MANIPULATIVE METHODS OF REPRESENTING MOSCOW CITY DUMA ELECTIONS ON SOCIAL NETWORKS

Authors

Keywords:

political communication, representation, manipulative methods, social networks, electoral communication

Abstract

The research studies the issues of using manipulative methods in political communications via social networks. The media topicality of the issue was triggered by the elections to the Moscow City Duma of the VII convocation which were held on September 8th, 2019, and became one of the most prominent political events of the year in Russia. Data for the research were collected from posts in the 9 political communities on social networks on VK, Telegram, Odnoklassniki over the two definite periods: starting 22 June through to 13th July, i.e., two weeks before the deadline for submitting signatures and a week after that, and starting 25 August until 15 September which is directly related to the 8 September - voting day. The research employed a content analysis method to study quantitative and qualitative characteristics of posts which made it possible to expose key manipulation methods and characterize specifics of the elections’ representation in the digital social media. The studies found that groups of both pro-government and oppositional orientation actively used manipulation methods in conducting counter-propaganda. The commonest were sets of lexical techniques, name-calling, conceptual confusion, dramatization, exaggeration and appeal to authority. That being said, nonverbal communication means were also actively employed, i.e. graphic images, photos and mems.DOI: 10.17072/2218-1067-2021-1-84-96

Author Biographies

Кристина Зуйкина / K. L. Zuykina, Lomonosov Moscow State University

PhD in Philology, Senior Researcher, Department of Sociology of Mass Communications, Faculty of Journalism

Олеся Кондрушина / O. E. Kondrushina, Lomonosov Moscow State University

bachelor of journalism graduate

References

Богатырев, А. П. (2020) Демагогические шаблоны: основы полемики с демагогами. URL: https://psy.wikireading.ru/90146 (дата обращения: 22.06.2020). [Bo-gatyrev, A. P. (2020) Demagogical templates: basics of polemics with demagogues [Demagogicheskie Shablony: Os-novy Polemiki s demagogami] [online]. Available at: https://psy.wikireading.ru/90146 (Ac-cessed: 22th June 2020).

Бутусов, А. В. (2017) ‘Политические PR-технологии в информационных войнах’, Вестник Тамбовского университета. Серия: Общественные науки, 4(12), сс. 86–89. [Butusov, A. V. (2017) ‘Political PR-technologies in information warfare’ [Politicheskie PR-tekhnologii v informatsionnykh voinakh], Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta. Seriya Ob-shchestvennye nauki, 4 (12), рp. 86–89. (In Russ.)].

Вартанова, Е. Л. (2014) ‘Коммуникация – ин-формация: о подходах технооптимистов, технопессимистов и технопрагма-тиков’, Меди@льманах, 4(63), сс. 8−10. [Vartanova, E. L. (2014) ‘Commu-nication – information: on the approaches of techno-optimists, techno-pessimists and techno-pragmatists’ [Kommunikacija – informacija: o podhodah tehnooptimistov, tehnopessimistov i tehnoprag-matikov], Medi@lmanakh, 4(63), рp. 8−10. (In Russ.)].

Вирен, Г. (2017) Современные медиа: приемы информационных войн. Москва: Аспект Пресс. [Viren, G. (2017) Modern media: Techniques of information wars [Sov-remennye media: Priemy informacionnyh vojn]. Moscow: Aspekt Press. (In Russ.)].

Гладкова, Л. А. (2016) ‘Глобальная информационная война’, Социально-гуманитарные знания, 1, сс. 36–44. [Gladkovа, L. A. (2016) ‘Global information war’ [Global'naia informatsionnaia voina], Social'no-gumanitarnye znanija, 1, pр. 36–44. (In Russ.)].

Данилова, А. А. (2014) Манипулирование словом в средствах массовой информации. Москва: Добросвет: КДУ. [Danilova, А. А. (2014) Manipulation of words in the media [Manipulirovaniye slovom v sredstvakh massovoy informatsii]. Moscow: Dobrosvet: KDU. (In Russ.)].

Дзялошинский, И. М. (2006) Манипулятивные технологии в СМИ. Москва: Гуманитарный институт. [Dzjaloshinskij, I. M. (2006) Manipulative technologies in mass media [Manipuljativnye tehnologii v SMI]. Moscow: Gumanitarnyj institute. (In Russ.)].

Дунас, Д. В. (2013) ‘Переосмысление понятий в теории новых медиа’ в: Корконосенко, С. Г. (ред.) Средства массовой ин-формации в современном мире. Петербургские чтения. Санкт-Петербург: СПбГУ. URL: https://jf.spbu.ru/upload/files/file_1363679274_7485.doc (дата обращения: 09.06.2020). [Dunas, D. V. (2013) ‘Re-thinking concepts in the theory of new media’ [Pereosmyslenie ponjatij v teorii novyh media] in: Korokonosenko, S. G. (ed.) Mass Media in the modern world. Petersburg readings [Sredstva massovoj informacii v sovremennom mire. Peter-burgskie chtenija]. Saint-Petersburg: SPbSU. Available at: https://jf.spbu.ru/upload/files/file_1363679274_7485.doc (Accessed: 9th June 2020)].

Иванов, Л. Ю. (2004) ‘Пиар есть пиар ‒ примеры речевой манипуляции в новом российском политическом дискурсе’, Sprach. Literatur. Politik, cc. 33‒62 [Ivanov, L. Ju. (2004) ‘PR is PR – examples of verbal manipulation in Russian new political discourse’ [Piar est' piar – primery rechevoj manipuljacii v novom rossijskom politicheskom diskurse], Sprach. Literatur. Politik, pp. 33‒62. (In Russ.)].

Кара-Мурза, С. Г. (2005) Манипулирование сознанием. Москва: Эксмо. [Kara-Murza, S. G. (2005) Mind manipulation [Manip-ulirovanie soznaniem]. Мoscow: Eksmo. (In Russ.)].

Мельников, Э. (2016) Парадоксы медиа. Основы медиаграмотности: популярно о сложном. Вильнюс: Артефактас. [Mel'nikov, Je. (2016) Media paradoxes. Basic of media literacy: popular about the complex [Osnovy mediagramotnosti: populjarno o slozhnom]. Vilnius: Arte-faktas. (In Russ.)].

Нечипоренко, Б. Ю. (2014) ‘Прагмалингвистические особенности психотехники «навешивание ярлыков» в китайском медиадискурсе’, Общество, 1, cc. 37‒40. [Nechyporenko, B. Y. (2014) ‘Pragmalinguistic features of the psycho-technic name calling within Chinese me-diadiscourse’ [Pragma-lingvisticheskie osobennosti psihotehniki «naveshivanie jarlykov» v kitajskom mediadiskurse], Obshhestvo, 1, pp. 37‒40. (In Russ.)].

Новгородцева, А. Н., Сивкова, Н. И. (2015) ‘Социальные сети как канал социально-политической коммуникации’ в: Грунт, Е. В., Меренков, А. В., Антонова, Н. Л. (ред.) Культура, личность, общество в современном мире: методология, опыт эмпирического исследования. Екатеринбург: УрФУ, с. 1667‒1675. [Novgo-rodtseva, A. N., Sivkova, N. I. (2015) ‘Social networks as a channel of social-political communication’ [Social'nye seti kak kanal social'no-politicheskoj kom-munikacii] in: Grunt, E. V., Merenkov, A. V., Antonova, N. L. (eds.) Culture, personality, society in the modern world: methodology, experience of empirical re-search [Kul'tura, lichnost', obshhestvo v sovremennom mire: metodologija, opyt jempiricheskogo issledovanija]. Ekaterinburg: UrFU, pp. 1667‒1675. (In Russ.)].

Панарин, И. Н. (2006) Информационная война, PR и мировая политика. Москва: Горячая Линия-Телеком. [Panarin, I. N. (2006) Information war, PR and world politics [Informacionnaja vojna, PR i mi-rovaja politika]. Moscow: Gorjachaja Linija-Telekom. (In Russ.)].

Пашинян, И. А. (2012) ‘Контент-анализ как метод исследования: достоинства и ограничения’, Научная периодика: проблемы и решения, 3(9), cc. 13‒17. [Pashinyan, I. (2012) ‘Content analysis as a method of research: advantages and limitations’ [Kontent-analiz kak metod issledovanija: dostoinstva i ogranichenija], Nauchnaja periodika: problemy i reshenija, 3(9), pp. 13‒17. (In Russ.)].

Ремчукова, Е. Н. (2010) ‘Некоторые коммуникативные и стилистические особенности креативных феноменов в СМИ’, Периодическое изд-е научных статей, 6, cc. 451–457. [Remchukova, E. N. (2010) ‘Some communicative and stylistic features of creative phenomena in the media’ [Nekotorye kommunikativnye i stilisticheskie osobennosti kreativnyh fe-nomenov v SMI], Periodicheskoe izd-e nauchnyh statej, 6, pp. 451–457. (In Russ.)].

Федорова, М. А., Семилет, Т. А. (2016) ‘Мем в медиасреде как ярлык и стигма’, Медиаисследования, 3, cc. 211‒216. [Fydorova, M. A., Semilet, T. A. ‘The mem in mass media as a label and a stigma’ [Mem v mediasrede kak jarlyk i stigma], Mediaissledovanija, 3, pp. 211‒216. (In Russ.)].

Aguilar, J., Terán, O. (2015) ‘Social media and free knowledge: Case study - public opinion formation’ in: Aguilar, J., Terán, O. (eds.) Societal Benefits of Freely Accessible Technologies and Knowledge Resources. Venezuela: IGI GLOBAL, pp. 55‒78.

Bradshaw, S., Howard, P. (2019) The Global Disinformation Order 2019 Global Inventory of Organise Social Media Manipulation. Oxford, UK, 23 p.

Fitzpatrick, N. (2018) ‘Media Manipulation 2.0: The Impact of Social Media on News, Competition, and Accuracy’, Athens Journal of Mass Media and Communications, 4(1), pp. 45‒62.

Ryabchenko, N. A., Malysheva, O. P. (2017) ‘How to become a president: Election technologies in the posttruth and fake news Era’, Man in India, pp. 507‒527.

Woolley, S., Howard, P. (2018) Computational Propaganda: Political Parties, Politicians, and Political Manipulation on Social Media. Available at: URL: https://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/oso/9780190931407.001.0001/oso-9780190931407 (Accessed: 19 June 2020).

Zeitzoff, T. (2017) ‘How Social Media Is Changing Conflict’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 61 (9), pp. 1970‒1991.

Zelenskaya, L. (2018) ‘Verbal means of media manipulation with fears (on material of the American, English and Russian Tabloid Press)’, XLinguae European Scientific Language Journal, 11 (3), pp. 39‒50.

Published

2021-04-23

How to Cite

K. L. Zuykina К. З. /, & O. E. Kondrushina О. К. /. (2021). MANIPULATIVE METHODS OF REPRESENTING MOSCOW CITY DUMA ELECTIONS ON SOCIAL NETWORKS. Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science, 15(1), 84–96. Retrieved from https://press.psu.ru/index.php/polit/article/view/4502