FACTORS OF CENTRIFUGAL POLITICAL TENDENCIES IN SPAIN: A QUALITATIVE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Authors

Keywords:

Spain, Autonomous Communities, centrifugal tendencies, regionalist parties, regional policy of the European Union, Qualitative Comparative Analysis, center-periphery relations

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to analyze the centrifugal tendencies in 17 Autonomous Communities of Spain by demonstrating that certain differences in the configurations of factors have led to varying degrees of the loss of autonomy. The main conclusion is that for the configurations leading to less autonomy, there is a low level of economic development, a low volume of EU funding, and an absence of local languages as a factor of identity. The cases of Andalusia, Asturias, and Galicia are of particular importance in these configurations. For the configurations that lead to greater autonomy, two patterns are identified. The first group (Catalonia and the Basque Country) demonstrates a link between centrifugal tendencies and three conditions: the existence of regionalist parties in the parliaments of Autonomous Communities (AC), a high level of economic development and a high level of identification with a regional language. The second group of cases (Valencia and the Canary Islands) demonstrates the added importance of funding under the EU regional policy programs for the period from 2014 to 2020. The scientific novelty of the article lies in its analysis of the dynamics of centrifugal tendencies in Spain via crisp-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (csQCA).DOI: 10.17072/2218-1067-2021-1-45-56

Author Biographies

Юлия Белоус / Ju. А. Belous, National Research University “Higher School of Economics”, Moscow

Research Assistant at the Center for Comprehensive European and International Studies, PhD student

Андрей Тарасов / A. S. Tarasov, University of Trento

PhD student at the School of International Studies, Research Assistant

References

Бусыгина, И. М. (2001) Политическая роль регионов в структуре Европейского сою-за: Концептуальные и прикладные аспекты, Автореф. дис. докт. полит. наук. Москва. [Busygina, I. M. (2001) Political Role of Regions in the Structure of the European Union: Conceptual and Applied Aspects [Politicheskaja rol' regionov v strukture Evropejskogo sojuza: Konceptual'nye i prikladnye aspekty], Avtoreferat Dr. Diss. (Polit.). Moscow. (In Russ.)].

Верников, В. Л. (2018) ‘Кризис в Каталонии изменил политический облик Испании’, Научно-аналитический Вестник Института Европы РАН, 2, сс. 79‒85. [Vernikov, V. L. (2018) ‘Crisis in Catalonia changes the political image of Spain’ [‘Krizis v Katalonii izmenil politicheskij oblik Ispanii’], Nauchno-analiticheskij Vestnik Instituta Evropy RAN, 2, pр. 79‒85. (In Russ.)].

Ивановский, З. В. (2015) ‘Национально-этнический аспект: политические и правовые коллизии’, в: Яковлев, П. П., Ермольева, Э. Г. (ред.) Испания на выходе из кризиса. Москва: ИЛА РАН, сс. 68‒78. [Ivanovskij, Z. V. (2015) ‘National-Ethnic Aspect: Political and Legal Collisions’ [‘Nacional'no-jetnicheskij aspekt: politicheskie i pravovye kollizii’], in: Yakovlev, P. P., Ermol'eva, E. G. (eds.) Spain Recovering from the Crisis [‘Ispanija na vyhode iz krizisa’]. Moscow: ILA RAN, pp. 68‒78. (In Russ.)].

Коваль, Т. Б. (2012) Испания: государство автономий как способ сохранения территориальной целостности?: рецензия на книгу: Волкова, Г. И. (2011) Испания: государство автономий и проблема территориальной целостности. Москва, МАКС Пресс, 328 с., Современная Европа, Москва, 3, сс. 143‒145. [Koval, T. B. (2012) Spain: a state of autonomy as a way to maintain territorial integrity? [Ispania: gosudarstvo avtonomii kak sposob sohranenia territorial’noi tselostnosti?], review of the book: Volkova, G. I. (2011) Spain: a state of autonomy and the problem of territorial integrity [Ispanija: gosudarstvo avtonomij i problema territorial'noj celostnosti]. Moscow, MAKS Press, 328 р.],

Sovremennaya Evropa, Moscow, 3, pp. 143‒145. (In Russ.)].

Панов, П. (2020) ‘Многоликий регионализм’, Вестник Пермского университета. Политология, 14(1), сс. 102‒115. [Panov, P. (2020) ‘Diverse Regionalism’ [‘Mnogolikij regionalizm’], Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science, 14(1), pр. 102‒115. (In Russ.)].

Прохоренко, И.Л. (2011) ‘Регионы Испании в политическом пространстве Европейского союза’, Вестник Московского университета. Серия 25. Международные отношения и мировая политика, 1, с. 32-48. [Prohorenko, I.L. (2011) ‘Regions of Spain in Public Space of the European Union’ [‘Regiony Ispanii v politicheskom prostranstve Evropejskogo sojuza’], Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Serija 25. Mezhdunarodnye otnoshenija i mirovaja politika, 1, p. 32-48 (In Russ.)].

Прохоренко, И. Л. (2014) ‘Субнациональные элиты как субъекты трансформации политического пространства Европейского союза’, Политическая наука, 2, сс. 108‒126. [Prohorenko, I. L. (2014) ‘Subnational Elites as Subjects of Transformation of Public Space of the European Union’ [‘Subnacional'nye jelity kak subekty transformacii politicheskogo prostranstva Evropejskogo sojuza’], Politicheskaja nauka, 2, pр. 108‒126. (In Russ.)].

Прохоренко, И. Л. (2015) ‘Испания в Европейском союзе: взаимовлияние национального и транснационального политических пространств’: Дисс. … докт. полит. наук. Москва, 375 с. [Prohorenko, I. L. (2015) ‘Spain in the European Union: the Mutual Influence of National and Transnational Public Space [‘Ispanija v Evropejskom sojuze: vzaimovlijanie nacional'nogo i transnacional'nogo politicheskih prostranstv’], Dr. Diss. (Polit.). Moscow, 375 р. (In Russ.)].

Прохоренко, И. Л. (2015) ‘Испанский опыт регулирования межнациональных отношений и инокультурной иммиграции’, Мировая экономика и международные отношения, 12, сс. 80‒89. [Prohorenko, I. L. (2015) ‘Spanish Experience in Regulating of International Affairs and Foreign Migration’ [‘Ispanskij opyt regu-lirovanija mezhnacional'nyh otnoshenij i inokul'turnoj immigracii’], Mirovaja jekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheni-ja, 12, pр. 80‒89. (In Russ.)].

Хенкин, С. М. (2018) ‘Сепаратизм по-каталонски’, Мировая экономика и международные отношения, 62(5), сс. 29‒40. [Khenkin, S. M. (2018) ‘Separatism, Catalonian Way’ [Separatism po-catalonski], Mirovaya ekonomika y mezhdunarodnyie otnoshenia, 62(5), pр. 29‒40. (In Russ.)].

Шашкова, А. В. (2018) ‘Проблемы регионального развития Испании’, Вопросы российского и международного права, 8(4А), сс. 170‒176. [Shashkova, A. V. (2018) ‘Problems of Regional Development of Spain’ [Problemy regional'nogo razvitija Ispanii], Voprosy rossijskogo i mezhdunarodnogo prava, 8(4A), pр. 170‒176. (In Russ.)].

Aláez Corral, B., Bastida Freijedo, F. (2019) ‘Constitutionalizing Secession in Order to Harmonize Constitutionality and Democracy in Territorial Decentralized States Like Spain’ in: López-Basaguren, A., Escajedo San-Epifanio, L. (ed.) Claims for Secession and Federalism. A Comparative Study with a Special Focus on Spain. Switzerland: Springer, pp. 265‒287.

Alesina, A and Spolaore, E. (2003) The Size of Nations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Álvarez Pereira, B, Portos, M, Vourdas, J. (2017) ‘Waving Goodbye? The Determinants of Autonomism and Secessionism in Western Europe’, Regional Studies, DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2017.1282609.

Bache, I. and Jones, R. (2000) ‘Has EU regional policy empowered the regions? A study of Spain and the United Kingdom’, Regional & Federal Studies, 10(3), pр. 1‒20.

Bahl, R. (1999). ‘Fiscal Decentralization as Development Policy’, Public Budgeting and Finance, 19 (2), pр. 59–75.

Brancati, D. (2014) ‘Another great illusion: the advancement of separatism through economic integration’, Political science re-search and methods, 2(1), p. 69.

CIS estudio N2956 Barometro Autonomo III.

CIS estudio N3247 Barómetro De Mayo.

Colino, С. (2020) ‘Decentralization in Spain: Federal Evolution and Perfomance of Estado Autonomico’, in: Muro, D., Lago, I. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Spanish Politics. UK: Oxford University Press, pp. 62‒82.

Crescenzi, R. et al. (2018) ‘One or Many Cohesion Policies of the European Union? On the Diverging Impacts of Cohesion Policy across Member States’, Spatial Economics Research Centre, LSE, 0230.

DG Regio European Structural and Investment Funds [online]. Available at: URL: https://cohesiondata.ec.europa.eu/.

Downs, W. (2000) ‘Constructing a New Scottish parliament for the ‘Europe of regions’: Can institutional engineering assure sub-sidiarity?’, The Journal of Legislative Studies, 6(2), pр. 67‒92, DOI: 10.1080/13572330008420623.

El Pais. Resultados de elecciones autonomicas. (2019) [online]. Available at: URL: https://resultados.elpais.com/elecciones/autonomicas-municipales.html.

EUROSTAT Gross domestic product (GDP) at current market prices by NUTS 2 regions [online]. Available at: URL: https://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=nama_10r_2gdp&lang=en.

Gross, M., Debus, M. (2018) ‘Does EU regional policy increase parties’ support for European integration?’, West European Poli-tics, 41(3), pp. 594‒614.

Hepburn, E. (2010) ‘Small worlds in Canada and Europe: A comparison of regional party systems in Quebec, Bavaria and Scot-land’, Regional and Federal Studies, 20(4-5), pp. 527‒544.

Hetcher, M. (1975) Internal colonialism. Berke-ley, Zikreden Erkin Ekrem.

Hooghe, L., Marks, G. N., Schakel, A. H. (2010) The rise of regional authority: A comparative study of 42 democracies. Routledge.

Inguanzo, I. (2018) ‘Paths to recognition: explaining indigenous peoples’ rights in Southeast Asia through qualitative comparative analysis (QCA)’, Philippine Po-litical Science Journal, DOI: 10.1080/01154451.2018.1512256.

Khenkin, S. M. (2018) ‘Conflicto Catalán: Su Naturaleza y Dinámica’, Iberoamérica, 4, рp. 126‒150.

López-Basaguren, A., Escajedo San-Epifanio, L. (2019) Claims for Secession and Federalism. A Comparative Study with a Special Focus on Spain. Switzerland: Springer.

Martínez-Tapia, Ó. (2016) Los Problemas no Resueltos de la Democracia. Centro y periferia en España. Madrid, Arrebato Libros.

Masseti, E., Schakel, A. (2015) ‘From class to region: How regionalist parties link (and subsume) left-right into centre-periphery politics’, Party Politics, 21(6), pp. 866–886.

Ragin, C. (1987) The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Roy, B. (1999) ‘Fiscal Decentralization as Development Policy’, Public Budgeting and Finance, 19(2), pp. 59–75.

Sambanis, N., Milanovic, B. (2011) ‘Explaining the demand for sovereignty’, The World Bank.

Schakel, A. H. (2010) ‘Explaining regional and local government: An empirical test of the decentralization theorem’, Governance, 23 (2), pp. 331‒355.

Schneider, C.Q., Wagemann, C. (2012) Set-theoretic methods for the social sciences: A guide to qualitative comparative analysis. Cambridge University Press.

Published

2021-04-23

How to Cite

Ju. А. Belous Ю. Б. /, & A. S. Tarasov А. Т. /. (2021). FACTORS OF CENTRIFUGAL POLITICAL TENDENCIES IN SPAIN: A QUALITATIVE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS. Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science, 15(1), 45–56. Retrieved from https://press.psu.ru/index.php/polit/article/view/4498