Spatial image of Europe in Russian youth notions: on the results of empirical study

Authors

  • Инна Мирошниченко / Inna Miroshnichenko Kuban State University

Keywords:

spatial image, geographical image, Europe, perception models, mapping, attributive characteristics

Abstract

The article discusses the results of the empirical study of Europe’s spatial image in the perception of Russian young people. Spatial images are becoming important components of the symbolic space of modern world politics. Europe is a key player in the transforming institutional design and in the semantic space of international politics. The image of state/country as a multi-component part of the global symbolic space has several parameters that determine its content. In this paper, the image of Europe is viewed from the perspective of subjective parameters that transmit images in the "optics" of perceptual models of modern youth, and also spatial parameters that determine geographical boundaries of the image. Specificity of geographical parameters determines the content and configurative system of the spatial image, where secondary and supporting images "constructed" by political and social actors and oriented to certain geopolitical strategies and projects of the state / foreign policy construction are "strung" onto a "core" basis. Geographical notions of young people concerning the borders of Europe are reflected in the results of mapping. The links between spatial images and other attributive characteristics, reflected in the notions of the subjects of perception and in chorological relations, were obtained with focus group interviews, expert interviews and projective techniques (semantic differentialand projective pictures). The results of the empirical study showed that the geographical image of Europe has flexible borders, and there are three zones within them: the core of Europe, its periphery, and the "non-Europe" semantic zone. This zoning is confirmed by the content of chorological relations: many countries are united by common destiny, while the commonality of European culture and identity (sociocultural attributive characteristics), as well as the structure of the European Union (political and economic attributive characteristics) are "supportive", integrating grounds for different European states. In young people's notions, the degree of state belonging to the "semantic map" of Europe is determined by its "sequence number" in acquiring the status of the European Union member or by the desire to join it.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2018-2-31-44

Author Biography

Инна Мирошниченко / Inna Miroshnichenko, Kuban State University

Head of the Department of Public Policy and Public Administration

References

Замятин Д.Н. Власть пространства и пространство власти: географические образы в политике и международных отношениях. М., 2004. [Zamyatin D.N. The Power of Space and Space of the Power: Geographical Images in Pol-itics and International Relations. Moscow, 2004].

Замятин Д.Н. Политико-географические образы и геополитические картины мира: представление географических знаний в моделях политического мышления // Полис. Политические исследования. 1998. № 6. С. 80−91. [Zamyatin D.N. Political Geographic Images and Geopolitical World Pictures // Polis. Political Studies. 1998. No. 6. P. 80−91].

Замятина Н.Ю. Вариации региональных образов: когнитивно-географические контексты // Полис. Политические исследования. 2004. № 5. С. 85−97. [Zamyatina N.Yu. Variations of Regional Images: Cognitive-Geographical Contexts // Polis. Political Studies. 2004. No. 5. P. 85−97].

Колосов В.А. Географические образы и геополитические представления: пути формирования и подходы к изучению // Вестник ДВГСГА. Сер. 1. Гуманитарные науки. 2008. № 1. С. 72−91. [Kolosov V.A. Geographical Im-ages and Geopolitical Ideas: Ways of Formation and Approaches to Studying // Bulletin of the Far Eastern Socio-Humanitarian Academy. Series 1. Humani-ties. 2008. No. 1. P. 72−91].

Медведев Д.А. Реализации ресурса «мягкой силы» во внешнеполитической стратегии России // Soft Power, мягкая сила, мягкая власть. Междисциплинарный анализ: колл. монография / сост. и ред. Е.Г. Борисова. 3-е изд. М., 2016. C. 11−12. [Medvedev D.A. Realization of the “Soft Power” Resource in the Foreign Policy Strategy of Russia // Soft Power. Cross-Disciplinary Analy-sis: Collective Monograph / ed. by E.G. Borisova. 3rd ed. Moscow, 2016. P. 11−12].

Паршин П.Б. Приключения мягкой силы в мире коммуникативных технологий (прекраснодушные заметки) // Soft Power, мягкая сила, мягкая власть. Междисциплинарный анализ: колл. монография / сост. и ред. Е.Г. Борисова. 3-е изд. М., 2016. C. 2−7. [Parshin P.B. Adventures of Soft Power in the World of Communicative Technologies (Starry-Eyed Notes) // Soft Power. Cross-Disciplinary Analysis: Collective Monograph / ed. by E.G. Borisova. 3rd ed. Moscow, 2016. P. 2−7].

Пищева Т.Н., Виноградова Н.С., Недова А.Д. Образ России под углом зрения политических коммуникаций // Полис. Политические исследования. 2010. № 4. С. 107−108. [Pishcheva T.N., Vinogradova N.S., Nedova A.D. The Image of Russia through Prisms of Political Communications // Polis. Political Studies. 2010. No. 4. P. 107−108].

Gilbert A. L’idéologie spatiale: conceptualisation, mise en forme et portée pour la géographie // Espace géographique. 1986. No. 1. P. 57–66.

Gottmann J. La politique des Etats et leur géographie. Paris, 1952. Available at: http://www.persee.fr/doc/rfsp_0035-2950_1952_num_2_4_392176_ t1_0831_0000_000.

O'Tuathail G., Dalby S. Introduction: Rethinking geopolitics: Towards a critical geopolitics. London, 1998.

Published

2018-09-23

How to Cite

Inna Miroshnichenko И. М. /. (2018). Spatial image of Europe in Russian youth notions: on the results of empirical study. Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science, (2), 31–44. Retrieved from https://press.psu.ru/index.php/polit/article/view/1573