NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT GOALS OF RUSSIA AT THE REGIONAL LEVEL: POLITICAL AND GEOGRAPHICAL ANALYSIS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2022-3-63-76

Keywords:

critical geopolitics of development; socio-economic development; regional policy; target indicator; regional grouping; comparative analysis; spatial autocorrelation; economic-geographical location; Russian Federation

Abstract

The study groups the regions of Russia by the multidimensional distance to the national development goals determining the preference ratio of the identified groups according to possible political consequences for the heads of regions. The initial data for 85 regions and 15 indicators for 2021–2030 are taken from the appendix to the «Unified Plan for Achieving the National Development Goals of the Russian Federation for the Period up to 2024 and for the Planning Period up to 2030». The research uses methods of grouping regions, comparative analysis, and assessment of spatial autocorrelation and regions' economic-geographical location. Four groups of regions have been identified by the multidimensional distance to hypothetical regions, each of which corresponds to a certain quartile of a ranked series of relative increases in the values of target indicators. The resulting grouping of regions is interpreted according to the length of the path to national development goals and the likelihood of a change of regional government due to the non-fulfillment of the goals. Additional potential threats to senior officials of the Russian Federation’s subjects are determined by the spatial autocorrelation of the regions and their position in relation to the regions of the first and fourth groups.

Author Biography

V. I. Blanutsa, V. B. Sochava Institute of Geography of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Doct. Sci. (Geogr.), RAS Expert in Economic Sciences, Leading Researcher at the Laboratory of Geo-Resource Studies and Political Geography

References

Белякова, Г. Я., Воробьева, Т. Н. (2018) ‘Институциональные основы и роль организации деятельности органов исполнительной власти субъекта РФ и оценки ее эффективности в российской системе государственного управления региональным экономическим развитием’, Региональные проблемы преобразования экономики, (10), сс. 134–145 [Belyakova, G. Ya., Vorobieva, T. N. (2018) ‘Institutional foundations and the role of organization of activity of execu-tive power authorities of an entity of the Russian Federation and evaluation of its effectiveness in the Russian system of governmental administration of the re-gional economic development’ [Instituci-onal'nye osnovy i rol' organizacii deyatel'nosti organov ispolnitel'noj vlasti sub''ekta RF i ocenki ee effektivnosti v rossijskoj sisteme gosudarstvennogo up-ravleniya regional'nym ekonomicheskim razvitiem], Regional Problems of Eco-nomic Transformation, (10), pp. 134–145. DOI: 10.26726/1812-7096-2018-10-134-145. (In Russ.)].

Блануца, В. И. (2021) Географическая экспертиза стратегий экономического развития России. Москва: ИНФРА-М [Blanutsa, V. I. (2021) Geographical Ex-pertise of Russia's Economic Development Strategies [Geograficheskaya ekspertiza strategij ekonomicheskogo razvitiya Ros-sii]. Moscow: INFRA-M Publ. (In Russ.)].

Лексин, В. Н. (2019) ‘Дороги, которые мы не выбираем (О правительственной «Стратегии пространственного развития Российской Федерации на период до 2025 года»)’, Российский экономический журнал, (3), сс. 3–24 [Leksin, V. N. (2019) ‘Roads that we do not choose (On the government's «Spatial Development Strategy of the Russian Federation for the period up to 2025»)’ [Dorogi, kotorye my ne vybiraem (O pravitel'stvennoj «Strategii prostranstvennogo razvitiya Rossijskoj Federacii na period do 2025 goda»)], Russian Economic Journal, (3), pp. 3–24. DOI: 10.33983/0130-9757-2019-3-3-24. (In Russ.)].

Пронина, Л. И. (2021) ‘Трансформация стратегий социально-экономического и пространственного развития России на основе создания системы национального планирования’, Экономика и управление: проблемы, решения, 1(5), сс. 5–14 [Pronina, L. I. (2021) ‘Transformation of Russia's socio-economic and spatial development strategies based on the creation of a national planning system’ [Transformaciya strategij social'no-ekonomicheskogo i prostranstvennogo razvitiya Rossii na osnove sozdaniya sistemy nacional'nogo planirovaniya], Eco-nomics and Management: Problems, Solu-tions, 1(5), pp. 5–14. DOI: 10.36871/ek.up.p.r.2021.05.01.001. (In Russ.)].

Сильвестров, С. Н., Крупнов, Ю. А., Старо-войтов, В. Г. (2021) ‘Определение и реализация национальных целей развития в российском стратегическом планировании’, Российский экономический журнал, (1), сс. 32–44. [Silvestrov, S. N., Krupnov, Yu. A., Starovoitov, V. G. (2021) ‘Definition and implementation of national development goals in Russian strategic planning’ [Opredelenie i realiza-ciya nacional'nyh celej razvitiya v rossijskom strategicheskom planirovanii], Russian Economic Journal, (1), pp. 32–44. DOI: 10.33983/0130-9757-2021-1-32-44. (In Russ.)].

Сорокина, Н. Ю. (2020) ‘Общесистемные проблемы пространственного развития Российской Федерации’, Региональная экономика. Юг России, 8(1), сс. 4–15. [Sorokina, N. Y. (2020) ‘System-wide problems of spatial development of the Russian Federation’ [Obshchesistemnye problemy prostranstvennogo razvitiya Rossijskoj Federacii], Regional Economy. South of Russia, 8(1), pp. 4–15. DOI: 10.15688/re.volsu.2020.1.1. (In Russ.)].

Третьяк, И. А. (2021) ‘Конституционно-правовые аспекты отрешения от должности высшего должностного лица субъекта Российской Федерации в связи с утратой доверия президента’, Правоприменение, 5(1), сс. 141–155. [Tretyak, I. A. (2021) ‘Retirement of a highest official of constituent entity of the Russian Federation due to loss of president’s confidence: constitutional is-sues’ [Konstitucionno-pravovye aspekty otresheniya ot dolzhnosti vysshego dolzhnostnogo lica sub''ekta Rossijskoj Federacii v svyazi s utratoj doveriya pre-zidenta], Law Enforcement Review, 5(1), pp. 141–155. DOI: 10.24147/2542-1514.2021.5(1).141-155. (In Russ.)].

Anderson, J. E. (1979) ‘Theoretical foundation for the gravity equation’, American Eco-nomic Review, 69(1), pp. 106–116.

Andriati, R., Yusuf, A. A. (2021) ‘Indonesian provinces SDGs composite index: Lam-pung Province analysis’, Economics and Finance in Indonesia, 67(1), e819. DOI: 10.47291/efi.v67i1.819.

Anselin, D. (1995) ‘Local Indicators of Spatial Association – LISA’, Geographical Anal-ysis, 27(2), pp. 93–115. DOI: 10.1111/j.1538-4632.1995.tb00338.x.

Benedek, J., Ivan, K., Török, I., Temerdek, A., Holobâcă, I.-H. (2021) ‘Indicator-based assessment of local and regional progress toward the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): An integrated approach from Romania’, Sustainable Development, 29(5), pp. 860–875. DOI: 10.1002/sd.2180.

Blanutsa, V. I. (2015) ‘Economic-geographical location: Generalization of conceptual frameworks and generation of new mean-ings’, Geography and Natural Resources, 36(4), pp. 319–326. DOI 10.1134/S1875372815040010.

Bonnet, J., Coll-Martínez, E., Renou-Maissant, P. (2021) ‘Evaluating sustainable devel-opment by composite index: Evidence from French departments’, Sustainability, 13(2), pp. 1–23. DOI: 10.3390/su13020761.

Castañer, M., Jańczak, J., Martín-Uceda, J. (2018) ‘Economic development, (a)symmetries and local geopolitics: A new approach to studying cross-border cooperation in Europe’, Eurasia Border Review, 9(1), pp. 67–90.

Costanza, R. (Ed.) (1991) Ecological Economics: The Science and Management of Sustaina-bility. New York: Columbia University Press.

Costanza, R., Howard, R. B., Kubiszewski, I., Liu, S., Ma, C., Plumecocq, C., Stern, D. I. (2016a) ‘Influential publications in ecological economics revisited’, Ecologi-cal Economics, 123, pp. 68–76. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.01.007.

Costanza, R., Daly, L., Fioramonti, L., Giovan-nini, E., Kubiszewski, I., Mortensen, L.F., Pickett, K.E., Ragnarsdottir, K.V., De Vogli, R., Wilkinson, R. (2016b) ‘Modelling and measuring sustainable wellbeing in connection with the UN Sustainable Development Goals’, Ecolog-ical Economics, 130, pp. 350–355. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.07.009.

D’Adamo, I., Gastaldi, M., Imbriani, C., Morone, P. (2021) ‘Assessing regional perfor-mance for the Sustainable Development Goals in Italy’, Scientific Reports, 11, e24117. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-03635-8.

Gennari, P., D’Orazio, M. (2020) ‘A statistical approach for assessing progress toward the SDG targets’, Statistical Journal of the IAOS, 36, pp. 1129–1142. DOI: 10.3233/SJI-200688.

Ibourk, A., Raoui, S. (2021) ‘Scale effect on terri-torial disparities of sustainable human development in Morocco: A spatial anal-ysis’, Discover Sustainability, 2, e57. DOI: 10.1007/s43621-021-00068-1.

Lutz, S. U. (2019) ‘The European digital single market strategy: Local indicators of spa-tial association 2011–2016’, Telecommu-nication Policy, 43(5), pp. 393–410. DOI: 10.1016/j.telpol.2018.10.003.

Niklasson, L. (2019) Improving the Sustainable Development Goals: Strategies and the Governance Challenge. London: Routledge.

Ningrum, D., Malekpour, S., Raven, R., Moalle-mi, E. A. (2022) ‘Lessons learnt from previous local sustainability efforts to in-form local action for the Sustainable De-velopment Goals’, Environmental Science & Policy, 129, pp. 45–55. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2021.12.018.

ÓTuathail, G. (1994) ‘Critical geopolitics and development theory: Intensifying the dia-logue’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 19(2), pp. 228–233.

Qiu, W., Meng, F., Wang, Y., Fu, G., He, J., Savic, D., Zhao, H. (2018) ‘Assessing spatial and temporal variations in region-al sustainability in mainland China from 2004 to 2014’, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 20, pp. 1185–1194. DOI: 10.1007/s10098-018-1540-4.

Robin, E., Acuto, M. (2018) ‘Global urban policy and the geopolitics of urban data’, Politi-cal Geography, 66, pp. 76–87. DOI: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2018.08.013.

Sachs, J. D. (2015) The Age of Sustainable Devel-opment. New York: Columbia University Press.

Sajjad, M., Munir, H., Kanwal, S., Naqvi, S. A. A. (2022) ‘Spatial inequalities in education status and its determinants in Paki-stan: A district-level modelling in the context of sustainable development goal-4’, Applied Geography, 140, e102665. DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2022.102665.

Subra, P. (2012) ‘Geopolitics: A unique or multi-dimensional concept? Place, issues and tools of local geopolitics’, Hérodote, 146-147, pp. 45–70.

Tobler, W. R. (1970) ‘Computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region’, Economic Geography, 46(2), pp. 234–240. DOI: 10.2307/143141.

Wu, X., Liu, J., Fu, B., Wang, S., Wei, Y., Li, Y. (2022) ‘Bundling regions for promoting sustainable development goals’, Envi-ronmental Research Letters, 17(4), e044021. DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ac5c9d.

Published

2022-10-15

How to Cite

Blanutsa В. И. (2022). NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT GOALS OF RUSSIA AT THE REGIONAL LEVEL: POLITICAL AND GEOGRAPHICAL ANALYSIS. Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2022-3-63-76

Issue

Section

Междисциплинарные ракурсы политических исследований