"CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS" AND "CORONAVIRUS PANDEMIA" DISCOURSES IN THE DIGITAL POLITICAL AGENDA OF 2020: AGITATION VS INHIBITION IN THE STATE MEDIA

Authors

Keywords:

digital political agenda, state media, constitutional amendments 2020, coronavirus, pandemic, public opinion management, online space, network analysis, linguo-discursive analysis, social graph

Abstract

The article presents the results of a large-scale applied study of “Constitutional Amendments” and “Coronavirus Pandemic” discourses as a part of the digital political agenda formed by the state media in 2020. The empirical dataset comprises an array of network data collected by the continuous sampling of news articles published by Interfax, RIA Novosti and TASS agencies on their official websites in 2020 within the March-September period.The obtained data was subjected to network analysis, visual analysis and linguo-discursive analysis. It allowed the authors to identify the dominant topics in the digital agenda created by the state media, determine the techniques used to form and manage the digital political agenda in the online space and assess their effectiveness. The article concludes by the description of the identified features, strategies and techniques used for shaping, maintaining and managing the digital political agenda by the state media regarding the analyzed discourses – "Constitutional Amendments" and "Coronavirus Pandemic". The authors infer that the strategy of pragmatic modeling was used for online agitation with the aim of ideological mobilization of citizens. Оnline-informing strategy was used to neutralize panic sentiment among citizens and form constructive civic behavioral patterns in the context of a pandemic and an internal lockdown.DOI: 10.17072/2218-1067-2021-2-142-155

Author Biographies

Наталья Рябченко / Nataliya Ryabchenko, Kuban State University

Candidate of Political Science, Associate Professor of the Department of social work, psychology and pedagogy of Higher education

Ольга Малышева / Olga Malisheva, Kuban State University

PhD in Philology, Associate Professor of the Department of english philology

Инна Мирошниченко / Inna Miroshnichenko, Kuban State University

Doctor of Political Science, Associate Professor, Head. Department of public policy and public administration

References

Дьякова, Е. Г. (2003) ‘Массовая политическая коммуникация в теории установления повестки дня: от эффекта к процессу’, Полис. Политические исследования, 3, cc. 109‒119. [Dyakova, E. G. (2003) ‘Mass Political Communication in Agen-da Setting Theory: From Effect to Process’ [Massovaja politicheskaja kommu-nikacija v teorii ustanovlenija povestki dnja: ot jeffekta k processu], Polis. Politicheskie issledovanija, 3, рр. 109‒119 (In Russ.)].

Казун, А. (2017) ‘Откуда берется повестка дня? Роль СМИ в конструировании значимости событий’, Вестник общественного мнения, 1–2 (124). [Kazun, A. (2017) ‘Where does the agenda come from? The role of the media in construct-ing the significance of events’ [Otkuda beretsja povestka dnja? Rol' SMI v kon-struirovanii znachimosti sobytij], Vestnik obshhestvennogo mnenija, 1–2 (124) (In Russ.)].

Найбет, Т., Рода, К. (2009) ‘Виртуальные социальные пространства: подходы, практики, перспективы’, Социологический ежегодник: сб. науч. тр. Москва: РАН. [Naybet, T., Roda, K. (2009) ‘Virtual social spaces: approaches, practices, perspectives’ [Virtual'nye social'nye prostranstva: podhody, praktiki, perspektivy], Sociologicheskij ezhegodnik. Moscow. (In Russ.)].

Плотичкина, Н. В. (2021) ‘Публичная политика управления инфодемией COVID-19’, Общество: политика, экономика, право, 2, сс. 12‒16. [Plotichkina, N. V. (2021) ‘Public policy for managing the COVID-19 infodemia’ [Publichnaja poli-tika upravlenija infodemiej COVID-19], Obshhestvo: politika, jekonomika, pravo, 2, рр. 12‒16 (In Russ.)].

Радина, Н. К., Балакина Ю. В. (2020) ‘Общество и пандемия: теоретико-методологические основания психологических исследований’, Общественные науки и современность, 6, сс. 49‒64. [Radina, N. K. Balakina, Yu. V. (2020) ‘Society and Pandemic: Theoreti-cal and Methodological Foundations of Psychological Research’ [Obshhestvo i pandemija: teoretiko-metodologicheskie osnovanija psihologicheskih issledovanij], Obshhestvennye nauki i sovremennost, 6, рр. 49‒64 (In Russ.)].

Русакова, О. Ф., Максимов, Д. А. (2006) ‘Политическая дискурсология: предметное поле, теоретические подходы и струк-турная модель политического дискурса’, Полис. Политические исследования, 4, сс. 26‒43. DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2006.04.04 [Rusakova, O. F., Maksimov, D. A. (2006) ‘Political dis-course: subject field, theoretical ap-proaches and structural model of political discourse’ [Politicheskaja diskursologija: predmetnoe pole, teoreticheskie podhody i strukturnaja model' politicheskogo diskursa], Polis. Politicheskie issledovani-ja, 4, рр. 26‒43. DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2006.04.04 (In Russ.)].

Рябченко, Н. А., Гнедаш, А. А. (2014) ‘Конструктивные и деструктивные социально-политические практики в online-пространстве современной России: «фейлы», «кейсы», «механики»’, Чело-век. Сообщество. Управление, 2, сс. 40‒54. [Ryabchenko, N. A., Gnedash, A. A. (2014) ‘Constructive and destructive socio-political practices in the online space of modern Russia: «fail», «cases», «mechanics»’ [Konstruktivnye i destruktivnye social'no-politicheskie praktiki v online-prostranstve sovremen-noj Rossii: «fejly», «kejsy», «mehaniki»], Chelovek. Soobshhestvo. Upravlenie, 2, рр. 40‒54. (In Russ.)].

Рябченко, Н. А., Мирошниченко, И. В., Гнедаш, А. А. (2020) ‘От «квазикритики власти» к дискурсу «соучастия и развития»: общественная повестка дня в социальных сетях рунета (практики сетевых сообществ)’, Южно-российский журнал социальных наук, 21 (3), сс. 20‒36. DOI: 10.31429/26190567-21-3-20-36. [Ryabchenko, N. A., Mirosh-nichenko, I. V., Gnedash, A. A. (2020) ‘From the “Quasi-criticism of Authority” to the Discourse “Participation and De-velopment”: A Public Agenda on the Runet Social Networks (Case Studies of Network Community Practices’ [Ot «kvazikritiki vlasti» k diskursu «souchastija i razvitija»: obshhestvennaja povestka dnja v social'nyh setjah runeta (praktiki setevyh soobshhestv)], Juzhno-rossijskij zhurnal social'nyh nauk, 21 (3), рр. 20‒36. DOI: 10.31429/26190567-21-3-20-36. (In Russ.)].

Шейгал, Е. И. (2000) Семиотика политического дискурса. Волгоград. [Sheigal, E. I. (2000) Semiotics of Political Discourse [Semiotika politicheskogo diskursa. Vol-gograd (In Russ.)].

Ballesteros Herencia, C. A. (2020) ‘The digital spread of the coronavirus: Measuring engagement of entertainment on the emerging social network TikTok’, Revista Española de Comunicación en Salud, 11, pp. 171‒185. URL: https://doi.org/10.20318/recs.2020.5459.

Dijk, Teun A. van (2008) Discourse and power. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

Fiske, J. (1986) ‘Television: Polysemy and popularity’, Critical Studies in Media Communication, 3-4, pp. 391‒408.

Jones, R. H., Chik, A., Hafner, C. A. (2015) Discourse and Digital Practices: Doing Discourse Analysis in the Digital Era. N.Y.: Routledge.

Mavragani, A. (2020) ‘Infodemiology and Infoveillance: Scoping Review’, Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22 (4). URL: https://doi.org/10.2196/16206.

McCombs, M. E., Shaw, D. L., Weaver, D. H. (2013) Communication and democracy: Exploring the intellectual frontiers in agenda-setting theory. Routledge.

McCombs, M. E., Shaw, D. L., Weaver, D. H. (2014) ‘New directions in agenda-setting theory and research’, Mass communication and society, 17, 6, pp. 781‒802.

The Nerves of Government: Models of Political Communication and Control. By Karl W. Deutsch. New York: The Free Press of Glencoe, 1963.

Vu, H. T., Guo, L., McCombs, M. E. (2014) ‘Exploring «the World Outside and the Pictures in Our Heads»’: A Network Agenda-Setting’, Study Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 91, pp. 669–686.

Published

2021-07-03

How to Cite

Nataliya Ryabchenko Н. Р. /, Olga Malisheva О. М. /, & Inna Miroshnichenko И. М. /. (2021). "CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS" AND "CORONAVIRUS PANDEMIA" DISCOURSES IN THE DIGITAL POLITICAL AGENDA OF 2020: AGITATION VS INHIBITION IN THE STATE MEDIA. Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science, 15(2), 143–155. Retrieved from https://press.psu.ru/index.php/polit/article/view/4618