U.S. VARYING APPROACHES TOWARDS EASTERN EUROPE AFTER THE OUTBREAK OF THE UKRAINE CRISIS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2022-1-84-93

Keywords:

United States; Central and Eastern Europe; NATO; Russia; China; allies; defense; values; regional forums; sanctions; energy security

Abstract

The region of Central and Eastern Europe has become a significant conflict factor between the Russian Federation and the Euro-Atlantic community. A qualitatively new stage in this confrontation started after the outbreak of the Ukraine crisis in 2014. Although building up a security counterbalance to Russia in CEE, as well as drawing the adjoining post-Soviet states into the Western orbit, enjoys bipartisan support in the United States, each of the American administrations has its own priorities and accents in this point. The article analyzes what was characteristic of the U.S. policies in relation to Eastern Europe in the final years of the Barack Obama presidency, in the period of the Donald Trump administration, and in the initial months of Joe Biden’s presidency. Solidarity within the American political class in its perception of the Russian challenge to Europe, by no means, excludes differences in approaches between various interest groups within the United States. Particularly noticeable is the contrast between the Trump and the Biden administrations. The Democratic administration attaches greater importance to common liberal values. The article pays special attention to the U.S. relations with multilateral forums in this region (NATO, the Visegrad Group, the Bucharest Nine, the Three Seas Initiative).

Author Biography

P. Ye. Smirnov, Institute for the US and Canadian Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences

senior research fellow

References

Орлик, И. И. (2020) 'Центрально-Восточная Европа: завершение постсоциалистической трансформации’, Мир перемен, 2, сс. 66‒80. [Orlik, I. I. (2020) ‘Central and Eastern Europe: End of Post-Socialist Transformation’ [Central'no-Vostochnaya Evropa: Zavershenie Postsocialisticheskoj Transformacii], The World of Transfor-mations, 2, pp. 66‒80. (In Russ.)].

Павлова, М. С. (2021) ‘Польско-американские отношения в 2020 г.: военно-политический аспект’, Россия и Америка в XXI веке. Электронный журнал, 2. URL: https://rusus.jes.su/s207054760015883-8-1/ [Pavlova, M. S. (2021) ‘U.S. – Polish Relations in 2020: Security As-pect’ [Pol'sko-amerikanskie otnosheniya v 2020 g.: voenno-politicheskij aspect], Russia and America in the 21st Century, 2. (In Russ.)]. URL: https://rusus.jes.su/s207054760015883-8-1/. DOI: 10.18254/S207054760015883-8.

Тихонова, С. В. (2018) ‘Развитие германо-польского противостояния в контексте общеевропейских энергетических процессов’, Проблемы национальной стратегии, 3, сс. 89‒105. [Tikhonova, S. V. (2018) ‘The Evolution of Germany-Poland Adversary in the Context of Pan-European Energy Matters’ [Razvitie ger-mano-pol'skogo protivostoyaniya v kontekste obshcheevropejskih energet-icheskih processov], National Strategy Is-sues, 3, pp. 89‒105. (In Russ.)].

Шишелина, Л. Н. (2018) ‘Идея Триморья: от возникновения до сегодняшнего дня’. Научно-аналитический вестник ИЕ РАН, 5, сс. 33‒38. [Shishelina, L. N. (2018) ‘The Three Seas Initiative – from the Origins till the Present Day’ [Ideya Trimor'ya: ot Vozniknoveniya do Segod-nyashnego Dnya], Nauchno-analiticheskij vestnik IE RAN, 5, pp. 33‒38. (In Russ.)]. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15211/vestnikieran520183338.

Allen, A. (2021) ‘The ongoing German-Polish NATO nuclear sharing nexus’. New East-ern Europe, July 1 [online]. Available at: https://neweasterneurope.eu/2021/07/01/the-ongoing-german-polish-nato-nuclear-sharing-nexus/ (accessed: 18.08.2021).

Bugajski, J. (2020) ‘How Biden Can Help Revive Eastern Europe’. The Hill, 19 [online]. Available at: https:// thehill.com/opinion/national-security/526420-how-biden-can-help-revive-eastern-europe (accessed: 22.08.2021).

Cianetti, L., Dawson, J., Hanley, S. (2018) ‘Re-thinking “democratic backsliding” in Central and Eastern Europe – looking be-yond Hungary and Poland’. East Europe-an Politics, 34 (3), pp. 243‒256. DOI: 10.1080/21599165.2018.1491401.

Completing Europe. From the North-South Cor-ridor to Energy, Transportation, and Tel-ecommunications Union. (2014) Atlantic Council, Washington DC, 84 pp.

Eristavi, M. (2020) ‘To Heal the Transatlantic Rift, Biden Should Look to Central and Eastern Europe. The United States Needs a Foreign Policy That Projects Ideals, Not Power’. Foreign Affairs, 16 [online]. Available at: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/central-europe/2020-11-16/heal-transatlantic-rift-biden-should-look-central-and-eastern (accessed: 26.08.2021).

Jensen, J. (2021) ‘«Trans» without «Formation» — Reloaded. The Social Models of the Eastern and Central European Countries’ in: Shihelina L.N. (eds.) Central Europe: Thirty Years of Reforms. Problems, Chal-lenges, Prospects [Central'naya Evropa: tridcat' let po puti reform], pp. 101‒119. Institut Evropy RAN. Moscow, Russia.

‘Joe Biden’s Victory and US Relations with Cen-tral and Eastern European Countries’ (2021) Warsaw Institute, Feb. 8 [online]. Available at: https: //warsawinstitute.org/joe-bidens-victory-us-relations-central-eastern-european-countries/ (accessed: 26.08.2021).

McFaul, M. (2021) ‘How to Contain Putin’s Rus-sia. A Strategy for Countering a Rising Revisionist Power’. Foreign Affairs, Jan. 19 [online]. Available at: https:// www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/ukraine/2021-01-19/how-contain-putins-russia (ac-cessed: 25.08.2021).

Miller, Ch. (2021) ‘Biden Can’t Take Peace in Europe for Granted’. Foreign Policy, May 27, 2021 [online]. Available at: https://foreignpolicy.com/2021/05/27/biden-cant-take-peace-in-europe-for-granted/ (ac-cessed: 21.08.2021).

Sierakowski, S. (2021) ‘Biden’s Strategy of Be-nign Neglect in Eastern Europe’. The Strategist, April 14 [online]. Available at: https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/bidens-strategy-of-benign-neglect-in-eastern-europe/ (accessed 22.08.2021).

Published

2022-05-06

How to Cite

Smirnov П. Е. (2022). U.S. VARYING APPROACHES TOWARDS EASTERN EUROPE AFTER THE OUTBREAK OF THE UKRAINE CRISIS. Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2022-1-84-93