“BETWEEN THE WEST AND THE EAST”: THE BELARUSSIAN NATIONAL IDEA IN CURRENT ACADEMIC DISCUSSION

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2022-1-22-30

Keywords:

nation; nation-building; national identity; Belarusian nation; The Republic of Belarus

Abstract

The article aims to systematize the current academic discussion about the essential elements of the idea of the Belarusian nation. Within the framework of the analysis, the author identifies "semantic baskets", based on which he divides the current controversy into theoretical schools and thematic clusters. The designated semantic baskets are identified based on the attitude to the language issue and culture, history and historical memory, the essential interpretation of the Belarusian nation, territory, and sovereignty. The author concludes that the current academic discussion on this issue is represented by three theoretical schools – nativists, the “Moscow Project” and neo-constructivists. Nativists emphasize the importance of the ethnic element in the Belarusian nation. The foundation of the "Moscow Project" is the ideology of pan-Slavism, highlighting bilingualism as a natural state of Belarusians as well as the Soviet period of history with invaluable experience in state-building. Finally, the concept of the “third way” is neo-constructivism, the ideas of which are reduced to building the Belarusian nation as a civil one. The constructed theoretical framework allows us to analyze the national policy of the Republic of Belarus, as well as approaches to the definition of the “Belarusian nation” in public discussion.

Author Biography

N. A. Zaripov, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia

4th year Bachelor in Political Science

References

Ачкасов, В. А. (2013) ‘"Политика памяти" как инструмент строительства постсоциалистических наций’, Журнал социологии и социальной антропологии, 16, 4, сс. 106‒121. [Achkasov, V. A. (2013) ‘“Poli-tics of memory” as a tool for building post-Soviet nations’ [“Politika Pamyati” kak instrument stroitelstva postsocialis-ticheskih natsiy], Journal of sociology and social anthropology, 16, 4, pp. 106‒121. (In Russ.).

ВЦИОМ (2020) ‘СССР: сказка о потерянном референдуме’, Официальный сайт Всероссийского центра исследования общественного мнения. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://wciom.ru/index.php?id=236&uid=115619 (дата обращения: 20.05.2020). [VTsIOM (2020) ‘USSR: The tale of the lost referendum’ [SSSR: skazka o poteryannom referendume], Of-ficial site of Russian Public Opinion Re-search Center. Available at: https://wciom.ru/index.php?id=236&uid=115619 (Accessed: 20.05.2020) (In Russ.).

Довнар-Запольский, М. В. (2014) История Беларуси. Москва: Директ-Медиа, 582 с. [Dovnar-Zapolskiy, M. V. (2014) His-tory of Belarus [Istoriya Belarusi]. Мoscow, Direct Media, 582 p. (In Russ.)].

Бабосов, Е. М. (2016) ‘У истоков белорусской национальной идеи’, Беларуская думка, 10, с. 77. [Babosov, E. M. (2016) ‘At the origins of the Belarusian national idea’ [U istokov belorusskoi natsionalnoy idei]. Belaruskaya Dumka, 10, р. 77. (In Russ.)].

Мартин, Т. (2011) Империя "положительной деятельности". Нации и национализм в СССР, 1923‒1939. Москва: РОССПЭН, 664 с. [Martin, T. (2011) Empire of "posi-tive activity". Nation and nationalism in the USSR, 1923‒1939 [Imperiya “polozhitelnoi deyatelnosti”. Natsii i na-tionalism v SSSR, 1923‒1939]. Moscow: ROSSPEN, 664 p. (In Russ.)].

Титаренко, Л. Г. (2006) Национальная идентичность и социокультурные ценности населения в современном белорусском обществе, Минск: РИВШ, 145 с. [Titarenko, L. G. (2006) National identity and sociocultural values of popu-lation in modern belarussian society [Natsionalnya identichnost I sociokultur-nye cennosti naseleniya v sovremennom belorusskom obshestve]. Minsk: RIVSH, 145 p. (In Russ.)].

Филюшкин, А. (1998) ‘Защитный пояс Третьего Рима’, Родина, 4, сс. 37‒40 [Filyushkin, A. (1998) ‘Protective belt of the Third Rome’ [Zashitniy poyas Tre-tiego Ryma], Homeland [Rodyna], 4, pp. 37‒40 (In Russ.)].

Anderson, B. (2006) Imagined communities: Re-flections on the origin and spread of na-tionalism. Verso books. 240 p.

Babkou, I. (2015) ‘The Genealogy of the Belarus-ian Idea’. Arche, Vol. 2, pp. 126‒165.

Gapova, E. (2017) ‘The Politics of the Belarus-sian Self: Performing Truth, Converting in Public’. Journal of Soviet and Post-Soviet Politics and Society, Vol. 3, 1, pp. 3‒30.

Greenfeld, L., Eastwood, J. (2007) ‘National identity’ in: C. Boix, S. Stokes (Eds.) The Oxford handbook of comparative politics. New York: Oxford, DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199566020.003.0011.

Harrison, L. E., Huntington, S. P. (2000) Culture matters: How values shape human pro-gress. New York: Basic books, 384 p.

Hobsbawm, J. (1998) “Nations and nationalism since 1780: Programme, Myth, Reality”. Translated from English by A. A. Vasi-lyeva, Spb: Alethea [Aleteya], 306 p. (In Russ.).

Hroch, M. (1998) ‘From national movement to the fully-formed nation’. Haynes, M., p. 19.

Kazakevich, A. (2013) ‘National Identity as a Necessity for democracy’, Bell: Belarus-InfoLetter, Eastern Europe Studies Centre, 2 (32), p. 5.

Ioffe, G. (2007) ‘Culture wars, soul-searching, and Belarusian identity’, East European Politics and Societies, Vol. 21, 2, pp. 348‒381.

Orlov, V. (2006) ‘Destruction of Identity’, Re-trieved November, Vol. 9, p. 200.

Rakicki, V. (2010) ‘Belarusian Atlantis’ S. l., radyjo Svabodnaja Jewropa / radyjo Svaboda, p. 352.

Rohava, M. (2018) ‘Identity in an autocratic state: Or what Belarusians talk about when they talk about national identity’, East European Politics and Societies, Vol. 32, 5, pp. 639‒668.

Shimov, Y. (2006) ‘Belorussia: Vostochnoevro-peiskii paradox’, Neprikosnovennyi zapas, 3, pp. 40‒46.

Wallerstein, I. (2011) The modern world-system I: Capitalist agriculture and the origins of the European world-economy in the six-teenth century. University of California Press, Vol. 1.

Published

2022-05-06

How to Cite

Zaripov Н. А. (2022). “BETWEEN THE WEST AND THE EAST”: THE BELARUSSIAN NATIONAL IDEA IN CURRENT ACADEMIC DISCUSSION. Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2022-1-22-30