TV IMAGE OF UKRAINE AS A MIRROR OF THE RUSSIAN POLITICAL SELF AT THE FORMATION STAGE OF THE MODERN STATE IDENTITY POLICY

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2022-4-40-52

Keywords:

Ukraine; Russian political identity; identity politics; Russia 1 TV channel; antagonistic discourse; significant other

Abstract

The mass protests in Russia in 2011-2012 prompted the authorities to search for what later became known as “spiritual bonds”. One of the “spiritual bonds” is the idea of brotherhood with the post-Soviet peoples. Among them Ukraine and Belarus - are the closest choice, and if Belarus is relatively stable in relation to Russia, Ukraine is mobile. For now the Ukrainian theme dominates in television discourse. We can trace the role of the image of Ukraine at the formation stage of a modern communication strategy using content-analysis of news materials of one of the main conductors of the state identity politics - TV channel "Russia 1" at the break of the socalled "protest year" in December 2011 and December 2012. Everything is clear with the image of the enemy and the image of the partner on the Russia 1 TV channel in the year of protest: the United States and the collective West are the embodiment of everything insidious, wrong, China is a role model. The plots about Ukraine, on the other hand, reveal interesting indentitarian strategies and show the subtleties of the state political identity, raising such topics of Russian political identity as the influence of the West, the discourse of a lost power, and the European choice.

Author Biography

Iu. V. Sursanova, Perm State University

Master of Political Science, lecturer and PhD student for the Department of Polit. Science

References

Арбатов, А. Г. (2022) ‘Украинский кризис и стратегическая стабильность’, Полис. Политические исследования, 4, сс. 10‒31. [Arbatov, A. G. (2022) ‘Ukrainian Crisis and Strategic Stability’ [Ukrainskii krizis i strategicheskaya stabil'nost'], Pol-icy. Political studies, 4, pp. 10‒31. (In Russ.)].

Байша, О. А. (2021) Дискурсивный разлом социального поля: Уроки Евромайдана. Москва: Изд. дом Высшей школы экономики, 184 с. [Baisha, O. A. (2021) Discursive Fracture of the Social Field: Lessons from the Euromaidan [Diskursivnyi razlom sotsial'nogo polya: Uroki Evromaidana], Moscow: Ed. house of the Higher School of Economics, 184 p. (In Russ.)].

Барт, Ф. (2006) Этнические группы и границы. Москва: Новое издательство. [Bart, F. (2006) Ethnic groups and borders [Etnicheskie gruppy i granitsy], Moscow: New publishing house. (In Russ.)].

Бурдье, П. (2002) О телевидении и журналистике. Москва: Фонд «Прагматика культуры», 159 с. [Burd'e, P. (2002) On television and journalism [O televidenii i zhurnalistike], Moscow: Pragmatics of Culture Foundation, 159 p. (In Russ.)].

Быкова Т. Ю. (2014) ‘Отцы и дети великой страны: метафора родства в советском политическом медиадискурсе 1945‒1954 гг.’, Политическая лингвистика, 2 (48) [Bykova, T. Yu. (2014) ‘Fathers and sons of a great country: a metaphor for kinship in the Soviet politi-cal media discourse of 1945‒1954.’ [Ottsy i deti velikoi strany: metafora rod-stva v sovetskom politicheskom mediadiskurse 1945-1954 gg.], Political Lin-guistics, 2 (48). (In Russ.)].

Ефремова, В. Н. (2017) ‘Символическая поли-тика государства в отношении российских праздников после 2012 г.’, Символическая политика: сб. науч. тр. Вып. 5: Политика идентичности / под ред. О. Ю. Малиновой. Москва: ИНИОН РАН, сс. 294–307. [Efremova, V. N. (2017) ‘The symbolic policy of the state in rela-tion to Russian holidays after 2012’ [Simvolicheskaya politika gosudarstva v otnoshenii rossiiskikh prazdnikov posle 2012 g.], Symbolic Politics: Sat. scientific tr. Issue. 5: Identity Politics / еd. O. Yu. Malinova. Moscow: INION RAN, pp. 294–307. (In Russ.)].

Керимов, А. А., Вербицкая, Т. В. (2019) ‘Цветная революция как угроза политической системе государства: проблемы определения’, Вопросы управления, 2 (38), сс. 6‒15. [Kerimov, A. A. ‘Color revolution as a threat to the political system of the state: problems of definition’ [Tsvetnaya revolyutsiya kak ugroza politicheskoi sisteme gosudarstva: prob-lemy opredeleniya], Management Issues, 2 (38), pp. 6‒15. (In Russ.)].

Кондратьева, О. Н. (2017) ‘Майдан в метафорическом зеркале российских массмедиа’, Политическая лингвистика, 5 (65). [Kondrat'eva, O. N. (2017) ‘Maidan in the metaphorical mirror of Russian mass media’ [Maidan v metaforicheskom zerkale rossiiskikh massmedia], Political Linguistics, 5 (65) (In Russ.)].

Кучма, Л. Д. (2003) Украина ‒ не Россия. Москва: Время, 560 с. [Kuchma, L. D. (2003) Ukraine is not Russia [Ukraina ‒ ne Rossiya], Moscow: Time, 560 p. (In Russ.)].

Малинова, О. Ю. (2012) ‘Символическое единство нации? Репрезентация макрополитического сообщества в предвыборной риторике Владимира Путина’, Pro et contra, 16 (3), сс. 76–93. [Malinova, O. Yu. (2012) ‘Symbolic unity of the na-tion? Representation of the Macropolitical Community in Vladimir Putin's Elec-tion Rhetoric’ [Simvolicheskoe edinstvo natsii? Reprezentatsiya makropolitich-eskogo soobshchestva v predvybornoi ri-torike Vladimira Putina], Pro et contra, 16 (3), pp. 76–93. (In Russ.)].

Малинова, О. Ю. (2017) ‘Современный русский национализм: Коллективный портрет в политическом интерьере (Рецензия)’, Символическая политика: cб. науч. труд. Вып. 5: Политика идентичности / под ред. О. Ю. Малиновой. Москва: ИНИОН РАН, сс. 348–355. [Malinova, O. Yu. (2017) ‘Contemporary Russian Nationalism: A Collective Portrait in a Political Interior (Review)’ [Sovremennyi russkii natsionalizm: Kollektivnyi portret v politicheskom inter'ere (Retsenziya)], Symbolic politics: Sat. scientific work, Issue. 5: Identity Politics / Ed. O. Yu. Malinova. Moscow: INION RAN, pp. 348–355. (In Russ.)].

Мироненко, В. И. (2020) Украинский транзит. Опыт ситуационного анализа, Москва: Ин-т Европы РАН, 98 с. [Mironenko, V. I. (2020) Ukrainian transit. Situation analysis experience [Ukrainskii tranzit. Opyt situatsionnogo analiza], Moscow: Institute of Europe RAS, 98 p. (In Russ.)].

Попова, О. В. (2019) ‘Государственная поли-тика идентичности как теоретический конструкт и реальная практика: опыт экспертных оценок российских исследователей’, Южно-российский журнал социальных наук, 20 (4), cc. 74‒91. [Popova, O. V. (2019) ‘State Identity Pol-icy as a Theoretical Construct and Real Practice: Expert Evaluations of Russian Researchers’ [Gosudarstvennaya politika identichnosti kak teoreticheskii konstrukt i real'naya praktika: opyt ekspertnykh otsenok rossiiskikh issledovatelei], South Russian Journal of Social Sciences, 20 (4), pp. 74‒91. (In Russ.)].

Сурсанова, Ю. В. (2019) ‘Телеканал Россия 1 как проводник политики идентичности современного российского государства’, Вестник Удмуртского университета, 3 (1), cc. 40‒54. [Sursanova, Yu. V. ‘TV channel Russia 1 as an instru-ment of the identity policy of the modern Russian state’ [Telekanal Rossiya 1 kak provodnik politiki identichnosti sov-remennogo rossiiskogo gosudarstva], Bul-letin of the Udmurt University, 3 (1), pp. 40‒54. (In Russ.)].

Шестопал, Е. Б., Смулькина, Н. В., Морозикова, И. В. (2019) ‘Сравнительный анализ образов своей страны у жителей российских регионов’, Сравнительная политика, 3, cc. 74‒94. [Shestopal, E. B., Smul'kina, N. V., Morozikova, I. V. (2019) ‘Comparative analysis of images of their own country among residents of Russian regions’ [Sravnitel'nyi analiz obrazov svoei strany u zhitelei rossiiskikh regionov], Comparative Politics, 3, pp. 74‒94. (In Russ.)].

Billig, M. (1995) Banal nationalism. Sage Publi-cations, 200 p.

Carpentier, N. (2017) The Discursive-Material Knot: Cyprus in Conflict and Community Media Participation. N. Y.: Peter Lang.

Deriglazova, L. V. (2017) ‘How Much ‘Euro-peanness’ Remains in Contemporary Russia?’, Anthropological Journal of Eu-ropean Cultures, Vol. 26, 1, pp. 75‒97 (Online).

Janmaat, J. G. (2007) ‘The ethnic ‘other’ in Ukrainian history textbooks: the case of Russia and the Russians. Compare’, Brit-ish Association for International and Comparative Education, Vol. 37, 3, pp. 307–324. DOI: 10.1080/03057920701330180.

Kappeler, A. (2014) ‘Ukraine and Russia: Legаcies of the imperial past and competing memories’. University of Vienna, Austria, Journal of Eurasian Studies, 5, pp. 107–115.

Kurylo, B. (2016) ‘Russia and Carl Schmitt: the hybridity of resistance in the globalised world’, Palgrave Communications, 2, p. 96. DOI: 10.1057/ palcomms.2016.96.

Laclau, E. (2005) On Populist Reason. N. Y.: Verso.

Laclau, E., Mouffe, C. (1985) Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Dem-ocratic Politics. L., UK: Verso.

Mouffe, C. (2009) The Democratic Paradox. N. Y.: Verso.

Molchanov, M. A. (2015) ‘Russia as Ukraine's ‘Other’: Identity and Geopolitics’, in: Ukraine and Russia: People, Politics, Propaganda and Perspectives, edited by Agnieszka Pikulicka-Wilczewska & Rich-ard Sakwa. Available at: URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2650162.

Semenenko, I. (2013) ‘The Quest for Identity: Russian Public Opinion on Europe and the European Union and the National Identity Agenda’, Perspectives on European Politics and Society, 14 (1), pp. 102–122.

Published

2022-12-27

How to Cite

Sursanova Ю. В. (2022). TV IMAGE OF UKRAINE AS A MIRROR OF THE RUSSIAN POLITICAL SELF AT THE FORMATION STAGE OF THE MODERN STATE IDENTITY POLICY. Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science, 16(4). https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2022-4-40-52