Parliamentary networks in transnational economic governance
Keywords:
parliament, transnational network, economic governance, globalization, European UnionAbstract
Economic globalization results in blurring the clear boundary between the internal space of national politics and the international political space. At the same time, autonomous trans-governmental networks, which include representatives of national executive bodies, become central to the international political process. This process lacks a conclusive democratic dimension; it has no necessary checks and balances. In this regard, it is especially important to involve national parliaments in overseeing multilateral negotiations, as well as to increase their participation in the implementation of the arrangements reached. In this context, the article considers some forms of engaging parliaments in global economic governance (through the examples of WTO, IMF and the World Bank) and in regional integration (a case of the European Union). The author states that the control of national parliaments over the activities of their own governments in global/ regional arenas of regulation remains irregular and patchy. Yet, based on the idea of deliberative democracy and the notions of transnational networks and multilevel governance, the analysis confirms that in different international venues national parliaments are being endowed with new roles, while transnational interparliamentary formations are gradually acquiring manifold functions of their own. Becoming an attribute of the institutional structure of international organizations and regional groupings, the transnational parliamentary component helps to harmonize national regulatory norms, to conciliate documents, to do the groundwork for dialogue, and to provide additional mechanisms for promoting integrative initiatives and decisions. However, with higher levels of integration, all that becomes insufficient, in which case there arises a need for legislative functions to be performed (i.e. a supranational parliament has to be established).DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2018-2-5-20References
Чекушкина Е. Н. Коммуникативная теория Ю. Хабермаса и культура информационного общества // Теория и практика общественного развития. 2014. №1. С. 25–27. [Chekushkina E.N. Communicative Theory of J. Habermas and Culture of the Information Society //Theory and Practice of Social Development. 2014. No. 1. P. 25–27]. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/kommunikativnaya-teoriya-yu-habermasa-i-kultura-informatsionnogo-obschestva (accessed 23.04.2018)].
Cooper I. The politicization of interparliamentary relations in the EU: Constructing and contesting the ‘Article 13 Conference’ on economic governance // Comparative European Politics. 2016. No. 14. P. 196–214.
Cottier T. The legitimacy of WTO law // The Law and Economics of Globalisation / Ed. by L. Yueh. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2009.
Elsig M. The World Trade Organization’s Legitimacy Crisis: What Does the Beast Look Like? // Journal of World Trade. 2007. No. 41(1). P. 75–90. Available at: http://graduateinstitute.ch/files/live/sites/iheid/files/shared/summer/
WTO2011/ ME2.pdf (accessed 23.04.2018).
Hooghe L., Marks G. Multi-Level Governance and European Integration. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield, 2001.
Hooghe L., Marks G. Types of Multi-Level Governance // European Integration Online Papers (EIoP). 2001. Vol. 5. No. 11. P. 1–7. Available at: http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2001-011a.htm (accessed 23.04.2018).
Jancic D. Multilayered International Parliamentarism: the Case of EU-Brazil Relations // LSE Law, Society and Economy Working Papers. 2014. No. 17. Available at: https://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/law/wps/WPS2014-17_Jancic.pdf (accessed 23.04.2018).
Joerges Ch., Petersmann E.-U. (eds.) Constitutionalism, Multilevel Trade Governance and Social Regulation, Oxford: Hart Publishers, 2006.
Longo M. Lessons for the WTO from Constitutional Developments in the European Union: Challenges of Legitimacy and the Conceptualization of Authority // Southern Cross University Law Review. 2007. No. 11. P. 173–204.
Malamud A. and Stavridis S. Parliaments and Parliamentarians as International Actors // The Ashgate Research Companion to Non-State Actors / Ed. by B. Reinalda. Surrey: Ashgate Publishing Limited, 2011. P. 106–116.Available at: http://apps.eui.eu/Personal/Researchers/malamud/Ashgate-MalamudStavridis.pdf (accessed 23.04.2018).
Nye J. Globalization’s Democratic Deficit: How to Make International Institutions More Accountable // Foreign Affairs. July/August, 2001. Available at: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/2001-07-01/globalizations-democraticdeficit-how-make-international-institutions-more
(accessed 23.04.2018).
Parkinson J. and Mansbridge J. (eds.) Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
Rittberger B. Integration without Representation? The European Parliament and the Reform of Economic Governance in the EU // JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies. 2014. Volume 52. Issue 6. P. 1174–1183.
Scharpf F. Governing in Europe: effective and democratic? Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999. 15.Slaughter A.-M. Disaggregated Sovereignty: Towards the Public Accountability of Global Government networks. // Government and Opposition. March 17, 2004. Vol. 39. Issue 2. P. 159–190. DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00119.x. Available at: https://www.princeton.edu/~slaughtr/Articles/GovtOpp.pdf (accessed 23.04.2018).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The author grants the Publisher of the journal (Perm State University) the right to use their article in the journal, as well as to include the text of the abstract, the full text of the article and information about authors in the "Russian Science Citation Index" (RSCI).
The author agrees to the processing of personal data.
The right to use the journal as a whole belongs to the Publisher and acts indefinitely on the territory of the Russian Federation and beyond in accordance with cl. 1260 of the Russian Federation Civil Code.
There is no author's fee paid for providing the above rights by the author.
The author of the article included in the journal retains the exclusive right to it, regardless of the Publisher's right to use the journal as a whole:
a. The authors retain their copyrights to the article and transfer the right of the first publication along with the article to the journal, while also licensing it on the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to distribute this article with the obligatory indication of authorship of the article and reference to the original publication in this journal.
b. The authors retain the right to enter into separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive dissemination of the version of the text published by this journal (for example, post it in a university archive or publish it in a book), with reference to the original publication in this journal.
c. d. Authors are allowed to post their text on the Internet (for example, in a university archive or on their personal website) before and during the review process by this journal, as this can lead to a fruitful discussion and to higher number of the references to this published work (Please refer to The Effect of Open Access).
Submission of an article by the author implies that they agree for it to be used by the Publisher on the above conditions and to be included in the RSCI system. It also implicates that the author is aware of the terms of its use. The information about the author sent to the Publisher, including by e-mail, is also considered as such consent.
The editorial board posts the full text of the article on the Perm State University site: http://www.psu.ru and in the OJS system at http://press.psu.ru
The publication fee is not collected and fees are not paid. The author's copy is sent to the author to the address provided by them.