WHEN ARE AUTHORITARIAN ELECTIONS COMPETITIVE? THE CASE OF ST. PETERSBURG'S LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY ELECTIONS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2022-4-85-93

Keywords:

elections; electoral authoritarianism; regional politic; regional elections; elections in Russia; authoritarian elections; competitiveness; deconsolidation of elite groups

Abstract

Elections in authoritarian regimes are commonly defined as “unfair and uncompetitive,” but is it always true? The author argues that in the case of the heterogeneity of elite groups in the region and the emergence of a conflict among them, regional elections become an "arena for confrontation" for competing actors of the political system. To test this assertion, data on the results of elections and the characteristics of election campaigns in 25 single-member districts in the elections to the Legislative Assembly of St. Petersburg in 2021 are used. With the method of qualitative comparative analysis (QCA), the hypothesis of the existing conflict among elite groups is confirmed. In case the city administration "approved" a candidate from the opposition party instead of the ruling one, and also if the previous deputy in the district is not re-elected in the same district, the elections are competitive, and the victory of a particular candidate is unpredictable. As a result of the analysis, such factors of election competitiveness as the number of candidates on the ballot and high turnout are also identified. Thus, in the event of a conflict between regional elites, authoritarian elections fulfill their original function: serve as platforms for the competitive struggle of various political groups.

Author Biography

D. A. Kozmin, European University in St. Petersburg

Master of Political Science, PhD Student, Faculty of Political Science

References

Карпенко, М., Клочкова, К. (2022) ‘Некоторым бюджетникам в Петербурге рекомендовали голосовать за конкретных кандидатов. Рассказываем, за каких’, портал "Ротонда". URL: https://t.me/rotondamedia/2731 (Дата обращения: 08.06.2022). [Karpenko, M., Klochkova, K. (2022) ‘Some state employees in St. Petersburg were advised to vote for specific candidates. We tell you for who’ [Nekotorym byudzhetnikam v Peterburge rekomendovali golosovat' za konkretnykh kandidatov. Rasskazyvayem, za kakikh], information portal "Rotonda". Availa-ble at: https://t.me/rotondamedia/2731 (Accessed: 8 June 2022) (In Russ.)].

Кынев, А. В. (2020) Губернаторы в России: между выборами и назначениями. Москва: Фонд «Либеральная миссия», 1030 с. [Kynev, A. V. (2020) Governors in Russia: between elections and appoint-ments [Gubernatory v Rossii: mezhdu vy-borami i naznacheniyami]. Moscow: Lib-eral Mission Foundation, 1030 p. (In Russ.)].

Bader, M. (2013) ‘Crowdsourcing election monitoring in the 2011–2012 Russian elections’, East European Politics, 29(4), pp. 521‒535. DOI: 10.1080/21599165.2013.818979.

Bernhard, M., Edgell, A. B., Lindberg, S. I. (2020) ‘Institutionalising electoral uncertainty and authoritarian regime survival’, European Journal of Political Research, 59, pp. 465‒487, DOI: 10.1111/1475-6765.12355.

Bogaards, M. (2009) ‘How to classify hybrid regimes? Defective democracy and electoral authoritarianism’, Democratization, 16(2), pp. 399‒423. DOI: 10.1080/13510340902777800.

Bunce, V., Wolchik, S. (2010) ‘Defeating Dictators: Electoral Change and Stability in Competitive Authoritarian Regimes’, World Politics, 62(1), pp. 43‒86. DOI: 10.1017/S0043887109990207.

Conitzer, V. (2007) ‘When are elections with few candidates hard to manipulate?’, Journal of the ACM, 54(3), pp. 14‒28. DOI: 10.1145/1236457.1236461.

Diamond, L. (2002) ‘Elections Without Democracy: Thinking About Hybrid Regimes’, Journal of Democracy, 13(2), pp. 21‒35. DOI: 10.1353/jod.2002.0025.

Donno, D. (2013) ‘Elections and Democratization in Authoritarian Regimes’, American Journal of Political Science, 57(3), pp. 703‒716. DOI: 10.1111/ajps.12013.

Egorov, G., Sonin, K. (2018) ‘Elections in Non-Democracies’, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2497277 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2497277.

Esen, B., Gumuscu, S. (2019) ‘Killing Competitive Authoritarianism Softly: The 2019 Local Elections in Turkey’, South Euro-pean Society and Politics, 24(3), pp. 317‒342. DOI: 10.1080/13608746.2019.1691318.

Frye, T., Reuter, O. J., Szakonyi, D. (2014) ‘Political machines at work: Voter Mobiliza-tion and Electoral Subversion in the Workplace’, World Politics, 66(2), pp. 195‒228. DOI: 10.1353/wp.2014.0012.

Golosov, G. V. (2011) ‘The Regional Roots of Electoral Authoritarianism in Russia’, Europe-Asia Studies, 63(4), pp. 623‒639. DOI: 10.1080/09668136.2011.566427.

Golosov, G. V. (2016) ‘Why and how electoral systems matter in autocracies’, Australian Journal of Political Science, 51(3), pp. 367‒385. DOI: 10.1080/10361146.2016.1182617.

Hong, H., Wong, T-N. (2020) ‘Authoritarian election as an incentive scheme’, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 32(3), pp. 460‒493. DOI: 10.1177/0951629820910563.

Howard, M. M., Roessler, P.G. (2006) ‘Liberalizing Electoral Outcomes in Competitive Authoritarian Regimes’, American Jour-nal of Political Science, 50(2), pp. 365‒381. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00189.x.

Kaminski, M. M. (1999) ‘How communism could have been saved: Formal analysis of electoral bargaining in poland in 1989’, Public Choice, 98(1‒2), pp. 83‒109.

Kaya, R., Bernhard, M. (2013) ‘Are Elections Mechanisms of Authoritarian Stability or Democratization? Evidence from Post-communist Eurasia’, Perspectives on Pol-itics, 11(3), pp. 734‒752. DOI: 10.1017/S1537592713002119.

Kim, N. K. (2017) ‘Antiregime uprisings and the emergence of electoral authoritarian-ism’, Political Research Quarterly, 70(1), pp. 111‒126. DOI: 10.1177/1065912916675739.

Kuzio, T. (2015) ‘Rise and Fall of the Party of Regions Political Machine’, Problems of Post-Communism, 62(3), pp. 174‒186. DOI: 10.1080/10758216.2015.1020127.

Levitsky, S., Way, L. A. (2002) ‘Elections With-out Democracy: The Rise of Competitive Authoritarianism’, Journal of Democracy, 13(2), pp. 51‒65. DOI: 10.1353/jod.2002.0026.

Miller, M. K. (2020) ‘The strategic origins of electoral authoritarianism’, British Jour-nal of Political Science, 50(1), pp. 17‒44. DOI: 10.1017/S0007123417000394.

Morse, Y. L. (2015) ‘From Single-Party to Electoral Authoritarian Regimes: The Institutional Origins of Competitiveness in Post-Cold War Africa’, Comparative Poli-tics, 48(1), pp. 126‒151. DOI: 10.5129/001041515816075141.

Prasetyo, W. (2019) ‘Political Machine and Chal-lenger Victory in a Javanese Village Chief Election’, PCD Journal, 7(2), pp. 317‒374. DOI: 10.22146/pcd.52779.

Saikkonen, I. A.-L. (2016) ‘Variation in subnational electoral authoritarianism: evi-dence from the Russian Federation’, De-mocratization, 23(3), pp. 437‒458. DOI: 10.1080/13510347.2014.975693.

Schedler, А. (2002) ‘The Menu of Manipulation’, Journal of democracy, 13(2), pp. 36‒50. DOI: 10.1353/jod.2002.0031.

Tkacheva, T., Golosov, G. V. (2019) ‘United Russia’s Primaries and the Strength of Political Machines in the Regions of Rus-sia: Evidence from the 2016 Duma Elec-tions’, Europe-Asia Studies, 71(5), pp. 824‒839. DOI: 10.1080/09668136.2019.1613515.

Turchenko, M., Golosov, G. V. (2021) ‘Smart enough to make a difference? An empiri-cal test of the efficacy of strategic voting in Russia’s authoritarian elections’, Post-Soviet Affairs, 37(1), pp. 65‒79. DOI: 10.1080/1060586X.2020.1796386.

Published

2022-12-27

How to Cite

Kozmin Д. А. (2022). WHEN ARE AUTHORITARIAN ELECTIONS COMPETITIVE? THE CASE OF ST. PETERSBURG’S LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY ELECTIONS. Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science, 16(4). https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2022-4-85-93