SYMBOLIC VS. ISSUE-RELATED LEGISLATION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SPHERE: INSTITUTIONAL CONSEQUENCES OF THE PERCEPTION CONFLICT (ON THE EXAMPLE OF RUSSIAN REGIONS)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2025-4-49-63

Keywords:

symbolic legislation, issue-related legislation, environmental legislation, State Duma, regions’ right of legislative initiative, regional environmental legislative initiatives, Russian regions

Abstract

The Russian Federation employs a mechanism of multi-level governance whereby regional parliaments hold the right of legislative initiative in the federal legislature. Regions face no thematic restrictions on proposals, and their initiatives undergo the same legislative procedure as those from other actors. However, bills submitted by regional entities are frequently postponed and subsequently rejected by the State Duma. This pattern is particularly pronounced in the environmental sphere: despite procedural parity, over 90% of regional environmental initiatives are rejected, with 63% undergoing consideration for more than one year –significantly longer than initiatives on other topics. This study employs the theoretical lens of symbolic legislation to examine how perceptual discrepancies regarding environmental initiatives among legislative actors (regional initiators vs. federal deputies) influence their adoption likelihood. Through analysis of 416 regional environmental initiatives (2004–2022), their explanatory notes, and plenary session transcripts, we demonstrate that a systemic misalignment in bill-type perception (symbolic vs. issue-related) constitutes the primary barrier to adoption. Empirically, when perceptual alignment is achieved, adoption probability reaches 55–100%. Existing institutional practices – notably power centralization and committee gatekeeping – amplify perceptual conflicts, transforming them into systematic filters for regional initiatives. Crucially, our findings reveal that an initiative’s fate depends not on its formal type, but on actor-level perceptual (mis)alignment. This insight uncovers a key mechanism behind regional initiative failure in multi-level governance systems.

Author Biography

Christina Turtseva, Perm State University, Perm, Russia.

Candidate of Sciences (in Politics), Senior Lecturer, Junior Research Fellow,Department of Political Sciences

References

Иванов, К. К. (2013) ‘К вопросу о применении совместной законодательной инициативы субъектами Российской Федерации’, МНИЖ, 12-2 (19), сс. 133–134. [Ivanov, K. K. (2013) ‘On the issue of the application of joint legislative initiative by the constituent entities of the Russian Federation’ [K voprosu o primenenii sovmestnoi zakonodatel'noi initsiativy sub"ektami Rossiiskoi Federatsii], MNIZh, 12-2 (19), pp. 133–134. (In Russ.)].

Колесников, Е. В., Пажетных, Д. В. (2009) ‘Участие Совета Федерации в законодательном процессе, Конституционное и муниципальное право, 11. [Kolesnikov’, E. V., Pazhetnyh, D. V. (2009) ‘Participation of the Federation Council in the legislative process’ [Uchastie Soveta Federacii v zakonodatel'nom processe], Konstitucionnoe i municipal'noe pravo, 11. (In Russ.)].

Морозова, А. С. (2018) ‘Особенности реализации права законодательной инициативы в субъектах Российской Федерации’, Муниципалитет: экономика и управление, 2 (23), cc. 96–100. [Morozova, A. S. (2018) ‘Features of the implementation of the right of legislative initiative in the constituent entities of the Russian Federation’ [Osobennosti realizatsii prava zakonodatel'noi initsiativy v sub"ektakh Rossiiskoi Federatsii], Munitsipalitet: ekonomika i upravlenie, 2 (23), pp. 96–100. (In Russ.)].

Помигуев, И. А., Зарипов, Н. А. (2022) ‘Влияние Совета Законодателей на законодательную деятельность региональных легислатур’, Вестник РУДН. Серия Политология, 4, cc. 619–633. [Pomiguev, I. A., Zaripov, N. A. (2022) ‘The influence of the Council of Legislators on the legislative activity of regional legislatures’ [Vliyanie Soveta Zakonodatelei na zakonodatel'nuyu deyatel'nost' regional'nykh legislatur], Vestnik RUDN. Seriya Politologiya, 4, pp. 619–633. (Accessed: 30.06.2025). (In Russ.)].

Серова, Ю. В. (2019) ‘Актуальные проблемы законотворческой деятельности законодательных (представительных) органов субъектов Российской Федерации’, Право и современные государства, 6, cc. 22–29. [Serova, Yu. V. (2019) ‘Current issues of legislative activity of legislative (representative) bodies of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation [Aktual'nye problemy zakonotvorcheskoi deyatel'nosti zakonodatel'nykh (predstavitel'nykh) organov sub"ektov Rossiiskoi Federatsii], Pravo i sovremennye gosudarstva, 6, pp. 22–29. (In Russ.)].

Сулакшин, С. С., Гаганов, А. А. (2015) Постсоветский российский парламентаризм взглядом аналитика. Труды Центра научной политической мысли и идеологии. Вып. № 13. М.: Наука и политика, 48 с. [Sulakshin, S. S., Gaganov, A. A. (2015) Post-Soviet Russian Parliamentarism through an Analyst's Eye [Postsovetskij rossijskij parlamentarizm vzgljadom analitika]. Trudy Centra nauchnoj politicheskoj mysli i ideologii. Vyp. № 13. M.: Nauka i politika, 48 p. (In Russ.)].

Сулимов, К. А. (2020) ‘Оспаривание vs коррекция: динамика активности российских регионов в использовании обращений в конституционный суд и законодательной инициативы на федеральном уровне’, Ars Administrandi (Искусство управления), 12 (4), cc. 541–713. [Sulimov, K. A. (2020) ‘Contestation vs. correction: dynamics of activity of Russian regions in using appeals to the constitutional court and legislative initiatives at the federal level’ [Osparivanie vs korrektsiya: dinamika aktivnosti rossiiskikh regionov v ispol'zovanii obrashchenii v konstitutsionnyi sud i zakonodatel'noi initsiativy na federal'nom urovne], Ars Administrandi, 12 (4), pp. 541–713. (In Russ.)].

Сулимов, К. А. (2024) ‘Законодательные инициативы российских регионов на федеральном уровне в условиях пандемии COVID-19. Ars Administrandi (Искусство управления), 16(4), cc. 589–607. https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-9173-2024-4-589-607 [Sulimov, K. A. (2024) ‘Legislative initiatives of Russian regions at the federal level in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic’ [Zakonodatel'nye initsiativy rossiiskikh regionov na federal'nom urovne v usloviyakh pandemii COVID-19], Ars Administrandi, 16(4), pp. 589–607. (In Russ.)].

Сулимов, К. А., & Турцева, К. П. (2024) ‘Законодательные экологические инициативы регионов России в федеральном парламенте: политико-стратегическая эффективность или проблемно-ориен¬тированный подход?’, Вестник Пермского университета. Политология, 18(4), cc. 111–127. https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2024-4-111-127 [Sulimov K. А. & Turtseva Ch. P. (2025) ‘Legislative environmental initiatives of Russian regions in the federal parliament: political-strategic effectiveness or issue-related approach? [Zakonodatel'nye ekologicheskie initsiativy regionov Rossii v federal'nom parlamente: politiko-strategicheskaya effektivnost' ili problemno-orientirovannyi podkhod?], Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science, 18(4), pp. 111–127. https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2024-4-111-127 (In Russ.)].

Удычак Ф. Н., Чеботарева И. Ю. (2016) ‘Реализация права законодательной инициативы субъектов Российской Федерации’, НАУ, 10-1 (26). URL: https://cyber-leninka.ru/article/n/realizatsiya-prava-za¬ko¬nodatelnoy-initsiativy-subektov-ros¬siy¬skoy-federatsii (дата обращения: 30.06.2025) [Udychak F. N., Chebotareva I. Yu. (2016) ‘Implementation of the right of legislative initiative of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation’ [Realizatsiya prava zakonodatel'noi initsiativy sub"ektov Rossiiskoi Federatsii], NAU, 10-1 (26). Available at: https://cyber¬leninka.ru/article/n/realizatsiya-prava-za¬ko-nodatelnoy-initsiativy-subektov-rossiy¬s¬koy-federatsii (Accessed: 30.06.2025) (In Russ.)].

Behnke, N, Mueller, S. (2017) ‘The purpose of intergovernmental councils: A framework for analysis and comparison’, Regional and Federal Studies, 27 (5), pp. 507–527.

Campbell, R. M. (1993) ‘Symbolic regulation: the case of third-party regulation of Canada Post’, Canadian Public Policy – Analyse de Politiques, 19(3), pp. 325–339.

Dwyer, J. P. (1990) ‘The pathology of symbolic le¬gislation’, Ecology Law Quarterly, 17, 233–316.

Edelman, M. (1976) The Symbolic Uses of Politics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

Ferraro, F. (2022) ‘Deception and Expression: The Puzzling Rationality of Symbolic Legislation’. In: Ferraro, F., Zorzetto, S. (eds) Exploring the Province of Legislation. Legisprudence Library, vol 9. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87262-5_6

Gandhi, J. (2008) Political institutions under dictatorship. Cambridge University Press.

Huffman, N., Kane J, Stack D. (2025) “Worth a Try? The Electoral Consequences of Symbolic Legislation”, APSA Preprints. doi: 10.33774/apsa-2025-ds4h5.

Klink, van B. (2016) ‘Symbolic legislation: An essentially political concept, in Klink van B., Beers, van B. and Poort, L. (eds.), Symbolic legislation theory and developments in biolaw, Springer, Cham, Switzerland, pp. 19–35, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33365-6_2.

Lembcke, O. W. (2016) ‘Symbolic Legislation and Authority’ In: van Klink, B., van Beers, B., Poort, L. (eds) Symbolic Legislation Theory and Developments in Biolaw. Legisprudence Library, vol. 4. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/-3-319-33365-6_6

Levitsky, S., Way, L. A. (2010) Competitive authoritarianism: Hybrid regimes after the Cold War. Cambridge University Press.

Newig, J. (2007) ‘Symbolic environmental legislation and societal self-deception’, Environmental Politics, 16 (2), pp. 276-296, DOI: 10.1080/09644010701211783

Noble, B. (2019) ‘Regional legislatures and national lawmaking’, The Journal of Legislative Studies, 25 (1), pp. 143–147. DOI: 10.1080/13572334.2019.1570597

Palermo, F. (2018) ‘Beyond Second Chambers: Alternative Representation of Territorial Interests and Their Reasons’, Perspectives on Federalism, 10 (2), pp. 49–70.

Schedler, A. (2013) The politics of uncertainty: Sustaining and subverting electoral authoritarianism. Oxford University Press.

Schwitters, R. (2016) ‘How Law Matters: Sociological Reflections on the Symbolic Dimension of Legislation’ In: van Klink, B., van Beers, B., Poort, L. (eds) Symbolic Legislation Theory and Developments in Biolaw. Legisprudence Library, vol. 4. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33365-6_4

Tremblay, J.-F. (ed.) (2023). The Forum of Federations Handbook of Fiscal Federalism. Springer Nature. 483 p.

Vgl. Thurman W. Arnold, (1938) The Symbols of Govern¬ment. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Witteveen, W. J. (1999) ‘Significant, symbolic and symphonic laws’, in H. van Schooten (ed.), Semiotics and Legislation. Jurisprudential, Institutional and Sociological Perspectives, pp. 27–70. (Liverpool: Charles).

Published

2026-01-12

How to Cite

Turtseva К. П. (2026). SYMBOLIC VS. ISSUE-RELATED LEGISLATION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SPHERE: INSTITUTIONAL CONSEQUENCES OF THE PERCEPTION CONFLICT (ON THE EXAMPLE OF RUSSIAN REGIONS). Bulletin of Perm University. Political Science, 19(4), 49–63. https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2025-4-49-63

Issue

Section

Political institutions, processes, technologies