SOCIO-PSYCHOLOGICAL FACTORS OF MASS SUPPORT FOR AUTOCRACIES: LITERATURE REVIEW

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2022-4-118-126

Keywords:

autocracies; political support; hybrid regimes; political trust; social identity; Big Five; emotions; values; nationalism

Abstract

Despite the fact that autocracies are frequently portrayed in art as states where all power belongs to a single person or a group of people, such states need mass political support. The latter signals that attempts at changing the status quo have little chances of success, lowers the probability of violent revolutions, and forms democratic legitimacy, while at the same time weakening the political role of civilian population. A significant share of studies on mass support of autocracies considers economic factors as key variables. Nevertheless, a number of papers point out that such states could be rather resilient to economic shocks. Social psychology has a number of approaches that could offer additional explanations of dynamics of political support in autocracies. This article attempts to systematize results of publications that maintain the significance of these theories. Potential explanatory models include social identity theory, value theories of Inglehart-Welzel and Schwartz as well as Big Five personality traits and emotions in politics.

Author Biography

N. S. Zubarev, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Russia, St. Petersburg

2 year postgraduate student, Department of Political Science and International Relations, trainee researcher, Laboratory for Comparative Social Research. Ronald Franklin Inglehart

References

Юдин, Г. Б. (2021) ‘Россия как плебисцитарная демократия’, Социологическое обозрение, 20 (2), сс. 9–47. [Yudin, G. B. (2021) ‘Russia as a Plebiscitary Democra-cy’ [Rossiya kak plebiscitarnaya demokratiya], The Russian Sociological Review, 20 (2), pp. 9–47. (In Russ.)]. DOI: 10.17323/1728-192x-2021-2-9-47.

Achen, C. H. and Bartels, L. M. (2017) Democracy for Realists. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 408 p.

Alexseev, M. A. and Hale, H. E. (2016) ‘Rallying ’round the leader more than the flag: Changes in Russian nationalist public opinion 2013–2014’, in Kolstø, P. and Blakkisrud, H. (Eds.) The New Russian Nationalism: Imperialism, Ethnicity and Authoritarianism 2000‒2015. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 192–220. DOI:10.3366/edinburgh/9781474410427.003.0008.

Axelrod, R. (1986) ‘An Evolutionary Approach to Norms’, The American Political Science Review, 80 (4), pp. 1095–1111. DOI: 10.2307/1960858.

Baker, W. D. and Oneal, J. R. (2001) ‘Patriotism or Opinion Leadership?: The Nature and Origins of the “Rally 'Round the Flag” Effect’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 45 (5), pp. 661–687. DOI: 10.1177/0022002701045005006.

Brader, T. (2006) Campaigning for Hearts and Minds: How Emotional Appeals in Politi-cal Ads Work. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press (Studies in Communica-tion, Media, and Public Opinion). 280 p. Available at: https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/C/bo3640346.html (Accessed: 10 May 2022).

Caprara, G. V., Schwartz, S., Capanna, C., Vec-chione, M. and Barbaranelli, C. (2006) ‘Personality and Politics: Values, Traits, and Political Choice’, Political Psycholo-gy, 27 (1), pp. 1–28. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2006.00447.x.

Carney, D. R., Jost, J. T., Gosling, S. D. and Pot-ter, J. (2008) ‘The Secret Lives of Liber-als and Conservatives: Personality Pro-files, Interaction Styles, and the Things They Leave Behind’, Political Psycholo-gy, 29 (6), pp. 807–840. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00668.x.

Diaz-Cayeros, A., Magaloni, B. and Weingast, B.R. (2003) Tragic Brilliance: Equilibri-um Party Hegemony in Mexico. SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 1153510. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. DOI:10.2139/ssrn.1153510.

Dobewall, H. and Rudnev, M. (2014) ‘Common and Unique Features of Schwartz’s and Inglehart’s Value Theories at the Coun-try and Individual Levels’, Cross-Cultural Research, 48 (1), pp. 45–77. DOI: 10.1177/1069397113493584.

Dukalskis, A. and Lee, J. (2020) ‘Everyday Na-tionalism and Authoritarian Rule: A Case Study of North Korea’, Nationalities Pa-pers, 48 (6), pp. 1052–1068. DOI: 10.1017/nps.2019.99.

Easton, D. (1975) ‘A Re-Assessment of the Concept of Political Support’, British Journal of Political Science, 5 (4), pp. 435–457. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123400008309.

Fiorina, M. P. (1976) ‘The Voting Decision: Instrumental and Expressive Aspects’, The Journal of Politics, 38 (2), pp. 390–413. doi:10.2307/2129541.

Frye, T. (2019) ‘Economic Sanctions and Public Opinion: Survey Experiments From Russia’, Comparative Political Studies, 52 (7), pp. 967–994. DOI: 10.1177/0010414018806530.

Gandhi, J. and Lust-Okar, E. (2009) ‘Elections Under Authoritarianism’, Annual Review of Political Science, 12 (1), pp. 403–422. DOI:10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060106.095434.

Gerber, A. S., Huber, G. A., Doherty, D. and Dowling, C. M. (2011) ‘The Big Five Personality Traits in the Political Arena’, Annual Review of Political Science, 14 (1), pp. 265–287. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-polisci-051010-111659.

Gerschewski, J. (2013) ‘The three pillars of sta-bility: legitimation, repression, and co-optation in autocratic regimes’, Democra-tization, 20 (1), pp. 13–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2013.738860.

Golosov, G. V. (2016) ‘Voter Volatility in Elec-toral Authoritarian Regimes: Testing the “Tragic Brilliance” Thesis’, Comparative Sociology, 15 (5), pp. 535–559. DOI: 10.1163/15691330-12341399.

Greene, S. and Robertson, G. (2017) ‘Agreeable Authoritarians: Personality and Politics in Contemporary Russia’, Comparative Political Studies, 50 (13), pp. 1802–1834. DOI: 10.1177/0010414016688005.

Greene, S. A. and Robertson, G. (2020) ‘Affect and Autocracy: Emotions and Attitudes in Russia after Crimea’, Perspectives on Politics, 20 (1), pp. 1–15. DOI: 10.1017/S1537592720002339.

Groeling, T. and Baum, M. A. (2008) ‘Crossing the Water’s Edge: Elite Rhetoric, Media Coverage, and the Rally-Round-the-Flag Phenomenon’, The Journal of Politics, 70 (4), pp. 1065–1085. DOI: 10.1017/S0022381608081061.

Gustavsson, G. and Miller, D. (2019) ‘Why Lib-eral Nationalism Today?’, in (Eds.), Gus-tavsson, G. and Miller, D., Liberal Nationalism and Its Critics. New York: Ox-ford University Press, pp. 1–20. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198842545.003.0001.

Hale, H. E. (2013) ‘Regime Change Cascades: What We Have Learned from the 1848 Revolutions to the 2011 Arab Uprisings’, Annual Review of Political Science, 16 (1), pp. 331–353. DOI:10.1146/annurev-polisci-032211-212204.

Hale, H. E. (2018) ‘How Crimea Pays: Media, Rallying ’Round the Flag, and Authori-tarian Support’, Comparative Politics, 50 (3), pp. 369‒391. DOI: 10.5129/001041518822704953.

Hale, H. E. (2022) ‘Authoritarian rallying as rep-utational cascade? Evidence from Putin’s popularity surge after Crimea’, American Political Science Review, 116 (2), pp. 580–594. DOI: 10.1017/S0003055421001052.

Havel, V. and Wilson, P. (1985) ‘The power of the powerless’, International Journal of Politics, 3/4 (15), pp. 23–96.

Hogg, M. A. (2006) ‘Social Identity Theory’, in Burke, P.J. (Eds.) Contemporary Social Psychological Theories. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 111–136. DOI: 10.1515/9781503605626-007.

Laruelle, M. (2009) In the Name of the Nation: Nationalism and Politics in Contemporary Russia. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 254 p. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230101234.

Magaloni, B. (2006) Voting for Autocracy: Hege-monic Party Survival and its Demise in Mexico. Cambridge: Cambridge Universi-ty Press. (Cambridge Studies in Compara-tive Politics). 300 p. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511510274.

Marcus, G. E. (2000) ‘Emotions in Politics’, An-nual Review of Political Science, 3 (1), pp. 221‒250. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.3.1.221.

Mishler, W. and Rose, R. (2005) ‘What Are the Political Consequences of Trust?: A Test of Cultural and Institutional Theories in Russia’, Comparative Political Studies, 38 (9), pp. 1050–1078. DOI: 10.1177/0010414005278419.

Mueller, J. E. (1970) ‘Presidential Popularity from Truman to Johnson’, The American Political Science Review, 64 (1), pp. 18–34. DOI: 10.2307/1955610.

Nathan, A. J. (2020) ‘The Puzzle of Authoritari-an Legitimacy’, Journal of Democracy, 31 (1), pp. 158–168. DOI:10.1353/jod.2020.0013.

Norris, P. (1999) ‘The Growth of Critical Citi-zens’, in Norris, P. (Eds.) Critical Citi-zens: Global Support for Democratic Gov-ernment. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–30. Available at: 10.1093/0198295685.003.0001.

Panagopoulos, C. (2010) ‘Affect, Social Pressure and Prosocial Motivation: Field Experi-mental Evidence of the Mobilizing Ef-fects of Pride, Shame and Publicizing Voting Behavior’, Political Behavior, 32 (3), pp. 369–386. DOI: 10.1007/s11109-010-9114-0.

Pearlman, W. (2013) ‘Emotions and the Micro-foundations of the Arab Uprisings’, Per-spectives on Politics, 11 (2), pp. 387–409. DOI:10.1017/S1537592713001072.

Posner, D. N. (2005) Institutions and Ethnic Poli-tics in Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 339 p. Available at: https:10.1017/CBO9780511808661.

Schwartz, S. H. and Bardi, A. (2001) ‘Value Hierarchies Across Cultures: Taking a Simi-larities Perspective’, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32 (3), pp. 268–290. DOI: 10.1177/0022022101032003002.

Seligson, A. and Tucker, J. (2005) ‘Feeding the Hand that Bit You: Voting for Ex-Authoritarian Rulers in Russia and Boliv-ia’, Demokratizatsiya: The Journal of Post-soviet Democratization, 13, pp. 11–44. DOI: 10.3200/DEMO.13.1.11-44.

Sharafutdinova, G. (2020) ‘Public Opinion For-mation and Group Identity: The Politics of National Identity Salience in Post-Crimea Russia’, Problems of Post-Communism, 69 (3), pp. 1–13. DOI: 10.1080/10758216.2020.1829975.

Sirotkina, E. and Zavadskaya, M. (2020) ‘When the party’s over: political blame attribu-tion under an electoral authoritarian re-gime’, Post-Soviet Affairs, 36 (1), pp. 37–60. DOI: 10.1080/1060586X.2019.1639386.

Tang, W. (2016) Populist Authoritarianism: Chinese Political Culture and Regime Sustainability. Oxford University Press. 220 p. Available at: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190205782.001.0001.

Truex, R. (2022) ‘Political Discontent in China is Associated with Isolating Personality Traits’, The Journal of Politics [Preprint]. DOI: 10.1086/719273.

Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D. and Wetherell, M.S. (1987) Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. 239 p.

Weiss, J. C. (2020) China’s Self-Defeating Nationalism, Foreign Affairs. Available at: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/china/2020-07-16/chinas-self-defeating-nationalism (Accessed: 10 May 2021).

Young, L. E. (2019) ‘The Psychology of State Repression: Fear and Dissent Decisions in Zimbabwe’, American Political Science Review, 113 (1), pp. 140–155. DOI: 10.1017/S000305541800076X.

Zavadskaya, M. and Welzel, C. (2015) ‘Subvert-ing autocracy: emancipative mass values in competitive authoritarian regimes’, Democratization, 22 (6), pp. 1105–1130. DOI: 10.1080/13510347.2014.914500.

Published

2022-12-27

How to Cite

Zubarev Н. С. (2022). SOCIO-PSYCHOLOGICAL FACTORS OF MASS SUPPORT FOR AUTOCRACIES: LITERATURE REVIEW. Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science, 16(4). https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2022-4-118-126