This is an outdated version published on 2022-12-29. Read the most recent version.

UNDISCIPLINED MUNICIPALITIES: MALFUNCTION OF CENTRALIZATION AND LOCAL AUTONOMY IN RUSSIA IN 2010S

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2022-4-29-39

Keywords:

municipal politics; local executives; local autonomy; regional politics; machine politics; state-business relations in Russia

Abstract

The local political autonomy in Russia is extremely low. Along with the municipalities having a narrow range of powers and financial capabilities higher-level authorities control local heads. The opportunities of regional authorities to appoint and dismiss heads of municipalities, as well as strengthening of the party of power on the local level, aim at control over electoral results and policy implementation. However, existing tools of political centralization at the local level often fail. In the article, we show two scenarios of regaining autonomy by the local elites. The first one is typical for the appointed mayors, who shirk regional policies because regions cannot effectively control them by positive or negative incentives. The second scenario is typical for elected mayors, who have a political power to provide necessary electoral outcomes and bargain electoral loyalty for the benefits of their municipalities being more responsive to voters’ demands.  Moreover, even weak local institutions do not only help regional authorities to consolidate local elites but also provide opportunities for local elites to struggle more effectively for their aims. The research is based on interviews with local officials, deputies and experts conducted in Sverdlovsk and Irkutsk regions in summer of 2022 as well as on media materials.

Author Biographies

I. K. Shevtsova, Perm State University

Associate Professor of the Department of Political Sciences

А. V. Gilev, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Russia, St. Petersburg

Associate Professor of the Department of Political Science and International Relations

References

Витковская, Т. Б. (2021) ‘От лоббистов до статистов: основные группы муниципальных депутатов в российских муниципалитетах’, Ars Administrandi, 13(3), сс. 406‒422. [Vitkovskaya, T. B. (2021) ‘From lobbyist to extras: Main groups of municipal deputies in Russian municipal-ities’ [Ot lobbistov do statistov: osnovnye gruppy municipal'nyh deputatov v ros-sijskih municipalitetah], Ars Adminis-trandi, 13(3), pp. 406‒422 (In Russ.)].

Гилев, А. В., Шевцова, И. К. (2019) ‘Фундамент" вертикали": выборы и распределение межбюджетных трансфертов на местном уровне (Случаи Новгородской области и Пермского края)’, Журнал политической философии и социологии политики «Полития. Анализ. Хроника. Прогноз», 2 (93), cc. 151‒167. [Gilev, A., Shevtsova, I. (2019) ‘Foundation of “vertical”: election and distribution of in-tergovernmental transfers at local level. Cases of Novgorod oblast and Perm krai [Fundament" vertikali": vybory i raspre-delenie mezhbyudzhetnyh transfertov na mestnom urovne (Sluchai Novgorodskoj oblasti i Permskogo kraya)], Zhurnal politicheskoj filosofii i sociologii politiki «Politiya. Analiz. Hronika. Prognoz, 2 (93), pp. 151‒167 (In Russ.)].

Гилев, А. В., Шевцова, И. К. (2021) ‘Бесконфликтная арена? Эффекты введения процедуры конкурсного отбора глав местной власти в крупных городах Рос-сии’, Политическая наука, 2, cc. 260‒281. [Gilev, A., Shevtsova, I. (2021) ‘The conflict free arena? Effects of pro-cedure of selecting local heads in large Russian cities’ [Beskonfliktnaya arena? Effekty vvedeniya procedury konkursno-go otbora glav mestnoj vlasti v krupnyh gorodah Rossii], Politicheskaya nauka, 2, pp. 260‒281 (In Russ.)].

Ковин, В. С., Петрова, Р. И. (2017) ‘Конкурентность в локальном политическом пространстве: конкурсы по избранию глав МСУ и выборы депутатов представительных органов власти в муниципальных районах и городских округах Пермского края в 2012‒2017 гг.’, Вестник Пермского федерального исследовательского центра, 4, cc. 112‒120. [Kovin, V., Pe-trova, R. (2017) ‘Competitiveness in the local political space: electoral competitions for the heads of LSGS and the elections of deputies of representative author-ities in municipal districts and urban districts of Perm region in 2012‒2017’ [Konkurentnost' v lokal'nom politich-eskom prostranstve: konkursy po izbrani-yu glav MSU i vybory deputatov pred-stavitel'nykh organov vla-sti v munitsi-pal'nykh rayonakh i gorodskikh okrugakh Permskogo kraya v 2012‒2017 gg.], Vest-nik Permskogo federal'nogo issle-dovatel'skogo centra, 4, pp. 112‒120 (In Russ.)].

Минаева, Э. Ю. (2022) ‘Стратегии сохранения и отмены прямых выборов глав муниципальных образований в России’, Мир России. Cоциология. Этнология, 31(2), сс. 97‒117. [Minaeva, E. (2022) ‘Strategies for the Preservation and Cancellation of the Direct Election of Municipal Heads in Russia’ [Strategii sohraneniya i otmeny pryamyh vyborov glav municipal'nyh obrazovanij v Rossii], Mir Rossii, 31, pp. 97‒117 (In Russ.)].

Панов, П. В., Петрова, Р. И. (2017) ‘Представительные органы МСУ как канал лоббирования интересов региона: новая система рекрутирования глав МСУ’, Вестник Пермского университета. Се-рия: Политология, 2, cc.111‒122. [Panov, P., Petrova, R. (2017) ‘Local leg-islatures as a channel of lobbying interests of the region: a new system of mayors’ recruitment’ [Predstavitel'nye organy MSU kak kanal lobbirovaniya in-teresov regiona: novaya sistema rekruti-rovaniya glav MSU], Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Serija: Politologija, 2, pp. 111‒122 (In Russ.)].

Туровский, Р. Ф. (2015). ‘Российское местное самоуправление: агент государственной власти в ловушке недофинансирования и гражданской пассивности’, Полис, 2, cc. 35‒51. [Turovsky, R. (2015) ‘Russia’s local self-government: the agent of the government in the trap of insufficient funding and civil passivity’ [Rossijskoe mestnoe samoupravlenie: agent gosudar-stvennoj vlasti v lovushke nedofinansiro-vaniya i grazhdanskoj passivnosti], Polis, 2, pp. 35‒51 (In Russ.)].

Чирикова, А. Е., Ледяев, В. Г. (2015) ‘Власть в малых российских городах: модели взаимодействия исполнительной и представительной власти’. Мир России. Социология. Этнология, 24(3), cc. 6‒32. [Chirikova, A., Ledyaev, V. (2015) ‘Pow-er in Small Russian Towns: Models of In-teractions Between the Legislative and Executive Branches of Local Govern-ment’ [Vlast' v malyh rossijskih gorodah: modeli vzaimodejstviya ispolnitel'noj i predstavitel'noj vlasti], Mir Rossii, 24 (3), pp. 6–32 (In Russ.)].

Шевцова, И. К., Гилев, А. В., Завадская, М. А. (2022) ‘Когда мэры против: факторы муниципальной автономии в условиях централизации’, Мир России. Социоло-гия. Этнология, 31(2), cc. 75‒96. [Shev-tsova, I., Gilev, A., Zavadskaya, M. (2022) ‘When Mayors Object: Factors of Municipal Autonomy in a Centralized State’ [Kogda mery protiv: faktory mu-nicipal'noj avtonomii v usloviyah central-izacii], Mir Rossii, 31, pp. 75‒96 (In Russ.)].

Buckley, N., Reuter, O. J., Rochlitz, M., Aisin, A. (2022) ‘Staying out of trouble: Criminal cases against Russian mayors’, Comparative Political Studies, 55, pp. 1539‒1568.

Gel'man, V., Ryzhenkov, S. (2011) ‘Local regimes, subnational governance and the ‘power vertical’ in contemporary Russia’, Europe-Asia Studies, 63(3), pp. 449‒465.

Gilev, A., Dimke, D. (2021) ‘No Time for Quality’: Mechanisms of Local Governance in Russia’, Europe-Asia Studies, 73(6), pp 1060‒1079.

Golosov, G. V. (2011) ‘The regional roots of elec-toral authoritarianism in Russia’, Europe-Asia Studies, 63(4), pp. 623‒639.

Golosov, G. V., Tkacheva, T. (2018) ‘Let my people run: Pre-election resignations of Russia’s governors, 2013–2015’, Prob-lems of Post-Communism, 65(4), pp. 243‒252.

Frye, T., Reuter, O. J., Szakonyi, D. (2014) ‘Political machines at work voter mobilization and electoral subversion in the workplace’, World Politics, 66(2), pp. 195‒228.

Malesky, E. J., Todd, J. D., Tran, A. (2022) ‘Can Elections Motivate Responsiveness in a Single-Party Regime? Experimental Evidence from Vietnam’, American Political Science Review, pp. 1‒21.

Minaeva, E., Panov, P. (2021) ‘Dense networks, ethnic minorities, and electoral mobilization in contemporary Russia’, Problems of Post-Communism, pp. 1‒12.

Panov, P., Ross, C. (2016) ‘Levels of centralisation and autonomy in Russia’s ‘Party of Power’: Cross-Regional variations’, Europe-Asia Studies, 68(2), pp. 232‒252.

Reuter, O. J., Buckley, N., Shubenkova, A., Garifullina, G. (2016) ‘Local elections in authoritarian regimes: An elite-based theory with evidence from Russian mayoral elections’, Comparative Political Studies, 49(5), pp. 662‒697.

Reuter, O. J., Remington, T. F. (2009) ‘Dominant party regimes and the commitment problem: The case of United Russia’, Comparative Political Studies, 42(4), pp. 501‒526.

Reuter, O. J., Robertson, G. B. (2012) Subnational appointments in authoritarian regimes: Evidence from Russian gubernatorial appointments, The Journal of Politics, 74(4), pp. 1023‒1037.

Shkel, S. (2021) ‘Why Political Machines Fail: Evidence from Bashkortostan’, Demo-kratizatsiya: The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization, 29(1), pp. 31‒62.

Turchenko, M. (2017) ‘The rise and fall of local self-government in Petrozavodsk’, Demo-kratizatsiya: The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization, 25(2), pp. 155‒173.

Published

2022-12-27 — Updated on 2022-12-29

Versions

How to Cite

Shevtsova И. К., & Gilev А. В. (2022). UNDISCIPLINED MUNICIPALITIES: MALFUNCTION OF CENTRALIZATION AND LOCAL AUTONOMY IN RUSSIA IN 2010S. Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science, 16(4). https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2022-4-29-39 (Original work published December 27, 2022)