POLITICAL AND PHILOSOPHICAL JUSTIFICATION OF THE DOCTRINE OF NUCLEAR DETERRENCE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-1067-2025-2-24-35Keywords:
global security, MAD theory, ethics of nuclear deterrence, asymmetric threats, existential risks, war, nuclear weapons, security systemAbstract
The article provides a political and philosophical understanding of the doctrine of nuclear deterrence as a concept that arose in the context of global rivalry and transformed in the process of developing international relations. The purpose of the study is to identify the axiological, normative and strategic foundations underlying the idea of preventing aggression by demonstrating a nuclear threat. The analysis covers the key stages of the doctrine formation, reveals its moral and political contradictions, and reflects the transformation of perception in the context of asymmetric risks and weakening trust between states. Special attention is paid to the relationship between deterrence as a rational mechanism and as a symbolic form of political communication embedded in the culture of security. The work uses historical and constructivist approaches that make it possible to trace the evolution of military strategies and determine the social foundations of doctrine formation. Modern challenges are considered: the proliferation of nuclear technologies, the emergence of new threats to global security, and a change in the balance of power. The importance of international cooperation, humanitarian and legal aspects of ensuring stability is emphasized. It is concluded that the concept of nuclear deterrence is losing its universality as an instrument of global order and requires rethinking in new philosophical and humanitarian coordinates. It is argued that an effective security system of the 21st century is impossible without the development of new forms of global interaction and collective responsibility.References
Артамонов, В. С., Лукин, В. Н., Мусиенко, Т. В. (2020) ‘Стратегическая культура: к вопросу об эволюции теории‘, Национальная безопасность и стратегическое планирование, 3 (31), сс. 5–15. DOI: 10.37468/2307-1400-2020-3-5-15 [Artamonov, V. S., Lukin, V. N., Musienko, T. V. (2020) ‘Strategic culture: on the evolution of the theory’ [Strategicheskaya kul'tura: k voprosu ob evolyutsii teorii], Natsionalnaya bezopasnost i strategicheskoe planirovanie, 3 (31), pp. 5–15. (In Russ.)]. EDN: BHQGKC
Веселов, В. А. (2010) ‘Ядерный фактор в мировой политике: структура и содержание‘, Вестник Московского университета. Серия 25. Международные отношения и мировая политика, 1, сс. 68–90. [Veselov, V. A. (2010) ‘The nuclear factor in world politics: structure and content’ [Yadernyi faktor v mirovoi politike: struktura i soderzhanie], Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 25. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya i mirovaya politika, 1, pp. 68–90. (In Russ.)]. EDN: MBYTFD
Крылова, И. А. (2018) ‘Военная безопасность России: актуальные проблемы’, Знание. Понимание. Умение, 3, сс. 51–63. DOI: 10.17805/zpu.2018.3.5 [Krylova, I. A. (2018) ‘Russia’s military security: current issues’ [Voennaya bezopasnost' Rossii: aktual'nye problemy], Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie, 3, pp. 51–63. (In Russ.)]. EDN: YABLQD
Неклесса, А. И. (2019) ‘Мускулы войны и нервы мира: гибридная метаморфоза. Методологические и прогностические аспекты постсовременного общежития’, Полис. Политические исследования, 4, сс. 149–164. DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2019.04.11 [Neklessa, A. I. (2019) ‘Muscles of war and nerves of peace: hybrid metamorphosis. Methodological and prognostic aspects of postmodern cohabitation’ [Muskuly voiny i nervy mira: gibridnaya metamorfoza. Metodologicheskie i prognosticheskie aspekty postsovremennogo obshchezhitiya], Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya, 4, pp. 149–164. (In Russ.)]. EDN: CFSKTD
Bauman, Z. (1998) Globalization: The Human Consequences. Columbia University Press, 136 p.
Beaufre, A. (1965) An Introduction to Strategy: With Particular Reference to Problems of Defense, Politics, Economics, and Diplomacy in the Nuclear Age. Praeger, 138 p.
Bostrom, N., Cirkovic, M. M. (2011) Global Catastrophic Risks. OUP Oxford, 554 p.
Braden, M. (2021) Women Politicians and the Media. University Press of Kentucky, 248 p.
Buzan, B., Wæver, O., de Wilde, J. (1998) Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Lynne Rienner Publishers, 239 p.
Dinello, D. (2013) Technophobia!: Science Fiction Visions of Posthuman Technology. University of Texas Press, 341 p.
Doyle, M. W. (1997) Ways of War and Peace: Realism, Liberalism, and Socialism. Norton, 557 p.
Falk, R. A. (1995) On Humane Governance: Toward a New Global Politics. Polity Press, 288 p.
Fromm, E. (2023) The Revolution of Hope: Toward a Humanized Technology. Open Road Media, 204 p.
Goldberg, A. (1984) History of the Office of the Secretary of Defense: The McNamara Ascendancy, 1961–1965. Historical Office, Office of the Secretary of Defense.
Kahn, H., Jones, E. (2017) On Thermonuclear War. Routledge, 690 p. DOI: 10.4324/9781315125701
Kissinger, H. A. (2023) Nuclear Weapons And Foreign Policy. Highlyy Publishing LLP, 338 p.
Morgenthau, H. J. (1948) Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. Knopf, 489 p.
Mumford, L. (1974) The Pentagon of Power. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 496 p.
Noel-Baker, P. (1958) The Arms Race: A Programme for World Disarmament. Oceana Publications, 579 p.
Ohnesorge, H. W. (2019) Soft Power: The Forces of Attraction in International Relations. Springer Nature, 307 p. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-29922-4
Ord, T. (2021) The Precipice: Existential Risk and the Future of Humanity. Bloomsbury Publishing, 480 p.
Paquette, L. (2003) The Path to Peace: Strategies and Counter Strategies for Significant International Events. Nova Publishers, 125 p.
Paul, T. V., Morgan, P. M., Wirtz, J. J. (2009) Complex Deterrence: Strategy in the Global Age. University of Chicago Press, 360 p.
Payne, K. B. (2021) The Fallacies of Cold War Deterrence and a New Direction. University Press of Kentucky, 242 p.
Powell, R. (1990) Nuclear Deterrence Theory: The Search for Credibility. Cambridge University Press, 230 p.
Rapoport, A. (1964) Strategy and Conscience. Harper & Row, 323 p.
Rees, M. (2009) Our Final Hour: A Scientist's Warning. Basic Books, 240 p.
Schell, J. (2000) The Fate of the Earth and The Abolition. Stanford University Press, 417 p.
Schelling, T. C. (1981) The Strategy of Conflict: With a New Preface by the Author. Harvard University Press, 328 p.
Steiner, B. H. (1991) Bernard Brodie and the Foundations of American Nuclear Strategy. University Press of Kansas, 367 p.
Thompson, E. P., Smith, D. (1981) Protest and Survive. NYU Press, 216 p.
Trachtenberg, M. (2020) History and Strategy. Princeton University Press, 304 p.
Viotti, P. R. (2024) Kenneth Waltz: An Intellectual Biography. Columbia University Press, 261 p.
Walt, S. M. (1990) The Origins of Alliance. Cornell University Press, 321 p.
Weikart, R. (2016) The Death of Humanity: and the Case for Life. Simon and Schuster, 288 p.
York, H. F. (1970) Race to Oblivion: A Participant's View of the Arms Race. Simon and Schuster, 256 p.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The author grants the Publisher of the journal (Perm State University) the right to use their article in the journal, as well as to include the text of the abstract, the full text of the article and information about authors in the "Russian Science Citation Index" (RSCI).
The author agrees to the processing of personal data.
The right to use the journal as a whole belongs to the Publisher and acts indefinitely on the territory of the Russian Federation and beyond in accordance with cl. 1260 of the Russian Federation Civil Code.
There is no author's fee paid for providing the above rights by the author.
The author of the article included in the journal retains the exclusive right to it, regardless of the Publisher's right to use the journal as a whole:
a. The authors retain their copyrights to the article and transfer the right of the first publication along with the article to the journal, while also licensing it on the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to distribute this article with the obligatory indication of authorship of the article and reference to the original publication in this journal.
b. The authors retain the right to enter into separate, additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive dissemination of the version of the text published by this journal (for example, post it in a university archive or publish it in a book), with reference to the original publication in this journal.
c. d. Authors are allowed to post their text on the Internet (for example, in a university archive or on their personal website) before and during the review process by this journal, as this can lead to a fruitful discussion and to higher number of the references to this published work (Please refer to The Effect of Open Access).
Submission of an article by the author implies that they agree for it to be used by the Publisher on the above conditions and to be included in the RSCI system. It also implicates that the author is aware of the terms of its use. The information about the author sent to the Publisher, including by e-mail, is also considered as such consent.
The editorial board posts the full text of the article on the Perm State University site: http://www.psu.ru and in the OJS system at http://press.psu.ru
The publication fee is not collected and fees are not paid. The author's copy is sent to the author to the address provided by them.
