ‘От устойчивого развития к ESG: опыт европейских компаний и правительств’, Государственное управление. Электронный вестник, 91, сс. 94‒103. [Bobrova, O. S. (2022) ‘From sustainable development to ESG: the ex-perience of European companies and governments’ [Ot ustoichivogo razvitiya k ESG: opyt evropeiskikh kompaniii pravitel'stv], Gosudarstvennoe upravlenie. Elektronnyivestnik, 91, pp. 94‒103. (In Russ.)].

Бордовских, А. Н. (2020) ‘Политические риски в условиях глобальных вызовов традиционным системам госуправления’, Анализ и прогноз, Журнал ИМЭМО РАН, 1, сс. 63‒73. DOI: 10.20542/afij-2020-1-63-73. [Bordovskikh, A. N. (2020) ‘Political risks in the face of global chal-lenges to traditional public administra-tion systems’ [Politicheskieriski v uslovi-yakh global'nykh vyzovov traditsionnym sistemam gosupravleniya], Analiz I prognoz. Zhurnal IMEMO RAN, 1, рp. 63‒73. Available at: https://doi.org/10.20542/afij-2020-1-63-73. (In Russ.)].

Гидденс, Э. (1994) ‘Судьбы, риск и бeзonacность’, Thesis, Вып.5. [Giddens, E. (1994) ‘Fate, risk and safety’ [Sud'by, risk ibezonacnost'], Thesis. Vyp. 5. (In Russ.)].

Дейк, Т. А. Ван. (1989) Язык. Познание. Коммуникация / пер. с англ. [Deik, T. A. van. (1989) Language. Cognition. Communication [Yazyk. Poznanie. Kommu-nikatsiya] / рer. s angl. Moscow. (In Russ.)].

Загашвили, В. С. (2017) ‘Политические риски зарубежных инвестиций российских компаний’, Мировая экономика и международные отношения, 61 (12), сс. 27–35. [Zagashvili, V. S. (2017) ‘Political risks of foreign investments by Russian companies’ [Politicheskie risk izarubezh-nykh investitsii rossiiskikh kompanii], Мirovaya ekonomika I mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 61 (12), pp. 27–35. (In Russ.)].

Измайлова, М. А. (2022) ‘Реализация ESG-стратегий российских компаний в условиях санкционных ограничений’, МИР (Модернизация. Инновации. Развитие), 13 (2), сс. 185‒201. [Izmailova, M. A. (2022) ‘Implementation of ESG strategies of Russian companies under sanctions restrictions’ [Realizatsiya ESG-strategii rossiiskikh kompanii v uslovi-yakh sanktsionnykh ogranichenii], MIR (Modernizatsiya. Innovatsii. Razvitie), 13 (2), рр. 185‒201. (In Russ.)].

Луман, Н. (1994) ‘Понятие риска’ / пер. А. Ф. Филиппова, Thesis, 5. [Luman, N. (1994) ‘The concept of risk‘ [Po-nyatieriska] / рer. A. F. Filippova, Thesis, 5. (In Russ.)].

Матвеенко, Ю. И. (2012) ‘Политический риск: о некоторых методах иприкладных моделях его анализа и изучения’, Социо-логия власти, 1, сс. 147‒158. [Matveenko, Yu. I. (2012) ‘Political risk: about some methods and applied models of its analysis and study’ [Politicheskii risk: o nekotorykhmetodakhipriklad-nykhmodelyakh ego analizaiizucheniya], Sotsiologiya vlasti, 1, pp. 147‒158. (In Russ.)].

Нарышкина, М. В. (2017) ‘Основные методы оценки политических рисков в деятельности политических партий’, Право и политика, 3, сс. 62‒73. DOI: 10.7256/2454 0706.2017.3.22067. URL: https://nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=22067. [Naryshkina, M. V.(2017) ‘Basic methods for assessing political risks in the activities of political parties’ [Osnovnye metody otsenki politichesk ikhriskov v deyatel'nosti politicheskikh partii], Pravo i politika, 3, рр. 62‒73. DOI: 10.7256/2454 0706.2017.3.22067 [online]. Available at: https://nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=22067. (In Russ.)].

Цифровая трансформация экономических систем: проблемы и перспективы (ЭКО-ПРОМ-2022): сборник трудов VI Все-российской научно-практической конференции с зарубежным участием, Санкт-Петербург, 11–12 нояб., Санкт-Петербург: ПОЛИТЕХ-ПРЕСС, 819 с. DOI 10.18720/IEP/2021.4. [Digital Trans-formation of Economic Systems: Problems and Prospects (ECOPROM-2022) [Tsifrovaya transformatsiya ekonomicheskikh sistem: problem I per-spektivy], Proceedings of the VI All-Russian Scientific and Practical Confer-ence with Foreign Participation, Sankt-Peterburg, 11–12 noyab., Sankt-Peterburg: POLITEKh-PRESS, 819 p. (In Russ.)].

Соловьев, Э. (2010) ‘Политические риски – фактор формирования российского инвестиционного имиджа’, Мировая экономика и международные отношения, 4, сс. 64‒70. URL: https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2010-4-64-70. [Solov'ev, E. (2010) ‘Political risks - a factor in the formation of the Russian investment image’ [Politicheskieriski – factor formiro-vaniya rossiiskogo investitsionnogo im-idzha], Mirovaya ekonomika imezhdu-narodnye otnosheniya, 4, рр. 64‒70. Available at: https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2010-4-64-70. (In Russ.)].

Талеб, Н. Н. (2009) Черный лебедь под знаком непредсказуемости. Москва: Издательство Колибри. [Taleb, N. N. (2009) Black swan under the sign of unpredicta-bility [Chernyilebed' pod znakom nepredskazuemosti]. Moscow: Iz-datel'stvo Kolibri. (In Russ.)].

Ялманов, Н. И. (2012) ‘Риск и неопределенность в процессе принятия политических решений’, Вопросы управления, 1, сс. 41‒45. [Yalmanov, N. I. (2012) ‘Risk and Uncertainty in Political Decision Making’ [Risk ineopredelennost' v protsesse prinyatiya politicheskikh resh-enii], Voprosy upravleniya, 1, рp. 41‒45. (In Russ.)].

Althaus, C. (2009) Calculating Political Risk. Published by Routledge, 304 p.

Alexander, C., Sheedy, E. (2004) The Profession-al Risk Managers’ Handbook: A Comprehensive Guide to Current Theory and Best Practices.

Clark, E. (1997) ‘Valuing Political Risk’, Journal of International Money and Finance, Vol 16, 3, рр. 477‒490.

Holburn, G. L. F., Zelner, B. A. (2009) Political capabilities, policy risk, and international investment strategy: Evidence from the global electric power industry. Working paper.

Labuschagne, C. (2005) ‘Sustainable Project Life Cycle Management: the need to integrate life cycles in the manufacturing sector’, International Journal of Project Manage-ment, Vol. 23, рр. 159‒168.

Morgan, M. G., Florig, H. K., DeKay, M. L. and Fischbeck, P. (2000) ‘Categorizing risks for risk ranking’, Risk Analysis, Vol. 20, 1, pp. 49–58.

Strategies and Techniques for Investors and Fi-nancial Institutions (2008) Blackwell pub-lisher.

Silvius, A. J. G. and Tharp, J. (2013) Sustainability Integration for Effective Project Man-agement, IGI Global Publishing.

Silvius, G., Kampinga, M., Paniagua, S., Mooi, H. (2017) ‘Considering sustainability in project management decision making; An investigation using Q-methodology’, In-ternational Journal of Project Manage-ment, 35, рр. 1133‒1150.

Simon, J. D. (1982) ‘Political risk assessment: Past trends and future prospects’, Colum-bia Journal of World Business, рр. 62‒71.

Published

2023-07-13

How to Cite

Semenova Д. М., & Kudryavtsev С. А. (2023). ESG IN THE POLITICAL DISCOURSE OF MODERN RUSSIA: KEY RISKS . Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2023-2-39-47